Comprehensive Transcriptome Analysis of Intestinal Epithelial Cells of Cyprinus carpio Exposed to Lipopolysaccharide

doi:10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2021-0055

Abstract

Abstract:

This work aims to explore the effect of lipopolysaccharide（LPS）on the genes and functions of intestinal epithelial cells in Cyprinus carpio. The intestinal epithelial cells of C. carpio were taken as the research object,normal treatment was as the control group,and lipopolysaccharide treatment was as the experimental group. Transcriptome sequencing was performed on the two groups of the intestinal epithelial cells of C. carpio treated for 24 h. A total 44.77G of high-quality data from transcriptome sequencing results were obtained,of which,nearly 81.83% data could be aligned to the C. carpio genome. Analyzed using the DESeq software and compared with the control group,590 differentially expressed genes（DEG）were induced by LPS treatment. Among them,303 were up-regulated and 287 were down-regulated. Gene Ontology（GO）functional enrichment analysis showed that DEG accounted for the highest proportion in cellular processes,single organism processes,metabolic processes,cells,cell part,organelle,binding and catalytic activity functional subclasses. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes（KEGG）pathway analysis revealed that DEG was significantly enriched in cell cycle,autophagy and apoptosis pathways. The 10 randomly selected differential genes were verified by quantitative real-time PCR,and the results showed that the transcriptome data were reliable. In this study,transcriptome sequencing technology was used to comprehensively and rapidly obtain all transcriptome information during LPS exposure to C. carpio intestinal epithelial cells,and to systematically prove that LPS blocked the cell cycle of C. carpio intestinal epithelial cells,induced autophagy and apoptosis,thus providing an important theoretical basis for the molecular mechanism of LPS regulation in C. carpio intestinal epithelial cells.

Key words: lipopolysaccharide, Cyprinus carpio, intestinal epithelial cells, transcriptome sequencing, quantitative real-time PCR

CHEN Jian-jun, ZHAO Yi-di, CAO Xiang-lin. Comprehensive Transcriptome Analysis of Intestinal Epithelial Cells of Cyprinus carpio Exposed to Lipopolysaccharide[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2021, 37(8): 213-220.

Figures/Tables 7

References 35

[1]	Chen J, Liu N, Zhang H, et al. The effects of Aeromonas hydrophila infection on oxidative stress, nonspecific immunity, autophagy, and apoptosis in the common carp[J]. Dev Comp Immunol, 2020, 105:103587. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2019.103587 URL
[2]	Rasmussen-Ivey CR, Hossain MJ, Odom SE, et al. Classification of a hypervirulent aeromonas hydrophila pathotype responsible for epidemic outbreaks in warm-water fishes[J]. Front Microbiol, 2016, 18(7):1615.
[3]	唐黎标. 鲤鱼养殖的常见病害防治[J]. 渔业致富指南, 2019, 510(6):50-51.
	Tang LB. Common disease control of carp culture[J]. Fisheries Rich Guide, 2019, 510(6):50-51.
[4]	Pulido-Salgado M, Vidal-Taboada JM, Barriga GG, et al. RNA-Seq transcriptomic profiling of primary murine microglia treated with LPS or LPS + IFNγ[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 318(1):16096.
[5]	Kong S, Zhang YH, Zhang W. Regulation of intestinal epithelial cells properties and functions by amino acids[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018:2819154.
[6]	Pesonen M, Andersson TB. Fish primary hepatocyte culture;an important model for xenobiotic metabolism and toxicity studies[J]. Aquatic Toxicology, 1997, 37(2/3):253-267. doi: 10.1016/S0166-445X(96)00811-9 URL
[7]	Yin G, Cao L, Xu P, et al. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects of glycyrrhiza glabra extract against carbon tetrachloride(CCl4)-Induced hepatocyte damage in common carp(Cyprinus carpio)[J]. Fish Physiol Biochem, 2011, 37:209-216. doi: 10.1007/s10695-010-9436-1 URL
[8]	Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-seq:a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics[J]. Nat Rev Genet, 2009, 10(1):57-63. doi: 10.1038/nrg2484 URL
[9]	López-Nieva P, Fernández-Navarro P, Graña-Castro O, et al. Detection of novel fusion-transcripts by RNA-Seq in T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma[J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1):5179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41675-3 pmid: 30914738
[10]	吕钧惠, 王悦, 周蕾, 等. 雌二醇暴露中国青鳉原代肝细胞转录组分析[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2021, 15:1-15.
	Lv JH, Wang Y, Zhou L, et al. Transcriptome analysis of Oryzias sinensis primary hepatocytes under the exposure of estradiol[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2020, 15:1-15.
[11]	岳影星, 杨舟鑫, 卢艳, 等. 脂多糖调控对大鼠心脏微血管内皮细胞的转录组分析[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志, 2020, 10(6):328-335.
	Yue XX, Yang ZX, Lu Y, et al. Transcriptomic characteristics of lipopolysaccharide-induced cardiac microvascular endothelial cells[J]. Chin J Cell Stem Cell, 2020, 10(6):328-335.
[12]	Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT:a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements[J]. Nat Meth, 2015, 12(4):357. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317 URL
[13]	Roberts A, Trapnell C, Donaghey J, et al. Improving RNA-Seq expression estimates by correcting for fragment bias[J]. Genome Biology, 2011. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r22. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r22
[14]	Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression of RNA-Seq data at the gene level-the DESeq package[J]. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 2012.
[15]	Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, et al. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2008, 36:480-484. pmid: 18077471
[16]	Chai L, Yang Y, Yang H, et al. Transcriptome analysis of genes expressed in the earthworm Eisenia fetida in response to cadmium exposure[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 240:124902. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124902 URL
[17]	Satsu H. Molecular and cellular studies on the absorption, function, and safety of food components in intestinal epithelial cells[J]. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2017, 81(3):419-425. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2016.1259552 URL
[18]	Biswas G, Korenaga H, Takayama H, et al. Cytokine responses in the common carp, Cyprinus carpio L. treated with baker’s yeast extract[J]. Aquaculture, 2012, 356-357:169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.05.019 URL
[19]	Low C, Wadsworth S, Burrells C, et al. Expression of immune genes in turbot(Scophthalmus maximus)fed a nucleotide-supplemented diet[J]. Aquaculture, 2003, 221(1-4):23-40. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00022-X URL
[20]	Grayfer L, Belosevic M. Molecular characterization, expression and functional analysis of goldfish(Carassius aurutus L.)interferon gamma[J]. Dev Comp Immunol, 2009, 33(2):235-246. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2008.09.001 pmid: 18831986
[21]	Salvador JM, Brown-Clay JD, Fornace AJ Jr. Gadd45 in stress signaling, cell cycle control, and apoptosis[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2013, 793:1-19. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8289-5_1 pmid: 24104470
[22]	Zhan Q, Antinore MJ, Wang XW, et al. Association with Cdc2 and inhibition of Cdc2/Cyclin B1 kinase activity by the p53-regulated protein Gadd45[J]. Oncogene, 1999, 18(18):2892-2900. pmid: 10362260
[23]	Dong ML, Zhu YC, Hopkins JV. Oil A induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells via caspase activation, redistribution of cell cycle and GADD expression[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2003, 9(12):2745-2750. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i12.2745 URL
[24]	Du WW, Yang W, Liu E, et al. Foxo3 circular RNA retards cell cycle progression via forming ternary complexes with p21 and CDK2[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016, 44(6):2846-2858. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw027 URL
[25]	Pietenpol JA, Stewart ZA. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling:cell cycle arrest versus apoptosis[J]. Toxicology, 2002, 181-182:475-481. pmid: 12505356
[26]	Lamkanfi M. Caspases in cell death, inflammation, and disease[J]. Immunity, 2019, 50(6):1352-1364. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.05.020 URL
[27]	Okinaga T, Kasai H, Tsujisawa T, et al. Role of caspases in cleavage of lamin A/C and PARP during apoptosis in macrophages infected with a periodontopathic bacterium[J]. J Med Microbiol, 2007, 56:1399-1404. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47193-0 URL
[28]	Yang Y, Dong F, Liu X, et al. Crosstalk of oxidative damage, apoptosis, and autophagy under endoplasmic reticulum(ER)stress involved in thifluzamide-induced liver damage in zebrafish(Danio rerio)[J]. Environ Pollut, 2018, 243:1904-1911. doi: S0269-7491(18)32400-X pmid: 30408879
[29]	Zhang Y, Liu D, et al. HIF-1α/BNIP3 signaling pathway-induced-autophagy plays protective role during myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury[J]. Biom Phar, 2019, 120:109464.
[30]	Zhu Y, Ji JJ, Yang R, et al. Lactate accelerates calcification in VSMCs through suppression of BNIP3-mediated mitophagy[J]. Cell Signal, 2019, 58:53-64. doi: S0898-6568(19)30049-X pmid: 30851408
[31]	You Z, Xu Y, Wan W, et al. TP53INP2 contributes to autophagosome formation by promoting LC3-ATG7 interaction[J]. Autophagy, 2019, 15(8):1309-1321. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1580510 URL
[32]	Huang R, Liu W. Identifying an essential role of nuclear LC3 for autophagy[J]. Autophagy, 2015, 11(5):852-853. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1038016 pmid: 25945743
[33]	Singh PK, Kumar R, Sharma A, et al. Podophyllum hexandrum fraction(REC-2006)shows higher radioprotective efficacy in the p53-carrying hepatoma cell line:a role of cell cycle regulatory proteins[J]. Integr Cancer Ther, 2009, 8(3):261-272. doi: 10.1177/1534735409343589 URL
[34]	Reynaud K, Driancourt MA. Oocyte attrition[J]. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 2000, 163(1-2):101-108. pmid: 10963881
[35]	Xing Y, Li J, Li SP, et al. MiR-27a-5p regulates apoptosis of liver ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice by targeting Bach1[J]. J Cell Biochem, 2018, 119(12):10376-10383. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27383 pmid: 30145824

Primer name	Gene bank	Oligonucleotide sequence（5'-3'）
β-actin	M24113.1	F：TCAGGACATTGAACCTCACTGTCT R：TAACACCATCACCAGAGTCCATCC
Ferritin	XM_019064890.1	F：ACGAGGACAGACTGAAGG R：AGCACAGATGGTCAACGA
LC3	XM_019072575.1	F：GCCATCCGACAGACCCTT R：TGAGCTGCAGTCTACGCC
Cathepsin	XM_019064744.1	F：ACCACACGCAACCAACAC R：CTCCACCATTGCAGGAAC
Casp9	XM_019066459.1	F：TGATCCCTCTGCCAGTCC R：TCTCCATCTTGTCGCAGT
Lamin	XM_019083381.1	F：TGGCTTTGGCTCAGGCTC R：GTCTCCGTCTCCAGCTGT
PARP	XM_019073641.1	F：GGTGCAGTCTCCCATGTT R：TCTGCTCTCCTTTCCCTC
BNIP3	XM_019071032.1	F：CATCAGTGCAGCCTCCTT R：TGTTCCGCTTTGGCTGTT
ULK1	XM_019089282.1	F：AGGGAAGCGGAAAGAGGA R：AATACCACAGCGAAGGCA
TP53INP2	XM_019070597.1	F：AGAGCTGAAGGGACCGAA R：ATGCTGGGGTGCTCGATG
LAMP	XM_019096275.1	F：CTGCATTGGCTGACATGG R：AGCTGGAAGGTGTTGAGA

Primer name	Gene bank	Oligonucleotide sequence（5'-3'）
β-actin	M24113.1	F：TCAGGACATTGAACCTCACTGTCT R：TAACACCATCACCAGAGTCCATCC
Ferritin	XM_019064890.1	F：ACGAGGACAGACTGAAGG R：AGCACAGATGGTCAACGA
LC3	XM_019072575.1	F：GCCATCCGACAGACCCTT R：TGAGCTGCAGTCTACGCC
Cathepsin	XM_019064744.1	F：ACCACACGCAACCAACAC R：CTCCACCATTGCAGGAAC
Casp9	XM_019066459.1	F：TGATCCCTCTGCCAGTCC R：TCTCCATCTTGTCGCAGT
Lamin	XM_019083381.1	F：TGGCTTTGGCTCAGGCTC R：GTCTCCGTCTCCAGCTGT
PARP	XM_019073641.1	F：GGTGCAGTCTCCCATGTT R：TCTGCTCTCCTTTCCCTC
BNIP3	XM_019071032.1	F：CATCAGTGCAGCCTCCTT R：TGTTCCGCTTTGGCTGTT
ULK1	XM_019089282.1	F：AGGGAAGCGGAAAGAGGA R：AATACCACAGCGAAGGCA
TP53INP2	XM_019070597.1	F：AGAGCTGAAGGGACCGAA R：ATGCTGGGGTGCTCGATG
LAMP	XM_019096275.1	F：CTGCATTGGCTGACATGG R：AGCTGGAAGGTGTTGAGA

Sample	CON_1	CON_2	CON_3	LPS_1	LPS_2	LPS_3
Total reads/M	52.55	54.38	50.14	50.75	54.24	51.36
Mapped reads/M	43.22	44.32	41.35	41.31	44.24	42.00
Mapped ratio/%	82.25	81.50	82.48	81.39	81.57	81.78
Clean bases/G	7.56	7.72	7.25	7.18	7.72	7.34
Q30/%	93.88	93.35	93.56	94.00	93.89	93.83
GC/%	46.91	46.27	46.45	46.50	47.62	47.38

Sample	CON_1	CON_2	CON_3	LPS_1	LPS_2	LPS_3
Total reads/M	52.55	54.38	50.14	50.75	54.24	51.36
Mapped reads/M	43.22	44.32	41.35	41.31	44.24	42.00
Mapped ratio/%	82.25	81.50	82.48	81.39	81.57	81.78
Clean bases/G	7.56	7.72	7.25	7.18	7.72	7.34
Q30/%	93.88	93.35	93.56	94.00	93.89	93.83
GC/%	46.91	46.27	46.45	46.50	47.62	47.38

	Gene name	Gene description	LPS -vs- CON Log₂（fold change）
自噬	LC3	微管相关蛋白轻链3	2.111361109
	BNIP3	B淋巴细胞瘤-2基因/腺病毒E1B相互作用蛋白3	3.959358016
	ULK1	自噬启动激酶ULK1	1.590396387
	TP53INP2	肿瘤蛋白p53诱导核蛋白2	3.655351829
	LAMP	溶酶体相关膜蛋白	3.987927168
	ATG16	自噬相关蛋白16	1.900464326
凋亡	Casp9	半胱氨酸天冬氨酸蛋白酶	3.774933444
	Cathepsin	组织蛋白酶	2.158941208
	Gadd45	生长阻滞和DNA损伤诱导蛋白45	2.436517227
	PARP	多聚ADP-核糖聚合酶	-3.684498174
	Lamin	核纤层蛋白	-4.006426269
	AP-1	激活蛋白1	2.264738712
细胞周期	PCNA	增殖细胞核抗原	-2.80580447
	Cdc14	细胞分裂周期蛋白	-1.920565533
	CycB	细胞周期调节蛋白B	-3.421463768
	CDK2	细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶2	-2.038135129
	MCM2	微染色体维持蛋白2	-4.143929793
	PLK1	丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶PLK1	-3.602036014
	TGF-β	转化生长因子-β	-2.509819643