生物技术通报 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 66-71.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2017.02.010

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

重金属污染土壤的植物仿生和植物修复比较研究

郝大程1, 周建强2, 王闯1, 韩君2   

  1. 1. 大连交通大学环境化工学院 生物技术研究所,大连 116028;
    2. 北京新源国能科技集团股份有限公司,北京 100016
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-14 出版日期:2017-02-26 发布日期:2017-02-08
  • 作者简介:郝大程,男,副教授,研究方向:植物生物技术;E-mail:hao@djtu.edu.cn;并列第一作者:周建强,男,工程师,研究方向:环境污染修复;E-mail:995774933@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省自然科学基金项目(2015020663),大连交通大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目(2016)

Plant Bionic Remediation and Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal-contaminated Soil

HAO Da-Cheng1, ZHOU Jian-qiang2, WANG Chuang1, HAN Jun2   

  1. 1. School of Environment and Chemical Engineering/Biotechnology Institute,Dalian Jiaotong University,Dalian 116028;
    2. Beijing E & E Technologies Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100016;
  • Received:2016-07-14 Published:2017-02-26 Online:2017-02-08

摘要: 土壤是人类赖以生存和发展的重要物质基础,但是随着工业化、城市化的快速推进,我国面临的土壤环境安全问题日益严峻。探讨新型植物仿生修复技术修复重金属污染土壤的可行性,采用基于植物仿生的重金属污染土壤原位自持修复技术,研究该方法对重金属污染土壤的修复能力。研究不同填充材料(海泡石、高岭土、活性炭、硅藻土)的仿生修复装置修复同一种金属离子(铅、铬、镉或锌)的效果和同一填充材料的仿生修复装置对不同金属离子的修复效果,并首次将植物仿生修复与植物修复效果进行对比。结果显示,植物仿生修复装置对不同的重金属离子具有不同的降低效率,海泡石组Cr含量降低最多,4种填料均显著降低褐土Zn和Cd含量,含硅藻土的装置Pb去除率最高。这与重金属本身性质有一定关系,也与吸附填料类型相关,同时与重金属含量及饱和吸附位点密切相关。与单纯植物修复比较,仿生修复与植物修复联用,显著降低红土Cd和Pb含量,且对植物富集Cd和Pb无消极影响,同时海泡石+硅藻土+高岭土+活性炭组填料中Pb和Cd含量高于其它填料组合。该技术可以与植物修复技术、微生物修复技术、物理-化学修复技术等联用,构建污染土壤的复合修复技术。植物仿生修复作为一种新型修复技术可以有效降低土壤重金属含量。在同一条件下,植物仿生修复与植物修复相比,效率较高,吸附重金属的量较大。

关键词: 重金属污染, 土壤, 仿生修复, 植物修复

Abstract: Soil is essential for human survival and development. With the rapid advance of industrialization and urbanization,China is undergoing the increasingly serious soil pollutions. The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility of the novel plant bionic remediation and compare the effects of plant bionic remediation and phytoremediation on the heavy metal-contaminated soil. The effects of different filling materials of the bionic device,i.e.,sepiolite,kaolin,activated carbon,and diatomite,on the same metal ion(cadmium,chromium,zinc,or lead),as well as the effects of the same filling material on the different metal ions,were investigated,and the effects of bionic remediation and phytoremediation were compared. Results showed that the bionic device differentially reduced four heavy metal ions. Cr of brown earth reduced most significantly in the sepiolite group,Zn and Cd dramatically reduced by all four types of filling materials,while diatomite-containing equipment was the most efficient in reducing Pb. This was correlated with the different features of heavy metals and the type of filling materials,closely correlated with the heavy metal abundance of soil and the saturated adsorption sites. Compared with single phytoremediation,the combined use of bionic remediation and phytoremediation substantially decreased Cd and Pb in red earth,and this approach caused no negative effects on the Cd and Pb accumulation in Brassica campestris,while Pb and Cd of filling materials were higher in sepiolite+diatomite+kaolin+activated carbon than in other types of filling materials. The bionic technology may be combined with phytoremediation,microbial remediation,and physicochemical remediation to perform the hybrid restoration of contaminated soil. The plant bionic remediation,as a novel restoration technology,may cost-effectively reduce the content of heavy metals in soil. Under the same conditions,the bionic remediation demonstrates higher efficiency and much better adsorption of heavy metals than phytoremediation.

Key words: heavy metal pollution, soil, bionic remediation, phytoremediation