不同处理对油菜秸秆养分、纤维结构和硫苷含量的影响

doi:10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2024-0077

生物技术通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 172-179.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2024-0077

不同处理对油菜秸秆养分、纤维结构和硫苷含量的影响

杨代毅¹^,²(), 樊杨³, 屠焰², 徐志宇⁴, 薛颖昊⁴, 孙元丰⁴, 王进⁵, 郝小燕¹(), 马涛²()

1.山西农业大学动物科技学院，太谷 030800
2.中国农业科学院饲料研究所农业农村部饲料生物技术重点实验室，北京 100081
3.四川农业大学生命科学学院，雅安 625014
4.农业农村部农业生态与资源保护总站，北京 102200
5.内蒙古坤珍天禧农牧科技有限责任公司，呼和浩特 010050

收稿日期:2024-01-19 出版日期:2024-06-26 发布日期:2024-06-24
通讯作者: 郝小燕，女，博士，副教授，研究方向：反刍动物营养与饲料科学；E-mail: haoxiaoyan1990@sina.com；
马涛，男，博士，研究员，研究方向：反刍动物营养需要与调控技术；E-mail: matao@caas.cn
作者简介:杨代毅，男，硕士，研究方向：反刍动物营养；E-mail: sxauydy@163.com
第一联系人：
樊杨同为本文第一作者
基金资助:
财政部和农业农村部：国家现代农业产业技术体系专项(CARS-38);非粮饲料资源挖掘与饲料粮减量替代技术体系(CAAS-IFR-ZDRW202301);饲料配方软件国产化(IFR-ZDRW202303)

Effects of Different Treatments on the Nutrients, Fiber Structure, and Glucosinolate Contents in Rapeseed Straw

YANG Dai-yi¹^,²(), FAN Yang³, TU Yan², XU Zhi-yu⁴, XUE Ying-hao⁴, SUN Yuan-feng⁴, WANG Jin⁵, HAO Xiao-yan¹(), MA Tao²()

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801
2. Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Feed Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
3. College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an 625014
4. Rural Energy and Environment Agency, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 102200
5. Inner Mongolia Kunzhen Tianxi Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Technology Co., Ltd., Hohhot 010050

Received:2024-01-19 Published:2024-06-26 Online:2024-06-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 采用物理（膨化）和微生物（黑曲霉、枯草芽孢杆菌）处理油菜秸秆，并分析发酵后的营养物质含量、纤维结构和硫代葡萄糖苷含量，旨在提高油菜秸秆作为粗饲料在反刍动物上的饲用价值。【方法】 试验设计6个组，分别为：油菜秸秆（M组，即对照组）、对照加黑曲霉（MA组）、对照加枯草芽孢杆菌（MB组）、对照膨化（PM组）、对照膨化加黑曲霉（PMA组）、对照膨化加枯草芽孢杆菌（PMB组）。【结果】 与M组（2.60%）相比，其他各组的粗蛋白质含量显著增加（P<0.05），分别为3.16%（MA组）、3.24%（MB组）、3.31%（PM组）、4.02%（PMA组）、3.73%（PMB组）；与M组（83.4%）相比，其他各组的中性洗涤纤维（NDF）含量显著降低（P<0.05），分别为81.6%（MA组）、80.3%（MB组）、80.4%（PM组）、77.3%（PMA组）、78.3%（PMB组）。MA组的结晶度（27.0% vs 25.3%）和比表面积（1.22 m²/g vs 1.19 m²/g）显著高于M组（P<0.05），氢键作用力减弱，聚合度与其他各组无显著差异（P>0.05）；与M组（0.49 μmol/g）相比，其他各组硫代葡萄糖苷含量显著降低（P<0.05），PMA组（0.24 μmol/g）和PMB组（0.22 μmol/g）样品的硫代葡萄糖苷含量差异不显著，但显著低于其他各组（P<0.05）。【结论】 通过物理和微生物处理油菜秸秆能通过破坏纤维结构降低NDF水平，并减少抗营养因子硫代葡萄糖苷含量，从而改善其在反刍动物上的饲用价值。

关键词: 油菜秸秆, 膨化, 黑曲霉, 枯草芽孢杆菌, 纤维结构, 硫代葡萄糖苷

Abstract:

【Objective】 Physical（extrusion）and microbial（Aspergillus niger and Bacillus subtilis）treatments were applied to analyze the changes in the nutrient content, fiber structure and glucosinolates of the rapeseed straw after fermentation, aiming to improve the feeding value of rape straw as roughage for ruminants.【Method】 The experiment included 6 treatments: Rape straw group（M group, that is, control group）, control plus Aspergillus niger group（MA group）, control plus Bacillus subtilis group（MB group）, control puffed group（PM group）, control puffed plus A. niger group（PMA group）, and control puffed plus B. subtilis group（PMB group）.【Result】 Compared with the M group（2.60%）, the crude protein content significantly increased 3.16%（MA group）, 3.24%（MB group）, 3.31%（PM group）, 4.02%（PMA group）, 3.73%（PMB group）and the NDF content significantly reduced in other groups, 81.6%（MA group）, 80.3%（MB group）, 80.4%（PM group）, 77.3%（PMA group）and 78.3%（PMB group）（P<0.05）. The crystallinity（27.0% vs 25.3%）and specific surface area（1.22 m²/g vs 1.19 m²/g）in MA group was higher that than in M group（P<0.05）, the hydrogen bonding force was weakened, and there was no significant difference in the degree of polymerization in MA compared with that in the M group（P>0.05）. Compared with the M group（0.49 μmol/g）, the glucosinolate content of the other groups was significantly lower（P<0.05）. The difference in the glucosinolate contents in PMA（0.24 μmol/g）and PMBs（0.22 μmol/g）groups was not significant（P<0.05）.【Conclusion】 The use of microbial and physical treatments of rape straw can reduce the NDF level by breaking fiber structure and reducing the content of glucosinolates, thus improving its feeding value in ruminants.

Key words: rapeseed straw, extrusion, Aspergillus niger, Bacillus subtilis, fiber structure, glucosinolate

杨代毅, 樊杨, 屠焰, 徐志宇, 薛颖昊, 孙元丰, 王进, 郝小燕, 马涛. 不同处理对油菜秸秆养分、纤维结构和硫苷含量的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2024, 40(6): 172-179.

YANG Dai-yi, FAN Yang, TU Yan, XU Zhi-yu, XUE Ying-hao, SUN Yuan-feng, WANG Jin, HAO Xiao-yan, MA Tao. Effects of Different Treatments on the Nutrients, Fiber Structure, and Glucosinolate Contents in Rapeseed Straw[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 172-179.

图/表 4

参考文献 41

[1]	饶越悦, 周顺利, 黄毅, 等. 秸秆富集深层还田对农田土壤质量影响的研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报: 中英文, 2023, 31(10): 1579-1587.
	Rao YY, Zhou SL, Huang Y, et al. Advances in research involving deep incorporation of enriched straw on soil quality[J]. Chin J Eco Agric, 2023, 31(10): 1579-1587.
[2]	Pauly M, Keegstra K. Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels[J]. Plant J, 2008, 54(4): 559-568.
[3]	Ding SY, Liu YS, Zeng YN, et al. How does plant cell wall nanoscale architecture correlate with enzymatic digestibility?[J]. Science, 2012, 338(6110): 1055-1060.
[4]	Zeng JJ, Singh D, Chen SL. Biological pretreatment of wheat straw by Phanerochaete chrysosporium supplemented with inorganic salts[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2011, 102(3): 3206-3214.
[5]	Castoldi R, Bracht A, de Morais GR, et al. Biological pretreatment of Eucalyptus grandis sawdust with white-rot fungi: study of degradation patterns and saccharification kinetics[J]. Chem Eng J, 2014, 258: 240-246.
[6]	王玉荣, 陶莲, 马涛, 等. 不同酶及组合处理对青贮水稻秸秆微观结构的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017, 29(4): 1401-1408.
	Wang YR, Tao L, Ma T, et al. Effect of different enzymes and their combinations on microstructure of rice straw silage[J]. Chin J Anim Nutr, 2017, 29(4): 1401-1408.
[7]	崔美, 黄仁亮, 苏荣欣, 等. 木质纤维素新型预处理与顽抗特性[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(3): 677-687. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.03.002
	Cui M, Huang RL, Su RX, et al. An overview on lignocellulose pretreatment and recalcitrant characteristics[J]. CIESC J, 2012, 63(3): 677-687. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.03.002
[8]	张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2003.
	Zhang LY. Feed analysis and feed quality detecting technology[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2003.
[9]	An QD, Zhang GL, Wu HT, et al. Alginate-deriving oligosaccharide production by alginase from newly isolated Flavobacterium sp. LXA and its potential application in protection against pathogens[J]. J Appl Microbiol, 2009, 106(1): 161-170. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03988.x pmid: 19054241
[10]	Meyer L, Jacquet N, Vanderghem C, et al. Effect of steam explosion pre-treatment on enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic material[C]. Cost FP0602 Final Meeting/Italic 6, 2011.
[11]	郭翰林. 纤维素超分子结构及其降解过程的表征分析[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2012.
	Guo HL. Characterization of degradation process of cellulose superstructure[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2012.
[12]	王玉荣. 不同微生态制剂对稻秸分子结构及瘤胃降解特性的影响[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2017.
	Wang YR. Effects of different microbial ecological preparations on microstructure and rumen degradability of rice straw[D]. Ala'er: Tarim University, 2017.
[13]	Yin L, Chen HC, Cao BH, et al. Molecular characterization of MYB28 involved in aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis in Chinese kale(Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra bailey)[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 1083.
[14]	刘高坤, 王思伟, 刘少兴, 等. 不同微生物添加剂组合对全株玉米青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2021, 57(8): 215-218, 223.
	Liu GK, Wang SW, Liu SX, et al. Effect of different microbial additives on the quality of whole plant maize silage[J]. Chin J Anim Sci, 2021, 57(8): 215-218, 223.
[15]	欧荣娣, 范觉鑫, 王升平, 等. 红薯渣固态发酵条件优化[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015, 27(10): 3302-3310.
	Ou RD, Fan JX, Wang SP, et al. Optimum conditions of sweet potato residue by solid-state fermentation[J]. Chin J Anim Nutr, 2015, 27(10): 3302-3310.
[16]	崔艺燕, 王超普, 邓盾, 等. 不同菌种有氧发酵对柑橘渣营养价值的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34(3): 2030-2040. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2022.03.061
	Cui YY, Wang CP, Deng D, et al. Effects of aerobic fermentation with different strains on nutritional value of Citrus pomace[J]. Chin J Anim Nutr, 2022, 34(3): 2030-2040.
[17]	刘纪成, 刘佳, 张敏, 等. 不同真菌发酵对花生秸秆营养含量及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2018(15): 73-77.
	Liu JC, Liu J, Zhang M, et al. Effects of different fungi fermentations on nutrient contents and enzyme activities of peanut straw[J]. China Feed, 2018(15): 73-77.
[18]	才金玲, 王乃可, 王娟, 等. 水稻秸秆预处理技术研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(3): 24-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.03.004
	Cai JL, Wang NK, Wang J, et al. Research process on pretreatment technology of rice straw[J]. China Rice, 2023, 29(3): 24-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.03.004
[19]	龚剑明, 赵向辉, 周珊, 等. 不同真菌发酵对油菜秸秆养分含量、酶活性及体外发酵有机物降解率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015, 27(7): 2309-2316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.07.039
	Gong JM, Zhao XH, Zhou S, et al. Effects of different fungi fermentations on nutrient contents, enzyme activities and in vitro fermentation organic matter degradation rate of rape straw[J]. Chin J Anim Nutr, 2015, 27(7): 2309-2316.
[20]	李立波, 任晓冬, 窦森. 固态发酵中2种微生物降解玉米秸秆效果的对比研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(10): 2136-2142.
	Li LB, Ren XD, Dou S. Comparative study of the degradation efficiency of 2 types of microorganisms on the degradation of corn stalks in solid-state fermentation[J]. J Agro Environ Sci, 2017, 36(10): 2136-2142.
[21]	Abo-Donia FM, Abdel-Azim SN, Elghandour MMY, et al. Feed intake, nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation activities in sheep-fed peanut hulls treated with Trichoderma viride or urea[J]. Trop Anim Health Prod, 2014, 46(1): 221-228. doi: 10.1007/s11250-013-0479-z pmid: 24085418
[22]	郭照宙, 许灵敏, 宋建楼, 等. 产朊假丝酵母功能的探究及应用[J]. 饲料博览, 2016(3): 33-35, 39.
	Guo ZZ, Xu LM, Song JL, et al. Functional exploration and application of Candida Utilis[J]. Feed Rev, 2016(3): 33-35, 39.
[23]	陈松, 丁立孝, 张莉, 等. 发酵苹果渣生产蛋白饲料的混合菌种的筛选[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2008, 34(2): 94-96.
	Chen S, Ding LX, Zhang L, et al. Screening of the multi-strains to produce single cell protein feeds from apple pomace[J]. Food Ferment Ind, 2008, 34(2): 94-96.
[24]	Shi CY, He J, Yu J, et al. Physicochemical properties analysis and secretome of Aspergillus niger in fermented rapeseed meal[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(4): e0153230.
[25]	Zhang MF, Qin YH, Ma JY, et al. Depolymerization of microcrystalline cellulose by the combination of ultrasound and Fenton reagent[J]. Ultrason Sonochem, 2016, 31: 404-408.
[26]	黄珍. 产纤维素酶重组乳酸乳球菌的构建、对秸秆微贮品质的影响及机理[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2022.
	Huang Z. Construction of cellulase-producing recombinant Lactococcus lactis and its effect and mechanism on straw silage quality[D]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2022.
[27]	裴继诚. 植物纤维化学[M]. 4版. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2012.
	Pei JC. Lignocellulosic chemistry[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2012.
[28]	王玉荣, 陶莲, 许贵善, 等. 秸秆木质纤维素微观结构及其裂解方法[J]. 中国饲料, 2016(12): 38-41.
	Wang YR, Tao L, Xu GS, et al. The mierostructure of straw lignocellulose and its decomposition method[J]. China Feed, 2016(12): 38-41.
[29]	Esteves B, Velez MA, Domingos I, et al. Chemical changes of heat treated pine and eucalypt wood monitored by FTIR[J]. Maderas Cienciay, 2013, 15(2): 245-258.
[30]	陈亮, 武小芬, 齐慧, 等. γ射线、电子束辐照处理对芦苇木质纤维素结构及酶解性能的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2023, 37(5): 971-980. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.1000-8551.2023.05.0971
	Chen L, Wu XF, Qi H, et al. Effects of γ-ray and electron beam irradiation pretreatment on structure and enzymatic efficiency of lighocellulose in Phragmites australis[J]. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2023, 37(5): 971-980.
[31]	Dai YZ, Si MY, Chen YH, et al. Combination of biological pretreatment with NaOH/Urea pretreatment at cold temperature to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2015, 198: 725-731.
[32]	Yang L, Ru Y, Xu S, et al. Features correlated to improved enzymatic digestibility of corn stover subjected to alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatment[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2021, 325: 124688.
[33]	薛润林, 斯薛辉. 废木材生产有机肥的研究[J]. 新农业, 2017(11): 63-64.
	Xue RL, Si XH. Research on the production of organic fertilizer from waste wood[J]. New Agriculture, 2017(11): 63-64.
[34]	Mertoglu Elmas G, Yilgor N. Chemical and thermal characterizations of Pinus sylvestris and Pinus pinaster[J]. BioResources, 2020, 15(2): 3604-3620.
[35]	Wang FQ, Xie H, Chen W, et al. Biological pretreatment of corn stover with ligninolytic enzyme for high efficient enzymatic hydrolysis[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 144: 572-578.
[36]	Agerbirk N, Olsen CE. Glucosinolate structures in evolution[J]. Phytochemistry, 2012, 77: 16-45. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.02.005 pmid: 22405332
[37]	Tripathi MK, Mishra AS. Glucosinolates in animal nutrition: a review[J]. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 2007, 132(1-2): 1-27.
[38]	Tsao GT, Xia LM, Cao NJ, et al. Solid-state fermentation with Aspergillus niger for cellobiase production[M]// Twenty-First Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2000: 743-749.
[39]	Zhu XF, Wang LY, Zhang Z, et al. Combination of fiber-degrading enzymatic hydrolysis and lactobacilli fermentation enhances utilization of fiber and protein in rapeseed meal as revealed in simulated pig digestion and fermentation in vitro[J]. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 2021, 278: 115001.
[40]	Mahajan A, Dua S. Role of enzymatic treatments in modifying the functional properties of rapeseed(Brassica campestris var. toria)meal[J]. Int J Food Sci Nutr, 1998, 49(6): 435-440.
[41]	Shi CY, He J, Yu J, et al. Solid state fermentation of rapeseed cake with Aspergillus niger for degrading glucosinolates and upgrading nutritional value[J]. J Anim Sci Biotechnol, 2015, 6(1): 13.

项目 Item	组别 Groups						SEM	P
项目 Item	对照组 M	对照加黑曲霉组MA	对照加枯草芽孢杆菌组MB	对照膨化组PM	对照膨化加黑曲霉组PMA	对照膨化加枯草芽孢杆菌组PMB	SEM	P
干物质DM	70.5^a	67.8^b	67.3^b	70.3^a	67.2^b	64.2^b	0.40	<0.01
粗蛋白质CP	2.60^d	3.16^c	3.24^bc	3.31^bc	4.02^a	3.73^ab	0.12	<0.01
中性洗涤纤维NDF	83.4^a	81.6^b	80.3^b	80.4^b	77.3^c	78.3^c	0.52	<0.01
酸性洗涤纤维ADF	66.8^a	65.2^ab	64.1^bc	63.2^c	60.1^d	61.1^d	0.40	<0.01

项目 Item	组别 Groups						SEM	P
项目 Item	对照组 M	对照加黑曲霉组MA	对照加枯草芽孢杆菌组MB	对照膨化组PM	对照膨化加黑曲霉组PMA	对照膨化加枯草芽孢杆菌组PMB	SEM	P
干物质DM	70.5^a	67.8^b	67.3^b	70.3^a	67.2^b	64.2^b	0.40	<0.01
粗蛋白质CP	2.60^d	3.16^c	3.24^bc	3.31^bc	4.02^a	3.73^ab	0.12	<0.01
中性洗涤纤维NDF	83.4^a	81.6^b	80.3^b	80.4^b	77.3^c	78.3^c	0.52	<0.01
酸性洗涤纤维ADF	66.8^a	65.2^ab	64.1^bc	63.2^c	60.1^d	61.1^d	0.40	<0.01

项目 Item	组别 Group						SEM	P
项目 Item	对照组 M	对照加黑曲霉组MA	对照加枯草芽孢杆菌组MB	对照膨化组PM	对照膨化加黑曲霉组PMA	对照膨化加枯草芽孢杆菌组PMB	SEM	P
聚合度Degree of polymerization	467.6^a	435.1^ab	414.3^b	458.7^a	397.7^bc	366.9^c	8.04	<0.01
结晶度 Crystallinity	25.3^d	27.0^b	26.5^c	26.3^c	28.6^a	27.8^b	0.27	<0.01
比表面积 Specific surface area	1.19^d	1.22^c	1.47^b	1.46^b	1.46^b	1.72^a	0.04	<0.01

项目 Item	组别 Group						SEM	P
项目 Item	对照组 M	对照加黑曲霉组MA	对照加枯草芽孢杆菌组MB	对照膨化组PM	对照膨化加黑曲霉组PMA	对照膨化加枯草芽孢杆菌组PMB	SEM	P
聚合度Degree of polymerization	467.6^a	435.1^ab	414.3^b	458.7^a	397.7^bc	366.9^c	8.04	<0.01
结晶度 Crystallinity	25.3^d	27.0^b	26.5^c	26.3^c	28.6^a	27.8^b	0.27	<0.01
比表面积 Specific surface area	1.19^d	1.22^c	1.47^b	1.46^b	1.46^b	1.72^a	0.04	<0.01

不同处理对油菜秸秆养分、纤维结构和硫苷含量的影响

Effects of Different Treatments on the Nutrients, Fiber Structure, and Glucosinolate Contents in Rapeseed Straw

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 41

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王璐, 刘梦雨, 张富源, 纪守坤, 王云, 张英杰, 段春辉, 刘月琴, 严慧. 瘤胃源粪臭素降解菌的分离鉴定及其降解特性研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2024, 40(3): 305-311.
[2]	赵志祥, 王殿东, 周亚林, 王培, 严婉荣, 严蓓, 罗路云, 张卓. 枯草芽孢杆菌Ya-1对辣椒枯萎病的防治及其对根际真菌群落的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(9): 213-224.
[3]	杨冬, 唐璎. 枯草芽孢杆菌WTX1胞外酶降解AFB₁酶学特性及降解位点分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(4): 93-102.
[4]	高凯月, 郭雨婷, 杜奕谋, 郑小梅, 马欣荣, 赵伟, 郑平, 孙际宾. 黑曲霉葡萄糖吸收定量检测的方法建立及其在MstC功能研究中的应用[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(12): 71-80.
[5]	祖雪, 周瑚, 朱华珺, 任佐华, 刘二明. 枯草芽孢杆菌K-268的分离鉴定及对水稻稻瘟病的防病效果[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(6): 136-146.
[6]	薛鲜丽, 王静然, 毕杭杭, 王德培. 过表达Spt7对黑曲霉生长及抗逆性影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(5): 112-122.
[7]	马艳琴, 邱益彬, 李莎, 徐虹. 透明质酸的生物合成及其代谢工程的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(2): 252-262.
[8]	张倩, 徐春燕, 张铎, 王亚会, 梁新盈, 李慧. 黄褐土玉米秸秆腐解菌株筛选及其促腐能力研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(12): 233-243.
[9]	郭宇飞, 闫荣媚, 张小茹, 曹威, 刘浩. 代谢工程改造黑曲霉生产葡萄糖二酸[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(11): 227-237.
[10]	苗华彪, 曹艳, 杨梦瀚, 黄遵锡. 基于信号肽策略提高外源蛋白在枯草芽孢杆菌中的表达[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(6): 259-271.
[11]	李红叶, 陈立佼, 刘明丽, 郭天杰, 王道平, 潘映红, 赵明. 黑曲霉单宁酶基因Tan2克隆与表达[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(3): 44-52.
[12]	孟晓建, 于建东, 郑小梅, 郑平, 李志敏, 孙际宾, 叶勤. 小分子代谢物对黑曲霉己糖激酶和丙酮酸激酶的酶活调控[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(12): 180-190.
[13]	唐璎, 黄佳, 邓展瑞, 杨晓楠. 一株枯草芽孢杆菌降解黄曲霉毒素B₁产物分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(12): 82-90.
[14]	张维娇, 金学荣, 徐雅晴, 李江华, 堵国成, 康振. 枯草芽孢杆菌表达与调控工具相关研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(4): 26-33.
[15]	付首颖, 夏苗苗, 张祎凝, 刘川, 涂然, 张大伟. 核黄素工业菌株高通量筛选方法的建立和应用[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(4): 47-53.