木本饲料青贮研究进展

doi:10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2021-0913

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着我国畜牧业迅速发展,对优质粗饲料的需求日渐增加,使饲草的供应越来越紧缺,因而寻求可缓解传统饲料不足的新型饲料变得尤为重要。木本饲料是一种新型饲料,具有资源丰富、产量高、粗蛋白含量高等特点,合理开发利用可缓解我国畜多草少的压力。青贮可高质量保存和保全饲草营养养分,是木本饲料重要的贮藏方式。近年来,与木本饲料青贮相关的研究逐渐增多。本文总结了木本饲料营养特点及其影响因素、自然青贮发酵特性及其影响因素及木本饲料青贮在畜禽生产中的应用,并对后续研究方向做出建议,以期为木本饲料青贮利用和发展提供参考依据。

关键词: 木本饲料, 青贮品质, 微生物多样性, 研究进展

Abstract:

With the rapid development of animal husbandry in China,the demand for high-quality roughage is growingly increasing,and the supply of forage is more and more scarce. Therefore,it is important to exploit new forage which can alleviate the shortage of traditional forage. Woody forage is a new type of forage that is characterized by abundant resources,high yield and high crude protein content. Reasonable development and utilization of woody forage may alleviate the shortage of forage resources. Silage is an important storage method of woody forage,which can preserve forage nutrients with high quality. In recent years,more and more researches have being focused on woody forage silages. This paper summarized the nutritional characteristics,quality of natural ensiling,improvement methods of woody forage silages,application of woody forage silages in livestock production and brought out suggestions for future research,aiming at providing reference for the utilization and development of woody forage silages.

Key words: woody forage, silage quality, microbial diversity, research progress

张颖超, 尹守亮, 王一炜, 王学凯, 杨富裕. 木本饲料青贮研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(9): 48-57.

ZHANG Ying-chao, YIN Shou-liang, WANG Yi-wei, WANG Xue-kai, YANG Fu-yu. Research Progress in Woody Forage Silage[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2021, 37(9): 48-57.

参考文献 67

[1]	Zhang YC, Wang XK, Li DX, et al. Impact of wilting and additives on fermentation quality and carbohydrate composition of mulberry silage[J]. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 2019:254-263.
[2]	韩彦明. 全球大豆市场趋势及饲料蛋白的选择与利用[J]. 兽医导刊, 2020(5):5-6.
	Han YM. Global soybean market trend and the selection or utilization of feed protein[J]. Vet Orientat, 2020(5):5-6.
[3]	王辽卫. 2019年饲料粮市场供需形势回顾及2020年展望[J]. 广东饲料, 2020, 29(1):21-23.
	Wang LW. Review of supply and demand situation of feed grain market in 2019 and prospect in 2020[J]. Guangdong Feed, 2020, 29(1):21-23.
[4]	王丽. 构树的饲用价值及在反刍动物上的应用研究进展[J]. 中国奶牛, 2019(12):25-28.
	Wang L. Advances in research on the feeding value of paper mulberry and their application in ruminants[J]. China Dairy Cattle, 2019(12):25-28.
[5]	王梓贞, 李相全. 适于北方高寒地区种植的11种木本饲料树种饲用营养成分评定[J]. 畜牧产业, 2020(8):65-68.
	Wang ZZ, Li XQ. Evaluation of nutrients of 11 woody forage species suitable for planting in northern Alpine Region[J]. Animal Agric, 2020(8):65-68.
[6]	于晨晨, 汪佑佑, 李文清, 等. 青贮饲料技术研究进展与问题展望[J]. 饲料研究, 2021, 44(12):145-148.
	Yu CC, Wang YY, Li WQ, et al. Research progress and problems prospect of silage technology[J]. Feed Res, 2021, 44(12):145-148.
[7]	武晓宏, 杨风宝, 刘旭. 饲料苜蓿中粗蛋白含量的测定及分析——谈宁夏中卫市的饲料监管措施[J]. 中国动物保健, 2009, 11(8):98-99.
	Wu XH, Yang FB, Liu X. Determination and analysis of crude protein content in forage alfalfa—discussion on feed supervision measures in Zhongwei city of Ningxia[J]. China Animal Heal, 2009, 11(8):98-99.
[8]	Silva VP, Pereira OG, Leandro ES, et al. Effects of lactic acid bacteria with bacteriocinogenic potential on the fermentation profile and chemical composition of alfalfa silage in tropical conditions[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2016, 99(3):1895-1902. doi: S0022-0302(16)00033-3 pmid: 26774723
[9]	Tao L, Zhou H, Zhang N, et al. Effects of different source additives and wilt conditions on the pH value, aerobic stability, and carbohydrate and protein fractions of alfalfa silage[J]. Anim Sci J, 2017, 88(1):99-106. doi: 10.1111/asj.2017.88.issue-1 URL
[10]	张浩雯. 植物乳杆菌阿魏酸酯酶LP₀796底物识别与催化机制[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2021.
	Zhang HW. Substrate recognition and catalytic mechanisms of feruloyl esterase LP₀796 from Lactobacillus plantarum[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2021.
[11]	李乔仙, 薛世明, 黄必志, 等. 两种野生木本植物饲用价值研究[J]. 中国草食动物科学, 2020, 40(5):37-41.
	Li QX, Xue SM, Huang BZ, et al. Study on feeding value of two species of wild woody plants[J]. China Herbiv Sci, 2020, 40(5):37-41.
[12]	刘芳, 敖常伟. 刺槐叶蛋白的营养价值评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2007, 27(6):53-57, 62.
	Liu F, Ao CW. Evaluation of the nutritive value of leaf proteins from Robinia pseudoacacia[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2007, 27(6):53-57, 62.
[13]	张颖超, 李东霞, 庞帝琼, 等. 四倍体刺槐青贮营养品质动态变化及发酵特性[J]. 草学, 2018(S1):41-42.
	Zhang YC, Li DX, Pang DQ, et al. Nutritional dynamics and fermentation characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia silage[J]. J Grassland Forage Sci, 2018(S1):41-42.
[14]	王益, 王学凯, 周玮, 等. 含水量及添加剂对黄梁木叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2018, 39(4):80-86.
	Wang Y, Wang XK, Zhou W, et al. Effects of moisture content and additive on silage quality of Neolamarckia cadamba leaves[J]. J South China Agric Univ, 2018, 39(4):80-86.
[15]	邓凯东, 陈玉华, 茅慧华, 等. 调制方法对桑叶青贮营养成分和活性物质含量的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2021, 44(11):90-93.
	Deng KD, Chen YH, Mao HH, et al. Effect of ensiling methods on the content of nutrients and biologically active substances of mulberry leaf silage[J]. Feed Res, 2021, 44(11):90-93.
[16]	Zhang YC, Li DX, Wang XK, et al. Fermentation quality and aerobic stability of mulberry silage prepared with lactic acid bacteria and propionic acid[J]. Anim Sci J, 2019, 90(4):513-522. doi: 10.1111/asj.2019.90.issue-4 URL
[17]	司丙文, 王宗礼, 孙启忠, 等. 尖叶胡枝子青贮微生物数量变化及发酵特性[J]. 草业科学, 2012, 29(4):650-657.
	Si BW, Wang ZL, Sun QZ, et al. Fermentation characteristics and changes of lactic acid bacteria isolated from ensiling Lespedeza hedysaroides[J]. Pratacultural Sci, 2012, 29(4):650-657.
[18]	于明, 刘素杰, 程波, 等. 构树叶的营养成分分析及与刺槐树叶的营养比较[J]. 辽宁农业职业技术学院学报, 2012, 14(4):15-16.
	Yu M, Liu SJ, Cheng B, et al. Comparison of nutritional components in Broussonetia papyrifera leaves and Robinia pseudoacacia leaves[J]. J Liaoning Agric Coll, 2012, 14(4):15-16.
[19]	李美如, 陈攀亮, 赵文康, 等. 刈割茬次对杂交构树青贮发酵品质和营养价值的影响[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2021, 53(1):43-47.
	Li MR, Chen PL, Zhao WK, et al. Effect of clipping stubbles on fermentation quality and nutrient components of hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera silage[J]. Animal Husb Vet Med, 2021, 53(1):43-47.
[20]	郝阳毅, 何雅琴, 刘高坤, 等. 不同留茬高度对构树产量、营养成分及其青贮品质和体外发酵的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020, 32(5):2387-2396.
	Hao YY, He YQ, Liu GK, et al. Effects of different cutting heights on yield, nutritional composition, silage fermentation quality and in vitro fermentation of hybrid paper mulberry[J]. Chin J Animal Nutr, 2020, 32(5):2387-2396.
[21]	宿爱芝. 辣木栽培技术与生物量关系的研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2012.
	Su AZ. The study of output compose physiology of morinsa oleifera cultivated for leaves[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2012.
[22]	吕竑建, 郭香, 陈德奎, 等. 植物乳酸菌和贮藏温度对辣木叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3):121-128.
	Lv HJ, Guo X, Chen DK, et al. Effect of lactic acid bacteria and storage temperature on the quality of Moringa oleifera leaf silage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sin, 2021, 30(3):121-128.
[23]	孙双印, 侯向阳, 卢欣石. 二十一世纪的绿色神奇功能饲料植物——饲料桑[J]. 中国奶牛, 2007(2):53-54.
	Sun SY, Hou XY, Lu XS. A green and magic functional feed plant in the 21st century --mulberry[J]. China Dairy Cattle, 2007(2):53-54.
[24]	吴頔, 蔡志华, 魏烨昕, 等. 辣木作为新型植物性蛋白质饲料的研究进展[J]. 动物营养学报, 2013, 25(3):503-511.
	Wu D, Cai ZH, Wei YX, et al. Research advances in Moringa as a new plant protein feed[J]. Chin J Animal Nutr, 2013, 25(3):503-511.
[25]	Pandey A, Negi PS. Traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological properties of Neolamarckia cadamba:a review[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2016, 181:118-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.01.036 pmid: 26821190
[26]	何立贵. 青贮饲料品质鉴定及影响关键因素[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2018, 14(3):26-27.
	He LG. Quality identification and key factors of silage[J]. Chin Livest Poult Breed, 2018, 14(3):26-27.
[27]	潘艺伟, 宦海琳, 许能祥, 等. 不同糖蜜及添加量对稻草饲料发酵品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(1):155-159.
	Pan YW, Huan HL, Xu NX, et al. Impact of different molasses and adding amounts on fermentation quality of rice straw[J]. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2020, 48(1):155-159.
[28]	Zhang Q, Li X, Zhao M, et al. Lactic acid bacteria strains for enhancing the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of Leymus chinensis silage[J]. Grass Forage Sci, 2016, 71(3):472-481. doi: 10.1111/gfs.2016.71.issue-3 URL
[29]	付锦涛, 林炎丽, 吴迪, 等. 四种木本饲料发酵质量研究[J]. 草学, 2018(S1):35-36.
	Fu JT, Lin YL, Wu D, et al. Study on the fermentation quality of four kinds of woody feeds[J]. J Grassland Forage Sci, 2018(S1):35-36.
[30]	赵娜, 樊启文, 魏金涛, 等. 植物乳杆菌添加量对构树叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020, 32(5):2298-2305.
	Zhao N, Fan QW, Wei JT, et al. Effects of addition amount of Lactobacillus plantarum on quality of Broussonetia papyrifera leaves silage[J]. Chin J Animal Nutr, 2020, 32(5):2298-2305.
[31]	朱春娟, 原现军, 董志浩, 等. 添加剂对饲料型四倍体刺槐青贮发酵品质和体外消化率的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2017, 40(4):725-731.
	Zhu CJ, Yuan XJ, Dong ZH, et al. Effect of additives on fermentation quality and in vitro digestibility of tetraploid black locust(Robinia pseudoacacia L. )silage[J]. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2017, 40(4):725-731.
[32]	He L, Zhou W, Wang C, et al. Effect of cellulase and Lactobacillus casei on ensiling characteristics, chemical composition, antioxidant activity, and digestibility of mulberry leaf silage[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2019, 102(11):9919-9931. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16468 URL
[33]	左艳春, 杜周和, 严旭, 等. 饲料桑青贮技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(4): 225,228.
	Zuo YC, Du ZH, Yan X, et al. Silage technique of mulberry forage[J]. Mod Agric Sci Technol, 2018(4): 225,228.
[34]	He LW, Lv H, Chen N, et al. Improving fermentation, protein preservation and antioxidant activity of Moringa oleifera leaves silage with Gallic acid and tannin acid[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2020, 297:122390. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122390 URL
[35]	He LW, Lv H, Xing YQ, et al. Intrinsic tannins affect ensiling characteristics and proteolysis of Neolamarckia cadamba leaf silage by largely altering bacterial community[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2020, 311:123496. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123496 URL
[36]	Du Z, Sun L, Chen C, et al. Exploring microbial community structure and metabolic gene clusters during silage fermentation of paper mulberry, a high-protein woody plant[J]. Animal Feed Sci Technol, 2021, 275:114766. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114766 URL
[37]	Zhang YC, Li DX, Wang XK, et al. Fermentation dynamics and diversity of bacterial community in four typical woody forages[J]. Ann Microbiol, 2019, 69(3):233-240. doi: 10.1007/s13213-018-1398-z
[38]	He L, Wang C, Xing Y, et al. Dynamics of proteolysis, protease activity and bacterial community of Neolamarckia cadamba leaves silage and the effects of formic acid and Lactobacillus farciminis[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2019, 294:122127. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122127 URL
[39]	周昕, 黄秋连, 王健, 等. 添加乳酸菌剂和糖蜜对不同含水量食叶草青贮发酵品质及体外干物质消失率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(3):1594-1606.
	Zhou X, Huang QL, Wang J, et al. Effects of adding lactic acid bacteria and molasses on fermentation quality and in vitro dry matter disappearance rate of Rumex hanus by. Silage with different moisture contents[J]. Chin J Animal Nutr, 2021, 33(3):1594-1606.
[40]	Guo LN, Wang XK, Lin YL, et al. Microorganisms that are critical for the fermentation quality of paper mulberry silage[J]. Food Energy Secur, 2021. DOI: 10.1002/fes3.304. doi: 10.1002/fes3.304
[41]	刘凯丽. 不同含水量及添加剂对杂交构树青贮饲料品质的影响[D]. 太谷:山西农业大学, 2019.
	Liu KL. Effects of different water content and additives on quality of hybrid paper mulberry silage[D]. Taigu:Shanxi Agricultural University, 2019.
[42]	王成, 周玮, 王学凯, 等. 晾晒处理对辣木叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草学, 2018(S1):39-40.
	Wang C, Zhou W, Wang XK, et al. Effect of wilting on the quality of Moringa oleifera leaves silage[J]. J Grassland Forage Sci, 2018(S1):39-40.
[43]	Muck RE, Nadeau EMG, McAllister TA, et al. Silage review:Recent advances and future uses of silage additives[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2018, 101(5):3980-4000. doi: S0022-0302(18)30322-9 pmid: 29685273
[44]	刘晓婧, 张颖超, 杨富裕. 乳酸菌添加剂对3种典型木本饲料青贮效果的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2019, 40(2):16-21.
	Liu XJ, Zhang YC, Yang FY. Effects of lactic acid bacteria additives on the fermentation quality of three woody forages[J]. Feed Ind, 2019, 40(2):16-21.
[45]	李平, 肖冰雪, 郑群英, 等. 乳酸菌及丙酸对老芒麦青贮品质的影响[J]. 草学, 2017(2):28-32.
	Li P, Xiao BX, Zheng QY, et al. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and proponic acid as additives on the quality of Elymus sibiricns L. silage[J]. J Grassland Forage Sci, 2017(2):28-32.
[46]	刘晓婧, 张颖超, 郭琳娜, 等. 乳酸菌添加剂对尖叶胡枝子发酵品质的影响[J]. 草学, 2018(S1):82-83, 86.
	Liu XJ, Zhang YC, Guo LN, et al. The effects of lactic acid bacteria additives on the fermentation quality of Lespedeza hedysaroides[J]. J Grassland Forage Sci, 2018(S1):82-83, 86.
[47]	王洋, 高正龙, 吕文竹, 等. 不同菌制剂对全株构树青贮饲料品质的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2021, 44(6):105-108.
	Wang Y, Gao ZL, Lü WZ, et al. Effect of different bacterial preparations on the quality of whole Broussonetia papyrifera silage[J]. Feed Res, 2021, 44(6):105-108.
[48]	黄媛, 代胜, 梁龙飞, 等. 不同添加剂对构树青贮饲料发酵品质及微生物多样性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(3):1607-1617.
	Huang Y, Dai S, Liang LF, et al. Effects of different additives on fermentation quality and microbial diversity of paper mulberry silage[J]. Chin J Animal Nutr, 2021, 33(3):1607-1617.
[49]	郑玉龙, 李东霞, 杨富裕, 等. 木本饲料与燕麦混合青贮发酵品质的研究[J]. 草学, 2018(S1):1-2, 13.
	Zheng YL, Li DX, Yang FY, et al. Study on fermentation quality of mixture silage of wood grass and oats[J]. J Grassland Forage Sci, 2018(S1):1-2, 13.
[50]	王芬, 赵腊梅. 稻草与构树混合青贮对青贮营养成分和发酵品质的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2021, 44(9):114-117.
	Wang F, Zhao LM. Effect of mixed silage of rice straw and Broussonetia papyrifera on nutrient composition and fermentation quality of silage[J]. Feed Res, 2021, 44(9):114-117.
[51]	付锦涛, 王学凯, 倪奎奎, 等. 添加乳酸菌和糖蜜对全株构树和稻草混合青贮的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4):121-128.
	Fu JT, Wang XK, Ni KK, et al. The effects of adding lactic acid bacteria and molasses on fermentation of Broussonetia papyrifera and rice straw mixed silage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sin, 2020, 29(4):121-128.
[52]	Wang C, He L, Xing Y, et al. Effects of mixing Neolamarckia cadamba leaves on fermentation quality, microbial community of high moisture alfalfa and stylo silage[J]. Microb Biotechnol, 2019, 12(5):869-878. doi: 10.1111/mbt2.v12.5 URL
[53]	Wang Y, Zhou W, Wang C, et al. Effect on the ensilage performance and microbial community of adding Neolamarckia cadamba leaves to corn stalks[J]. Microb Biotechnol, 2020, 13(5):1502-1514. doi: 10.1111/mbt2.v13.5 URL
[54]	Mendieta-Araica B, Spörndly E, Reyes-Sánchez N, et al. Silage quality whenMoringa oleiferais ensiled in mixtures with Elephant grass, sugar cane and molasses[J]. Grass Forage Sci, 2009, 64(4):364-373. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2009.00701.x URL
[55]	王春明, 穆春雨, 焦莉, 等. 单宁酸对北京鸭生长性能、屠宰性能、抗氧化指标和免疫器官指数的影响[J]. 中国家禽, 2021, 43(6):41-45.
	Wang CM, Mu CY, Jiao L, et al. Effects of tannic acid on growth performance, slaughter performance, antioxidant index and immune organ index of Peking duck[J]. China Poult, 2021, 43(6):41-45.
[56]	王春明, 王洪芳, 焦莉, 等. 单宁酸对北京鸭生长性能、肠道发育和盲肠菌群的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2021. DOI: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.20210113-01. doi: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.20210113-01
	Wang CM, Wang HF, Jiao L, et al. Effects of tannic acid on growth performance, intestinal development and cecal flora of Peking fuck[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2021. DOI: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.20210113-01. doi: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.20210113-01
[57]	徐婷婷, 杨智仁, 曹沛文, 等. 包膜单宁酸对断奶仔猪生长性能、肠道形态及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志 2021. DOI: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.20201229-05. doi: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.20201229-05
	Xu TT, Yang ZR, Cao PW, et al. Effects of coated tannic acid on growth performance, intestinal morphology and antioxidant capacity of Weaned piglets[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2021. DOI: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.20201229-05. doi: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.20201229-05
[58]	马莹, 陈星平, 习欠云. 构树在畜禽养殖业上的应用[J]. 广东饲料, 2019, 28(12):36-38.
	Ma Y, Chen X Y, Xi Q Y. Application of Broussonetia papyrifera in animal husbandry[J]. Guangdong Feed, 2019, 28(12):36-38.
[59]	黄炎坤, 李杨, 徐思源, 等. 青贮构树枝叶替代稻糠对皖西白鹅繁殖性能的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2020(15):125-128.
	Huang YK, Li Y, Xu SY, et al. Effects of Broussonetia papyrifera silage replacing rice bran on reproductive performance of Wanxi White Geese[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Sci Vet Med, 2020(15):125-128.
[60]	王诚, 王彦平, 崔太昌, 等. 猪用青贮饲料桑饲喂技术产业化开发的重要意义和亟待解决的几个技术问题[J]. 猪业科学, 2019, 36(4):120-123, 4.
	Wang C, Wang YP, Cui TC, et al. Significance of industrialization development of mulberry silage for pig and several technical problems to be solved[J]. Swine Ind Sci, 2019, 36(4):120-123, 4.
[61]	宋晶晶, 王腾蛟, 王田田, 等. 辣木、象草混合青贮饲料对三黄鸡生长性能、屠宰性能、肉品质及血液生化指标的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2020(8):87-92.
	Song JJ, Wang TJ, Wang TT, et al. Effects of Moringa and Elephant Grass mixed silage on growth performance, slaughter performance, meat quality and blood biochemical indexes of Three Yellow chicken[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Sci Vet Med, 2020(8):87-92.
[62]	陈娜, 周玮, 和立文, 等. 黄梁木叶对麻黄鸡屠宰性能、小肠形态和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(7):3833-3841.
	Chen N, Zhou W, He LW, et al. Effects of Neolamarckia cadamba leaves on slaughter performance, small intestine morphology and serum biochemical indices of partridge chicken[J]. Chin J Animal Nutr, 2021, 33(7):3833-3841.
[63]	曾斌, 习欠云, 孙加节, 等. 中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第十二次动物营养学术研讨会论文集[C]. 武汉: 中国农业大学出版社, 2016.
	Zeng B, Xi QY, Sun JJ, et al. Proceedings of the 12th Symposium on animal nutrition of animal nutrition branch of Chinese society of animal husbandry and veterinary[C]. Wuhan: China Agricultural University Press, 2016.
[64]	温芷莹, 田汉晨, 吴龙飞, 等. 青贮黄梁木替代青贮玉米对川中黑山羊肝脏代谢谱的影响[J]. 饲料工业, 2021, 42(7):27-33.
	Wen ZY, Tian HC, Wu LF, et al. Effects of silage Neolamarckia cadamba substitute silage corn on liver metabolic profile of Chuanzhong black goats[J]. Feed Ind, 2021, 42(7):27-33.
[65]	鲁志平, 郭莉, 李建臻, 等. 玉米秸秆与饲料桑混合发酵饲料对肉羊生长性能的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2020, 41(3):11-15.
	Lu ZP, Guo L, Li JZ, et al. Effects of fermented mixed feed of corn stalk and forage mulberry on growth performance of mutton sheep[J]. Animal Husb Feed Sci, 2020, 41(3):11-15.
[66]	张生伟, 王小平, 张展海, 等. 青贮杂交构树对杜湖杂交肉羊生长性能、血清生化指标和肉品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3):89-99.
	Zhang SW, Wang XP, Zhang ZH, et al. Effects of Broussonetia papyrifera silage on growth performance, serum biochemical indexes and meat quality of Dorper × Hu crossbred sheep[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sin, 2021, 30(3):89-99.
[67]	宋柏螈, 陶振阳, 任洪涛, 等. 杂交构树发酵饲料对奶牛生产性能、乳清抗氧化及生化指标的影响[J]. 家畜生态学报, 2020, 41(8):45-50.
	Song BY, Tao ZY, Ren HT, et al. Effects of b. kazinoki × b. papyrifera silage on production performance, whey antioxidant and biochemical indexes capacity in dairy cows[J]. J Domest Animal Ecol, 2020, 41(8):45-50.