生物技术通报 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 271-280.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2022-0944
程深伟1(), 张克强1, 梁军锋1, 刘福元2, 郜兴亮2, 杜连柱1()
收稿日期:
2022-07-28
出版日期:
2022-09-26
发布日期:
2022-10-11
作者简介:
程深伟,男,硕士研究生,研究方向:农业废弃物资源化处理与利用;E-mail: 基金资助:
CHENG Shen-wei1(), ZHANG Ke-qiang1, LIANG Jun-feng1, LIU Fu-yuan2, GAO Xing-liang2, DU Lian-zhu1()
Received:
2022-07-28
Published:
2022-09-26
Online:
2022-10-11
摘要:
为精准、快速检测畜禽养殖粪污中典型致病微生物,减少人畜共患病的传播风险,以金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠埃希氏菌(O157:H7)和肠炎沙门氏菌3种常见致病菌为研究对象,通过筛选其特异性引物与探针、优化反应系统,建立起快速、稳定的多重微滴式数字PCR(droplet digital PCR,ddPCR)反应体系。通过检测不同菌株验证该体系的特异性,并确定畜禽养殖废弃物致病菌的检出限,开发出多重微滴数字PCR快速检测方法。研究结果表明,各对引物探针对目标菌株均能扩增,ddPCR体系内未出现交叉反应,检测肠炎沙门氏菌的绝对定量检测低限为0.68 copies/µL;检测金黄色葡萄球菌的绝对定量检测低限为0.79 copies/µL;检测大肠埃希氏菌的绝对定量检测低限为1.02 copies/µL。研究建立的方法可实现对畜禽养殖粪污中3种典型致病菌的高效率、高精度的检测。
程深伟, 张克强, 梁军锋, 刘福元, 郜兴亮, 杜连柱. 畜禽养殖粪污中典型致病菌的三重微滴式数字PCR定量检测方法的建立[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(9): 271-280.
CHENG Shen-wei, ZHANG Ke-qiang, LIANG Jun-feng, LIU Fu-yuan, GAO Xing-liang, DU Lian-zhu. Establishment of a Triple Droplet Digital PCR Quantitative Detection Method for Typical Pathogenic Bacteria in Livestock and Poultry Manure[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 271-280.
菌株名称Species | 编号Code | 来源Origin |
---|---|---|
金黄色葡萄球菌 | CMCC(B)26073 | 中国医学细菌保藏管理中心 |
大肠埃希氏菌 (O157:H7) | ATCC 25922 | 美国菌种保藏中心 |
肠炎沙门氏菌 | CMCC(B)50041 | 中国医学细菌保藏管理中心 |
表1 3种典型致病菌具体信息
Table 1 Specific information on three typical pathogenic bacteria
菌株名称Species | 编号Code | 来源Origin |
---|---|---|
金黄色葡萄球菌 | CMCC(B)26073 | 中国医学细菌保藏管理中心 |
大肠埃希氏菌 (O157:H7) | ATCC 25922 | 美国菌种保藏中心 |
肠炎沙门氏菌 | CMCC(B)50041 | 中国医学细菌保藏管理中心 |
菌株名称Species | 靶基因Target gene | 引物探针序列Primer sequence(5'-3') |
---|---|---|
金黄色葡萄球菌 | nuc | CCTGAAGCAAGTGCATTTACGA |
CTTTAGCCAAGCCTTGACGAACT | ||
HEX-TGGACGTGGCTTAGCGTATATTTATGCTGATG-BHQ1 | ||
大肠埃希氏菌 | rfbE | TCAAAAGGAAACTATATTCAGAAGTTTGA |
CGATATACCTAACGCTAACAAAGCTAA | ||
CY5-AATAAATTTGCGGAACAAAACCATGTGCAA-BHQ2 | ||
肠炎沙门氏菌 | invA | GCGGCGTTGGAGAGTGATA |
AGCAATGGAAAAAGCAGGATG | ||
FAM-CATTTCTTAAACGGCGGTGTCTTTCCCT-BHQ1 |
表2 三重数字PCR检测3种致病菌的特异性引物
Table 2 Specific primers for detecting three pathogens by triple droplet digital PCR
菌株名称Species | 靶基因Target gene | 引物探针序列Primer sequence(5'-3') |
---|---|---|
金黄色葡萄球菌 | nuc | CCTGAAGCAAGTGCATTTACGA |
CTTTAGCCAAGCCTTGACGAACT | ||
HEX-TGGACGTGGCTTAGCGTATATTTATGCTGATG-BHQ1 | ||
大肠埃希氏菌 | rfbE | TCAAAAGGAAACTATATTCAGAAGTTTGA |
CGATATACCTAACGCTAACAAAGCTAA | ||
CY5-AATAAATTTGCGGAACAAAACCATGTGCAA-BHQ2 | ||
肠炎沙门氏菌 | invA | GCGGCGTTGGAGAGTGATA |
AGCAATGGAAAAAGCAGGATG | ||
FAM-CATTTCTTAAACGGCGGTGTCTTTCCCT-BHQ1 |
图1 肠炎沙门氏菌单重ddPCR检测一维图 1:肠炎沙门氏菌(CMCC(B)50041);2:空白对照;灰色:阴性微滴;蓝色:阳性微滴
Fig. 1 One-dimensional diagram of single ddPCR detection of S. enteritidis 1:S. enteritidis(CMCC(B)50041);2:blank control;gray:negative droplets;blue:positive droplets
图2 金黄色葡萄球菌单重ddPCR检测一维图 1:金黄色葡萄球菌(CMCC(B)26073);2:空白对照;灰色:阴性微滴;绿色:阳性微滴
Fig. 2 One-dimensional diagram of single ddPCR detection of S. aureus 1:S. aureus(CMCC(B)26073);2:blank control;gray:negative droplets;green:positive droplets
图3 大肠埃希氏菌单重ddPCR检测一维图 1:大肠埃希氏菌(O157:H7)(ATCC 25922);2:空白对照;灰色:阴性微滴;红色:阳性微滴
Fig. 3 One-dimensional diagram of single ddPCR detection of E.coli 1:E.coli(O157:H7)(ATCC 25922);2:blank control;gray:negative droplets;red:positive droplets
样品名称 Name of samples | 总微滴数 Total number of droplets | 肠炎沙门氏菌 S. enteritidis/ (Cp·µL-1) | 阳性微滴 Number of positive droplets | 金黄色葡萄球菌 S. aureus/ (Cp·µL-1) | 阳性微滴 Number of positive droplets | 大肠埃希氏菌 E. coli/(Cp·µL-1) | 阳性微滴 Number of positive droplets |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
沙门-阳性 | 27018 | 59.9 | 932 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
金黄-阳性 | 26349 | 0 | 0 | 75.7 | 1 143 | 0 | 0 |
大肠-阳性 | 26983 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.8 | 1 187 |
三重-阳性 | 25796 | 61.6 | 915 | 79.2 | 1 169 | 81.7 | 1 206 |
表3 单重及多重微滴数字PCR检测样本拷贝数结果
Table 3 Copy number of samples detected by single and multiple droplet digital PCR
样品名称 Name of samples | 总微滴数 Total number of droplets | 肠炎沙门氏菌 S. enteritidis/ (Cp·µL-1) | 阳性微滴 Number of positive droplets | 金黄色葡萄球菌 S. aureus/ (Cp·µL-1) | 阳性微滴 Number of positive droplets | 大肠埃希氏菌 E. coli/(Cp·µL-1) | 阳性微滴 Number of positive droplets |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
沙门-阳性 | 27018 | 59.9 | 932 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
金黄-阳性 | 26349 | 0 | 0 | 75.7 | 1 143 | 0 | 0 |
大肠-阳性 | 26983 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.8 | 1 187 |
三重-阳性 | 25796 | 61.6 | 915 | 79.2 | 1 169 | 81.7 | 1 206 |
图4 三重ddPCR特异性检测一维图 A:FAM通道,肠炎沙门氏菌检测一维图;B:HEX通道,金黄色葡萄球菌检测一维图;C:CY5通道,大肠埃希氏菌检测一维图。1:阳性样本;2-11:非目标菌株样本;12:空白对照
Fig. 4 One-dimensional map of specificity detected by triple ddPCR A:FAM channel,one-dimensional map of S. enteritidis detection. B:HEX channel,one-dimensional map of S.aureus detection. C:CY5 channel,one-dimensional map of E.coli detection. 1:Positive sample;2-11:non-target strain sample;12:blank control
样本稀释 Sample dilution | 肠炎沙门氏菌S. enteritidis /(Cp·µL-1) | 金黄色葡萄球菌S. aureus/(Cp·µL-1) | 大肠埃希氏菌E.coli/(Cp·µL-1) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Repeat1 | Repeat2 | Repeat3 | AVG | SD | RSD/% | Repeat1 | Repeat2 | Repeat3 | AVG | SD | RSD/% | Repeat1 | Repeat2 | Repeat3 | AVG | SD | RSD/% | ||
DNA-10× | 8 324 | 7 814 | 8 326 | 8 154.67 | 240.89 | 2.95 | 8 306 | 7 572 | 8 255 | 8 044.33 | 334.64 | 4.16 | 8 390 | 7 502 | 8 460 | 8 117.33 | 436.04 | 5.37 | |
DNA-100× | 785.3 | 702.8 | 756.9 | 748.33 | 34.22 | 4.57 | 830.8 | 774.9 | 788.1 | 797.93 | 23.86 | 2.99 | 831.2 | 755.3 | 803.1 | 796.53 | 31.33 | 3.93 | |
DNA-1 000× | 73.7 | 65.9 | 83.8 | 74.47 | 7.33 | 9.84 | 87.3 | 85.8 | 69.8 | 80.97 | 7.92 | 9.78 | 84 | 73 | 76.6 | 77.87 | 4.58 | 5.88 | |
DNA-10 000× | 7.67 | 7.77 | 5.48 | 6.97 | 1.06 | 15.15 | 6.21 | 8.11 | 8.38 | 7.57 | 0.97 | 12.76 | 8.41 | 8.78 | 5.8 | 7.66 | 1.33 | 17.31 | |
DNA-100 000× | 0.35 | 1.04 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 41.29 | 0.35 | 1.04 | 0.99 | 1.02 | 0.31 | 39.60 | 1.06 | 0.69 | 1.32 | 1.02 | 0.26 | 25.26 | |
DNA-1 000 000× | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | / | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | / | 0 | 1.75 | 0 | 0.58 | 0.82 | 141.42 |
表4 三重微滴数字PCR灵敏度检测结果
Table 4 Sensitivity detection results by triple droplet digital PCR
样本稀释 Sample dilution | 肠炎沙门氏菌S. enteritidis /(Cp·µL-1) | 金黄色葡萄球菌S. aureus/(Cp·µL-1) | 大肠埃希氏菌E.coli/(Cp·µL-1) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Repeat1 | Repeat2 | Repeat3 | AVG | SD | RSD/% | Repeat1 | Repeat2 | Repeat3 | AVG | SD | RSD/% | Repeat1 | Repeat2 | Repeat3 | AVG | SD | RSD/% | ||
DNA-10× | 8 324 | 7 814 | 8 326 | 8 154.67 | 240.89 | 2.95 | 8 306 | 7 572 | 8 255 | 8 044.33 | 334.64 | 4.16 | 8 390 | 7 502 | 8 460 | 8 117.33 | 436.04 | 5.37 | |
DNA-100× | 785.3 | 702.8 | 756.9 | 748.33 | 34.22 | 4.57 | 830.8 | 774.9 | 788.1 | 797.93 | 23.86 | 2.99 | 831.2 | 755.3 | 803.1 | 796.53 | 31.33 | 3.93 | |
DNA-1 000× | 73.7 | 65.9 | 83.8 | 74.47 | 7.33 | 9.84 | 87.3 | 85.8 | 69.8 | 80.97 | 7.92 | 9.78 | 84 | 73 | 76.6 | 77.87 | 4.58 | 5.88 | |
DNA-10 000× | 7.67 | 7.77 | 5.48 | 6.97 | 1.06 | 15.15 | 6.21 | 8.11 | 8.38 | 7.57 | 0.97 | 12.76 | 8.41 | 8.78 | 5.8 | 7.66 | 1.33 | 17.31 | |
DNA-100 000× | 0.35 | 1.04 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 41.29 | 0.35 | 1.04 | 0.99 | 1.02 | 0.31 | 39.60 | 1.06 | 0.69 | 1.32 | 1.02 | 0.26 | 25.26 | |
DNA-1 000 000× | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | / | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | / | 0 | 1.75 | 0 | 0.58 | 0.82 | 141.42 |
图5 三重ddPCR灵敏度检测一维图 A:FAM通道,肠炎沙门氏菌检测一维图;B:HEX通道,金黄色葡萄球菌检测一维图;C:CY5通道,大肠埃希氏菌检测一维图
Fig. 5 One-dimensional map of sensitivity detected by triple ddPCR A:The one-dimensional diagram of FAM channel and S. enteritidis detection. B:The one-dimensional diagram of HEX channel and S. aureus detection. C:The one-dimensional diagram of CY5 channel and E.coli detection
图6 三重ddPCR灵敏度检测线性范围拟合曲线 A:肠炎沙门氏菌灵敏度检测线性范围拟合曲线;B:金黄色葡萄球菌灵敏度检测线性范围拟合曲线;C:大肠埃希氏菌灵敏度检测线性范围拟合曲线
Fig. 6 Fitting curve of linear range for triple ddPCR sensitivity detection A:The fitting curve of the linear range of the sensitivity detection of S.enteritidis. B:The fitting curve of the linear range of the sensitivity detection of S.aureus. C:The fitting curve of the linear range of the sensitivity detection of E. coli
样品编号 Number of samples | 样品名称 Name of samples | A260/A280 | A260/A230 | 浓度 Concentration/ (ng·µL-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 猪1 | 2.23 | 0.21 | 536.8 |
2 | 猪2 | 2.09 | 0.41 | 1 127 |
3 | 猪3 | 2.1 | 0.35 | 956.4 |
4 | 猪4 | 2.1 | 0.65 | 2 110.5 |
5 | 猪5 | 2.21 | 0.19 | 455.1 |
6 | 猪6 | 2.11 | 0.48 | 1 337.8 |
7 | 猪7 | 2.48 | 0.12 | 281.6 |
8 | 猪8 | 2.36 | 0.13 | 280.4 |
9 | 猪9 | 1.99 | 14.66 | 382.85 |
10 | 鸡1 | 2.21 | 0.37 | 972.8 |
11 | 鸡2 | 2.57 | 0.1 | 225.4 |
12 | 鸡3 | 2.17 | 0.75 | 2 523.2 |
13 | 鸡4 | 2.05 | 8.49 | 393.56 |
14 | 鸡5 | 2.72 | 0.1 | 240.7 |
15 | 鸡6 | 1.96 | 10.14 | 684.53 |
16 | 鸡7 | 2.13 | 7.95 | 407.08 |
表5 16份样本DNA浓度检测结果
Table 5 DNA concentration test results of 16 samples
样品编号 Number of samples | 样品名称 Name of samples | A260/A280 | A260/A230 | 浓度 Concentration/ (ng·µL-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 猪1 | 2.23 | 0.21 | 536.8 |
2 | 猪2 | 2.09 | 0.41 | 1 127 |
3 | 猪3 | 2.1 | 0.35 | 956.4 |
4 | 猪4 | 2.1 | 0.65 | 2 110.5 |
5 | 猪5 | 2.21 | 0.19 | 455.1 |
6 | 猪6 | 2.11 | 0.48 | 1 337.8 |
7 | 猪7 | 2.48 | 0.12 | 281.6 |
8 | 猪8 | 2.36 | 0.13 | 280.4 |
9 | 猪9 | 1.99 | 14.66 | 382.85 |
10 | 鸡1 | 2.21 | 0.37 | 972.8 |
11 | 鸡2 | 2.57 | 0.1 | 225.4 |
12 | 鸡3 | 2.17 | 0.75 | 2 523.2 |
13 | 鸡4 | 2.05 | 8.49 | 393.56 |
14 | 鸡5 | 2.72 | 0.1 | 240.7 |
15 | 鸡6 | 1.96 | 10.14 | 684.53 |
16 | 鸡7 | 2.13 | 7.95 | 407.08 |
样品编号 Number of samples | 样品名称 Name of samples | 上样量 Sample amount |
---|---|---|
M | Marker | 3μL |
1 | 猪1 | 1μL |
2 | 猪2 | 1μL |
3 | 猪3 | 1μL |
4 | 猪4 | 1μL |
5 | 猪5 | 1μL |
6 | 猪6 | 1μL |
7 | 猪7 | 1μL |
8 | 猪8 | 1μL |
9 | 猪9 | 1μL |
10 | 鸡1 | 1μL |
11 | 鸡2 | 1μL |
12 | 鸡3 | 1μL |
13 | 鸡4 | 1μL |
14 | 鸡5 | 1μL |
15 | 鸡6 | 1μL |
16 | 鸡7 | 1μL |
表6 16份样本DNA浓度琼脂糖凝胶电泳检测表
Table 6 Detection of DNA concentration in 16 samples by agarose gel electrophoresis
样品编号 Number of samples | 样品名称 Name of samples | 上样量 Sample amount |
---|---|---|
M | Marker | 3μL |
1 | 猪1 | 1μL |
2 | 猪2 | 1μL |
3 | 猪3 | 1μL |
4 | 猪4 | 1μL |
5 | 猪5 | 1μL |
6 | 猪6 | 1μL |
7 | 猪7 | 1μL |
8 | 猪8 | 1μL |
9 | 猪9 | 1μL |
10 | 鸡1 | 1μL |
11 | 鸡2 | 1μL |
12 | 鸡3 | 1μL |
13 | 鸡4 | 1μL |
14 | 鸡5 | 1μL |
15 | 鸡6 | 1μL |
16 | 鸡7 | 1μL |
图8 三重ddPCR检测14样本一维图 A:FAM通道,肠炎沙门氏菌检测一维图;B:HEX通道,金黄色葡萄球菌检测一维图;C:CY5通道,大肠埃希氏菌检测一维图
Fig. 8 One-dimensional diagram of detecting 14 samples by triple ddPCR A:The one-dimensional diagram of FAM channel and S. enteritidis detection. B:The one-dimensional diagram of HEX channel and S. aureus detection. C:The one-dimensional diagram of CY5 channel and E.coli detection.
样品名称 Name of samples | 总微滴数 Total number of droplets | 肠炎沙门氏菌 S. enteritidis/ (Cp·µL-1) | 阳性微滴 Number of positive droplets | 金黄色葡萄球菌 S. aureus/ (Cp·µL-1) | 阳性微滴 Number of positive droplets | 大肠埃希氏菌 E. coli/ (Cp·µL-1) | 阳性微滴 Number of positive droplets |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
猪1 | 12 494 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.34 | 1 |
猪2 | 13 744 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
猪3 | 15 670 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
猪4 | 14 445 | 0 | 0 | 1.18 | 4 | 0.59 | 2 |
猪5 | 13 914 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.92 | 3 |
猪6 | 13 173 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
猪7 | 13 183 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.64 | 2 |
猪8 | 13 367 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
猪9 | 14 361 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
鸡1 | 12 270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
鸡2 | 13 422 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
鸡3 | 14 292 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
鸡4 | 13 928 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.31 | 1 |
鸡5 | 14 225 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
鸡6 | 13 949 | 0.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.13 | 7 |
鸡7 | 13 602 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.19 | 7 |
表7 16份样本三重微滴数字PCR拷贝数检测结果
Table 7 Copy number detection results for 16 samples by triple droplet digital PCR
样品名称 Name of samples | 总微滴数 Total number of droplets | 肠炎沙门氏菌 S. enteritidis/ (Cp·µL-1) | 阳性微滴 Number of positive droplets | 金黄色葡萄球菌 S. aureus/ (Cp·µL-1) | 阳性微滴 Number of positive droplets | 大肠埃希氏菌 E. coli/ (Cp·µL-1) | 阳性微滴 Number of positive droplets |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
猪1 | 12 494 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.34 | 1 |
猪2 | 13 744 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
猪3 | 15 670 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
猪4 | 14 445 | 0 | 0 | 1.18 | 4 | 0.59 | 2 |
猪5 | 13 914 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.92 | 3 |
猪6 | 13 173 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
猪7 | 13 183 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.64 | 2 |
猪8 | 13 367 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
猪9 | 14 361 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
鸡1 | 12 270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
鸡2 | 13 422 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
鸡3 | 14 292 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
鸡4 | 13 928 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.31 | 1 |
鸡5 | 14 225 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
鸡6 | 13 949 | 0.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.13 | 7 |
鸡7 | 13 602 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.19 | 7 |
[1] | 杨天学, 刘鸿志, 李东阳, 等. 种养废弃物协同污染控制现状及发展对策建议[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(1):473-481. |
Yang TX, Liu HZ, Li DY, et al. The Current situation and development suggestions of waste pollution cooperative control from planting and breeding industry[J]. China Environ Sci, 2021, 41(1):473-481. | |
[2] | 吴玉高, 李卓阳, 方菁. 畜禽粪便还田所致环境污染现况及其健康危害[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2021, 38(11):1284-1290. |
Wu YG, Li ZY, Fang J. Environmental pollution and health hazards caused by animal agriculture manure[J]. J Environ Occup Med, 2021, 38(11):1284-1290. | |
[3] | 中华人民共和国卫生部. 食品安全国家标准食品微生物学检验沙门氏菌检验:GB 4789. 4-2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010. |
Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. National food safety standard Food microbiological examination:Salmonella:GB 4789. 4-2010[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2010. | |
[4] |
Postollec F, Falentin H, Pavan S, et al. Recent advances in quantitative PCR(qPCR)applications in food microbiology[J]. Food Microbiol, 2011, 28(5):848-861.
doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2011.02.008 pmid: 21569926 |
[5] |
Sykes PJ, Neoh SH, Brisco MJ, et al. Quantitation of targets for PCR by use of limiting dilution[J]. BioTechniques, 1992, 13(3):444-449.
pmid: 1389177 |
[6] |
Corbisier P, Bhat S, Partis L, et al. Absolute quantification of genetically modified MON810 maize(Zea mays L. )by digital polymerase chain reaction[J]. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2010, 396(6):2143-2150.
doi: 10.1007/s00216-009-3200-3 pmid: 19816678 |
[7] | 杨冬燕, 杨永存, 李浩, 等. 数字PCR与荧光PCR方法鉴别餐厨废弃植物油的比较[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2015, 25(19):3221-3225, 3230. |
Yang DY, Yang YC, Li H, et al. Comparation of digital PCR and fluorescent PCR for detecting kitchen-waste vegetable oil[J]. Chin J Heal Lab Technol, 2015, 25(19):3221-3225, 3230. | |
[8] |
Kim TG, Jeong SY, Cho KS. Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative real-time PCR for examining population dynamics of bacteria in soil[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2014, 98(13):6105-6113.
doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5794-4 pmid: 24831026 |
[9] |
Hindson BJ, Ness KD, Masquelier DA, et al. High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number[J]. Anal Chem, 2011, 83(22):8604-8610.
doi: 10.1021/ac202028g pmid: 22035192 |
[10] |
Belgrader P, Tanner SC, Regan JF, et al. Droplet digital PCR measurement of HER2 copy number alteration in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma tissue[J]. Clin Chem, 2013, 59(6):991-994.
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.197855 pmid: 23358413 |
[11] |
Hindson CM, Chevillet JR, Briggs HA, et al. Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR[J]. Nat Methods, 2013, 10(10):1003-1005.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2633 pmid: 23995387 |
[12] | 魏咏新, 马丹, 李丹, 等. 食品中Escherichia coli O157:H7微滴数字PCR绝对定量检测方法的建立[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(16):259-265. |
Wei YX, Ma D, Li D, et al. Establishment of droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitative detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in foods[J]. Food Sci, 2020, 41(16):259-265. | |
[13] |
Kelley K, Cosman A, Belgrader P, et al. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by a duplex droplet digital PCR assay[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2013, 51(7):2033-2039.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.00196-13 URL |
[14] | 赵新, 兰青阔, 陈锐, 等. 应用微滴数字PCR技术快速检测食用菌中沙门氏菌[J]. 食品与生物技术学报, 2017, 36(3):315-321. |
Zhao X, Lan QK, Chen R, et al. Rapid detection of salmonellla spp. in edible fungi by droplet digital PCR[J]. J Food Sci Biotechnol, 2017, 36(3):315-321. | |
[15] | 刘聪, 蒋克明, 刘聪, 等. 微滴技术的数字PCR研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 化学研究与应用, 2018, 30(7):1041-1047. |
Liu C, Jiang KM, Liu C, et al. Research status and trend of digital PCR based on microdroplet technology[J]. Chem Res Appl, 2018, 30(7):1041-1047. | |
[16] |
Sharma VK. Real-time reverse transcription-multiplex PCR for simultaneous and specific detection of rfbE and eae genes of Escherichia coli O157:H7[J]. Mol Cell Probes, 2006, 20(5):298-306.
doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2006.03.001 URL |
[17] | 马薇, 孔义军, 吴伟健, 等. 水中大肠菌群微滴数字PCR定量检测方法的建立[J]. 环境保护科学, 2019, 45(1):58-66. |
Ma W, Kong YJ, WU WJ, et al. The establishment of quantitative detection of total coliforms in water based on ddPCR technology[J]. Environ Prot Sci, 2019, 45(1):58-66. | |
[18] | 赵丽青, 王静, 秦燕, 等. PMA结合ddPCR检测食品中金黄色葡萄球菌的研究[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2017, 37(1):105-109. |
Zhao LQ, Wang J, Qin Y, et al. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus in foods by PMA combined with ddPCR[J]. J Microbiol, 2017, 37(1):105-109. | |
[19] |
Wang M, Yang JJ, Gai ZT, et al. Comparison between digital PCR and real-time PCR in detection of Salmonella typhimurium in milk[J]. Int J Food Microbiol, 2018, 266:251-256.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.12.011 URL |
[20] | 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 化妆品微生物检验方法第11部分:金黄色葡萄球菌多重实时荧光PCR法 S N/T 2206. 11-2014[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014. |
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Determination of microorganism in cosmetics- Part 11:Multiplex fluorescent real-time PCR method for Staphylococcus aureus SN/T 2206. 11-2014[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2014. | |
[21] |
Malorny B, Bunge C, Helmuth R. A real-time PCR for the detection of Salmonella Enteritidis in poultry meat and consumption eggs[J]. J Microbiol Methods, 2007, 70(2):245-251.
doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.04.013 URL |
[22] |
Kawasaki S, Fratamico PM, Horikoshi N, et al. Multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for simultaneous detection and quantification of Salmonella Species, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground pork samples[J]. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2010, 7(5):549-554.
doi: 10.1089/fpd.2009.0465 pmid: 20132032 |
[23] | 崔元, 陈萍, 李佳暖, 等. 各类PCR技术的优缺点比较研究[C]北京: 北京畜牧兽医学会, 2016. |
Cui Yuan, Chen Ping, Li Jianuan, et al. Comparative study on the advantages and disadvantages of various PCR techniq-ues[C]Beijing: Beijing Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Association, 2016. |
[1] | 陈晓萌, 张雪静, 张欢, 张宝江, 苏艳. 重组牛乳源金黄色葡萄球菌GapC蛋白优势B细胞抗原表位的预测和筛选[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(5): 306-313. |
[2] | 李海利, 郎利敏, 张青娴, 游一, 朱文豪, 王治方, 张立宪, 王克领. 同时产碳青霉烯酶NDM-1和NDM-5的猪源大肠埃希氏菌的鉴定及耐药性研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(9): 106-115. |
[3] | 刘理慧, 储锦华, 隋雨欣, 陈杨, 程古月. 沙门氏菌中主要毒力因子的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(9): 72-83. |
[4] | 王子琰, 王建, 张伦, 桂水清, 卢雪梅. 家蝇抗菌肽MDC对鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的抑菌稳定性研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(3): 149-156. |
[5] | 岑潇龙, 雷曦, 马诗云, 陈倩茹, 黄遵锡, 周峻沛, 张蕊. 金黄色葡萄球菌透明质酸裂解酶HylS的异源表达与特性研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(1): 157-167. |
[6] | 黄景晓, 尚俊康, 陈慧敏, 沈嘉旻, 黎圆圆, 喻玉立, 倪进东, 林伯坤. 一株烈性沙门氏菌噬菌体的生物学特性及基因组分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(6): 136-146. |
[7] | 丰敏, 李舒婷, 张洋子, 粟元, 朱龙佼, 曹际娟, 刘海燕, 许文涛. 基于荧光自淬灭引物的沙门氏菌新型荧光定量PCR方法的开发[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(11): 285-292. |
[8] | 蒋成辉, 曾巧英, 王萌, 潘阳阳, 刘旭明, 尚天甜. CRISPR/Cas9构建srtA基因敲除的金黄色葡萄球菌[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(9): 253-265. |
[9] | 王琦, 颜春蕾, 高洪伟, 吴薇, 杨庆利. 基于核酸适配体传感器检测食品致病菌的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(11): 245-258. |
[10] | 余姝侨, 官昭瑛, 陈红. 利用大肠埃希氏菌光控基因表达系统降解多菌灵农残[J]. 生物技术通报, 2019, 35(2): 218-224. |
[11] | 支威, 马海燕, 仇永凤, 胡素娟, 卫玲玲, 朱爱华. 猪源沙门氏菌耐药性及耐药基因的分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2018, 34(3): 170-176. |
[12] | 赵艳坤, 刘慧敏, 王帅, 蔡建星, 王成, 陈贺. 奶牛乳房炎源金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2018, 34(10): 18-25. |
[13] | 李明阳, 贺气志, 马春霞, 俞建昆. 一种快速检测含tst基因的金黄色葡萄球菌的纳米生物传感器[J]. 生物技术通报, 2017, 33(12): 81-86. |
[14] | 王路路, 权春善, 许永斌, 王冠天, 刘爽, 陈莹. 跨膜蛋白AgrCTM6-7C分离纯化方法的优化[J]. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32(7): 59-65. |
[15] | 廖超, 张昭寰, 姚鑫, 谢晶, 张炜佳, 潘迎捷, 赵勇,. GC夹对三种食源性致病菌的rpoB-PCR-DGGE图谱的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32(5): 212-219. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||