Biotechnology Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 16-26.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2026-0038

Previous Articles    

Research Progress of Synthetic Microbiome in the Regulation of Agricultural Soil Health

ZHANG Li1,2,3(), LI Kai-xuan1,4, MA Zhi-yuan1, JIANG Mei-tong1, ZHANG Jia-bao1,2,3, LIANG Yu-ting1,2,3()   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135
    2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135
    3.University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    4.College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100
  • Received:2026-01-11 Online:2026-05-26 Published:2026-06-10
  • Contact: LIANG Yu-ting E-mail:zhangli@issas.ac.cn;ytliang@issas.ac.cn

Abstract:

The growing tension between global cropland degradation and rising food demand has made agricultural soil health a central determinant of food security and agricultural sustainability. Rhizosphere microorganisms play key roles in this context by driving nutrient cycling, maintaining soil structure, and enhancing crop stress tolerance. In recent years, synthetic microbiomes have emerged as a controllable strategy for engineering microbial communities to achieve targeted regulation of rhizosphere functions. This review focuses on key rhizosphere interaction processes that underpin soil health in agricultural systems, highlighting how plant-microbe interactions and microbial community dynamics contribute to nutrient cycling, environmental stress responses, and disease suppression. We then summarize current approaches for constructing synthetic microbiomes, including functional strain selection and assembly, community synergistic design, and strategies to enhance persistence under field conditions. Building on this framework, we examine their applications in agriculture, with emphasis on improving nutrient use efficiency, mitigating soil degradation, remediating contaminated soils, and controlling plant diseases. We further discuss major barriers to field implementation, including limited environmental adaptability, insufficient ecological risk assessment, high application costs, and the lack of standardized evaluation systems. Addressing these challenges will be essential for advancing the practical deployment of synthetic microbiomes. This review provides a foundation for both mechanistic understanding and field application of synthetic microbiomes in soil health management.

Key words: synthetic microbiome, agricultural soil health, rhizosphere microbiome, rhizosphere interactions, field application