大伏革菌防治针叶树根腐病的研究进展

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 叶树根腐病是北温带地区一种重要的森林病害, 其病原为异担子菌Heterobasidion, 应用大伏革菌对该病害进行生物防治是目前最常用的方法。而随着分子生物学、转录组学及基因组学的发展, 未来的研究重点将集中在与大伏革菌拮抗效率相关的基因上。从异担子菌的防治入手, 重点阐述了用大伏革菌防治针叶树根腐病的国内外研究进展, 包括大伏革菌防病历史、商业化制剂产生、防病机制、生态影响和筛选过程等。

关键词: 针叶树根腐病, 大伏革菌, 异担子菌, 生物防治, 研究进展

Abstract: Conifer root and butt rots is an common forest disease in the north temperate zone, and the pathogen is Heterobasidion spp. But with the development of molecular biology, transcriptomics and genomics, we will change our mind to the genes related to controlling efficacy of Phlebiopsis gigantea. Phlebiopsis gigantea is the best antagonistic fungus to prevent the disease. This paper began with controlling Heterobasidion spp. and expounded research progress of controlling conifer root and butt rots by Phlebiopsis gigantea, which included the history of controlling disease, products based on Phlebiopsis gigantea, the mechanisms, ecological influence and process of screening.

Key words: Conifer root and butt rots, Phlebiopsis gigantea, Heterobasidion, Biological control Research progress

李杏春, 何双辉. 大伏革菌防治针叶树根腐病的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2014, 0(7): 26-32.

Li Xingchun, He Shuanghui. Research Progress of Controlling Conifer Root and Butt Rots by Phlebiopsis gigantea[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2014, 0(7): 26-32.

参考文献

[1] Heterobasidion annosum［EB/OL] . Distribution Maps of Plant Diseases, CAB International, 1980, 271. http://www.cabi.org/dmpd/?loadmodule=review&page=4050&reviewid=13454&site=165
[2] 周仲铭. 林木病理学［M] . 北京：中国林业出版社, 2007：194-196.
[3] 戴玉成. 中国东北地区木材腐朽菌的多样性[J]. 菌物学报, 2010, 29：801-818.
[4] 戴玉成. 中国木本植物病原木材腐朽菌研究[J]. 菌物学报, 2012, 31：493-509.
[5] 戴玉成. 异担子菌及其病害防治的研究现状[J]. 林业科学研究, 2005, 18（5）：615-620.
[6] 戴玉成. 中国多孔菌名录[J]. 菌物学报, 2009, 28：315-327.
[7] 郑茂灿, 叶剑雄, 徐清元, 等. 进境北美云杉2种危险性根部病害及检疫方法综述[J]. 福建林业科技, 2009, 36（1）：247-250.
[8] 张晓燕, 李今中, 章溯. 针叶树干基腐朽病随进境原木传入中国的风险分析[J]. 植物检疫, 2009, 23：35-37.
[9] Holdenrieder O, Greig BJW. Biological methods of control［A] //Woodward S, Stenlid J, Karjalainen R, Hüttermann A. Heterobasidion annosum：Biology, Ecology, Impact and Control［C] . Oxon：CAB International, 1998：235-258.
[10] Korhonen K, Delatour C, Greig BJW, et al. Silvicultural control［A] //Woodward S, Stenlid J, Karjalainen R, Hüttermann A. Heterobasidion annosum: Biology, Ecology, Impact and Control[C]. Oxon：CAB International, 1998: 283-314.
[11] Pratt JE, Johansson M, Hottermann A. Chemical control of Heterobasidion annosum［A] //Woodward S, Stenlid J, Kaijnen R, Hüttermann A. Heterobasidion annosum：Biology, Ecology, Impact and Control［C] . Oxon：CAB International, 1998：259-282.
[12] Nicolotti G, Gonthier P. Stump treatment against Heterobasidion with Pblebiopsis gigantea and some chemicals in Picea abies stands in the western Alps[J]. Forest Pathology, 2005, 35：365-374.
[13] Oliva J, Samils N, Johansson U, et al. Urea treatment reduced Heterobasidion annosum s.l. root rot in Picea abies after 15 years[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255（7）：2876-2882.
[14] Lehtij?rvi A, Do?mu?-Lehtij?rvi HT, Aday AG, Oskay F. The efficacy of selected biological and chemical control agents against Heterobasidion abietinum on Abies cilicica[J]. Forest Pathology, 2011, 41（6）：470-476.
[15] Nicolotti G, Gonthier P, Varese GC. Effectiveness of some biological control and chemical treatments against Heterobasidion annosum on Norway spruce stumps[J]. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 1999, 29：339-346.
[16] Malecka M, Sierota Z, Zolciak A. Comparison of efficacy of the biological preparation with some Phlebiopsis gigantea isolates used to protect Scots pine stumps against primary infection of Heterobasidion annosum on post agricultural lands[J]. Sylwan, 2012, 156（7）：526-532.
[17] Berglund M, R?nnberg J, Holmer L, Stenlid J. Comparison of five strains of Phlebiopsis gigantea and two Trichoderma formulations for treatment against natural Heterobasidion spore infections on Norway spruce stumps[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2005, 20：12-17.
[18] Schubert M, Fink S, Schwarze F. Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. as a biocontrol agent against wood decay fungi in urban trees[J]. Biological Control, 2008, 45：111-123.
[19] Ronnberg J, Cleary MR. Presence of Heterobasidion infections in Norway spruce stumps 6 years after treatment with Phlebiopsis gigantea[J]. Forest Pathology, 2012, 42（2）：144-149.
[20] Wang LY, Palsson H, Ek E, Ronnberg J. The effect of Phlebiopsis gigantea and urea stump treatment against spore infection of Heterobasidion spp. on hybrid larch（Larix eurolepis）in southern Sweden[J]. Forest Pathology, 2012, 42（5）：420-428.
[21] Hamberg L, Korhonen K, Hantula J. Interaction between Chondro-stereum purpureum and Phlebiopsis gigantea in mixed suspensions and their biocontrol efficacy in spruce logs and birch stumps[J]. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 2012, 22（10）：1239-1243.
[22] Rishbeth J. Stump protection against Fomes annosus. III. inoculation with Peniophora gigantean [J]. Annals of Applied Biology, 1963, 52：63-77.
[23] Mgbeahuruike AC, Sun H, Fransson P, et al. Screening of Phlebiopsis gigantea isolates for traits associated with biocontrol of the conifer pathogen Heterobasidion annosum[J]. Biological Control, 2011, 57：118-129.
[24] Sun H, Korhonen K, Hantula J, et al. Use of a breeding approach for improving biocontrol efficacy of Phlebiopsis gigantea strains against Heterobasidion infection of Norway spruce stumps[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2009, 69（2）：266-273.
[25] Meredith DS. Further observations on fungi inhabiting pine stumps[J]. Annals of Botany（London）, 1960, 24：63-78.
[26] Pratt JE, Niemi M, Sierota ZH. Comparison of three products based on Phlebiopsis gigantea for the control of Heterobasidion annosum in Europe[J]. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 2000, 10：467-477.
[27] Thor M. 2003. Operational stump treatment against Heterobasidion annosum in European forestry-current situation［C] //Root and butt rot of forest tree. Proceedings of the tenth International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, Quebec City, Canada, 2001：170-175.
[28] Peltola A. Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry［C] . Helsinki, Vantaan toimintayksikk?, 2009：1-452.
[29] Ikediugwu FEO. The interface in hyphal interference by Peniophora gigantea against Heterobasidion annosum[J]. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 1976, 66（2）：291-296.
[30] Ikediugwu FEO, Webster J. Hyphal interference in a range of coprophilous fungal[J]. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 1970, 54（2）：205-210.
[31] Mgbeahuruike AC, Kohler A, Asiegbu FO. Expression analysis of the impact of culture filtrates from the biocontrol agent, Phlebiopsis gigantea on the conifer pathogen, Heterobasidion annosum s.s. transcriptome[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2013, 66（3）：669-681.
[32] K??rik A, Rennerfelt E. Investigations on the fungal flora of spruce and pine stumps[J]. Meddelanden fr?n Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut, 1957, 47： 1-88.
[33] Zolciak A, Kornillowicz-kowalska TA, Sierota Z, Iglik H. Enzymatic activity of Phlebiopsis gigantea isolates[J]. Acta Mycologica, 2008, 43（1）： 41-47.
[34] Zolciak A, Sierota Z, Malecka M. Characterisation of some Phlebiopsis gigantea isolates with respect to enzymatic activity and decay of Norway spruce wood[J]. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 2012, 22（7）： 777-788.
[35] Varela E, Martinez AT, Martinez MJ. Southern blot screening for lignin peroxidase and aryl-alcohol oxidase genes in 30 fungal species[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2000, 83：245-251.
[36] Kobae Y, Sekino T, Yoshioka H, et al. Loss of AtPDR8, a plasma membrance ABC transporter of Arabidopsis thaliana, causes hypersensitive cell death upon pathogen infection[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2006, 47：309-318.
[37] Trobacher CP, Senatore A, Greenwood JS. Masterminds or minions? Cystein proteinases in plant programmed cell death[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany, 2006, 84：651-667.
[38] Sun H, Paulin L, Alatalo E, Asiegbu FO. Response of living tissues of Pinus sylvestris to the saprotrophic biocontrol fungus Phlebiopsis gigantea[J]. Tree Physiology, 2011, 31：438-451.
[39] Keith B, Dong XN, Ausubel FM, Fink GR. Differential induction of 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase genes in Arabidopsis thaliana by wounding and pathogenic attack [J]. Plant Biology, 1991, 88：8821-8825.
[40] Gómez-Gómez L, Carrasco P. Differential expression of the S-adeno-syl-L-methionine synthase genes during pea development[J]. Plant Physiology, 1998, 117：397-405.
[41] Jurgensen MF, Larsen MJ, Spano SD, et al. Nitrogen fixation associated with increased wood decay in Douglas-fir residue[J]. Forest Science, 1984, 30：1038-1044.
[42] Vasiliauskas R, Larsson E, Larsson KH, Stenlid J. Persistence and long-term impact of Rotstop biological control agent on mycodiversity in Picea abies stumps[J]. Biological Control, 2005, 32：295-304.
[43] Sun H, Terhonen E, Koskinen K, et al. The impacts of treatment with biocontrol fungus（Phlebiopsis gigantea）on bacterial diversity in Norway spruce stumps[J]. Biological Control, 2013, 64（3）：238-246.
[44] Vainio EJ, Hallaksela AM, Lipponen K, Hantula J. Direct analysis of ribosomal DNA in denaturing gradients：application on the effects of Phlebiopsis gigantea treatment on fungal communities of conifer stumps[J]. Mycological Research, 2005, 109（1）：103-114.
[45] Menkis A, Burokiene D, Gaitnieks T, et al. Occurrence and impact of the root-rot biocontrol agent Phlebiopsis gigantea on soil fungal communities in Picea abies forests of northern Europe[J]. Fems Microbiology Ecology, 2012, 81（2）：438-445.
[46] Vasiliauskas R, Lygis V, Thor M, Stenlid J. Impact of biological（Rotstop）and chemical（urea）treatments on fungal community structure in freshly cut Picea abies stumps[J]. Biological Control, 2004, 31（3）：405-413.
[47] Varese GC, Gonthier P, Nicolotti G. Impact of biological and chemical treatments against Heterobasidion annosum on non-target micro-organisms［C] //Root and Butt Rots of Forest Trees- Proceedings of the IUFRO Working Party 7.02.01, Quebec, Canada, 2001：145-154.
[48] Vainio EJ, Lipponen K, Hantula J. Persistence of a biocontrol strain of Phlebiopsis gigantea in conifer stumps and its effects on within-species genetic diversity[J]. Forest Pathology, 2001, 31：285-295.
[49] Mgbeahuruike AC, Karlsson M, Asiegbu FO. Differential expression of two hydrophobin genes（Pgh1 and Pgh2）from the biological control agent Phlebiopsis gigantean[J]. Fungal Biology, 2012, 116：620-629.
[50] Sun H, Korhonen K, Hantula J, Kasanen R. Variation in properties of Phlebiopsis gigantea related to biocontrol against infection by Heterobasidion spp. in Norway spruce stumps[J]. Forest Pathology, 2009, 39（2）：133-144.
[51] Tubby KV, Scott D, Webber JF. Relationship between stump treatment coverage using the biological control product PG Suspension, and control of Heterobasidion annosum on Corsican pine, Pinus nigra ssp. laricio[J]. Forest Pathology, 2008, 38：37-46.
[52] Dumas MT. Stimulatory effect of ammonium lignosulfonate on germination and growth of Phlebiopsis gigantea spores[J]. Forest Pathology, 2011, 41（3）：189-192.