石楠锈孢锈菌重寄生菌的鉴定及产毒培养基筛选

doi:10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2019-1154

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 将3株重寄生拟盘多毛孢PG52、PG53和PG90鉴定到种,筛选出三者最佳产毒培养基,旨为毒素的分离鉴定奠定基础。通过PAUP软件构建系统发育树,并结合形态特征将3株拟盘多毛孢鉴定到种;以不同培养基制备的粗提物处理石楠锈孢锈菌和茶藨生柱锈菌的锈孢子,利用台盼蓝染色法和生测法筛选最佳产毒培养基。分子鉴定结果显示PG52与PG90属于同一个分支,与Pestalotiopsis kenyana和Pestalotiopsis Oryza在同一个大分支,PG53与Pestalotiopsis telopeae在同一个分支;从形态特征来看,PG53的形态与Pestalotiopsis telopea的形态描述基本一致;PG52和PG90的形态特征与Pestalotiopsis kenyana的形态描述一致;PG52于改良Fries培养基制备的粗提物处理孢子效果最好,PG53于改良M-1-D培养基制备的粗提物处理孢子效果最好,PG90于改良M-1-D培养基制备的粗提物处理孢子效果最好。PG52和PG90同属一种拟盘多毛孢菌为Pestalotiopsis kenyana;PG53为Pestalotiopsis telopeae的菌株。PG52菌株的最佳产毒培养基为改良Fries培养基;PG53菌株的最佳产毒培养基为改良M-1-D培养基;PG90菌株的最佳产毒培养基为改良M-1-D培养基。

关键词: 重寄生, 拟盘多毛孢, 毒素, 分子鉴定, 石楠锈孢锈菌

Abstract: Three Pestalotiopsis strains PG52,PG53 and PG90,which are mycoparasites of Aecidium pourthiaea,will be identified to species,and the optimal toxigenic medium of the 3 mycoparasites are screened in this study,for laying a foundation for the isolation and identification of toxins. The phylogenetic trees of 3 strains were constructed by PAUP software,and combined with morphological characteristics,they were identified to species. The crude extracts prepared from different medium were used to treat the aeciospores of A. pourthiaea and Cronartium ribicola,and the optimal toxigenic medium were screened by Trypan blue staining and bioassay. The results of molecular identification showed that PG52 and PG90 belonged to the same branch,and they were in the same big branch with Pestalotiopsis kenyana and Pestalotiopsis oryza. PG53 and Pestalotiopsis telopeae belonged to the same branch. On the morphological characteristics,the morphological description of PG53 was basically consistent with that of P. telopeae. The morphological characteristics of PG52 and PG90 were consistent with the morphological description of P. kenyana. The effects of treating spores by the crude extracts from PG52 in the improved Fries medium were the best,and also that by the crude extracts from PG53 and PG90 in the modified M-1-D medium were the best. In conclusion,PG52 and PG90 belong to P. kenyana. PG53 belong to P. telopeae. The optimal toxigenic medium for PG52 strain is the improved Fries medium,and the optimal toxigenic medium for both PG53 and PG90 strains was the modified M-1-D medium.

Key words: mycoparasite, Pestalotiopsis, toxin, molecular identification, Aecidium pourthiaea

隋国强, 张登云, 孔磊, 陈玉惠, 李靖. 石楠锈孢锈菌重寄生菌的鉴定及产毒培养基筛选[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(7): 104-111.

SUI Guo-qiang, ZHANG Deng-yun, KONG Lei, CHEN Yu-hui, LI Jing. Identification of the Mycoparasites from Aecidium pourthiaea and Screening[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2020, 36(7): 104-111.

参考文献

[1] 杨艳红, 陈玉惠. 植物病原菌重寄生菌作用机理的研究进展[J]. 西南林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2004, 24(2):70-75.
[2] 黄云, 叶华智, 刘紫英, 等. 华中五味子锈病菌及其重寄生菌的鉴定[J]. 植物病理学报2004, 34(2):117-121.
[3] 叶利芹, 吴小芹, 叶建仁. 竹叶锈病重寄生现象及重寄生菌鉴定[J]. 菌物学报2011, 30(3):54-60.
[4] 李利, 高立强, 杨家荣. 白粉菌重寄生真菌的分离鉴定[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2016, 62(10):38-41.
[5] 杨艳红, 陈玉惠, 朱云峰. 西南地区茶藨生柱锈重寄生菌的分离与鉴定[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2005, 22(4):414-419.
[6] 刘亚光. 大豆灰斑病菌毒素组分、致病性及其诱导抗性的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2002.
[7] 贺珍, 胡先文, 付艳苹, 等. 重寄生真菌盾壳霉与核盘菌对峙培养的差异代谢物分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2017, 36(1):35-41.
[8] Steyaert RL.Contribution a letude monographique de Pestalotia de not. et Monochaetia sate[J]. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique de 1'Ètat Bruxelles, 1949, 19:285-354.
[9] 宋玉. 拟盘多毛孢属(Pestalotiopsis)真菌系统学研究及条形码基因的评价[D]. 贵阳:贵州大学, 2015.
[10] Jeewon R, Liew ECY, Simpson JA, et al.Phylogenetic significance of morphological characters in the taxonomy of Pestalotiopsis species[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2003, 27(3):372-383.
[11] Liu AR, Xu T, Guo LD .Molecular and morphological description of Pestalotiopsis hainanensis sp. nov. , a new endophyte from a tropical region of China[J]. Fungal Divers, 2007, 24:23-36.
[12] Hu HL, Jeewon R, Zhou DQ, et al.Phylogenetic diversity of endophytic Pestalotiopsis species in Pinus armandii and Ribes spp. :evidence from rDNA and β- tubulin gene phylogenies[J]. Fungal Divers, 2007, 24:1-22.
[13] 蔡灿, 伍建榕. 球花石楠锈病病原物的初步研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2008(1):208-210.
[14] 李靖, 谢津, 李向楠, 等. 石楠锈孢锈菌重寄生拟盘多毛孢的分离鉴定及抑菌活性[J]. 生物技术通报, 2017, 33(3):122-127.
[15] 李靖, 刘风路, 陈玉惠. 茶麃生柱锈菌重寄生拟盘多毛孢产毒培养条件的筛选[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2017, 39(2):395-401.
[16] Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD, Groenewald JZ, et al.Pestalotiopsis revisited[J]. Studies in Mycology, 2014, 79(79):121-186.
[17] 葛起新, 陈育新, 徐同. 中国真菌志:拟盘多毛孢属[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2009.
[18] Liu F, Hou L, Raza M, et al.Pestalotiopsis and allied genera from Camellia, with description of 11 new species from China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7:866.
[19] Jeewon R, Liew ECY, Hyde KD .Phylogenetic relationships of Pestalotiopsis and allied genera inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences and morphological characters[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2002, 25(3):378-392.
[20] Kislev ME.Stem rust of wheat 3300 years old found in Israel[J]. Science, 1982, 216(4549):993-994.
[21] 谢联辉. 普通植物病理学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2006.
[22] Graham PH, Vance CP.Legumes:importance and constraints to greater use[J]. Plant Physiol, 2003, 131:872-877.
[23] Stokstad E.Deadly wheat fungus threatens world’s breadbaskets[J]. Science, 2007, 315(5820):1786-1787.
[24] 蒋继志, 白冰, 郑超, 等. 石楠拟盘多毛孢致病毒素除草作用的初步研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2012, 35(2):88-92.
[25] 唐瑶. 茶褐斑拟盘多毛孢对山茶致病机理的研究[D]. 成都:四川农业大学, 2010.