Biotechnology Bulletin ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 89-95.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2019-0357

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Construction and Activity Analysis of the PLIN1 Gene CRISPR/Cas9 Vector

XU Xiang1, DONG Wei-peng1, ZHANG Shao-hua1, FENG Chen-yi1, LIU Tian-fu2, YAN Jiong1   

  1. 1. School of Public Health,Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan 030001;
    2. Laboratory Animal Center of Shanxi Medical University,Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan 030001
  • Received:2019-04-22 Online:2019-11-26 Published:2019-11-19

Abstract:

The objectives of this work are to design and validate the sgRNA being capable of targeted cleaving the PLIN1 gene and to lay a foundation for the establishment of a highly efficient PLIN1 gene-cleaved animal model. Three sgRNAs with favorable evaluation results were designed using predictive software. After adding T7 promoter,the corresponding sgRNA was transcribed in vitro to construct the digestive system and to verify the cleavage activity in vitro. The corresponding gene knockout plasmid vector was constructed,and the plasmid was transferred into 3T3-L1 preadipocytes by electroporation and induced to differentiate. The expression of PLIN1 mRNA in cells was detected by RT-PCR. The expression of PLIN1 protein in cells was detected by Western blot. Three sgRNAs of PLIN1 were successfully transcribed in vitro and the restriction enzyme system was constructed. The cleavage efficiency of sgRNA-PLIN1-1 was 61.8%±9.0%,and that of sgRNA-PLIN1-2 was 64.1%±9.6%. The cleavage efficiency of sgRNA-PLIN1-3 was 34.1%±7.2%,and that of sgRNA-PLIN1-3 group was significantly lower than that of sgRNA-PLIN1-1 group and sgRNA-PLIN1-2 group(P<0.05). The plasmid vector of three sgRNAs was successfully constructed and electroporated into 3T3-L1 preadipocytes,and the transfection efficiency was about 30%. The expression of PLIN1 mRNA in each positive interference group(P<0.01)significantly decreased at the 4th day after differentiation. Compared with sgRNA-PLIN1-3 group,there was a significant difference in the expression level of PLIN1 mRNA in sgRNA-PLIN1-1 group and sgRNA-PLIN1-2 group. The expression of PLIN1 protein in each positive interference group significantly decreased(P<0.01),and there was no significant difference in the expression of PLIN1 protein between the positive interference groups. In conclusion,all three sgRNAs may cleave the exon 2 of the PLIN1 gene in a target manner,and the cleavage activity of the gRNA-PLIN1-1 group and the sgRNA-PLIN1-2 group is slightly higher than that of the sgRNA-PLIN1-3 group. In vitro active cleavage experiments may well predict intracellular cleavage and are an effective means of screening highly active sgRNA.

Key words: PLIN1 gene, CRISPR/Cas9, sgRNA, vector construction, cleavage efficiency