GAO Guo-liang1, ZHANG Qiao-ling1, FENG Wen-jie1, GAO Fa-rui1, GAO Bo2, ZONG Ke-dong2, GE Lin2, LI Shang-xian3, WANG Qiu-yun1, HUANG Xin-cheng1(
)
Received:2025-11-27
Online:2026-06-08
Contact:
HUANG Xin-cheng
E-mail:huang.xinc@163.com
GAO Guo-liang, ZHANG Qiao-ling, FENG Wen-jie, GAO Fa-rui, GAO Bo, ZONG Ke-dong, GE Lin, LI Shang-xian, WANG Qiu-yun, HUANG Xin-cheng. Whole-genome Analysis and Precision Breeding Strategies for a Novel Japonica Rice Variety Jiru Dao 1[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2025-1293.
试验类型 Test type | 全生育期 Growth period (d) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 有效穗 Panicles (×104/hm2) | 每穗总粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate (%) | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 较对照增产 Yield increase over CK (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019年区域试验 | 157 | 100.5 | 360.0 | 133.5 | 79.9 | 26.2 | 10 983.0 | 10.7 |
| 2020年区域试验 | 156 | 103.0 | 336.0 | 124.0 | 92.6 | 26.6 | 9 889.5 | 5.4 |
| 2021年生产试验 | 155 | 101.3 | 348.0 | 104.9 | 86.1 | 26.4 | 9 129.0 | 9.4 |
| 平均 Average | 156 | 101.6 | 348.0 | 128.7 | 86.2 | 26.4 | 10 437.0 | 8.1 |
Table 1 Yield and main agronomic traits of Jiru Dao 1 (2019‒2021)
试验类型 Test type | 全生育期 Growth period (d) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 有效穗 Panicles (×104/hm2) | 每穗总粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate (%) | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 较对照增产 Yield increase over CK (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019年区域试验 | 157 | 100.5 | 360.0 | 133.5 | 79.9 | 26.2 | 10 983.0 | 10.7 |
| 2020年区域试验 | 156 | 103.0 | 336.0 | 124.0 | 92.6 | 26.6 | 9 889.5 | 5.4 |
| 2021年生产试验 | 155 | 101.3 | 348.0 | 104.9 | 86.1 | 26.4 | 9 129.0 | 9.4 |
| 平均 Average | 156 | 101.6 | 348.0 | 128.7 | 86.2 | 26.4 | 10 437.0 | 8.1 |
试验组别 Test group | 出糙率 Brown rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 垩白度 Chalkiness degree (%) | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content (%) | 胶 稠 度 Gel consistency (mm) | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value | 部标等级 National standard grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019年区域试验 | 85.0 | 70.1 | 0.4 | 18.6 | 81.0 | 7.0 | 1 |
| 2020年区域试验 | 84.6 | 67.8 | 4.0 | 15.7 | 73.0 | 7.0 | 3 |
| 2021年生产试验 | 84.9 | 69.6 | 3.0 | 16.5 | 70.0 | 6.5 | 2 |
Table 2 Grain quality traits of Jiru Dao 1
试验组别 Test group | 出糙率 Brown rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 垩白度 Chalkiness degree (%) | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content (%) | 胶 稠 度 Gel consistency (mm) | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value | 部标等级 National standard grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019年区域试验 | 85.0 | 70.1 | 0.4 | 18.6 | 81.0 | 7.0 | 1 |
| 2020年区域试验 | 84.6 | 67.8 | 4.0 | 15.7 | 73.0 | 7.0 | 3 |
| 2021年生产试验 | 84.9 | 69.6 | 3.0 | 16.5 | 70.0 | 6.5 | 2 |
试验类型 Test type | 稻瘟病综合指数 Blast comprehensive index | 稻瘟病抗性评价 Blast resistance rating | 白叶枯病抗性 Bacterial blight resistance | 条纹叶枯病发病率 Stripe disease incidence (%) | 条纹叶枯病抗性 Stripe disease resistance | 纹枯病抗性 Sheath blight resistance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019年区试 | 3.0 | 中抗 | 抗 | 1.7 | 抗 | 抗 |
| 2020年区试 | 4.8 | 中感 | 抗 | 0.6 | 抗 | 抗 |
Table 3 Disease-resistance identification of Jiru Dao 1
试验类型 Test type | 稻瘟病综合指数 Blast comprehensive index | 稻瘟病抗性评价 Blast resistance rating | 白叶枯病抗性 Bacterial blight resistance | 条纹叶枯病发病率 Stripe disease incidence (%) | 条纹叶枯病抗性 Stripe disease resistance | 纹枯病抗性 Sheath blight resistance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019年区试 | 3.0 | 中抗 | 抗 | 1.7 | 抗 | 抗 |
| 2020年区试 | 4.8 | 中感 | 抗 | 0.6 | 抗 | 抗 |
性状类别 Trait category | 基因 Gene | 等位类型 Allele type | 遗传效应 Genetic effect | 与表型的关联分析及风险评估 Association with phenotype and risk assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
株高/株型 Plant height/Plant architecture | sd1 | 有利 | 半矮秆 | 是理想株高和强抗倒伏性的基础 |
| Ghd8 | 有利 | 株高降低 | 与sd1协同作用,共同贡献于理想的株高与抗倒伏能力 | |
| TAC1 | 有利 | 分蘖角度小 | 贡献于其紧凑株型 | |
产量构成 Yield components | LAX1 | 有利 | 产量提高 | 高产的遗传基础之一,促进穗型发育 |
| Gn1a | 待改良 | 穗粒数少 | 限制了每穗粒数的进一步提升,是制约产量潜力的关键位点 | |
| NOG1 | 待改良 | 穗粒数低 | 与Gn1a共同限制穗粒数,是制约产量的遗传短板 | |
| GNP1 | 待改良 | 穗粒数一般 | 进一步限制了穗粒数的遗传潜力 | |
稻米品质 Rice quality | Waxy | 有利 | 直链淀粉含量降低 | 决定适中直链淀粉含量,是优良食味的关键 |
| ALK | 有利 | 糊化温度降低 | 塑造了其软米特性与优良蒸煮食味品质 | |
| Chalk5 | 待改良 | 垩白率提高 | 在灌浆期遭遇逆境时外观品质易波动,垩白度易升高,是外观品质不稳定及提升至更高优质等级(如部标1级)的主要障碍 | |
| Badh2 | 中性 | 米粒无香味 | 解释其无香味的特性 | |
抗病性 Disease resistance | pi35, Pita | 有利 | 稻瘟病抗性 | 经KASP验证,是其稻瘟病中抗表现的基础,符合区域抗性分布特征 |
| Pib, Pid2, Pid3, Pi21 | 有利 | 稻瘟病抗性 | 多位点中效抗性基因的聚合,增强了抗性谱。是其对稻瘟病表现中抗的重要支持 | |
| Pi9, Pi2, Pigm | 缺失 | 广谱高抗 | 导致其对稻瘟病的抗性不够持久和全面,是抗病体系中的薄弱环节 | |
| Xa3, Xa25 | 有利 | 白叶枯病抗性 | 解释了其对白叶枯病的抗性 | |
| Xa23 | 缺失 | 广谱高抗 | 缺乏最有效的广谱基因Xa23,存在抗性丧失风险 | |
环境安全 Environmental safety | OsCd1, OsNRAMP5 | 有利 | 不富集镉 | 为其在轻中度镉污染地区的安全生产提供了核心遗传保障 |
养分利用 Nutrient utilization | NRT1.1B, OsNR2 | 中性 | 氮肥利用效率一般 | 解释了其对氮肥需求较高的现象,有改良空间 |
| PSTOL1 | 中性 | 磷吸收效率一般 | 磷吸收效率有待提升 |
Table 4 Allelic variation of key agronomic genes in Jiru Dao 1 and its association with phenotypes
性状类别 Trait category | 基因 Gene | 等位类型 Allele type | 遗传效应 Genetic effect | 与表型的关联分析及风险评估 Association with phenotype and risk assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
株高/株型 Plant height/Plant architecture | sd1 | 有利 | 半矮秆 | 是理想株高和强抗倒伏性的基础 |
| Ghd8 | 有利 | 株高降低 | 与sd1协同作用,共同贡献于理想的株高与抗倒伏能力 | |
| TAC1 | 有利 | 分蘖角度小 | 贡献于其紧凑株型 | |
产量构成 Yield components | LAX1 | 有利 | 产量提高 | 高产的遗传基础之一,促进穗型发育 |
| Gn1a | 待改良 | 穗粒数少 | 限制了每穗粒数的进一步提升,是制约产量潜力的关键位点 | |
| NOG1 | 待改良 | 穗粒数低 | 与Gn1a共同限制穗粒数,是制约产量的遗传短板 | |
| GNP1 | 待改良 | 穗粒数一般 | 进一步限制了穗粒数的遗传潜力 | |
稻米品质 Rice quality | Waxy | 有利 | 直链淀粉含量降低 | 决定适中直链淀粉含量,是优良食味的关键 |
| ALK | 有利 | 糊化温度降低 | 塑造了其软米特性与优良蒸煮食味品质 | |
| Chalk5 | 待改良 | 垩白率提高 | 在灌浆期遭遇逆境时外观品质易波动,垩白度易升高,是外观品质不稳定及提升至更高优质等级(如部标1级)的主要障碍 | |
| Badh2 | 中性 | 米粒无香味 | 解释其无香味的特性 | |
抗病性 Disease resistance | pi35, Pita | 有利 | 稻瘟病抗性 | 经KASP验证,是其稻瘟病中抗表现的基础,符合区域抗性分布特征 |
| Pib, Pid2, Pid3, Pi21 | 有利 | 稻瘟病抗性 | 多位点中效抗性基因的聚合,增强了抗性谱。是其对稻瘟病表现中抗的重要支持 | |
| Pi9, Pi2, Pigm | 缺失 | 广谱高抗 | 导致其对稻瘟病的抗性不够持久和全面,是抗病体系中的薄弱环节 | |
| Xa3, Xa25 | 有利 | 白叶枯病抗性 | 解释了其对白叶枯病的抗性 | |
| Xa23 | 缺失 | 广谱高抗 | 缺乏最有效的广谱基因Xa23,存在抗性丧失风险 | |
环境安全 Environmental safety | OsCd1, OsNRAMP5 | 有利 | 不富集镉 | 为其在轻中度镉污染地区的安全生产提供了核心遗传保障 |
养分利用 Nutrient utilization | NRT1.1B, OsNR2 | 中性 | 氮肥利用效率一般 | 解释了其对氮肥需求较高的现象,有改良空间 |
| PSTOL1 | 中性 | 磷吸收效率一般 | 磷吸收效率有待提升 |
| [1] | Khush GS. What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030 [J]. Plant Mol Biol, 2005, 59(1): 2159. |
| [2] | 王丹英, 徐春梅, 褚光, 等. 水稻高产与优质栽培的冲突与协调 [J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(4): 58-62. |
| Wang DY, Xu CM, Chu G, et al. Conflict and coordination between high yield and good quality in rice planting [J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(4): 58-62. | |
| [3] | 李俊周, 王书玉, 尹海庆, 等. 黄淮稻区优质抗病粳稻“六位一体”育种技术体系的构建与实践 [J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(12): 42-47. |
| Li JZ, Wang SY, Yin HQ, et al. Construction and practice of “six-in-one” breeding technology system for Japonica rice with high quality and disease resistance in Huang-huai region [J]. J Henan Agric Sci, 2017, 46(12): 42-47. | |
| [4] | 杨志奇, 杨春刚, 汤翠凤,等. 粳稻地方品种孕穗期耐冷性鉴定及耐冷性状间相关分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2010, 11(4): 387-393. |
| Yang ZQ, Yang CG, Tang CF, et al. Identification of cold tolerance at booting stage and correlation analysis of cold tolerance traits in japonica landraces [J]. J Plant Genet Resour, 2010, 11(4): 387-393. | |
| [5] | 余泓, 王冰, 陈明江, 等. 水稻分子设计育种发展与展望 [J]. 生命科学, 2018, 30(10): 1032-1037. |
| Yu H, Wang B, Chen MJ, et al. Research advance and perspective of rice breeding by molecular design [J]. Chin Bull Life Sci, 2018, 30(10): 1032-1037. | |
| [6] | 卞中, 曹东平, 庄文姝, 等. 水稻分子设计育种启示: 传统与现代相结合 [J]. 遗传, 2023, 45(9): 718-740. |
| Bian Z, Cao DP, Zhuang WS, et al. Revelation of rice molecular design breeding: the blend of tradition and modernity [J]. Hereditas: Beijing, 2023, 45(9): 718-740. | |
| [7] | Wei X, Qiu J, Yong KC, et al. A quantitative genomics map of rice provides genetic insights and guides breeding [J]. Nat Genet, 2021, 53(2): 243-253. |
| [8] | 陈峰, 徐建第, 姜明松, 等. 黄淮区粳稻抗稻瘟病基因Pi-ta、Pi-b、Pi54、Pikm的分子检测 [J]. 生物技术进展, 2018, 8(1): 46-54. |
| Chen F, Xu JD, Jiang MS, et al. Molecular detection of rice blast resistance genes Pi-ta, Pi-b, Pi54 and Pikm in Japonica rice of Huang-huai region [J]. Curr Biotechnol, 2018, 8(1): 46-54. | |
| [9] | 刘鹏. 黄淮海粳稻群体抗IMI除草剂和稻瘟病基因的筛查与定向改良 [D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2024. |
| Liu P. Screening and targeted improvement of imidazolinone herbicides and blast resistance genes for Japonica/Geng rice in the Huanghuaihai Region [D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2024. | |
| [10] | Sasaki A, Ashikari M, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, et al. A mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice [J]. Nature, 2002, 416(6882): 701-702. |
| [11] | Yan WH, Wang P, Chen HX, et al. A major QTL, Ghd8, plays pleiotropic roles in regulating grain productivity, plant height, and heading date in rice [J]. Mol Plant, 2011, 4(2): 319-330. |
| [12] | Tian ZX, Qian Q, Liu QQ, et al. Allelic diversities in rice starch biosynthesis lead to a diverse array of rice eating and cooking qualities [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106(51): 21760-21765. |
| [13] | Gao ZY, Zeng DL, Cheng FM, et al. ALK the key gene for gelatinization temperature, is a modifier gene for gel consistency in rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2011, 53(9): 756-765. |
| [14] | Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin SY, et al. Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production [J]. Science, 2005, 309(5735): 741-745. |
| [15] | Huo X, Wu S, Zhu Z, et al. NOG1 increases grain production in rice [J]. Nature Commun, 2017, 8: 1497. |
| [16] | 顾芸华, 许作鹏, 葛永申, 等. 穗粒数基因Gn1a在直立穗粳稻品种中的遗传效应分析 [J]. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2023, 44(6): 1-8. |
| Gu YH, Xu ZP, Ge YS, et al. Genetic effects of Gn1a controlling grain number in the erect-panicle type Japonica rice [J]. J Yangzhou Univ Life Sci Ed, 2023, 44(6): 1-8. | |
| [17] | Li YB, Fan CC, Xing YZ, et al. Chalk5 encodes a vacuolar H+-translocating pyrophosphatase influencing grain chalkiness in rice [J]. Nat Genet, 2014, 46(4): 398-404. |
| [18] | Deng YW, Zhai KR, Xie Z, et al. Epigenetic regulation of antagonistic receptors confers rice blast resistance with yield balance [J]. Science, 2017, 355(6328): 962-965. |
| [19] | Zhou B, Qu SH, Liu GF, et al. The eight amino-acid differences within three leucine-rich repeats between Pi2 and piz-t resistance proteins determine the resistance specificity to Magnaporthe grisea [J]. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2006, 19(11): 1216-1228. |
| [20] | 张金霞, 张倩倩, 王书玉, 等. 94份水稻骨干材料抗稻瘟病基因和恢复基因的分子检测与分析 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(5): 58-64. |
| Zhang JX, QQ, Wang SY, et al. Molecular detection and analysis of blast resistance genes and fertility restorer gene in 94 rice backbone materials [J]. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2024, 52(5): 58-64. | |
| [21] | Wang CL, Zhang XP, Fan YL, et al. XA23 is an executor R protein and confers broad-spectrum disease resistance in rice [J]. Mol Plant, 2015, 8(2): 290-302. |
| [22] | Sasaki A, Yamaji N, Yokosho K, et al. Nramp5 is a major transporter responsible for manganese and cadmium uptake in rice [J]. Plant Cell, 2012, 24(5): 2155-2167. |
| [23] | Yan HL, Xu WX, Xie JY, et al. Variation of a major facilitator superfamily gene contributes to differential cadmium accumulation between rice subspecies [J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 2562. |
| [24] | Hu B, Wang W, Ou SJ, et al. Variation in NRT1.1B contributes to nitrate-use divergence between rice subspecies [J]. Nat Genet, 2015, 47(7): 834-838. |
| [25] | Li S, Tian YH, Wu K, et al. Modulating plant growth-metabolism coordination for sustainable agriculture [J]. Nature, 2018, 560(7720): 595-600. |
| [26] | Gamuyao R, Chin JH, Pariasca-Tanaka J, et al. The protein kinase Pstol1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency [J]. Nature, 2012, 488(7412): 535-539. |
| No related articles found! |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||