生物技术通报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 56-69.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2020-0702
张秫华1(), 方千1, 贾红梅1, 韩桂琪1,2, 严铸云1, 何冬梅1()
收稿日期:
2020-06-08
出版日期:
2021-04-26
发布日期:
2021-05-13
作者简介:
张秫华,女,硕士研究生,研究方向:药用植物微生态;E-mail:基金资助:
ZHANG Shu-hua1(), FANG Qian1, JIA Hong-mei1, HAN Gui-qi1,2, YAN Zhu-yun1, HE Dong-mei1()
Received:
2020-06-08
Published:
2021-04-26
Online:
2021-05-13
摘要:
获知并比较川芎非根际、根际与川芎根茎内生真菌的群落结构特征及其差异。利用高通量测序技术分析川芎非根际土(S)、根际土(R)及川芎根茎(P)的真菌群落结构及差异;采用FUNGuild分析真菌群落功能。川芎非根际土、根际土及川芎根茎中皆含有丰富的真菌类群,真菌群落均匀度和多样性表现为S>R>P,丰富度表现为R>S>P。在不同分类水平下,3组样本皆具各自的优势菌群。川芎非根际与根茎的真菌群落差异最大,根际土与植物次之,土壤之间差异最小。川芎非根际、根际及根茎内生真菌皆具有产地差异,且大小为S>R>P,环境因子对非根际及根际菌群影响效应为S>R。川芎非根际土真菌以腐生型为主,其次为病原菌型,根际土真菌以病原菌型为主,腐生型次之,川芎内生菌则以病原菌型真菌为主。从非根际土到根际土再到川芎根茎内部,真菌菌群结构特征及菌群生态功能呈连续的渐次性变化,证明川芎在栽培过程中,从产地土壤中获得部分物种并发生了连续积累或消减,形成特定的内生菌群,是其微生态群落结构构建的重要策略,这为理解中药道地性品质形成提供了科学参考。
张秫华, 方千, 贾红梅, 韩桂琪, 严铸云, 何冬梅. 川芎非根际、根际及根茎内生真菌群落差异分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(4): 56-69.
ZHANG Shu-hua, FANG Qian, JIA Hong-mei, HAN Gui-qi, YAN Zhu-yun, HE Dong-mei. Difference Analysis of Fungal Community Among Bulk Soil,Rhizosphere and Rhizomes of Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort.[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2021, 37(4): 56-69.
产区 Origin area | 样点名称 Sample name | 地址Address | 土壤类型Soil type | 栽培方式Planting model | 样品编号Sample No. | 纬度Latitude(N°) | 经度Longitude (E°) | 海拔Altitude /m | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非根际土Bulk soil/S | 根际土Rhizosphere soil/R | 根茎Rhizome/P | ||||||||
石羊(SY) | SY1 | 都江堰市石羊镇 | 灰壤土 | 农户散种 | SSY1 | RSY1 | PSY1 | 30.84 | 103.67 | 619 |
石羊(SY) | SY2 | 都江堰市石羊镇 | 灰壤土 | 农户散种 | SSY2 | RSY2 | PSY2 | 30.83 | 103.68 | 603 |
石羊(SY) | SY3 | 都江堰市石羊镇 | 灰壤土 | 农户散种 | SSY3 | RSY3 | PSY3 | 30.84 | 103.67 | 577 |
石羊(SY) | SY4 | 都江堰市石羊镇 | 灰壤土 | 农户散种 | SSY4 | RSY4 | PSY4 | 30.82 | 103.67 | 591 |
石羊(SY) | SY5 | 都江堰市石羊镇 | 灰壤土 | 农户散种 | SSY5 | RSY5 | PSY5 | 30.84 | 103.65 | 574 |
石羊(SY) | SY6 | 都江堰市石羊镇 | 灰壤土 | 承包种植 | SSY6 | RSY6 | PSY6 | 30.83 | 103.66 | 597 |
眉山(MS) | XW | 眉山市修文镇 | 沙壤土 | 承包种植 | SXW | RXW | PXW | 30.01 | 103.70 | 398 |
眉山(MS) | YS | 眉山市永寿镇 | 红壤土 | 农户散种 | SYS | RYS | PYS | 29.99 | 103.85 | 364 |
眉山(MS) | XJ | 眉山市谢家镇 | 红黏土 | 农户散种 | SXJ | RXJ | PXJ | 30.22 | 103.79 | 394 |
彭州(PZ) | PZ | 彭州市敖平镇 | 灰壤土 | 承包种植 | SPZ | RPZ | PAP | 30.10 | 103.99 | 560 |
崇州(CZ) | CZ | 崇州市梓潼镇 | 灰壤土 | 农户散种 | SCZ | RCZ | PCZ | 30.75 | 103.67 | 563 |
邛崃(QL) | QL | 邛崃市回龙镇 | 棕黏土 | 承包种植 | SQL | RQL | PQL | 30.30 | 103.68 | 435 |
表1 川芎样品采集样地信息
Table 1 Sampling plot information of L. chuanxiong Hort.
产区 Origin area | 样点名称 Sample name | 地址Address | 土壤类型Soil type | 栽培方式Planting model | 样品编号Sample No. | 纬度Latitude(N°) | 经度Longitude (E°) | 海拔Altitude /m | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非根际土Bulk soil/S | 根际土Rhizosphere soil/R | 根茎Rhizome/P | ||||||||
石羊(SY) | SY1 | 都江堰市石羊镇 | 灰壤土 | 农户散种 | SSY1 | RSY1 | PSY1 | 30.84 | 103.67 | 619 |
石羊(SY) | SY2 | 都江堰市石羊镇 | 灰壤土 | 农户散种 | SSY2 | RSY2 | PSY2 | 30.83 | 103.68 | 603 |
石羊(SY) | SY3 | 都江堰市石羊镇 | 灰壤土 | 农户散种 | SSY3 | RSY3 | PSY3 | 30.84 | 103.67 | 577 |
石羊(SY) | SY4 | 都江堰市石羊镇 | 灰壤土 | 农户散种 | SSY4 | RSY4 | PSY4 | 30.82 | 103.67 | 591 |
石羊(SY) | SY5 | 都江堰市石羊镇 | 灰壤土 | 农户散种 | SSY5 | RSY5 | PSY5 | 30.84 | 103.65 | 574 |
石羊(SY) | SY6 | 都江堰市石羊镇 | 灰壤土 | 承包种植 | SSY6 | RSY6 | PSY6 | 30.83 | 103.66 | 597 |
眉山(MS) | XW | 眉山市修文镇 | 沙壤土 | 承包种植 | SXW | RXW | PXW | 30.01 | 103.70 | 398 |
眉山(MS) | YS | 眉山市永寿镇 | 红壤土 | 农户散种 | SYS | RYS | PYS | 29.99 | 103.85 | 364 |
眉山(MS) | XJ | 眉山市谢家镇 | 红黏土 | 农户散种 | SXJ | RXJ | PXJ | 30.22 | 103.79 | 394 |
彭州(PZ) | PZ | 彭州市敖平镇 | 灰壤土 | 承包种植 | SPZ | RPZ | PAP | 30.10 | 103.99 | 560 |
崇州(CZ) | CZ | 崇州市梓潼镇 | 灰壤土 | 农户散种 | SCZ | RCZ | PCZ | 30.75 | 103.67 | 563 |
邛崃(QL) | QL | 邛崃市回龙镇 | 棕黏土 | 承包种植 | SQL | RQL | PQL | 30.30 | 103.68 | 435 |
图1 川芎非根际土、根际土真菌及内生真菌物种曲线 A:Pan曲线;B:Core曲线;S:非根际土;R:根际土;P:川芎根茎
Fig. 1 Species curves of bulk、rhizosphere soil and endophytic fungi in L. chuanxiong Hort. A: Pan curve. B: Core curve. S: Bulk soil. R: Rhizosphere soil. P: Rhizome of, L. chuanxiong Hort.
样本类型Sample type | 香农指数 Shannon index | 辛普森指数Simpson index | Ace指数 Ace index | Chao指数 Chao index | Coverage指数Coverage index | Shannon even指数Shannon even index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非根际土Bulk soil(S) | 4.6244a | 0.0376c | 1090.68b | 1089.08b | 0.9942b | 0.6816a |
根际土Rhizosphere soil(R) | 3.9585b | 0.0661b | 1292.43a | 1190.61a | 0.9918c | 0.5879b |
川芎根茎Rhizome(P) | 1.8919c | 0.3401a | 400.24c | 355.53c | 0.9976a | 0.3431c |
表2 川芎非根际土真菌、根际土真菌及内生真菌的α多样性指数
Table 2 α diversity indices of bulk soil, rhizosphere soil and endophytic fungi in L. chuanxiong Hort.
样本类型Sample type | 香农指数 Shannon index | 辛普森指数Simpson index | Ace指数 Ace index | Chao指数 Chao index | Coverage指数Coverage index | Shannon even指数Shannon even index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非根际土Bulk soil(S) | 4.6244a | 0.0376c | 1090.68b | 1089.08b | 0.9942b | 0.6816a |
根际土Rhizosphere soil(R) | 3.9585b | 0.0661b | 1292.43a | 1190.61a | 0.9918c | 0.5879b |
川芎根茎Rhizome(P) | 1.8919c | 0.3401a | 400.24c | 355.53c | 0.9976a | 0.3431c |
门Phylum | 非根际土Bulk soil(S) | 根际土Rhizosphere soil(R) | 川芎根茎Rhizome (P) |
---|---|---|---|
子囊菌门Ascomycota*** | 59.60% | 71.43% | 90.05% |
担子菌门Basidiomycota*** | 14.52% | 16.20% | 7.843% |
被孢菌门Mortierellomycota*** | 14.8% | 8.397% | 0.9983% |
罗兹菌门Rozellomycota*** | 1.787% | 0.7173% | 0.0467% |
表3 川芎非根际、根际及内生真菌优势门相对丰度
Table 3 Relative abundance of dominate fungal commun-ities in bulk soil, rhizosphere soil and endophytic fungi of L. chuanxiong Hort. at Phylum level
门Phylum | 非根际土Bulk soil(S) | 根际土Rhizosphere soil(R) | 川芎根茎Rhizome (P) |
---|---|---|---|
子囊菌门Ascomycota*** | 59.60% | 71.43% | 90.05% |
担子菌门Basidiomycota*** | 14.52% | 16.20% | 7.843% |
被孢菌门Mortierellomycota*** | 14.8% | 8.397% | 0.9983% |
罗兹菌门Rozellomycota*** | 1.787% | 0.7173% | 0.0467% |
属名Genus | 川芎根茎Rhizome (P) | 根际土Rhizosphere soil(R) | 非根际土Bulk soil(S) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
小不整球壳菌属 | Plectosphaerella*** | 50.80% | 16.54% | 1.71% |
尾孢属 | Cercospora*** | 10.66% | 5.07% | - |
粪壳菌目未定属 | Unclassified Sordariomycetes | 8.74% | 4.30% | 5.20% |
球腔菌属 | Phaeosphaeria*** | 6.08% | 20.33% | 32.63% |
Dactylonectria*** | 5.37% | 2.65% | - | |
丝核菌属 | Rhizoctonia*** | 4.01% | - | - |
Calophoma*** | 2.76% | 2.19% | - | |
镰孢菌属 | Fusarium* | 2.19% | 2.52% | 3.72% |
小丛壳目未定属 | Unclassified Glomerellales*** | 1.84% | 1.84% | - |
异茎点霉属 | Paraphoma*** | 1.45% | - | - |
丛赤壳科未定属 | Unclassified Nectriaceae | 1.10% | - | - |
孢霉属 | Mortierella*** | - | 7.82% | 14.09% |
Unclassified Fungi*** | - | 2.02% | 7.68% | |
Saitozyma*** | - | 1.27% | 4.94% | |
格孢菌目未定属 | Unclassified Pleosporales*** | - | 1.10% | 2.01% |
芽枝霉属 | Cladosporium*** | - | 7.32% | 1.32% |
赤霉菌属 | Gibberella | - | 1.33% | - |
Cadophora*** | - | 1.69% | - | |
葡萄孢属 | Botrytis*** | - | 1.89% | - |
链格孢霉属 | Alternaria*** | - | 3.57% | - |
柱枝双胞霉属 | Sarocladium*** | - | 1.11% | - |
酵母菌 | Vishniacozyma*** | - | 2.53% | - |
隱真菌門未定属 | Unclassified Rozellomycota*** | - | 1.08% | - |
锁霉属 | Itersonilia*** | - | 2.43% | - |
毛壳菌属 | Chaetomium*** | - | 1.14% | - |
附球菌属 | Epicoccum*** | - | 1.07% | - |
球囊菌门未定属 | Unclassified Mortierellomycota*** | - | 1.03% | - |
白僵菌属 | Beauveria*** | - | - | 3.64% |
柄孢壳属 | Zopfiella*** | - | - | 2.32% |
尾柄孢壳属 | Cercophora*** | - | - | 2.20% |
粪壳菌目未定属 | Unclassified Sordariales*** | - | - | 1.87% |
翅孢壳属 | Emericellopsis*** | - | - | 1.76% |
木霉属 | Trichoderma*** | - | - | 1.75% |
Neocosmospora*** | - | - | 1.47% | |
毛球壳科未定属 | Unclassified Lasiosphaeriaceae*** | - | - | 1.43% |
Unclassified Ascomycota*** | - | - | 1.22% | |
Apiotrichum*** | - | - | 1.04% | |
小带菌属 | Taeniolella*** | - | - | 1.04% |
表4 川芎非根际土、根际土及内生真菌中优势属的相对丰度
Table 4 Relative abundance of dominate fungal communities in bulk soil, rhizosphere soil and endophytic fungi of L. chuanxiong Hort. at genus level
属名Genus | 川芎根茎Rhizome (P) | 根际土Rhizosphere soil(R) | 非根际土Bulk soil(S) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
小不整球壳菌属 | Plectosphaerella*** | 50.80% | 16.54% | 1.71% |
尾孢属 | Cercospora*** | 10.66% | 5.07% | - |
粪壳菌目未定属 | Unclassified Sordariomycetes | 8.74% | 4.30% | 5.20% |
球腔菌属 | Phaeosphaeria*** | 6.08% | 20.33% | 32.63% |
Dactylonectria*** | 5.37% | 2.65% | - | |
丝核菌属 | Rhizoctonia*** | 4.01% | - | - |
Calophoma*** | 2.76% | 2.19% | - | |
镰孢菌属 | Fusarium* | 2.19% | 2.52% | 3.72% |
小丛壳目未定属 | Unclassified Glomerellales*** | 1.84% | 1.84% | - |
异茎点霉属 | Paraphoma*** | 1.45% | - | - |
丛赤壳科未定属 | Unclassified Nectriaceae | 1.10% | - | - |
孢霉属 | Mortierella*** | - | 7.82% | 14.09% |
Unclassified Fungi*** | - | 2.02% | 7.68% | |
Saitozyma*** | - | 1.27% | 4.94% | |
格孢菌目未定属 | Unclassified Pleosporales*** | - | 1.10% | 2.01% |
芽枝霉属 | Cladosporium*** | - | 7.32% | 1.32% |
赤霉菌属 | Gibberella | - | 1.33% | - |
Cadophora*** | - | 1.69% | - | |
葡萄孢属 | Botrytis*** | - | 1.89% | - |
链格孢霉属 | Alternaria*** | - | 3.57% | - |
柱枝双胞霉属 | Sarocladium*** | - | 1.11% | - |
酵母菌 | Vishniacozyma*** | - | 2.53% | - |
隱真菌門未定属 | Unclassified Rozellomycota*** | - | 1.08% | - |
锁霉属 | Itersonilia*** | - | 2.43% | - |
毛壳菌属 | Chaetomium*** | - | 1.14% | - |
附球菌属 | Epicoccum*** | - | 1.07% | - |
球囊菌门未定属 | Unclassified Mortierellomycota*** | - | 1.03% | - |
白僵菌属 | Beauveria*** | - | - | 3.64% |
柄孢壳属 | Zopfiella*** | - | - | 2.32% |
尾柄孢壳属 | Cercophora*** | - | - | 2.20% |
粪壳菌目未定属 | Unclassified Sordariales*** | - | - | 1.87% |
翅孢壳属 | Emericellopsis*** | - | - | 1.76% |
木霉属 | Trichoderma*** | - | - | 1.75% |
Neocosmospora*** | - | - | 1.47% | |
毛球壳科未定属 | Unclassified Lasiosphaeriaceae*** | - | - | 1.43% |
Unclassified Ascomycota*** | - | - | 1.22% | |
Apiotrichum*** | - | - | 1.04% | |
小带菌属 | Taeniolella*** | - | - | 1.04% |
图2 OTU单元下川芎非根际土、根际土及内生真菌的物种Venn图 S:非根际土;R:根际土;P:川芎根茎
Fig. 2 Venn diagram of species in bulk soil, rhizosphere soil and endophytic fungi of L. chuanxiong Hort. at OTU level S: Bulk soil. R: Rhizosphere soil. P: Rhizome of L. chuanxiong Hort
门Phylum | 科Family | 属Genus | OTU | 川芎根茎(P) Rhizome/% | 根际土(R) Rhizosphere soil | 非根际土(S) Bulk soil |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mortierellomycota | Mortierellaceae | Mortierella | OTU1750 | - | 3.46% | 8.82% |
OTU2102 | - | 1.11% | - | |||
OTU4724 | - | 1.01% | - | |||
Basidiomycota | Trimorphomycetaceae | Saitozyma | OTU4345 | - | 1.23% | 4.78% |
Ceratobasidiaceae | Rhizoctonia | OTU715 | 2.76 | - | - | |
Mrakiaceae | Itersonilia | OTU2716 | - | 2.43% | - | |
Symmetrosporaceae | Symmetrospora | OTU1456 | - | 1.04% | - | |
Bolbitiaceae | Panaeolus | OTU624 | - | 1.02% | - | |
Ascomycota | Chaetomiaceae | Zopfiella | OTU6720 | - | - | 2.00% |
Cladosporium | OTU2449 | - | 7.05% | 1.26% | ||
Cordycipitaceae | Beauveria | OTU7040 | - | - | 3.64% | |
Didymellaceae | Calophoma | OTU353 | 2.76 | 2.19% | - | |
Hypocreales_fam_Incertae_sedis | Emericellopsis | OTU6007 | - | - | 1.24% | |
Ustilaginoidea | OTU5447 | - | - | 1.04% | ||
Kirschsteiniotheliaceae | Taeniolella | OTU5740 | - | - | 1.22% | |
Lasiosphaeriaceae | Cercophora | OTU6331 | - | - | 1.20% | |
Mycosphaerellaceae | Cercospora | OTU111 | 10.66 | 5.07% | - | |
Nectriaceae | Fusarium | OTU2533 | - | 1.04% | 2.94% | |
Neocosmospora | OTU2848 | - | - | 1.40% | ||
Dactylonectria | OTU235 | 5.02 | 2.53% | - | ||
Fusarium | OTU733 | 1.13 | 1.15% | - | ||
Phaeosphaeriaceae | Phaeosphaeria | OTU7026 | - | 1.07% | - | |
Plectosphaerellaceae | Plectosphaerella | OTU1565 | 50.21 | 16.35% | 1.65% | |
Alternaria | OTU2299 | - | 3.57% | - | ||
Sclerotiniaceae | Botrytis | OTU2392 | - | 1.89% | - | |
Unclassified Sordariomycetes | Unclassified Sordariomycetes | OTU2573 | - | - | 1.19% | |
OTU164 | 8.10 | 2.24% | - | |||
Unclassified Glomerellales | Unclassified Glomerellales | OTU412 | 1.83 | 1.76% | - | |
Unclassified Pleosporales | Unclassified Pleosporales | OTU4233 | - | - | 1.79% | |
Others | 15.60 | 39.29% | 60.67% | |||
总计Total | 98.07 | 96.51% | 94.85% |
表5 川芎非根际土、根际土及内生真菌的优势物种(相对丰度>1%)相对丰度
Table 5 Relative abundance of dominant fungal composition (Relative abundance > 1%) in bulk soil, rhizosphere soil and endophytic fungi of L. chuanxiong Hort. at OTU level
门Phylum | 科Family | 属Genus | OTU | 川芎根茎(P) Rhizome/% | 根际土(R) Rhizosphere soil | 非根际土(S) Bulk soil |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mortierellomycota | Mortierellaceae | Mortierella | OTU1750 | - | 3.46% | 8.82% |
OTU2102 | - | 1.11% | - | |||
OTU4724 | - | 1.01% | - | |||
Basidiomycota | Trimorphomycetaceae | Saitozyma | OTU4345 | - | 1.23% | 4.78% |
Ceratobasidiaceae | Rhizoctonia | OTU715 | 2.76 | - | - | |
Mrakiaceae | Itersonilia | OTU2716 | - | 2.43% | - | |
Symmetrosporaceae | Symmetrospora | OTU1456 | - | 1.04% | - | |
Bolbitiaceae | Panaeolus | OTU624 | - | 1.02% | - | |
Ascomycota | Chaetomiaceae | Zopfiella | OTU6720 | - | - | 2.00% |
Cladosporium | OTU2449 | - | 7.05% | 1.26% | ||
Cordycipitaceae | Beauveria | OTU7040 | - | - | 3.64% | |
Didymellaceae | Calophoma | OTU353 | 2.76 | 2.19% | - | |
Hypocreales_fam_Incertae_sedis | Emericellopsis | OTU6007 | - | - | 1.24% | |
Ustilaginoidea | OTU5447 | - | - | 1.04% | ||
Kirschsteiniotheliaceae | Taeniolella | OTU5740 | - | - | 1.22% | |
Lasiosphaeriaceae | Cercophora | OTU6331 | - | - | 1.20% | |
Mycosphaerellaceae | Cercospora | OTU111 | 10.66 | 5.07% | - | |
Nectriaceae | Fusarium | OTU2533 | - | 1.04% | 2.94% | |
Neocosmospora | OTU2848 | - | - | 1.40% | ||
Dactylonectria | OTU235 | 5.02 | 2.53% | - | ||
Fusarium | OTU733 | 1.13 | 1.15% | - | ||
Phaeosphaeriaceae | Phaeosphaeria | OTU7026 | - | 1.07% | - | |
Plectosphaerellaceae | Plectosphaerella | OTU1565 | 50.21 | 16.35% | 1.65% | |
Alternaria | OTU2299 | - | 3.57% | - | ||
Sclerotiniaceae | Botrytis | OTU2392 | - | 1.89% | - | |
Unclassified Sordariomycetes | Unclassified Sordariomycetes | OTU2573 | - | - | 1.19% | |
OTU164 | 8.10 | 2.24% | - | |||
Unclassified Glomerellales | Unclassified Glomerellales | OTU412 | 1.83 | 1.76% | - | |
Unclassified Pleosporales | Unclassified Pleosporales | OTU4233 | - | - | 1.79% | |
Others | 15.60 | 39.29% | 60.67% | |||
总计Total | 98.07 | 96.51% | 94.85% |
图3 川芎非根际土、根际土及内生真菌的物种PCoA分析(A)、ANOSIM分析(B)及距离heatmap图(C) S:非根际土;R:根际土;P:川芎根茎;样品编号对应的产地信息见表1,“_1、_2、_3”代表3个重复样品
Fig. 3 PCoA analysis (A)、ANOSIM analysis (B) and distance heatmap analysis (C) of fungal composition in bulk soil, rhizosphere soil and endophytic fungi of L. chuanxiong Hort. S: Bulk soil. R: Rhizosphere soil. P: Rhizome of L. chuanxiong Hort. The location information of corresponding sample name is shown in Table 1. ‘1, _2, and _3’ refer to three duplicate samples
图4 川芎非根际土、根际土及内生真菌群落heatmap图 S组:非根际土;R组:根际土;P组:川芎根茎;样品编号对应的产地信息见表1
Fig. 4 Heatmap of fungal communities in bulk, rhizosphere soil and endophyte in L. chuanxiong Hort. S: Bulk soil. R: Rhizosphere soil. P: Rhizome of L. chuanxiong Hort. The information of corresponding sample name is in Table 1
水解氮 HN/(mg·kg-1) | 有效钾 AK/(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 AP/(mg·kg-1) | 有机质 OM/(mg·kg-1) | 总氮 TN/(mg·kg-1) | pH | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPZ | 187.8 | 209.0b | 4.800b | 33.50a | 1.650a | 5.96 |
SCZ | 205.7 | 199.0bc | 4.700b | 24.20c | 1360bc | 5.92 |
SQL | 210.5 | 233.0a | 14.80ab | 28.00b | 1.470ab | 5.72 |
SMS | 196.9 | 196.0bc | 33.96a | 23.30c | 1.270bc | 6.47 |
SSY | 213.4 | 190.2c | 15.93a | 28.43b | 1.520a | 6.43 |
r2 | 0.1825 | 0.2285 | 0.6247 | 0.1461 | 0.0863 | 0.1873 |
P | 0.034 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.088 | 0.228 | 0.029 |
表6 川芎非根际土壤环境因子及RDA分析结果表
Table 6 Environmental factors of bulk soil of L. chuanxiong Hort. and db-RDA analysis
水解氮 HN/(mg·kg-1) | 有效钾 AK/(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 AP/(mg·kg-1) | 有机质 OM/(mg·kg-1) | 总氮 TN/(mg·kg-1) | pH | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPZ | 187.8 | 209.0b | 4.800b | 33.50a | 1.650a | 5.96 |
SCZ | 205.7 | 199.0bc | 4.700b | 24.20c | 1360bc | 5.92 |
SQL | 210.5 | 233.0a | 14.80ab | 28.00b | 1.470ab | 5.72 |
SMS | 196.9 | 196.0bc | 33.96a | 23.30c | 1.270bc | 6.47 |
SSY | 213.4 | 190.2c | 15.93a | 28.43b | 1.520a | 6.43 |
r2 | 0.1825 | 0.2285 | 0.6247 | 0.1461 | 0.0863 | 0.1873 |
P | 0.034 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.088 | 0.228 | 0.029 |
图5 川芎非根际、根际真菌与环境因子RDA分析 A:川芎非根际土RDA分析;B:川芎根际土RDA分析;产地信息见表1
Fig. 5 RDA analysis of bulk soil and rhizosphere soil fungi with environmental factors in L. chuanxiong Hort A: RDA analysis of bulk soil. B: RDA analysis of rhizosphere soil. Origin area information is in Table 1
水解氮 HN/(mg·kg-1) | 有效钾 AK/(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 AP/(mg·kg-1) | 有机质 OM/(mg·kg-1) | 总氮 TN/(mg·kg-1) | pH | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPZ | 169.2a | 188.0 | 8.000b | 39.86 | 2.600 | 5.53b |
RCZ | 94.4b | 188.0 | 0.900b | 33.42 | 2.000 | 6.17ab |
RQL | 104.5b | 203.0 | 9.700ab | 29.88 | 1.760 | 5.73b |
RMS | 190.2a | 191.3 | 23.47a | 38.63 | 1.960 | 6.19ab |
RSY | 168.7a | 184.7 | 19.58a | 38.76 | 2.040 | 6.56a |
r2 | 0.044 | 0.2234 | 0.2158 | 0.1496 | 0.1373 | 0.1157 |
P | 0.474 | 0.014 | 0.016 | 0.081 | 0.101 | 0.145 |
表7 川芎根际土壤环境因子及RDA分析结果表
Table 7 Environmental factors of rhizosphere soil of L. chuanxiong Hort. and db-RDA analysis
水解氮 HN/(mg·kg-1) | 有效钾 AK/(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 AP/(mg·kg-1) | 有机质 OM/(mg·kg-1) | 总氮 TN/(mg·kg-1) | pH | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPZ | 169.2a | 188.0 | 8.000b | 39.86 | 2.600 | 5.53b |
RCZ | 94.4b | 188.0 | 0.900b | 33.42 | 2.000 | 6.17ab |
RQL | 104.5b | 203.0 | 9.700ab | 29.88 | 1.760 | 5.73b |
RMS | 190.2a | 191.3 | 23.47a | 38.63 | 1.960 | 6.19ab |
RSY | 168.7a | 184.7 | 19.58a | 38.76 | 2.040 | 6.56a |
r2 | 0.044 | 0.2234 | 0.2158 | 0.1496 | 0.1373 | 0.1157 |
P | 0.474 | 0.014 | 0.016 | 0.081 | 0.101 | 0.145 |
图6 川芎非根际土、根际土及内生真菌的物种真菌功能预测分析 A:不同营养型相对丰度;B:生态功能群相对丰度bar图;S:非根际土;R:根际土;P:川芎根茎
Fig. 6 FUNGuild analysis of the fungi in bulk soil and rhizosphere soils and endophytic fungi of L. chuanxiong Hort A: Relative abundance of trophic modes. B:Relative abundance of guilds. S: Bulk soil. R: Rhizosphere soil. P: Rhizome of L. chuanxiong Hort.
[1] | 张少鹏, 胥婷, 杨丽强, 等. 不同草原类型针茅根部内生真菌群落结构[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014(12):98-105. |
Zhang SP, Xu T, Yang LQ, et al. Endophytic fungal communities of Stipa sp. roots in different types of steppes in northern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014(12):98-105. | |
[2] | 付静, 刘堰凤, 梅眉, 等. 韭菜根际真菌和内生真菌种群多样性分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2018,33(S1):250-256. |
Fu J, Liu YF, Mei M, et al. Comparing analysis of diversity of Chinese Leek rhizospheritic and endophytic fungal communities[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2018,33(S1):250-256. | |
[3] |
Cordovez V, Diniandreote F, Carrion VJ, et al. Ecology and evolution of plant microbiomes[J]. Annual Review of Microbiology, 2019,73(1):69-88.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090817-062524 URL |
[4] | 李毳, 刘怡. 晋东南3种道地药材植物根际真菌群落特性[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019,28(7):1388-1393. |
Li C, Liu Y, Characteristics of rhizosphere fungal community of three genuine medicinal plants in southeast Shanxi province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2019,28(7):1388-1393. | |
[5] | 杨娟. 杜仲相关真菌群落组成及其对活性成分的影响[D]. 贵阳:贵州大学, 2019. |
Yang J. Community composition of the related fungi from Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. and its active constituents[D]. Guiyang:Guizhou University, 2019. | |
[6] | 吴林坤, 黄伟民, 王娟英, 等. 不同连作年限野生地黄根际土壤微生物群落多样性分[J]. 作物学报, 2015,41(2):308-317. |
Wu LK, Huang WM, Wang JY, et al. Diversity analysis of rhizosphere microflora of wild R. glutinosa grown in monocropping for different years[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015,41(2):308-317. | |
[7] | 李吉. 怀牛膝连作对根际土壤微生物群落结构和功能多样性的影响[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2013. |
Li J. The changes in rhizospheric microbial community structure and functional diversity of Achyranthes Bidentata mediated by consecutive monoculture[D]. Fuzhou:Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2013. | |
[8] | 张培, 赵林华, 张海宇, 等. 川芎临床应用及其用量[J]. 吉林中医药, 2019,39(3):309-312. |
Zhang P, Zhao LH, Zhang HY, et al. Exploration about the clinical application and dosage of the rhizome of Chuanxiong[J]. Jilin Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2019,39(3):309-312. | |
[9] | 刘圆, 贾敏如. 川芎品种、产地的历史考证[J]. 中药材, 2001,24(5):364-367. |
Liu Y, Jia MR. Historical investigation on the medicinal species and habitats of Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort.[J]. Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2001,24(5):364-367. | |
[10] | 银玲, 彭月, 陈鸿平, 等. 新老产地川芎中酚酸类成分的含量比较及川芎等级划分内涵研究[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2013,19(11):91-94. |
Yin L, Peng Y, Chen HP, et al. Comparison of the content of Phenolic acids in Ligusticum chuanxiong from new and traditional producing areas and the connotation of division grades[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae, 2013,19(11):91-94. | |
[11] | 陈林, 刘友平, 陈鸿平, 等. 电子鼻在川芎不同产地不同等级评价中的应用[J]. 中药与临床, 2013(4):7-10. |
Chen L, Liu YP, Chen HP, et al. Electronic Nose used in evaluating Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort. produced in different regions and of different levels[J]. Pharmacy and Clinics of Chinese Materia Medica, 2013(4):7-10. | |
[12] | 王光志, 吴清华, 李萍. 川芎根际土壤微生物多样性初步研究[C]. 中医药现代化国际科技大会, 2013. |
Wang GZ, Wu QH, Li P. Microbial communities diversity in rhizosphere soils of Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort. by PCR-DGGE[C]. International Conference on Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2013. | |
[13] | 汪杨丽, 严铸云, 郭晓恒, 等. 川芎内生真菌的分离与鉴定[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2008,33(9):999-1001. |
Wang LY, Yan ZY, Guo YH, et al. Isolation and identification of endophytic fungi from Ligusticum[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2008,33(9):999-1001. | |
[14] | 王海, 严铸云, 何冬梅, 等. 多产区川芎内生真菌菌群组成的PCR-DGGE分析[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2013,38(12):1893-1897. |
Wang H, Yan ZY, He DM, et al. Analysis of endophytic fungi community of Ligusticum chuanxiong using PCR-DGGE[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2013,38(12):1893-1897. | |
[15] | 严铸云, 汪杨丽, 郭晓恒, 等. 川芎内生真菌种群与川芎油的相关性分析[C]. 植物内生菌开发与应用学术研讨会, 2009. |
Yan ZY, Wang YL, Guo XH, et al. Correlation analysis of endophytic fungi community and volatile oil of Ligusticum chuanxiong[C]. Symposium on Development and Application of Plant Endophytes, 2009. | |
[16] | 李佳穗, 严铸云, 兰英, 等. 四川主产区川芎根腐病病原菌鉴定[J]. 中药材, 2015,38(3):443-446. |
Li JS, Yan ZY, Lan Y, et al. Identification of pathogens causing root rot disease on Ligusticum chuanxiong in Sichuan[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2015,38(3):443-446. | |
[17] | 何冬梅, 王海, 严铸云. 从川芎苓子中筛选根腐病拮抗性内生真菌的研究[EB]. 北京:中国科技论文在线 [2017-05-17]. |
He DM, Wang H, Yan ZY. Screening of antagonistic endophytic fungi to root rot of Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort. [EB]. Beijing:Sciencepaper Online [2017-05-17]. | |
[18] | 胡容平, 龚国淑, 叶慧丽, 等. 川芎根腐病防治初步研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2013,26(5):1873-1877. |
Hu RP, Gong GS, Ye HL, et al. Preliminary study on control effect to root rot disease of Ligusticum chuanxiong[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013,26(5):1873-1877. | |
[19] | 何冬梅. 川芎山地育苓的微生态机制研究[D]. 成都:成都中医药大学, 2016. |
He DM. Mechanism study on microbial ecology of mountain-breeding nodes of Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort.[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2016. | |
[20] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
Bao SD. Soil agrochemical analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000. | |
[21] | 杨剑虹, 王成林, 代亨林. 土壤农化分析与环境监测[M]. 北京: 中国大地出版社, 2008. |
Yang JH, Wang CL, Dai HL. Soil agrochemical analysis and environmental monitoring[M]. Beijing: China Land Press, 2008. | |
[22] | 中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T1121. 7-2014 中华人民共和国农业行业标准[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005. |
Ministry of agriculture of the people’s Republic of China. NY/T1121. 7-2014 Agricultural industry standard of the People’s Republic of China[S]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2005. | |
[23] | 中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T 889-2004 中华人民共和国农业行业标准[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005. |
Ministry of agriculture of the People’s Republic of China. NY/T 889-2004 Agricultural industry standard of the People’s Republic of China[S]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2005. | |
[24] | 国家林业局. LY/T 1228-2015. 中华人民共和国林业行业标准[S]. 北京: 国家标准出版社, 2015. |
The state forestry administration of the People’s Republic of China LY/T 1228-2015 LY/T 1228-2015. Forestry industry standards of the People’s Republic of China[S]. Beijing: National Standards Press, 2015. | |
[25] | 李莹, 秦明一, 张超, 等. 黄瓜内生真菌对根结线虫生防活性测定[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2016,55(3):634-637. |
Li Y, Qin MY, Zhang C, et al. Biocontrol against Meloidogyne incognita by an endophytic fungus Plectosphaerella sp. from cucumber root galls[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2016,55(3):634-637. | |
[26] |
Atkins SD, Clark IM, Sosnowska D, et al. Detection and quantification of Plectosphaerella cucumerina, a potential biological control agent of potato cyst nematodes, by using conventional PCR, Real-Time PCR, selective media, and baiting[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003,69(8):4788-4793.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4788-4793.2003 URL |
[27] |
Glynou K, Nam B, Thines M, et al. Facultative root-colonizing fungi dominate endophytic assemblages in roots of nonmycorrhizal Microthlaspi species[J]. New Phytologist, 2018,217(3):1190-1202.
doi: 10.1111/nph.14873 URL |
[28] |
Nguyen NH, Song Z, Bates ST, et al. FUNGuild:An open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild[J]. Fungal Ecology, 2016,20:241-248.
doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006 URL |
[29] |
Noah, Fierer. Embracing the unknown:disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome[J]. Nature reviews Microbiology, 2017,15(10):579-590.
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87 URL |
[30] |
Zhu L, Wei Z, Yang T, et al. Core microorganisms promote the transformation of DOM fractions with different molecular weights to improve the stability during composting[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020,299:122575.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122575 URL |
[31] | 汪杨丽, 严铸云. 川芎内生真菌种群稳定性研究[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2009,20(12):2948-2949. |
Wang YL, Yan ZY. Population stability of endophytic fungi in Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort[J]. Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research, 2009,20(12):2948-2949. | |
[32] |
Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Plme S, et al. Fungal biogeography. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi[J]. Science, 2014,346(6213):1256688.
doi: 10.1126/science.1256688 URL |
[33] |
Edwards J, Johnson C, Santos-Medellín C, et al. Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015,112(8):911-920.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414592112 pmid: 25605935 |
[1] | 赵志祥, 王殿东, 周亚林, 王培, 严婉荣, 严蓓, 罗路云, 张卓. 枯草芽孢杆菌Ya-1对辣椒枯萎病的防治及其对根际真菌群落的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(9): 213-224. |
[2] | 赵光绪, 杨合同, 邵晓波, 崔志豪, 刘红光, 张杰. 一株高效溶磷产红青霉培养条件优化及其溶磷特性[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(9): 71-83. |
[3] | 方澜, 黎妍妍, 江健伟, 成胜, 孙正祥, 周燚. 盘龙参内生真菌胞内细菌7-2H的分离鉴定和促生特性研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(8): 272-282. |
[4] | 谢田朋, 张佳宁, 董永骏, 张建, 景明. 早期抽薹对当归根际土壤微环境的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(7): 206-218. |
[5] | 赵林艳, 徐武美, 王豪吉, 王昆艳, 魏富刚, 杨绍周, 官会林. 施用生物炭对连作三七根际真菌群落与存活率的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(7): 219-227. |
[6] | 徐红云, 吕俊, 于存. 根际溶磷伯克霍尔德菌Paraburkholderia spp.对马尾松苗的促生作用[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(6): 274-285. |
[7] | 李琦, 杨晓蕾, 李晓林, 申友磊, 李建宏, 姚拓. 高寒草地燕麦根际解植酸磷促生菌鉴定及其优势菌假单胞菌属菌株功能特性[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(3): 243-253. |
[8] | 申云鑫, 施竹凤, 周旭东, 李铭刚, 张庆, 冯路遥, 陈齐斌, 杨佩文. 三株具生防功能芽孢杆菌的分离鉴定及其生物活性研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(3): 267-277. |
[9] | 易希, 廖红东, 郑井元. 植物内生真菌防治根结线虫研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(3): 43-51. |
[10] | 孙海航, 官会林, 王旭, 王童, 李泓霖, 彭文洁, 刘柏桢, 樊芳玲. 生物炭对三七连作土壤性质及真菌群落的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(2): 221-231. |
[11] | 孙卓, 王妍, 韩忠明, 王云贺, 赵淑杰, 杨利民. 防风根际真菌的分离鉴定及其生防潜力评价[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(1): 264-273. |
[12] | 江美彦, 周杨, 刘仁浪, 姚菲, 杨云舒, 侯凯, 冯冬菊, 吴卫. 白芷根际促生菌的筛选及其促生效果研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(8): 167-178. |
[13] | 王子夜, 王志刚, 阎爱华. 不同树龄桑根际土壤原生生物群落组成多样性[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(8): 206-215. |
[14] | 陈天赐, 武少兰, 杨国辉, 江丹霞, 江玉姬, 陈炳智. 无柄灵芝醇提物对小鼠睡眠及肠道菌群的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(8): 225-232. |
[15] | 沈佳佳, 侯小改, 王二强, 王菲, 郭丽丽. 油用牡丹根际解有机磷细菌的筛选及解磷功能研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(6): 157-165. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||