生物技术通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 232-243.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2024-0088
陈琳1(), 陈莉莉1, 陈琳琳1, 章敏1, 陈炳智1,2(), 江玉姬1,2()
收稿日期:
2024-01-22
出版日期:
2024-08-26
发布日期:
2024-06-24
通讯作者:
陈炳智,男,博士,副教授,研究方向:食用菌的加工、保鲜和分子生物学;E-mail: cbz_2006@163.com;作者简介:
陈琳,女,硕士研究生,研究方向:农产品贮藏与加工;E-mail: cl2523985996@163.com
基金资助:
CHEN Lin1(), CHEN Li-li1, CHEN Lin-lin1, ZHANG Min1, CHEN Bing-zhi1,2(), JIANG Yu-ji1,2()
Received:
2024-01-22
Published:
2024-08-26
Online:
2024-06-24
摘要:
【目的】确定L-抗坏血酸(L-ascorbic acid, AA)联合超声(ultrasound, US)处理鲜切‘六月红芋’的最佳条件,并探究其保鲜效果。【方法】以永定‘六月红芋’为试材,通过对比自来水、纯水、去离子水、9%蔗糖溶液、1%碳酸钠溶液、1%氯化钠溶液、1% AA溶液以及不同有效氯质量浓度(20、40、60、80 mg/L)的微酸性电解水等11种保鲜护色液,筛选出对鲜切‘六月红芋’保鲜效果最佳的护色液。随后,进行AA与乙醇复配液处理,实验结果显示,AA单独使用的保鲜效果更佳。通过测定褐变度、硬度、pH值、相对电导率及感官评价得分等指标,进一步深入研究AA与US联合(AS)处理对鲜切‘六月红芋’贮藏品质的影响,以明确AS处理对鲜切‘六月红芋’的保鲜效果。【结果】在AA浓度为2%、浸泡时间为15 min、US处理时间为10 min、US频率为53 kHz、US功率为400 W的条件下,鲜切‘六月红芋’的感官品质最好。AS处理有效抑制褐变度的增加,维持酸度稳定性,减缓硬度的下降,保持细胞膜的完整性和较高的感官评分,这些参数为AS处理鲜切‘六月红芋’的最佳条件。【结论】在不同浸泡液中筛选得到AA为最佳护色液,并确定AS处理鲜切芋艿的最佳条件。AS处理能够显著提高鲜切‘六月红芋’的保鲜效果。
陈琳, 陈莉莉, 陈琳琳, 章敏, 陈炳智, 江玉姬. L-抗坏血酸联合超声处理鲜切芋艿的最佳条件[J]. 生物技术通报, 2024, 40(8): 232-243.
CHEN Lin, CHEN Li-li, CHEN Lin-lin, ZHANG Min, CHEN Bing-zhi, JIANG Yu-ji. Optimal Conditions for L-ascorbic Acid Combined with Ultrasonic Treatment of Fresh-cut Taro[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 232-243.
评价标准 Evaluation criterion | 评分 Score |
---|---|
无褐变,有清香气味,无水汽,无胀袋No browning, having a fresh aroma, no water vapor, and no expansion bag | 9 |
轻微(面积<5%),有清香气味,少量水汽,轻微胀袋 Light(area < 5%), having a fresh aroma, little water vapor, and slight expansion bag | 7-8 |
中度(面积5%-20%),气味较清香,较多水汽,中度胀袋 Moderate(area 5%-20%), having moderately fresh aroma, more water vapor, and moderate expansion bag | 5-6 |
较严重(面积20%-50%),稍有异味,有水珠,胀袋较严重More serious(area of 20%-50%), having slight odor, water droplets, and serious bag expansion | 3-4 |
极度严重(面积>50%),有严重异味,有积水,胀袋极度严重Extremely serious(area > 50%), having a serious odor, accumulated water, and extremely serious expansion bag | 1-2 |
表1 鲜切芋艿感官评价标准
Table 1 Criteria for sensory evaluation of fresh-cut taro
评价标准 Evaluation criterion | 评分 Score |
---|---|
无褐变,有清香气味,无水汽,无胀袋No browning, having a fresh aroma, no water vapor, and no expansion bag | 9 |
轻微(面积<5%),有清香气味,少量水汽,轻微胀袋 Light(area < 5%), having a fresh aroma, little water vapor, and slight expansion bag | 7-8 |
中度(面积5%-20%),气味较清香,较多水汽,中度胀袋 Moderate(area 5%-20%), having moderately fresh aroma, more water vapor, and moderate expansion bag | 5-6 |
较严重(面积20%-50%),稍有异味,有水珠,胀袋较严重More serious(area of 20%-50%), having slight odor, water droplets, and serious bag expansion | 3-4 |
极度严重(面积>50%),有严重异味,有积水,胀袋极度严重Extremely serious(area > 50%), having a serious odor, accumulated water, and extremely serious expansion bag | 1-2 |
图1 不同浸泡液处理鲜切‘六月红芋’感官品质变化 TW:自来水;PW:纯水;DW:去离子水;SUC:蔗糖溶液;AA:L-抗坏血酸溶液;SAEW:酸性电解水(数字表示有效氯质量浓度,分别为20、40、60、80 mg/L)。下同
Fig. 1 Changes in sensory quality of fresh-cut ‘June Red Taro’ treated with different soaking solutions TW: Tap water; PW: pure water; DW: deionized water; SUC: sucrose solution; AA: L-ascorbic acid solution ; SAEW: slightly acidic electrolyzed water(numbers indicate different effective chlorine mass concentrations, 20, 40, 60, 80 mg/L, respectively). The same below
指标 Index | 时间Time/d | 不同浸泡液处理组Different soaking liquid treatment groups | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TW | PW | DW | SUC | NaCO3 | NaCl | AA | SAEW 20 | SAEW 40 | SAEW 60 | SAEW 80 | ||
感官评价得分Sensory evaluation score | 0 | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a |
4 | 7.33±0.58d | 7.67±0.58cd | 8.33±0.58abc | 8.67±0.58ab | 8.00±0.00bcd | 8.67±0.58ab | 9.00±0.00a | 8.67±0.58ab | 8.33±0.58abc | 8.33±0.58abc | 8.00±0.00bcd | |
8 | 7.30±0.26d | 7.77±0.21cd | 7.77±0.25cd | 8.10±0.26abc | 7.37±0.32d | 8.33±0.29abc | 8.67±0.58a | 8.07±0.15bc | 8.03±0.25bc | 8.37±0.32abc | 8.50±0.36ab | |
12 | 7.00±0.10f | 7.20±0.20ef | 7.70±0.26de | 7.80±0.62cd | 6.67±0.31f | 8.37±0.32abc | 8.83±0.29a | 8.10±0.30bcd | 8.07±0.21bcd | 7.83±0.45cd | 8.53±0.35ab | |
16 | 6.53±0.29d | 6.73±0.38cd | 6.50±0.46d | 7.30±0.17bc | 6.13±0.42d | 7.70±0.36b | 8.77±0.21a | 7.53±0.50b | 7.70±0.36b | 7.57±0.46b | 7.80±0.26b | |
20 | 5.90±0.30e | 6.10±0.56e | 5.70±0.40e | 6.40±0.40de | 4.50±0.44f | 6.83±0.29cd | 8.43±0.35a | 7.33±0.38bc | 6.17±0.21de | 7.60±0.30b | 7.47±0.50bc | |
24 | 4.93±0.40fg | 5.40±0.40defg | 5.27±0.31efg | 5.63±0.21cdef | 3.60±0.40h | 5.93±0.50cde | 7.93±0.40a | 6.33±0.35bc | 4.73±0.87g | 6.13±0.25bcd | 6.73±0.32b | |
28 | 3.67±0.58c | 3.83±0.76c | 4.40±0.53bc | 4.97±0.35b | 2.50±0.50d | 4.43±0.51bc | 7.33±0.58a | 5.13±0.15b | 4.83±0.42b | 5.20±0.20b | 4.77±0.25b | |
褐变度 Browning | 0 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 |
4 | 8.95±0.36cd | 8.61±1.09bcd | 6.93±0.31a | 7.87±1.20abc | 9.52±0.39d | 7.72±0.15abc | 7.05±0.43ab | 7.98±1.31abcd | 8.12±1.36abcd | 9.28±0.89cd | 9.54±0.75d | |
8 | 10.36±0.62d | 8.69±1.35abcd | 7.44±1.46ab | 9.06±0.14abcd | 9.67±0.61cd | 8.05±0.92abc | 7.14±0.51a | 8.10±0.23abc | 9.23±1.99bcd | 9.47±1.67bcd | 9.95±0.65cd | |
12 | 10.73±0.86c | 8.83±0.64abc | 7.97±0.43ab | 9.41±0.65abc | 10.25±1.52bc | 8.67±1.60abc | 7.18±0.59a | 8.13±1.10ab | 9.36±1.43abc | 9.88±1.57bc | 10.04±1.94bc | |
16 | 12.44±0.16e | 8.99±0.51bc | 8.32±0.39b | 10.01±0.81d | 10.33±0.89d | 8.82±0.40b | 7.30±0.07a | 8.21±0.45b | 9.74±0.11cd | 10.27±0.26d | 10.29±0.19d | |
20 | 13.04±0.15c | 9.46±1.87ab | 9.23±1.77ab | 11.11±0.49bc | 11.54±0.63bc | 8.97±0.99ab | 7.46±0.96a | 8.94±0.59ab | 13.55±0.88c | 10.41±1.91abc | 10.38±0.24abc | |
24 | 13.53±0.11bc | 14.39±0.89c | 9.23±0.82ab | 11.86±1.08abc | 13.65±1.05bc | 9.44±0.45ab | 7.92±0.44a | 12.02±2.31abc | 14.32±3.32c | 11.43±0.24abc | 13.45±2.64bc | |
28 | 18.84±0.49c | 15.10±0.81abc | 12.01±1.43abc | 13.66±0.55abc | 16.14±3.36bc | 9.61±1.50ab | 8.07±0.74a | 12.18±2.26abc | 15.54±0.42bc | 13.61±0.41abc | 13.67±2.42abc | |
pH值 pH value | 0 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 |
4 | 4.46±0.02a | 4.50±0.01c | 4.48±0.01b | 4.59±0.01d | 5.44±0.01e | 5.96±0.01g | 5.72±0.01f | 6.03±0.01h | 6.02±0.01h | 6.05±0.01i | 6.11±0.01j | |
8 | 5.20±0.05b | 5.03±0.02a | 5.21±0.02b | 5.01±0.01a | 7.21±0.02g | 5.97±0.02e | 5.73±0.02c | 5.96±0.01e | 5.97±0.01e | 5.89±0.02d | 6.02±0.02f | |
12 | 7.12±0.01h | 7.03±0.01g | 6.93±0.05f | 6.94±0.01f | 6.63±0.02e | 6.47±0.01bc | 6.31±0.01a | 6.51±0.02d | 6.51±0.02d | 6.45±0.02b | 6.49±0.02cd | |
16 | 6.65±0.02h | 6.60±0.01g | 6.52±0.02e | 6.34±0.02b | 6.11±0.02a | 6.60±0.04g | 6.38±0.02c | 6.60±0.01g | 6.57±0.03fg | 6.44±0.01d | 6.56±0.03ef | |
20 | 6.19±0.03c | 5.97±0.02b | 5.88±0.06a | 5.85±0.02a | 6.48±0.06e | 6.59±0.03f | 6.37±0.02d | 6.69±0.05g | 6.65±0.03fg | 6.51±0.02e | 6.51±0.02e | |
24 | 6.28±0.05c | 6.17±0.01b | 6.41±0.03de | 6.27±0.06c | 6.47±0.03e | 6.38±0.08d | 6.00±0.02a | 6.13±0.06b | 6.17±0.01b | 6.13±0.01b | 6.28±0.01c | |
28 | 6.50±0.03e | 6.52±0.01e | 6.60±0.05f | 6.42±0.05d | 6.40±0.07cd | 6.30±0.04b | 6.07±0.02a | 6.40±0.01d | 6.33±0.05bc | 6.32±0.03b | 6.33±0.05bc | |
相对电导率 Relative conductivity/% | 0 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 |
4 | 16.33±0.58c | 9.33±0.58a | 9.67±1.15a | 9.67±1.15a | 9.33±0.58a | 15.67±0.58c | 13.00±0.00b | 13.00±0.00b | 10.33±0.58a | 10.33±0.58a | 10.00±0.58a | |
8 | 18.33±0.58f | 15.33±0.58d | 13.33±0.58c | 13.33±0.58c | 15.33±0.58d | 17.33±0.58e | 10.67±0.58a | 10.67±0.58a | 14.33±0.58cd | 11.67±0.58b | 13.33±0.58c | |
12 | 20.67±0.58f | 16.67±0.58cd | 15.33±0.58bc | 18.33±0.58e | 22.00±1.00g | 17.67±0.58de | 13.33±1.15a | 13.33±1.15a | 14.67±1.15ab | 17.33±0.58de | 14.67±0.58ab | |
16 | 21.00±1.00d | 22.33±0.58e | 18.33±0.58c | 20.67±1.15d | 25.00±1.00f | 19.33±0.58c | 14.67±0.58a | 14.67±0.58a | 16.67±0.58b | 28.33±0.58g | 19.67±0.58de | |
20 | 25.67±1.15d | 22.00±1.73bc | 20.67±1.15ab | 23.67±1.53c | 30.00±1.00f | 21.33±0.58ab | 19.67±0.58a | 19.67±0.58a | 26.33±0.58d | 28.33±0.58ef | 23.33±0.58bc | |
24 | 32.67±0.58e | 24.67±0.58b | 22.67±0.58a | 28.33±0.58cd | 29.67±0.58d | 28.33±0.58cd | 24.00±1.00ab | 24.00±1.00ab | 31.33±2.08e | 29.67±0.58d | 24.33±0.58a | |
28 | 41.33±0.58i | 27.00±1.00bc | 25.67±1.15b | 31.67±0.58fg | 35.33±2.31h | 28.67±0.58cd | 22.33±0.58a | 22.33±0.58a | 30.33±0.58def | 31.00±1.73ef | 30.33±0.58de |
表2 不同浸泡液处理对鲜切‘六月红芋’理化指标的影响
Table 2 Effects of different soaking solutions on the physicochemical indexes of fresh-cut ‘June Red Taro’
指标 Index | 时间Time/d | 不同浸泡液处理组Different soaking liquid treatment groups | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TW | PW | DW | SUC | NaCO3 | NaCl | AA | SAEW 20 | SAEW 40 | SAEW 60 | SAEW 80 | ||
感官评价得分Sensory evaluation score | 0 | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a | 9.00±0.00a |
4 | 7.33±0.58d | 7.67±0.58cd | 8.33±0.58abc | 8.67±0.58ab | 8.00±0.00bcd | 8.67±0.58ab | 9.00±0.00a | 8.67±0.58ab | 8.33±0.58abc | 8.33±0.58abc | 8.00±0.00bcd | |
8 | 7.30±0.26d | 7.77±0.21cd | 7.77±0.25cd | 8.10±0.26abc | 7.37±0.32d | 8.33±0.29abc | 8.67±0.58a | 8.07±0.15bc | 8.03±0.25bc | 8.37±0.32abc | 8.50±0.36ab | |
12 | 7.00±0.10f | 7.20±0.20ef | 7.70±0.26de | 7.80±0.62cd | 6.67±0.31f | 8.37±0.32abc | 8.83±0.29a | 8.10±0.30bcd | 8.07±0.21bcd | 7.83±0.45cd | 8.53±0.35ab | |
16 | 6.53±0.29d | 6.73±0.38cd | 6.50±0.46d | 7.30±0.17bc | 6.13±0.42d | 7.70±0.36b | 8.77±0.21a | 7.53±0.50b | 7.70±0.36b | 7.57±0.46b | 7.80±0.26b | |
20 | 5.90±0.30e | 6.10±0.56e | 5.70±0.40e | 6.40±0.40de | 4.50±0.44f | 6.83±0.29cd | 8.43±0.35a | 7.33±0.38bc | 6.17±0.21de | 7.60±0.30b | 7.47±0.50bc | |
24 | 4.93±0.40fg | 5.40±0.40defg | 5.27±0.31efg | 5.63±0.21cdef | 3.60±0.40h | 5.93±0.50cde | 7.93±0.40a | 6.33±0.35bc | 4.73±0.87g | 6.13±0.25bcd | 6.73±0.32b | |
28 | 3.67±0.58c | 3.83±0.76c | 4.40±0.53bc | 4.97±0.35b | 2.50±0.50d | 4.43±0.51bc | 7.33±0.58a | 5.13±0.15b | 4.83±0.42b | 5.20±0.20b | 4.77±0.25b | |
褐变度 Browning | 0 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 | 7.93±0.93 |
4 | 8.95±0.36cd | 8.61±1.09bcd | 6.93±0.31a | 7.87±1.20abc | 9.52±0.39d | 7.72±0.15abc | 7.05±0.43ab | 7.98±1.31abcd | 8.12±1.36abcd | 9.28±0.89cd | 9.54±0.75d | |
8 | 10.36±0.62d | 8.69±1.35abcd | 7.44±1.46ab | 9.06±0.14abcd | 9.67±0.61cd | 8.05±0.92abc | 7.14±0.51a | 8.10±0.23abc | 9.23±1.99bcd | 9.47±1.67bcd | 9.95±0.65cd | |
12 | 10.73±0.86c | 8.83±0.64abc | 7.97±0.43ab | 9.41±0.65abc | 10.25±1.52bc | 8.67±1.60abc | 7.18±0.59a | 8.13±1.10ab | 9.36±1.43abc | 9.88±1.57bc | 10.04±1.94bc | |
16 | 12.44±0.16e | 8.99±0.51bc | 8.32±0.39b | 10.01±0.81d | 10.33±0.89d | 8.82±0.40b | 7.30±0.07a | 8.21±0.45b | 9.74±0.11cd | 10.27±0.26d | 10.29±0.19d | |
20 | 13.04±0.15c | 9.46±1.87ab | 9.23±1.77ab | 11.11±0.49bc | 11.54±0.63bc | 8.97±0.99ab | 7.46±0.96a | 8.94±0.59ab | 13.55±0.88c | 10.41±1.91abc | 10.38±0.24abc | |
24 | 13.53±0.11bc | 14.39±0.89c | 9.23±0.82ab | 11.86±1.08abc | 13.65±1.05bc | 9.44±0.45ab | 7.92±0.44a | 12.02±2.31abc | 14.32±3.32c | 11.43±0.24abc | 13.45±2.64bc | |
28 | 18.84±0.49c | 15.10±0.81abc | 12.01±1.43abc | 13.66±0.55abc | 16.14±3.36bc | 9.61±1.50ab | 8.07±0.74a | 12.18±2.26abc | 15.54±0.42bc | 13.61±0.41abc | 13.67±2.42abc | |
pH值 pH value | 0 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 | 5.29±0.06 |
4 | 4.46±0.02a | 4.50±0.01c | 4.48±0.01b | 4.59±0.01d | 5.44±0.01e | 5.96±0.01g | 5.72±0.01f | 6.03±0.01h | 6.02±0.01h | 6.05±0.01i | 6.11±0.01j | |
8 | 5.20±0.05b | 5.03±0.02a | 5.21±0.02b | 5.01±0.01a | 7.21±0.02g | 5.97±0.02e | 5.73±0.02c | 5.96±0.01e | 5.97±0.01e | 5.89±0.02d | 6.02±0.02f | |
12 | 7.12±0.01h | 7.03±0.01g | 6.93±0.05f | 6.94±0.01f | 6.63±0.02e | 6.47±0.01bc | 6.31±0.01a | 6.51±0.02d | 6.51±0.02d | 6.45±0.02b | 6.49±0.02cd | |
16 | 6.65±0.02h | 6.60±0.01g | 6.52±0.02e | 6.34±0.02b | 6.11±0.02a | 6.60±0.04g | 6.38±0.02c | 6.60±0.01g | 6.57±0.03fg | 6.44±0.01d | 6.56±0.03ef | |
20 | 6.19±0.03c | 5.97±0.02b | 5.88±0.06a | 5.85±0.02a | 6.48±0.06e | 6.59±0.03f | 6.37±0.02d | 6.69±0.05g | 6.65±0.03fg | 6.51±0.02e | 6.51±0.02e | |
24 | 6.28±0.05c | 6.17±0.01b | 6.41±0.03de | 6.27±0.06c | 6.47±0.03e | 6.38±0.08d | 6.00±0.02a | 6.13±0.06b | 6.17±0.01b | 6.13±0.01b | 6.28±0.01c | |
28 | 6.50±0.03e | 6.52±0.01e | 6.60±0.05f | 6.42±0.05d | 6.40±0.07cd | 6.30±0.04b | 6.07±0.02a | 6.40±0.01d | 6.33±0.05bc | 6.32±0.03b | 6.33±0.05bc | |
相对电导率 Relative conductivity/% | 0 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 | 10.33±1.53 |
4 | 16.33±0.58c | 9.33±0.58a | 9.67±1.15a | 9.67±1.15a | 9.33±0.58a | 15.67±0.58c | 13.00±0.00b | 13.00±0.00b | 10.33±0.58a | 10.33±0.58a | 10.00±0.58a | |
8 | 18.33±0.58f | 15.33±0.58d | 13.33±0.58c | 13.33±0.58c | 15.33±0.58d | 17.33±0.58e | 10.67±0.58a | 10.67±0.58a | 14.33±0.58cd | 11.67±0.58b | 13.33±0.58c | |
12 | 20.67±0.58f | 16.67±0.58cd | 15.33±0.58bc | 18.33±0.58e | 22.00±1.00g | 17.67±0.58de | 13.33±1.15a | 13.33±1.15a | 14.67±1.15ab | 17.33±0.58de | 14.67±0.58ab | |
16 | 21.00±1.00d | 22.33±0.58e | 18.33±0.58c | 20.67±1.15d | 25.00±1.00f | 19.33±0.58c | 14.67±0.58a | 14.67±0.58a | 16.67±0.58b | 28.33±0.58g | 19.67±0.58de | |
20 | 25.67±1.15d | 22.00±1.73bc | 20.67±1.15ab | 23.67±1.53c | 30.00±1.00f | 21.33±0.58ab | 19.67±0.58a | 19.67±0.58a | 26.33±0.58d | 28.33±0.58ef | 23.33±0.58bc | |
24 | 32.67±0.58e | 24.67±0.58b | 22.67±0.58a | 28.33±0.58cd | 29.67±0.58d | 28.33±0.58cd | 24.00±1.00ab | 24.00±1.00ab | 31.33±2.08e | 29.67±0.58d | 24.33±0.58a | |
28 | 41.33±0.58i | 27.00±1.00bc | 25.67±1.15b | 31.67±0.58fg | 35.33±2.31h | 28.67±0.58cd | 22.33±0.58a | 22.33±0.58a | 30.33±0.58def | 31.00±1.73ef | 30.33±0.58de |
图2 L-抗坏血酸和乙醇复配液处理对鲜切‘六月红芋’感官品质的影响 A:鲜切芋艿外观图; B:感官评价得分; CK、AA、EA、AA+EA分别代表去离子水、L-抗坏血酸、乙醇、L-抗坏血酸和乙醇复配液;小写字母代表同一贮藏时间各处理组间的差异显著性(P<0.05)。下同
Fig. 2 Effects of L-ascorbic acid and ethanol mixture on the sensory quality of fresh-cut ‘June Red Taro’ A: Appearance of fresh-cut taro. B: Sensory evaluation scores. CK, AA, EA, AA+EA indicate deionized water, L-ascorbic acid, ethanol, L-ascorbic acid and ethanol mixture, respectively. The lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05)among the treatment groups at the same storage time. The same below
[1] | 袁晓, 杨盼迪, 林冲, 等. 脂氧合酶基因LOX6克隆及其表达与鲜切芋头褐变的相关性[J]. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(12): 17-25. |
Yuan X, Yang PD, Lin C, et al. Cloning of taro lipoxygenase gene LOX6 and correlation of its expression with browning of fresh-cut taros[J]. Shandong Agric Sci, 2023, 55(12): 17-25. | |
[2] | 张祖德, 卢春玉. 早熟芋新品种“六月红” 的选育[J]. 福建热作科技, 2007, 32(2): 17-19. |
Zhang ZD, Lu CY. Breeding of a new early maturing taro variety “Liuyuehong”[J]. Fujian Sci Technol Trop Crops, 2007, 32(2): 17-19. | |
[3] | 卢富定. ‘六月红’早熟芋品种提纯比较试验[J]. 东南园艺, 2022, 10(5): 347-350. |
Lu FD. ‘June Red Taro’ early-maturing taro variety purification comparison test[J]. Southeast Horticulture, 2022, 10(5): 347-350. | |
[4] | 曾小梅. 早熟芋“六月红” 的营养特性及施肥技术[J]. 福建农业, 2010(12): 13. |
Zeng XM. Nutritional characteristics and fertilization techniques of early-maturing taro “Liuyuehong”[J]. FuJian Agric, 2010(12): 13. | |
[5] | 袁晓, 杨盼迪, 王斌. AOS1基因克隆及其在鲜切芋头褐变中的表达模式分析[J]. 广东农业科学, 2023, 50(9): 198-206. |
Yuan X, Yang PD, Wang B. Analysis on cloning of AOS1 gene and its expression pattern during the browning process in fresh-cut taros[J]. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2023, 50(9): 198-206. | |
[6] | Wang B, Wang YK, Huang YY, et al. Anti-browning effects of citronellal on fresh-cut taro(Colocasia esculenta)slices under cold storage condition[J]. Front Sustain Food Syst, 2022, 6: 1001362. |
[7] | 王斌, 黄嘉坪, 肖艳辉, 等. 芳香植物纯露处理对鲜切芋头保鲜效果的影响[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2020, 20(3): 41-46. |
Wang B, Huang JP, Xiao YH, et al. Effects of hydrosol extracted from aromatic plants on preservation of fresh-cut taro[J]. Storage Process, 2020, 20(3): 41-46. | |
[8] | Xiao YH, Zhang JL, Jiang YY, et al. Cinnamic acid treatment reduces the surface browning of fresh-cut taro[J]. Sci Hortic, 2022, 291: 110613. |
[9] |
吴松霞, 郜海燕, 刘瑞玲, 等. 苹果多酚处理对鲜切芋艿品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2019, 40(13): 245-251.
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190225-176 |
Wu SX, Gao HY, Liu RL, et al. Effects of different concentrations of apple polyphenols on quality of fresh-cut taro(Colocasia esculenta(L.)schott)[J]. Food Sci, 2019, 40(13): 245-251. | |
[10] | Xiao YH, He JM, Zeng J, et al. Application of citronella and rose hydrosols reduced enzymatic browning of fresh-cut taro[J]. J Food Biochem, 2020, 44(8): e13283. |
[11] | 边昊, 雷镇欧. 超高压处理对鲜切芋头品质影响研究[J]. 四川旅游学院学报, 2020(1): 16-19. |
Bian H, Lei ZO. On the influence of ultra high pressure treatment on the quality of fresh-cut taros[J]. J Sichuan Tour Univ, 2020(1): 16-19. | |
[12] | Sarengaowa, Wang LY, Liu YM, et al. Effect of ascorbic acid combined with modified atmosphere packaging for browning of fresh-cut eggplant[J]. Coatings, 2022, 12(10): 1580. |
[13] | 邓钦予, 张杨涛, 郑果, 等. 外源抗坏血酸对鲜切竹根姜保鲜特性的影响[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2023, 34(5): 176-183. |
Deng QY, Zhang YT, Zheng G, et al. Effects of exogenous ascorbic acid on fresh-keeping characteristics of fresh-cut Zhugen ginger[J]. China Food Addit, 2023, 34(5): 176-183. | |
[14] | Zhou FH, Xu DY, Xiong SG, et al. Inhibition of wound healing in fresh-cut potatoes by ascorbic acid is associated with control of the levels of reactive oxygen species and the AsA-GSH cycle[J]. Sci Hortic, 2024, 323: 112472. |
[15] | Yu RY, Song HB, Chen YN, et al. Incorporation of ascorbic acid and L-cysteine in sodium carboxymethyl cellulose coating delays color deterioration and extends the shelf-life of fresh-cut asparagus lettuce(Lactuca sativa var. angustata)[J]. Postharvest Biol Technol, 2023, 204: 112419. |
[16] | 贾玉, 张芳, 王梦茹, 等. 超声波辅助异抗坏血酸处理对贮藏期鲜切苹果的护色作用[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2021, 21(10): 15-22. |
Jia Y, Zhang F, Wang MR, et al. Effect of ultrasound assisted erythorbic acid treatment on color protection in fresh-cut apple during storage[J]. Storage Process, 2021, 21(10): 15-22. | |
[17] | 刘俊红, 樊媛芳, 张苗玉, 等. 超声波结合溶菌酶对鲜切苹果保鲜的工艺优化[J]. 食品工业, 2021, 42(8): 34-39. |
Liu JH, Fan YF, Zhang MY, et al. Process optimization apple's fresh-keeping by ultrasound and lysozyme[J]. Food Ind, 2021, 42(8): 34-39. | |
[18] | Chen FY, Zhang M, Yang CH. Application of ultrasound technology in processing of ready-to-eat fresh food: a review[J]. Ultrason Sonochem, 2020, 63: 104953. |
[19] | Yıldız G, Yildiz G, Khan MR, et al. High-intensity ultrasound treatment to produce and preserve the quality of fresh-cut kiwifruit[J]. J Food Process Preserv, 2022, 46(5): e16542. |
[20] | 丁娇, 汤静, 董小盼, 等. 超声处理对鲜切西兰花的保鲜效果[J]. 食品科学, 2023, 48(10): 224-231. |
Ding J, Tang J, Dong XP, et al. Preservation effect of ultrasonic treatment on fresh-cut broccoli[J]. Food Sci, 2023, 48(10): 224-231. | |
[21] | Hou WF, Ma Y, Zhang CH, et al. Investigation on the inactivation effect and mechanism of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh-cut cucumber during storage by ultrasound combined with sodium hypochlorite[J]. Ultrason Sonochem, 2023, 101: 106706. |
[22] | Qu YL, Guo LN, Hong C, et al. Effects of multi-frequency ultrasonic assisted sodium hypochlorite on the cleaning effect and quality of fresh-cut scallion stems[J]. Ultrason Sonochem, 2023, 100: 106613. |
[23] | 杨福馨, 王金鑫, 朱惠, 等. 鲜切山药的抗菌处理及保鲜包装研究[J]. 包装学报, 2018, 10(2): 62-67. |
Yang FX, Wang JX, Zhu H, et al. Antibacterial pretreatment and fresh-keeping packaging of fresh cut yam[J]. Packag J, 2018, 10(2): 62-67. | |
[24] | 刘帅, 邓洁红, 敬小波, 等. 鲜切雪莲果护色保脆效果的研究[J]. 包装与食品机械, 2014, 32(2): 24-28, 18. |
Liu S, Deng JH, Jing XB, et al. Study on crisp-protection and browning preventing technology of fresh-cut yacon[J]. Packag Food Mach, 2014, 32(2): 24-28, 18. | |
[25] | 李国琴, 王昕昕, 许国帅, 等. 外源硫化氢对鲜切马铃薯褐变的影响[J]. 中国调味品, 2023, 48(8): 45-49, 59. |
Li GQ, Wang XX, Xu GS, et al. Effect of exogenous hydrogen sulfide on the browning of fresh-cut potatoes[J]. China Condiment, 2023, 48(8): 45-49, 59. | |
[26] | Badin EE, Rossi YE, Montenegro MA, et al. Thermal processing of raspberry pulp: effect on the color and bioactive compounds[J]. Food Bioprod Process, 2020, 124: 469-477. |
[27] | 陈玥, 杨同亮, 孟琬星, 等. 等离子体活化水对鲜切菠萝品质的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2021, 42(3): 105-110. |
Chen Y, Yang TL, Meng WX, et al. Effects of plasma-activated water on quality of fresh-cut pineapples[J]. Food Res Dev, 2021, 42(3): 105-110. | |
[28] | 陈嘉琪. 谷氨酸溶液处理抑制鲜切马铃薯褐变的研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2021. |
Chen JQ. Study on browning inhibition of glutamic acid solution on fresh-cut potatoes[D]. Tai'an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2021. | |
[29] | 陈丽萍, 何嘉莹, 蒋蓝英, 等. 淀粉膜浓度对鲜切淮山感官品质的影响[J]. 轻工科技, 2013, 29(6): 11-12. |
Chen LP, He JY, Jiang LY, et al. Effect of starch film concentration on sensory quality of fresh-cut yam[J]. Light Ind Sci Technol, 2013, 29(6): 11-12. | |
[30] | Wen YT, Liang YQ, Chai WM, et al. Effect of ascorbic acid on tyrosinase and its anti-browning activity in fresh-cut Fuji apple[J]. J Food Biochem, 2021, 45(12): e13995. |
[31] | Ahmad Bhat T, Rather AH, Hussain SZ, et al. Efficacy of ascorbic acid, citric acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 4-hexylresorcinol as inhibitors of enzymatic browning in osmo-dehydrated fresh cut kiwis[J]. J Food Meas Charact, 2021, 15(5): 4354-4370. |
[32] |
谭谊谈, 曾凯芳. 抗坏血酸、半胱氨酸与氯化钙复合处理对鲜切芋艿褐变的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2014, 35(4): 231-235.
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201404047 |
Tan YT, Zeng KF. Effects of combined treatment with ascorbic acid, cysteine and CaCl2 on browning of fresh-cut taro[J]. Food Sci, 2014, 35(4): 231-235. | |
[33] |
胡位荣, 刘顺枝, 黄惠娟, 等. 抗坏血酸与壳聚糖处理对鲜切香芋贮藏效果的研究[J]. 食品科学, 2010, 31(24): 436-439.
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201024095 |
Hu WR, Liu SZ, Huang HJ, et al. Effects of ascorbic acid and chitosan treatments on physiological changes of fresh-cut taro during storage[J]. Food Sci, 2010, 31(24): 436-439. | |
[34] | 贺一君, 王鸿飞, 李和生, 等. 鲜切奉化芋艿褐变控制的研究[J]. 食品科技, 2008, 33(7): 235-238. |
He YJ, Wang HF, Li HS, et al. Study on degree of browning control off resh-cut taro[J]. Food Sci Technol, 2008, 33(7): 235-238. | |
[35] | Yildiz G, Aadil RM. Comparative analysis of anti-browning agents, hot water and high-intensity ultrasound treatments to maintain the quality of fresh-cut mangoes[J]. J Food Sci Technol, 2022, 59(1): 202-211. |
[36] |
Pan YF, Chen L, Pang LL, et al. Ultrasound treatment inhibits browning and improves antioxidant capacity of fresh-cut sweet potato during cold storage[J]. RSC Adv, 2020, 10(16): 9193-9202.
doi: 10.1039/c9ra06418d pmid: 35497218 |
[37] | 王宁, 张艳艳, 张春燕, 等. 超声波处理鲜切马铃薯片对多酚氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2022(36): 139-143, 176. |
Wang N, Zhang YY, Zhang CY, et al. The effect of ultrasonic treatment on polyphenol oxidase activity of fresh-cut potato chips[J]. China Food Saf Mag, 2022(36): 139-143, 176. | |
[38] | 罗丽, 付院生, 陈万林, 等. 鲜切莲藕超声-热处理护色工艺优化[J]. 中国果菜, 2023, 43(5): 17-21, 28. |
Luo L, Fu YS, Chen WL, et al. Optimization of color protection technology of fresh-cut Lotus root by ultrasonic-heat treatment[J]. China Fruit Veg, 2023, 43(5): 17-21, 28. |
[1] | 毛沛琪, 李厚华, 李嫒, 曹志秀, 韩美玲, 张延龙. 硝酸银对‘凤丹’牡丹愈伤组织褐变过程中酚类物质合成及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2018, 34(8): 101-107. |
[2] | 高雪;. 柑橘钙结合蛋白基因的克隆及其在果皮褐变中的表达分析[J]. , 2011, 0(06): 53-57. |
[3] | 高雪;. 柑橘膨胀素相似基因的克隆及在采后胁迫条件下的表达[J]. , 2010, 0(09): 87-92. |
[4] | 陶冶. 马铃薯:非褐变译本[J]. , 1995, 0(05): 9-10. |
[5] | 陶冶;. 简单技术阻止培养基变成褐色[J]. , 1992, 0(06): 10-10. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||