生物技术通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 18-27.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2023-0622
收稿日期:
2023-06-29
出版日期:
2023-11-26
发布日期:
2023-12-20
通讯作者:
赵春钊,男,博士,研究员,研究方向:植物与非生物胁迫互作;E-mail: czzhao@cemps.ac.cn作者简介:
汪明滔,男,硕士,研究方向:植物与非生物胁迫互作;E-mail: mtwang@psc.ac.cn
基金资助:
WANG Ming-tao1,2(), LIU Jian-wei1, ZHAO Chun-zhao1()
Received:
2023-06-29
Published:
2023-11-26
Online:
2023-12-20
摘要:
植物细胞壁不仅起着支撑和保护细胞的作用,还被认为是植物抵抗逆境胁迫环境的第一道屏障。作为限制农业生产的一个主要非生物胁迫因子,盐胁迫能造成植物细胞壁的组分和结构发生改变,而植物可以通过细胞壁完整性感受器如CrRLK1Ls、LRXs和WAKs等蛋白来感知这些变化并启动下游盐胁迫响应。在细胞内,植物通过盐胁迫诱导的Ca2+内流、植物激素等信号促进细胞壁多聚糖合成和修饰相关基因的表达,从而有助于维持细胞壁的完整性,增强植物盐胁迫适应性。本文概述了植物初生细胞壁多聚糖的主要组分和各组分之间的相互结合关系,并且阐述了盐胁迫对细胞壁各组分的影响,以及盐胁迫下植物感知和维持细胞壁完整性的分子机制,最后讨论了盐胁迫下细胞壁完整性感知和调控研究领域还需要解决的科学问题。
汪明滔, 刘建伟, 赵春钊. 植物调控盐胁迫下细胞壁完整性的分子机制[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(11): 18-27.
WANG Ming-tao, LIU Jian-wei, ZHAO Chun-zhao. Molecular Mechanisms of Cell Wall Integrity in Plants Under Salt Stress[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(11): 18-27.
图1 植物调控盐胁迫下细胞壁完整性的示意图 植物细胞壁是由纤维素、半纤维素、果胶、糖蛋白等组分相互交联形成的高度复杂且动态变化的网络结构。盐胁迫会诱导细胞壁多聚糖的组分和结构发生变化,比如促进去甲酯化果胶含量的增加,而这些细胞壁变化能够被细胞壁完整性感受器,如CrRLK1Ls、LRXs和WAKs等蛋白感知并启动下游细胞壁修复机制,进而维持盐胁迫下细胞壁的完整性和增强植物的盐胁迫适应性
Fig. 1 A schematic illustration of the regulation of cell wall integrity in plants under salt stress Plant cell wall is composed of an intricate network of dynamically connected matrix, including cellulose, hemicellulos, pectin, and glycoproteins. Salt stress can trigger the alteration of cell wall compositions and structures, such as promoting the accumulation of de-methylesterified pectin. Salt stress-induced cell wall changes can be perceived by cell wall integrity sensors, such as CrRLK1L, LRXs and WAKs, and these proteins are able to activate intracellular signaling pathways to repair cell wall, and finally maintain cell wall integrity under salt stress and enhance the adaptability of plants to high salinity
[1] | Botella MA, Rosado A, Bressan RA, et al. Plant adaptive responses to salinity stress[M]// JenksMA, HasegawaPM.,Eds. Plant Abiotic Stress. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2005: 37-70. |
[2] |
Shrivastava P, Kumar R. Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation[J]. Saudi J Biol Sci, 2015, 22(2): 123-131.
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001 pmid: 25737642 |
[3] |
Singh A. Soil salinization management for sustainable development: a review[J]. J Environ Manage, 2021, 277: 111383.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111383 URL |
[4] |
Colin L, Ruhnow F, Zhu JK, et al. The cell biology of primary cell walls during salt stress[J]. Plant Cell, 2023, 35(1): 201-217.
doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac292 URL |
[5] |
Yu ZP, Duan XB, Luo L, et al. How plant hormones mediate salt stress responses[J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2020, 25(11): 1117-1130.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.06.008 pmid: 32675014 |
[6] |
Zhang HM, Zhu JH, Gong ZZ, et al. Abiotic stress responses in plants[J]. Nat Rev Genet, 2022, 23(2): 104-119.
doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00413-0 |
[7] |
Jiang ZH, Zhou XP, Tao M, et al. Plant cell-surface GIPC sphingolipids sense salt to trigger Ca2+ influx[J]. Nature, 2019, 572(7769): 341-346.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1449-z |
[8] |
Anderson CT, Kieber JJ. Dynamic construction, perception, and remodeling of plant cell walls[J]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2020, 71: 39-69.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-081519-035846 pmid: 32084323 |
[9] |
Voxeur A, Höfte H. Cell wall integrity signaling in plants: to grow or not to grow that’s the question[J]. Glycobiology, 2016, 26(9): 950-960.
pmid: 26945038 |
[10] |
Liu JW, Zhang W, Long SJ, et al. Maintenance of cell wall integrity under high salinity[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(6): 3260.
doi: 10.3390/ijms22063260 URL |
[11] |
Hamann T. The plant cell wall integrity maintenance mechanism—a case study of a cell wall plasma membrane signaling network[J]. Phytochemistry, 2015, 112: 100-109.
doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.09.019 URL |
[12] |
Feng W, Kita D, Peaucelle A, et al. The FERONIA receptor kinase maintains cell-wall integrity during salt stress through Ca2+ signaling[J]. Curr Biol, 2018, 28(5): 666-675.e5.
doi: S0960-9822(18)30025-3 pmid: 29456142 |
[13] |
Bacete L, Hamann T. The role of mechanoperception in plant cell wall integrity maintenance[J]. Plants, 2020, 9(5): 574.
doi: 10.3390/plants9050574 URL |
[14] |
Rui Y, Dinneny JR. A wall with integrity: surveillance and maintenance of the plant cell wall under stress[J]. New Phytol, 2020, 225(4): 1428-1439.
doi: 10.1111/nph.16166 pmid: 31486535 |
[15] |
Newman RH, Hill SJ, Harris PJ. Wide-angle X-ray scattering and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance data combined to test models for cellulose microfibrils in mung bean cell walls[J]. Plant Physiol, 2013, 163(4): 1558-1567.
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.228262 pmid: 24154621 |
[16] |
Paredez AR, Somerville CR, Ehrhardt DW. Visualization of cellulose synthase demonstrates functional association with microtubules[J]. Science, 2006, 312(5779): 1491-1495.
doi: 10.1126/science.1126551 pmid: 16627697 |
[17] |
Gutierrez R, Lindeboom JJ, Paredez AR, et al. Arabidopsis cortical microtubules position cellulose synthase delivery to the plasma membrane and interact with cellulose synthase trafficking compartments[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2009, 11(7): 797-806.
doi: 10.1038/ncb1886 pmid: 19525940 |
[18] |
McFarlane HE, Döring A, Persson S. The cell biology of cellulose synthesis[J]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2014, 65: 69-94.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040240 pmid: 24579997 |
[19] |
Persson S, Paredez A, Carroll A, et al. Genetic evidence for three unique components in primary cell-wall cellulose synthase complexes in Arabidopsis[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104(39): 15566-15571.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706592104 URL |
[20] |
McFarlane HE, Watanabe Y, Yang WL, et al. Golgi- and trans-Golgi network-mediated vesicle trafficking is required for wax secretion from epidermal cells[J]. Plant Physiol, 2014, 164(3): 1250-1260.
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.234583 pmid: 24468625 |
[21] |
Endler A, Kesten C, Schneider R, et al. A mechanism for sustained cellulose synthesis during salt stress[J]. Cell, 2015, 162(6): 1353-1364.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.028 pmid: 26343580 |
[22] |
Scheller HV, Ulvskov P. Hemicelluloses[J]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2010, 61: 263-289.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112315 pmid: 20192742 |
[23] |
Pauly M, Gille S, Liu LF, et al. Hemicellulose biosynthesis[J]. Planta, 2013, 238(4): 627-642.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-1921-1 pmid: 23801299 |
[24] |
Park YB, Cosgrove DJ. Xyloglucan and its interactions with other components of the growing cell wall[J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 2015, 56(2): 180-194.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu204 pmid: 25613914 |
[25] |
Zabotina OA, van de Ven WTG, Freshour G, et al. Arabidopsis XXT5 gene encodes a putative alpha-1, 6-xylosyltransferase that is involved in xyloglucan biosynthesis[J]. Plant J, 2008, 56(1): 101-115.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.2008.56.issue-1 URL |
[26] |
Zabotina OA, Avci U, Cavalier D, et al. Mutations in multiple XXT genes of Arabidopsis reveal the complexity of xyloglucan biosynthesis[J]. Plant Physiol, 2012, 159(4): 1367-1384.
doi: 10.1104/pp.112.198119 pmid: 22696020 |
[27] |
Brown DM, Goubet F, Wong VW, et al. Comparison of five xylan synthesis mutants reveals new insight into the mechanisms of xylan synthesis[J]. Plant J, 2007, 52(6): 1154-1168.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03307.x pmid: 17944810 |
[28] |
Lee CH, Zhong RQ, Ye ZH. Arabidopsis family GT43 members are xylan xylosyltransferases required for the elongation of the xylan backbone[J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 2012, 53(1): 135-143.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr158 URL |
[29] |
Verhertbruggen Y, Yin L, Oikawa A, et al. Mannan synthase activity in the CSLD family[J]. Plant Signal Behav, 2011, 6(10): 1620-1623.
doi: 10.4161/psb.6.10.17989 pmid: 21904114 |
[30] |
Caffall KH, Mohnen D. The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides[J]. Carbohydr Res, 2009, 344(14): 1879-1900.
doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2009.05.021 URL |
[31] |
Mohnen D. Pectin structure and biosynthesis[J]. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2008, 11(3): 266-277.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.03.006 pmid: 18486536 |
[32] |
Atmodjo MA, Hao ZY, Mohnen D. Evolving views of pectin biosynthesis[J]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2013, 64: 747-779.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105534 pmid: 23451775 |
[33] |
Harholt J, Suttangkakul A, Vibe Scheller H. Biosynthesis of pectin[J]. Plant Physiol, 2010, 153(2): 384-395.
doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156588 pmid: 20427466 |
[34] |
Wolf S, Mouille G, Pelloux J. Homogalacturonan methyl-esterification and plant development[J]. Mol Plant, 2009, 2(5): 851-860.
doi: 10.1093/mp/ssp066 pmid: 19825662 |
[35] |
Delmas F, Séveno M, Northey JGB, et al. The synthesis of the rhamnogalacturonan II component 3-deoxy-D-manno-2-octulosonic acid(Kdo)is required for pollen tube growth and elongation[J]. J Exp Bot, 2008, 59(10): 2639-2647.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern118 URL |
[36] |
Byrt CS, Munns R, Burton RA, et al. Root cell wall solutions for crop plants in saline soils[J]. Plant Sci, 2018, 269: 47-55.
doi: S0168-9452(17)30918-4 pmid: 29606216 |
[37] | Cosgrove DJ. Growth of the plant cell wall[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2005, 6(11): 850-861. |
[38] |
Wang T, Park YB, Caporini MA, et al. Sensitivity-enhanced solid-state NMR detection of expansin's target in plant cell walls[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110(41): 16444-16449.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316290110 pmid: 24065828 |
[39] |
Phyo P, Wang T, Xiao CW, et al. Effects of pectin molecular weight changes on the structure, dynamics, and polysaccharide interactions of primary cell walls of Arabidopsis thaliana: insights from solid-state NMR[J]. Biomacromolecules, 2017, 18(9): 2937-2950.
doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00888 URL |
[40] |
Miart F, Desprez T, Biot E, et al. Spatio-temporal analysis of cellulose synthesis during cell plate formation in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant J, 2014, 77(1): 71-84.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.2013.77.issue-1 URL |
[41] |
Zhang SS, Sun L, Dong XR, et al. Cellulose synthesis genes CESA6 and CSI1 are important for salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2016, 58(7): 623-626.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.v58.7 URL |
[42] |
Tang YJ, Wang MH, Cao LY, et al. OsUGE3-mediated cell wall polysaccharides accumulation improves biomass production, mechanical strength, and salt tolerance[J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2022, 45(8): 2492-2507.
doi: 10.1111/pce.v45.8 URL |
[43] |
Li ST, Zhang L, Wang Y, et al. Knockdown of a cellulose synthase gene BoiCesA affects the leaf anatomy, cellulose content and salt tolerance in broccoli[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 41397.
doi: 10.1038/srep41397 pmid: 28169290 |
[44] |
Nagashima Y, Ma ZY, Liu XT, et al. Multiple quality control mechanisms in the ER and TGN determine subcellular dynamics and salt-stress tolerance function of KORRIGAN1[J]. Plant Cell, 2020, 32(2): 470-485.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00714 URL |
[45] |
Dabravolski SA, Isayenkov SV. The regulation of plant cell wall organisation under salt stress[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2023, 14: 1118313.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1118313 URL |
[46] |
Yan JW, Huang Y, He H, et al. Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase-hydrolase30 negatively affects salt tolerance in Arabidopsis[J]. J Exp Bot, 2019, 70(19): 5495-5506.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz311 URL |
[47] |
Xu PP, Fang S, Chen HY, et al. The brassinosteroid-responsive xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase 19(XTH19)and XTH23 genes are involved in lateral root development under salt stress in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant J, 2020, 104(1): 59-75.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.v104.1 URL |
[48] |
Shomer I, Novacky AJ, Pike SM, et al. Electrical potentials of plant cell walls in response to the ionic environment[J]. Plant Physiol, 2003, 133(1): 411-422.
pmid: 12970506 |
[49] |
Gigli-Bisceglia N, van Zelm E, Huo WY, et al. Arabidopsis root responses to salinity depend on pectin modification and cell wall sensing[J]. Development, 2022, 149(12): dev200363.
doi: 10.1242/dev.200363 URL |
[50] |
Yan JW, He H, Fang L, et al. Pectin methylesterase31 positively regulates salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2018, 496(2): 497-501.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.01.025 URL |
[51] |
Chen J, Chen XH, Zhang QF, et al. A cold-induced pectin methyl-esterase inhibitor gene contributes negatively to freezing tolerance but positively to salt tolerance in Arabidopsis[J]. J Plant Physiol, 2018, 222: 67-78.
doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.01.003 URL |
[52] |
Mahajan M, Yadav SK. Overexpression of a tea flavanone 3-hydroxylase gene confers tolerance to salt stress and Alternaria solani in transgenic tobacco[J]. Plant Mol Biol, 2014, 85(6): 551-573.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-014-0203-z pmid: 24880475 |
[53] |
Yan JW, Liu Y, Yang L, et al. Cell wall β-1, 4-galactan regulated by the BPC1/BPC2-GALS1 module aggravates salt sensitivity in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Mol Plant, 2021, 14(3): 411-425.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.11.023 URL |
[54] | Yan JW, Liu Y, Yan JW, et al. The salt-activated CBF1/CBF2/CBF3-GALS1 module fine-tunes galactan-induced salt hypersensitivity in Arabidopsis[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2023. |
[55] | Zhu JH, Lee BH, Dellinger M, et al. A cellulose synthase-like protein is required for osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant J, 2010, 63(1): 128-140. |
[56] |
Zhao H, Li ZX, Wang YY, et al. Cellulose synthase-like protein OsCSLD4 plays an important role in the response of rice to salt stress by mediating abscisic acid biosynthesis to regulate osmotic stress tolerance[J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2022, 20(3): 468-484.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.v20.3 URL |
[57] |
Liu HH, Ma Y, Chen N, et al. Overexpression of stress-inducible OsBURP16, the β subunit of polygalacturonase 1, decreases pectin content and cell adhesion and increases abiotic stress sensitivity in rice[J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2014, 37(5): 1144-1158.
doi: 10.1111/pce.2014.37.issue-5 URL |
[58] |
Jin J, Duan JL, Shan C, et al. Ethylene insensitive3-like2(OsEIL2)confers stress sensitivity by regulating OsBURP16, the β subunit of polygalacturonase(PG1β-like)subfamily gene in rice[J]. Plant Sci, 2020, 292: 110353.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110353 URL |
[59] |
Franck CM, Westermann J, Boisson-Dernier A. Plant malectin-like receptor kinases: from cell wall integrity to immunity and beyond[J]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2018, 69: 301-328.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040557 pmid: 29539271 |
[60] |
Lin WW, Tang WX, Pan X, et al. Arabidopsis pavement cell morphogenesis requires FERONIA binding to pectin for activation of ROP GTPase signaling[J]. Curr Biol, 2022, 32(3): 497-507.e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.030 URL |
[61] |
Tang WX, Lin WW, Zhou X, et al. Mechano-transduction via the pectin-FERONIA complex activates ROP6 GTPase signaling in Arabidopsis pavement cell morphogenesis[J]. Curr Biol, 2022, 32(3): 508-517.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.031 URL |
[62] |
Herger A, Dünser K, Kleine-Vehn J, et al. Leucine-rich repeat extensin proteins and their role in cell wall sensing[J]. Curr Biol, 2019, 29(17): R851-R858.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.039 |
[63] |
Zhao CZ, Zayed O, Yu ZP, et al. Leucine-rich repeat extensin proteins regulate plant salt tolerance in Arabidopsis[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115(51): 13123-13128.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816991115 URL |
[64] |
Dünser K, Gupta S, Herger A, et al. Extracellular matrix sensing by FERONIA and Leucine-Rich Repeat Extensins controls vacuolar expansion during cellular elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. EMBO J, 2019, 38(7): e100353.
doi: 10.15252/embj.2018100353 URL |
[65] |
Sede AR, Borassi C, Wengier DL, et al. Arabidopsis pollen extensins LRX are required for cell wall integrity during pollen tube growth[J]. FEBS Lett, 2018, 592(2): 233-243.
doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12947 pmid: 29265366 |
[66] |
Galindo-Trigo S, Blanco-Touriñán N, DeFalco TA, et al. CrRLK1L receptor-like kinases HERK1 and ANJEA are female determinants of pollen tube reception[J]. EMBO Rep, 2020, 21(2): e48466.
doi: 10.15252/embr.201948466 URL |
[67] |
Lin W, Wang YH, Liu XY, et al. OsWAK112, A wall-associated kinase, negatively regulates salt stress responses by inhibiting ethylene production[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 751965.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.751965 URL |
[68] |
Kaur R, Singh K, Singh J. A root-specific wall-associated kinase gene, HvWAK1, regulates root growth and is highly divergent in barley and other cereals[J]. Funct Integr Genomics, 2013, 13(2): 167-177.
doi: 10.1007/s10142-013-0310-y URL |
[69] |
Van der Does D, Boutrot F, Engelsdorf T, et al. The Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase MIK2/LRR-KISS connects cell wall integrity sensing, root growth and response to abiotic and biotic stresses[J]. PLoS Genet, 2017, 13(6): e1006832.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006832 URL |
[70] |
Yu LJ, Nie JN, Cao CY, et al. Phosphatidic acid mediates salt stress response by regulation of MPK6 in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. New Phytol, 2010, 188(3): 762-773.
doi: 10.1111/nph.2010.188.issue-3 URL |
[71] |
Zhou S, Chen QH, Li XY, et al. MAP65-1 is required for the depolymerization and reorganization of cortical microtubules in the response to salt stress in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Sci, 2017, 264: 112-121.
doi: S0168-9452(17)30399-0 pmid: 28969791 |
[72] |
Wang C, Li JJ, Yuan M. Salt tolerance requires cortical microtubule reorganization in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 2007, 48(11): 1534-1547.
pmid: 17906320 |
[73] |
Kesten C, Wallmann A, Schneider R, et al. The companion of cellulose synthase 1 confers salt tolerance through a Tau-like mechanism in plants[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1): 857.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08780-3 pmid: 30787279 |
[74] |
Lindwall G, Cole RD. Phosphorylation affects the ability of tau protein to promote microtubule assembly[J]. J Biol Chem, 1984, 259(8): 5301-5305.
pmid: 6425287 |
[1] | 王帅, 冯宇梅, 白苗, 杜维俊, 岳爱琴. 大豆GmHMGR基因响应外源激素及非生物胁迫功能研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(7): 131-142. |
[2] | 魏茜雅, 秦中维, 梁腊梅, 林欣琪, 李映志. 褪黑素种子引发处理提高朝天椒耐盐性的作用机制[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(7): 160-172. |
[3] | 王海龙, 李雨倩, 王勃, 邢国芳, 张杰伟. 谷子SiMAPK3基因的克隆和表达特性分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(3): 123-132. |
[4] | 杜清洁, 周璐瑶, 杨思震, 张嘉欣, 陈春林, 李娟起, 李猛, 赵士文, 肖怀娟, 王吉庆. 过表达CaCP1提高转基因烟草对盐胁迫的敏感性[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(2): 172-182. |
[5] | 叶红, 王玉昆. 植物PRR免疫受体功能研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(12): 1-15. |
[6] | 张玉娟, 黎冬华, 宫慧慧, 崔新晓, 高春华, 张秀荣, 游均, 赵军胜. 芝麻NAC转录因子基因SiNAC77的克隆及耐盐功能分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(11): 308-317. |
[7] | 徐扬, 丁红, 张冠初, 郭庆, 张智猛, 戴良香. 盐胁迫下花生种子萌发期代谢组学分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(1): 199-213. |
[8] | 陈光, 李佳, 杜瑞英, 王旭. 水稻盐敏感突变体ss2的鉴定与基因功能分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(9): 158-166. |
[9] | 张斌, 杨昕霞. 水稻响应盐胁迫关键转录因子的鉴定[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(3): 9-15. |
[10] | 张业猛, 朱丽丽, 陈志国. 藜麦NHX基因家族鉴定及盐胁迫下表达分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(12): 184-193. |
[11] | 张彤彤, 郑登俞, 吴忠义, 张中保, 于荣. 玉米NF-Y转录因子基因ZmNF-YB13响应干旱和盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(10): 115-123. |
[12] | 马亚男, 卢旭, 魏云春, 李康, 魏若男, 李胜, 马绍英. 葡萄AKR基因家族的鉴定和组织特异性表达分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(8): 141-151. |
[13] | 刘娟, 朱春晓, 肖雪琼, 莫陈汨, 王高峰, 肖炎农. 淡紫紫孢菌亲环蛋白PlCYP6 互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(7): 137-145. |
[14] | 张永兰, 解莉楠. HKT1在植物耐盐机制中的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(6): 213-224. |
[15] | 王琪媛, 王甲辰, 叶磊, 姜帆. 含ACC脱氨酶的根际细菌提高植物抗盐性的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(2): 174-186. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||