生物技术通报 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 284-294.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2024-0591
• 研究报告 • 上一篇
于静1(
), 于桂爽1, 孙昊杰1, 姜春姣1, 苑广迪1, 杨珍1, 王志伟1, 王超2, 王传堂1(
)
收稿日期:2024-06-20
出版日期:2025-02-26
发布日期:2025-02-28
通讯作者:
王传堂,男,博士,研究员,研究方向 :花生育种技术与方法;E-mail: chinapeanut@126.com作者简介:于静,女,博士,助理研究员,研究方向 :花生抗果腐病遗传育种;E-mail: iamyujing2008@126.com
基金资助:
YU Jing1(
), YU Gui-shuang1, SUN Hao-jie1, JIANG Chun-jiao1, YUAN Guang-di1, YANG Zhen1, WANG Zhi-wei1, WANG Chao2, WANG Chuan-tang1(
)
Received:2024-06-20
Published:2025-02-26
Online:2025-02-28
摘要:
目的 厘清品种、地点、气象因素和镉含量对花生种用品质的影响,并开发花生种用品质相关标记,为提高花生种用品质和实现花生高产稳产的产业目标提供依据。 方法 采用不同花生品种在北方区进行多点试验,对花生种用品质进行方差分析和多重比较;以种用品质指标为因变量、气象因子为自变量进行逐步回归分析;对籽仁镉含量与种用品质指标间的相关性进行分析;运用关联分析发掘花生种用品质相关分子标记。 结果 品种、地点、气象因素及其互作对花生种用品质的影响均达极显著水准。种植大粒花生的10个地点中,青岛发芽势、发芽率及发芽指数高于其他地点,唐山活力指数高于其他地点。种植小粒花生的12个地点中,青岛发芽势高于其他地点,青岛和唐山发芽率高于其他地点,青岛发芽指数和活力指数高于其他地点。大粒花生镉含量与4项种用品质指标存在显著或极显著负相关关系;在一定范围内,镉含量与小粒花生发芽指数存在着极显著正相关关系。利用标准发芽试验统计的4个种子活力性状数据与60对AhTE标记进行关联分析,选用的标记覆盖全部的花生20条染色体组,共发掘9个与花生种用品质显著相关的分子标记。 结论 品种、地点、气象因素和镉含量对花生种用品质均存在显著的影响,共获得9个与种用品质性状相关的分子标记。
于静, 于桂爽, 孙昊杰, 姜春姣, 苑广迪, 杨珍, 王志伟, 王超, 王传堂. 花生种用品质影响因素及相关标记研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2025, 41(2): 284-294.
YU Jing, YU Gui-shuang, SUN Hao-jie, JIANG Chun-jiao, YUAN Guang-di, YANG Zhen, WANG Zhi-wei, WANG Chao, WANG Chuan-tang. Affecting Factors and Relevant Marker Study on Peanut Seed Quality[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 284-294.
| 变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | |||
| 地点 Location | 9 | 0.08 | 5.54 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 3.37 | 0.00 | 39.58 | 8.66 | 0.00 | 5 913.88 | 6.79 | 0.00 | |
| 品种 Variety | 10 | 0.02 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 12.42 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 2 365.60 | 2.72 | 0.00 | |
地点×品种 Location × variety | 90 | 0.01 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 4.57 | 4.08 | 0.00 | 870.48 | 4.05 | 0.00 | |
| 误差 Error | 220 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 1.12 | 215.06 | |||||||||
表1 北方区试大粒花生种用品质方差分析
Table 1 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the seed quality of large-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
| 变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | |||
| 地点 Location | 9 | 0.08 | 5.54 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 3.37 | 0.00 | 39.58 | 8.66 | 0.00 | 5 913.88 | 6.79 | 0.00 | |
| 品种 Variety | 10 | 0.02 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 12.42 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 2 365.60 | 2.72 | 0.00 | |
地点×品种 Location × variety | 90 | 0.01 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 4.57 | 4.08 | 0.00 | 870.48 | 4.05 | 0.00 | |
| 误差 Error | 220 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 1.12 | 215.06 | |||||||||
地点 Location | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 合肥 Hefei | 0.98±0.05AB | 0.98±0.05AB | 13.41±1.34B | 73.40±18.12D |
| 菏泽 Heze | 0.85±0.13C | 0.90±0.11C | 10.79±2.05D | 50.55±19.99F |
| 漯河 Louhe | 0.98±0.05AB | 0.98±0.05AB | 14.40±1.22A | 90.01±22.46AB |
| 商丘 Shangqiu | 0.98±0.04AB | 0.98±0.04A | 13.45±1.27B | 85.05±19.02BC |
| 青岛 Qingdao | 0.99±0.03A | 0.99±0.03A | 14.76±1.37A | 76.01±14.07CD |
| 泰安 Tai’an | 0.98±0.04AB | 0.98±0.04AB | 12.85±0.75BC | 73.04±15.27D |
| 潍坊 Weifang | 0.94±0.11AB | 0.97±0.08AB | 12.80±1.30BC | 62.37±16.37E |
| 烟台 Yantai | 0.94±0.08B | 0.98±0.04AB | 12.90±1.25BC | 66.76±12.95DE |
| 郑州 Zhengzhou | 0.95±0.09AB | 0.95±0.09B | 12.33±1.26C | 71.40±21.63DE |
| 唐山 Tangshan | 0.87±0.16C | 0.91±0.13C | 13.19±2.84B | 96.06±41.68A |
表2 北方区试大粒花生地点间种用品质的差异比较
Table 2 Comparison of differences in seed quality of large-seeded peanut among locations in the northern regional test
地点 Location | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 合肥 Hefei | 0.98±0.05AB | 0.98±0.05AB | 13.41±1.34B | 73.40±18.12D |
| 菏泽 Heze | 0.85±0.13C | 0.90±0.11C | 10.79±2.05D | 50.55±19.99F |
| 漯河 Louhe | 0.98±0.05AB | 0.98±0.05AB | 14.40±1.22A | 90.01±22.46AB |
| 商丘 Shangqiu | 0.98±0.04AB | 0.98±0.04A | 13.45±1.27B | 85.05±19.02BC |
| 青岛 Qingdao | 0.99±0.03A | 0.99±0.03A | 14.76±1.37A | 76.01±14.07CD |
| 泰安 Tai’an | 0.98±0.04AB | 0.98±0.04AB | 12.85±0.75BC | 73.04±15.27D |
| 潍坊 Weifang | 0.94±0.11AB | 0.97±0.08AB | 12.80±1.30BC | 62.37±16.37E |
| 烟台 Yantai | 0.94±0.08B | 0.98±0.04AB | 12.90±1.25BC | 66.76±12.95DE |
| 郑州 Zhengzhou | 0.95±0.09AB | 0.95±0.09B | 12.33±1.26C | 71.40±21.63DE |
| 唐山 Tangshan | 0.87±0.16C | 0.91±0.13C | 13.19±2.84B | 96.06±41.68A |
品种 Variety | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花育33号 Huayu 33 | 0.97±0.07A | 0.98±0.04A | 13.52±1.33AB | 72.08±16.94CDE |
| 花小宝108 Hua Xiaobao 108 | 0.93±0.11A | 0.94±0.09BC | 12.88±1.95BCD | 64.43±20.76EF |
| 冀花1353 Jihua 1353 | 0.94±0.09A | 0.97±0.05AB | 12.69±1.61CD | 73.35±26.51BCDE |
| 漯花28号 Luohua 28 | 0.94±0.10A | 0.96±0.07AB | 12.99±1.97ABCD | 78.43±23.25ABCD |
| 农大429 Nongda 429 | 0.95±0.09A | 0.97±0.06AB | 12.57±1.61D | 67.94±20.54DE |
| 中育花134号 Zhong Yuhua 134 | 0.88±0.16B | 0.92±0.14C | 11.57±2.39E | 57.17±21.90F |
| 囤花207 Tunhua 207 | 0.98±0.05A | 0.99±0.03A | 13.531±1.72AB | 84.14±29.57AB |
| 花育9137 Huayu 9137 | 0.96±0.08A | 0.98±0.06AB | 13.76±1.75A | 86.87±28.63A |
| 农大D3313 Nongda D3313 | 0.96±0.10A | 0.96±0.10ABC | 13.66±2.11AB | 73.52±20.78BCDE |
| 中育花135号 Zhongyuhua 135 | 0.93±0.11A | 0.95±0.08ABC | 13.44±1.54ABC | 80.45±25.03ABC |
| 周科花18 Zhou Kehua 18 | 0.97±0.08A | 0.98±0.05A | 13.36±1.42ABC | 80.75±23.51ABC |
表3 北方区试大粒花生品种间种用品质的差异比较
Table 3 Comparison of differences in seed quality among large-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
品种 Variety | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花育33号 Huayu 33 | 0.97±0.07A | 0.98±0.04A | 13.52±1.33AB | 72.08±16.94CDE |
| 花小宝108 Hua Xiaobao 108 | 0.93±0.11A | 0.94±0.09BC | 12.88±1.95BCD | 64.43±20.76EF |
| 冀花1353 Jihua 1353 | 0.94±0.09A | 0.97±0.05AB | 12.69±1.61CD | 73.35±26.51BCDE |
| 漯花28号 Luohua 28 | 0.94±0.10A | 0.96±0.07AB | 12.99±1.97ABCD | 78.43±23.25ABCD |
| 农大429 Nongda 429 | 0.95±0.09A | 0.97±0.06AB | 12.57±1.61D | 67.94±20.54DE |
| 中育花134号 Zhong Yuhua 134 | 0.88±0.16B | 0.92±0.14C | 11.57±2.39E | 57.17±21.90F |
| 囤花207 Tunhua 207 | 0.98±0.05A | 0.99±0.03A | 13.531±1.72AB | 84.14±29.57AB |
| 花育9137 Huayu 9137 | 0.96±0.08A | 0.98±0.06AB | 13.76±1.75A | 86.87±28.63A |
| 农大D3313 Nongda D3313 | 0.96±0.10A | 0.96±0.10ABC | 13.66±2.11AB | 73.52±20.78BCDE |
| 中育花135号 Zhongyuhua 135 | 0.93±0.11A | 0.95±0.08ABC | 13.44±1.54ABC | 80.45±25.03ABC |
| 周科花18 Zhou Kehua 18 | 0.97±0.08A | 0.98±0.05A | 13.36±1.42ABC | 80.75±23.51ABC |
变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | |||
| 地点 Location | 11 | 0.029 4 | 4.113 | 0.000 | 0.024 1 | 4.746 | 0.000 0 | 27.163 9 | 13.608 | 0.000 0 | 4 741.735 4 | 15.487 | 0.000 0 | |
| 品种 Variety | 6 | 0.038 3 | 5.359 | 0.000 | 0.025 4 | 4.995 | 0.000 1 | 10.354 1 | 5.187 | 0.000 1 | 5 552.077 2 | 18.134 | 0.000 0 | |
地点×品种 Location × variety | 66 | 0.011 4 | 1.594 | 0.009 1 | 0.008 4 | 1.662 | 0.004 9 | 3.678 4 | 1.843 | 0.000 9 | 541.647 9 | 1.769 | 0.001 9 | |
| 误差 Error | 168 | 0.007 | 0.005 1 | 1.996 2 | 306.170 0 | |||||||||
表4 北方区试小粒花生种用品质方差分析表
Table 4 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for seed quality of small-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | |||
| 地点 Location | 11 | 0.029 4 | 4.113 | 0.000 | 0.024 1 | 4.746 | 0.000 0 | 27.163 9 | 13.608 | 0.000 0 | 4 741.735 4 | 15.487 | 0.000 0 | |
| 品种 Variety | 6 | 0.038 3 | 5.359 | 0.000 | 0.025 4 | 4.995 | 0.000 1 | 10.354 1 | 5.187 | 0.000 1 | 5 552.077 2 | 18.134 | 0.000 0 | |
地点×品种 Location × variety | 66 | 0.011 4 | 1.594 | 0.009 1 | 0.008 4 | 1.662 | 0.004 9 | 3.678 4 | 1.843 | 0.000 9 | 541.647 9 | 1.769 | 0.001 9 | |
| 误差 Error | 168 | 0.007 | 0.005 1 | 1.996 2 | 306.170 0 | |||||||||
地点 Location | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白城 Baicheng | 0.86±0.17D | 88±0.13C | 11.72±2.31EF | 64.39±30.38EF |
| 阜新 Fuxin | 0.95±0.09ABC | 96±0.09AB | 13.97±1.85ABC | 87.96±25.90BC |
| 菏泽 Heze | 0.88±0.13CD | 94±0.10AB | 11.52±1.66F | 61.44±13.39F |
| 锦州 Jinzhou | 0.94±0.11ABC | 94±0.10AB | 12.07±1.91DEF | 60.78±20.40F |
| 青岛 Qingdao | 0.98±0.04A | 98±0.04A | 14.84±1.09A | 105.19±30.69A |
| 濮阳 Puyang | 0.90±0.10BCD | 90±0.10BC | 13.15±2.08BCD | 68.60±31.39DEF |
| 泰安 Tai’an | 0.95±0.08ABC | 97±0.05A | 11.29±1.17F | 71.67±16.61DEF |
| 唐山 Tangshan | 0.98±0.04AB | 98±0.04A | 12.84±1.16CDE | 69.07±14.18DEF |
| 潍坊 Weifang | 0.97±0.08AB | 97±0.08A | 13.15±1.44BCD | 62.04±15.96F |
| 烟台 Yantai | 0.94±0.07ABC | 97±0.04A | 13.04±1.57BCD | 80.78±21.84CD |
| 驻马店 Zhumadian | 0.95±0.08ABC | 95±0.08AB | 13.79±1.33ABC | 77.82±15.04CDE |
| 漯河 Luohe | 0.94±0.08ABC | 97±0.05A | 14.27±1.52AB | 99.84±21.76AB |
表5 北方区试小粒花生地点间种用品质的差异比较
Table 5 Comparison of differences in seed quality of small-seeded peanut among locations in the northern regional test
地点 Location | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白城 Baicheng | 0.86±0.17D | 88±0.13C | 11.72±2.31EF | 64.39±30.38EF |
| 阜新 Fuxin | 0.95±0.09ABC | 96±0.09AB | 13.97±1.85ABC | 87.96±25.90BC |
| 菏泽 Heze | 0.88±0.13CD | 94±0.10AB | 11.52±1.66F | 61.44±13.39F |
| 锦州 Jinzhou | 0.94±0.11ABC | 94±0.10AB | 12.07±1.91DEF | 60.78±20.40F |
| 青岛 Qingdao | 0.98±0.04A | 98±0.04A | 14.84±1.09A | 105.19±30.69A |
| 濮阳 Puyang | 0.90±0.10BCD | 90±0.10BC | 13.15±2.08BCD | 68.60±31.39DEF |
| 泰安 Tai’an | 0.95±0.08ABC | 97±0.05A | 11.29±1.17F | 71.67±16.61DEF |
| 唐山 Tangshan | 0.98±0.04AB | 98±0.04A | 12.84±1.16CDE | 69.07±14.18DEF |
| 潍坊 Weifang | 0.97±0.08AB | 97±0.08A | 13.15±1.44BCD | 62.04±15.96F |
| 烟台 Yantai | 0.94±0.07ABC | 97±0.04A | 13.04±1.57BCD | 80.78±21.84CD |
| 驻马店 Zhumadian | 0.95±0.08ABC | 95±0.08AB | 13.79±1.33ABC | 77.82±15.04CDE |
| 漯河 Luohe | 0.94±0.08ABC | 97±0.05A | 14.27±1.52AB | 99.84±21.76AB |
品种 Variety | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花育20号 Huayu 20 | 0.94±0.10A | 0.96±0.07A | 13.39±1.95A | 84.54±24.26B |
| 冀花714 Jihua 714 | 0.87±0.15B | 0.9±0.13B | 11.98±2.44B | 58.11±23.79D |
| 农大6037 Nongda 6037 | 0.97±0.06A | 0.98±0.05A | 13.49±1.57A | 96.27±30.66A |
| 安花9号 Anhua 9 | 0.93±0.12A | 0.94±0.11AB | 13.29±2.27A | 78.23±28.31BC |
| 囤花257 Tunhua 257 | 0.95±0.08A | 0.96±0.07A | 12.84±1.69AB | 69.91±18.99C |
| 潍花30 Weihua 30 | 0.94±0.08A | 0.96±0.07A | 12.62±1.62AB | 67.10±16.73CD |
| 郑农花32号 Zheng Nonghua 32 | 0.97±0.06A | 0.97±0.06A | 13.20±1.46A | 76.43±21.09BC |
表6 北方区试小粒花生品种间种用品质的差异比较
Table 6 Comparison of differences in seed quality among small-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
品种 Variety | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花育20号 Huayu 20 | 0.94±0.10A | 0.96±0.07A | 13.39±1.95A | 84.54±24.26B |
| 冀花714 Jihua 714 | 0.87±0.15B | 0.9±0.13B | 11.98±2.44B | 58.11±23.79D |
| 农大6037 Nongda 6037 | 0.97±0.06A | 0.98±0.05A | 13.49±1.57A | 96.27±30.66A |
| 安花9号 Anhua 9 | 0.93±0.12A | 0.94±0.11AB | 13.29±2.27A | 78.23±28.31BC |
| 囤花257 Tunhua 257 | 0.95±0.08A | 0.96±0.07A | 12.84±1.69AB | 69.91±18.99C |
| 潍花30 Weihua 30 | 0.94±0.08A | 0.96±0.07A | 12.62±1.62AB | 67.10±16.73CD |
| 郑农花32号 Zheng Nonghua 32 | 0.97±0.06A | 0.97±0.06A | 13.20±1.46A | 76.43±21.09BC |
种用品质 Seed peanut quality | 气象因子 Meteorological factor | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 标准回归系数 Standard regression coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t值 t-value | P值 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发芽势 Germination potential | 海拔 Altitude | 0.000 5 | 0.445 7 | 0.299 0 | 3.225 9 | 0.001 7 |
| 温差 Temperature difference | -0.065 4 | -0.719 8 | -0.397 5 | 4.460 0 | 0.000 0 | |
| 平均风速 Average wind velocity | -0.034 8 | -0.525 2 | -0.268 0 | 2.863 6 | 0.005 0 | |
发芽率 Germination rate | 经度 Longitude | 0.027 7 | 1.067 5 | 0.227 7 | 2.361 9 | 0.020 1 |
| 纬度 Latitude | -0.024 4 | -0.763 8 | -0.220 0 | 2.277 6 | 0.024 8 | |
| 海拔 Altitude | 0.000 7 | 0.805 8 | 0.215 9 | 2.233 1 | 0.027 7 | |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 4.052 8 | 56.011 9 | 0.230 5 | 2.392 4 | 0.018 6 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -4.125 3 | -81.542 0 | -0.232 6 | 2.415 4 | 0.017 5 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | 4.036 7 | 56.714 5 | 0.229 6 | 2.382 2 | 0.019 1 | |
| 平均风速 Mean wind speed | -0.118 5 | -2.283 3 | -0.274 4 | 2.881 8 | 0.004 8 | |
发芽指数 Germination index | 经度 Longitude | 1.268 3 | 1.930 7 | 0.321 8 | 3.449 3 | 0.000 8 |
| 纬度 Latitude | -0.624 9 | -0.772 2 | -0.337 1 | 3.634 5 | 0.000 4 | |
| 海拔 Altitude | 0.026 0 | 1.145 6 | 0.291 6 | 3.093 7 | 0.002 5 | |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | -1.493 1 | -1.164 3 | -0.269 4 | 2.838 6 | 0.005 5 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | 0.834 7 | 0.493 4 | 0.200 9 | 2.081 6 | 0.039 9 | |
| 平均风速 Mean wind speed | -3.493 4 | -2.654 7 | -0.348 3 | 3.770 8 | 0.000 3 | |
活力指数 Vitality index | 纬度 Latitude | -18.600 0 | -1.742 4 | -0.450 5 | 5.070 6 | 0.000 0 |
| 海拔 Altitude | -0.338 6 | -1.131 4 | -0.370 6 | 4.010 7 | 0.000 1 | |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | -3 886.817 9 | -229.777 3 | -0.488 4 | 5.624 2 | 0.000 0 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | 4 376.925 1 | 180.918 3 | 0.502 8 | 5.845 1 | 0.000 0 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | 4 173.234 3 | 175.356 3 | 0.498 0 | 5.771 4 | 0.000 0 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | 45.394 0 | 2.034 2 | 0.457 6 | 5.172 7 | 0.000 0 | |
| 平均气温 Mean temperature | -648.074 9 | -29.521 9 | -0.532 7 | 6.325 2 | 0.000 0 | |
| 平均风速 Mean wind speed | -86.673 2 | -4.993 5 | -0.548 0 | 6.583 4 | 0.000 0 |
表7 气象因子对北方区试大粒花生种用品质的影响
Table 7 Effect of meteorological factors on seed quality of large-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
种用品质 Seed peanut quality | 气象因子 Meteorological factor | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 标准回归系数 Standard regression coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t值 t-value | P值 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发芽势 Germination potential | 海拔 Altitude | 0.000 5 | 0.445 7 | 0.299 0 | 3.225 9 | 0.001 7 |
| 温差 Temperature difference | -0.065 4 | -0.719 8 | -0.397 5 | 4.460 0 | 0.000 0 | |
| 平均风速 Average wind velocity | -0.034 8 | -0.525 2 | -0.268 0 | 2.863 6 | 0.005 0 | |
发芽率 Germination rate | 经度 Longitude | 0.027 7 | 1.067 5 | 0.227 7 | 2.361 9 | 0.020 1 |
| 纬度 Latitude | -0.024 4 | -0.763 8 | -0.220 0 | 2.277 6 | 0.024 8 | |
| 海拔 Altitude | 0.000 7 | 0.805 8 | 0.215 9 | 2.233 1 | 0.027 7 | |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 4.052 8 | 56.011 9 | 0.230 5 | 2.392 4 | 0.018 6 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -4.125 3 | -81.542 0 | -0.232 6 | 2.415 4 | 0.017 5 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | 4.036 7 | 56.714 5 | 0.229 6 | 2.382 2 | 0.019 1 | |
| 平均风速 Mean wind speed | -0.118 5 | -2.283 3 | -0.274 4 | 2.881 8 | 0.004 8 | |
发芽指数 Germination index | 经度 Longitude | 1.268 3 | 1.930 7 | 0.321 8 | 3.449 3 | 0.000 8 |
| 纬度 Latitude | -0.624 9 | -0.772 2 | -0.337 1 | 3.634 5 | 0.000 4 | |
| 海拔 Altitude | 0.026 0 | 1.145 6 | 0.291 6 | 3.093 7 | 0.002 5 | |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | -1.493 1 | -1.164 3 | -0.269 4 | 2.838 6 | 0.005 5 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | 0.834 7 | 0.493 4 | 0.200 9 | 2.081 6 | 0.039 9 | |
| 平均风速 Mean wind speed | -3.493 4 | -2.654 7 | -0.348 3 | 3.770 8 | 0.000 3 | |
活力指数 Vitality index | 纬度 Latitude | -18.600 0 | -1.742 4 | -0.450 5 | 5.070 6 | 0.000 0 |
| 海拔 Altitude | -0.338 6 | -1.131 4 | -0.370 6 | 4.010 7 | 0.000 1 | |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | -3 886.817 9 | -229.777 3 | -0.488 4 | 5.624 2 | 0.000 0 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | 4 376.925 1 | 180.918 3 | 0.502 8 | 5.845 1 | 0.000 0 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | 4 173.234 3 | 175.356 3 | 0.498 0 | 5.771 4 | 0.000 0 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | 45.394 0 | 2.034 2 | 0.457 6 | 5.172 7 | 0.000 0 | |
| 平均气温 Mean temperature | -648.074 9 | -29.521 9 | -0.532 7 | 6.325 2 | 0.000 0 | |
| 平均风速 Mean wind speed | -86.673 2 | -4.993 5 | -0.548 0 | 6.583 4 | 0.000 0 |
种用品质 Seed peanut quality | 气象因子 Meteorological factor | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 标准回归系数Standard regression coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t值 t-value | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发芽势Germinative force | 纬度 Latitude | -0.029 2 | -1.464 0 | -0.320 6 | 2.989 2 | 0.003 7 |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 3.840 9 | 77.902 8 | 0.263 3 | 2.410 3 | 0.018 3 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -3.365 4 | -80.365 5 | -0.235 2 | 2.137 0 | 0.005 7 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | -3.534 9 | -50.216 3 | -0.245 9 | 2.240 6 | 0.027 9 | |
| 平均气温 Average temperature | -0.537 7 | -10.884 8 | -0.367 3 | 3.487 7 | 0.000 8 | |
| 发芽率Germination rate | 纬度 Latitude | -0.022 2 | -1.277 2 | -0.287 8 | 2.671 4 | 0.009 2 |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 0.364 8 | 8.486 8 | 0.327 1 | 3.076 8 | 0.002 9 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -0.137 0 | -2.232 0 | -0.347 2 | 3.291 0 | 0.001 5 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | -0.412 2 | -7.572 5 | -0.326 8 | 3.073 4 | 0.002 9 | |
发芽指数 Germination index | 纬度 Latitude | -1.323 4 | -2.690 4 | -0.243 1 | 2.199 5 | 0.030 8 |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 0.015 6 | 0.765 5 | 0.408 1 | 3.922 7 | 0.000 2 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -161.157 1 | -152.164 4 | -0.388 7 | 3.702 0 | 0.000 4 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | 160.455 7 | 178.374 2 | 0.390 4 | 3.721 1 | 0.000 4 | |
| 平均气温 Average temperature | 159.328 7 | 105.367 2 | 0.389 1 | 3.705 9 | 0.000 4 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | -4.378 0 | -2.631 2 | -0.331 4 | 3.082 1 | 0.002 9 | |
活力指数 Vital index | 纬度 Latitude | -15.652 3 | -2.577 6 | -0.383 9 | 3.718 8 | 0.000 4 |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -23.138 8 | -1.814 9 | -0.350 1 | 3.343 0 | 0.001 3 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | -22.775 7 | -0.965 8 | -0.351 7 | 3.360 2 | 0.001 2 |
表8 气象因子对北方区试小粒花生种用品质的影响
Table 8 Influence of meteorological factors on seed quality of small-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
种用品质 Seed peanut quality | 气象因子 Meteorological factor | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 标准回归系数Standard regression coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t值 t-value | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发芽势Germinative force | 纬度 Latitude | -0.029 2 | -1.464 0 | -0.320 6 | 2.989 2 | 0.003 7 |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 3.840 9 | 77.902 8 | 0.263 3 | 2.410 3 | 0.018 3 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -3.365 4 | -80.365 5 | -0.235 2 | 2.137 0 | 0.005 7 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | -3.534 9 | -50.216 3 | -0.245 9 | 2.240 6 | 0.027 9 | |
| 平均气温 Average temperature | -0.537 7 | -10.884 8 | -0.367 3 | 3.487 7 | 0.000 8 | |
| 发芽率Germination rate | 纬度 Latitude | -0.022 2 | -1.277 2 | -0.287 8 | 2.671 4 | 0.009 2 |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 0.364 8 | 8.486 8 | 0.327 1 | 3.076 8 | 0.002 9 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -0.137 0 | -2.232 0 | -0.347 2 | 3.291 0 | 0.001 5 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | -0.412 2 | -7.572 5 | -0.326 8 | 3.073 4 | 0.002 9 | |
发芽指数 Germination index | 纬度 Latitude | -1.323 4 | -2.690 4 | -0.243 1 | 2.199 5 | 0.030 8 |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 0.015 6 | 0.765 5 | 0.408 1 | 3.922 7 | 0.000 2 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -161.157 1 | -152.164 4 | -0.388 7 | 3.702 0 | 0.000 4 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | 160.455 7 | 178.374 2 | 0.390 4 | 3.721 1 | 0.000 4 | |
| 平均气温 Average temperature | 159.328 7 | 105.367 2 | 0.389 1 | 3.705 9 | 0.000 4 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | -4.378 0 | -2.631 2 | -0.331 4 | 3.082 1 | 0.002 9 | |
活力指数 Vital index | 纬度 Latitude | -15.652 3 | -2.577 6 | -0.383 9 | 3.718 8 | 0.000 4 |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -23.138 8 | -1.814 9 | -0.350 1 | 3.343 0 | 0.001 3 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | -22.775 7 | -0.965 8 | -0.351 7 | 3.360 2 | 0.001 2 |
种用品质 Seed peanut quality | 镉含量 Cadmium content | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
大粒花生 Large-seeded peanut | 小粒花生 Small-seeded peanut | |||
发芽势 Germinative force | -0.277 6** | 0.153 1 | ||
发芽率 Germination rate | -0.230 7* | 0.070 5 | ||
活力指数 Vital index | -0.218 6* | 0.183 5 | ||
发芽指数 Germination index | -0.275 9** | 0.318 0** | ||
表9 北方区试大、小粒花生镉含量与种用品质Pearson相关分析
Table 9 Pearson correlation analysis of cadmium content and seed quality of large-and small-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
种用品质 Seed peanut quality | 镉含量 Cadmium content | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
大粒花生 Large-seeded peanut | 小粒花生 Small-seeded peanut | |||
发芽势 Germinative force | -0.277 6** | 0.153 1 | ||
发芽率 Germination rate | -0.230 7* | 0.070 5 | ||
活力指数 Vital index | -0.218 6* | 0.183 5 | ||
发芽指数 Germination index | -0.275 9** | 0.318 0** | ||
关联模型 Correlation model | 标记 Marker | 连锁群 Linkage group (LG) | 关联性状 Associated character | R2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0003 | A14 | VI | 0.102 1‒0.149 9 | 0.007 7‒0.009 4 |
| GLM | AhTE0422 | A17 | GI | 0.077 5 | 0.007 9 |
| GLM | AhTE0498 | A13 | VI | 0.046 7 | 0.018 4 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0556 | A17 | GI | 0.063 3‒0.071 6 | 0.021 2‒0.021 4 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0191 | A14 | GI | 0.087 8‒0.109 2 | 0.010 2‒0.025 2 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0634 | A13 | GF | 0.042 2‒0.044 9 | 0.026 7‒0.029 2 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0634 | A13 | VI | 0.041 8‒0.047 5 | 0.023 9‒0.029 9 |
| GLM | AhTE0097 | A20 | GF | 0.044 2 | 0.032 5 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0013 | A13 | GR | 0.058 7‒0.060 8 | 0.041 5‒0.033 0 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0122 | A9 | GR | 0.036 5‒0.040 2 | 0.033 7‒0.045 5 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0013 | A13 | GF | 0.054 8‒0.055 9 | 0.039 9‒0.044 9 |
| GLM | AhTE0006 | A18 | GF | 0.054 3 | 0.042 4 |
| GLM | AhTE0097 | A20 | GR | 0.039 0 | 0.044 6 |
| GLM | AhTE0019 | A17 | VI | 0.034 0 | 0.046 0 |
| GLM | AhTE0143 | A17 | VI | 0.033 3 | 0.049 0 |
| MLM | AhTE0003 | A14 | GR | 0.124 4 | 0.022 9 |
| MLM | AhTE0003 | A14 | GF | 0.106 2 | 0.043 4 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0573 | A13 | GI | 0.059 4‒0.068 1 | 0.031 6‒0.041 4 |
表10 主要分子标记与种用品质关联性汇总
Table 10 Summary of associations of major molecular markers with seed quality
关联模型 Correlation model | 标记 Marker | 连锁群 Linkage group (LG) | 关联性状 Associated character | R2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0003 | A14 | VI | 0.102 1‒0.149 9 | 0.007 7‒0.009 4 |
| GLM | AhTE0422 | A17 | GI | 0.077 5 | 0.007 9 |
| GLM | AhTE0498 | A13 | VI | 0.046 7 | 0.018 4 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0556 | A17 | GI | 0.063 3‒0.071 6 | 0.021 2‒0.021 4 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0191 | A14 | GI | 0.087 8‒0.109 2 | 0.010 2‒0.025 2 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0634 | A13 | GF | 0.042 2‒0.044 9 | 0.026 7‒0.029 2 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0634 | A13 | VI | 0.041 8‒0.047 5 | 0.023 9‒0.029 9 |
| GLM | AhTE0097 | A20 | GF | 0.044 2 | 0.032 5 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0013 | A13 | GR | 0.058 7‒0.060 8 | 0.041 5‒0.033 0 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0122 | A9 | GR | 0.036 5‒0.040 2 | 0.033 7‒0.045 5 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0013 | A13 | GF | 0.054 8‒0.055 9 | 0.039 9‒0.044 9 |
| GLM | AhTE0006 | A18 | GF | 0.054 3 | 0.042 4 |
| GLM | AhTE0097 | A20 | GR | 0.039 0 | 0.044 6 |
| GLM | AhTE0019 | A17 | VI | 0.034 0 | 0.046 0 |
| GLM | AhTE0143 | A17 | VI | 0.033 3 | 0.049 0 |
| MLM | AhTE0003 | A14 | GR | 0.124 4 | 0.022 9 |
| MLM | AhTE0003 | A14 | GF | 0.106 2 | 0.043 4 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0573 | A13 | GI | 0.059 4‒0.068 1 | 0.031 6‒0.041 4 |
| 1 | 徐秀娟. 中国花生病虫草鼠害 [M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2009. |
| Xu XJ. Diseases, pests, weeds and damage in rats of peanuts in China [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009. | |
| 2 | 孙大容. 花生育种学 [M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998. |
| Sun DR. Peanut breeding [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998. | |
| 3 | 张满良. 农业植物病理学(北方本)[M]. 北京: 世界图书出版公司, 1997. |
| Zhang ML. Agricultural Plant Pathology (Boreal) [M]. Beijing: World Book Press, 1997. | |
| 4 | 成广雷, 张海娇, 赵久然, 等. 临界胁迫贮藏条件下不同基因型玉米种子活力及生理变化 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(1): 33-42. |
| Cheng GL, Zhang HJ, Zhao JR, et al. Vigor and physiological changes of different genotypes of maize seed (Zea mays L.) under critical stress storage conditions [J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48(1): 33-42. | |
| 5 | 崔婷, 唐启源. 种子活力保持与提高技术研究进展 [J]. 作物研究, 2014, 28(4): 435-439, 446. |
| Cui T, Tang QY. Research progress on measures of maintaining and improving seed vigor [J]. Crop Res, 2014, 28(4): 435-439, 446. | |
| 6 | 梁煜莹, 张加羽, 姜骁, 等. 花生品质与气候环境的关系研究 [J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2024, 25(2): 227-244. |
| Liang YY, Zhang JY, Jiang X, et al. Study on the relationship between peanut quality and climatic environments [J]. J Plant Genet Resour, 2024, 25(2): 227-244. | |
| 7 | 陈娜, 程果, 潘丽娟, 等. 东北地区收获期低温对花生品质影响及耐低温品种筛选 [J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(11): 2417-2427. |
| Chen N, Cheng G, Pan LJ, et al. Effect of low temperature on peanut quality and screening of low temperature tolerant varieties in Northeast China [J]. Plant Physiol J, 2020, 56(11): 2417-2427. | |
| 8 | 姜骁, 许静, 潘丽娟, 等. 花生产量相关性状与气象因子多环境相关性分析 [J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(11): 3110-3121. |
| Jiang X, Xu J, Pan LJ, et al. Peanut yield-related traits and meteorological factors correlation analysis in multiple environments [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49(11): 3110-3121. | |
| 9 | 秦美林, 罗枫雪, 刘连胜, 等. miR164c和miR168b的表达与水稻种子活力的相关性研究 [J]. 激光生物学报, 2013, 22(2): 166-173. |
| Qin ML, Luo FX, Liu LS, et al. A study on the relationship between the expression of miR164c and miR168b and seed vigor of rice [J]. Acta Laser Biol Sin, 2013, 22(2): 166-173. | |
| 10 | Kim JY, Kwak KJ, Jung HJ, et al. MicroRNA402 affects seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana under stress conditions via targeting DEMETER-LIKE Protein3 mRNA [J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 2010, 51(6): 1079-1083. |
| 11 | Feng XM, Qiao Y, Mao K, et al. Ectopic overexpression of AtmiR398b gene in tobacco influences seed germination and seedling growth [J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult PCTOC, 2010, 102(1): 53-59. |
| 12 | 孙彩霞, 沈秀瑛, 谷铁实. 不同基因型玉米种子萌发特性与芽、苗期抗旱性的关系 [J]. 种子, 2001, 20(5): 32-35. |
| Sun CX, Shen XY, Gu TS. Relationship between seed germination and its drought resistance of shoot-seedling in different genotype maize [J]. Seed, 2001, 20(5): 32-35. | |
| 13 | TeKrony DM, Hunter JL. Effect of seed maturation and genotype on seed vigor in maize [J]. Crop Sci, 1995, 35(3): 857-862. |
| 14 | 汤学军, 傅家瑞, 黄上志. 决定种子寿命的生理机制研究进展 [J]. 种子, 1996, 15(6): 29-32. |
| Tang XJ, Fu JR, Huang SZ. Research progress on physiological mechanism of determining seed longevity [J]. Seed, 1996, 15(6): 29-32. | |
| 15 | 马守才, 张改生, 王军卫, 等. 小麦种子活力性状的遗传变异和相关研究 [J]. 西北植物学报, 2004, 24(9): 1674-1679. |
| Ma SC, Zhang GS, Wang JW, et al. Genetic difference and interrelationship among seed vigor traits in wheat [J]. Acta Bot Boreali Occidentalia Sin, 2004, 24(9): 1674-1679. | |
| 16 | 徐彪, 李玉发, 牛海龙, 等. 利用AhMITE分子标记对花生杂交F1代的真伪鉴定 [J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(11): 94-97. |
| Xu B, Li YF, Niu HL, et al. Identification of F1 generation peanut hybrids using AhMITE molecular markers [J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2022, 50(11): 94-97. | |
| 17 | 许梦琦. 花生SNP分子标记的开发及应用 [D]. 大连: 大连工业大学, 2015. |
| Xu MQ. Development and application of SNP molecular markers in peanut [D]. Dalian: Dalian Polytechnic University, 2015. | |
| 18 | Ashwini, Nayidu NK, Rakesh JL, et al. Validation of yield associated molecular markers in a groundnut minicore collection [J]. S Afr N J Bot, 2023, 159: 26-34. |
| 19 | 房元瑾, 孙子淇, 齐飞艳, 等. 花生分子标记辅助育种研究进展与展望 [J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2024, 46(4): 728-736. |
| Fang YJ, Sun ZQ, Qi FY, et al. Advances of marker-assisted selection in peanut breeding [J]. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2024, 46(4): 728-736. | |
| 20 | 严玫, 张新友, 韩锁义, 等. 花生重要农艺及产量性状的全基因组关联分析 [J]. 植物学报, 2015, 50(4): 460-472. |
| Yan M, Zhang XY, Han SY, et al. Genome-wide association study of agronomic and yield traits in a worldwide collection of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) germplasm [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2015, 50(4): 460-472. | |
| 21 | 刘文童, 赵永锋, 郭晋杰, 等. 玉米种子活力相关性状的全基因组关联分析 [J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2020, 43(6): 6-14. |
| Liu WT, Zhao YF, Guo JJ, et al. Genome-wide association studies of seed vigor related traits in maize [J]. J Hebei Agric Univ, 2020, 43(6): 6-14. | |
| 22 | 杨彬, 周嘉润, 沈玉婷, 等. 水稻种子活力性状全基因组关联分析研究进展 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(3): 16-21. |
| Yang B, Zhou JR, Shen YT, et al. Research progress on genome-wide association analysis of rice seed vigor [J]. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2023, 51(3): 16-21. | |
| 23 | 石冰欣. 小麦种子活力相关性状全基因组关联分析及其优异种质鉴定 [D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2023. |
| Shi BX. Genome-wide association study and excellent germplasm identification of wheat seed vigor related traits [D]. Ya'an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2023. | |
| 24 | 张红梅, 张威, 王琼, 等. 大豆籽粒Ve含量的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报: 2024, 50(5):1223-1235. |
| Zhang HM, Zhang W, Wang Q, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of Ve content in soybean grains [J]. Acta Cropologica Sinica: 2024, 50(5): 1223-1235. | |
| 25 | Zhang H, Wang ML, Dang P, et al. Identification of potential QTLs and genes associated with seed composition traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using GWAS and RNA-Seq analysis [J]. Gene, 2021, 769: 145215. |
| 26 | 李丽. 利用连锁和全基因组关联分析鉴定花生株型相关性状的QTLs [D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2019. |
| Li L. Quantitative trait loci identification for growth habit-related traits using the linkage and genome-wide association analysis in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) [D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2019. | |
| 27 | 张秀荣, 张昆, 骆璐, 等. 花生抗旱相关SSR标记及优异等位变异分析 [J/OL]. 分子植物育种, 2023. . |
| Zhang XR, Zhang K, Luo L, et al. Analysis of drought resistance related SSR markers and superior allelic variation in peanut [J/OL]. Mol Plant Breed, 2023. . | |
| 28 | McLaughlin MJ, Bell MJ, Wright GC, et al. Inter- and intra-specific variation in accumulation of cadmium by peanut, soybean, and navybean [J]. Aust J Agric Res, 1997, 48(8): 1151. |
| 29 | 国家技术监督局. 农作物种子检验规程 发芽试验: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 1995. |
| The State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. Rules for agricultural seed testing-germination test: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1995. | |
| 30 | 张鹤. 花生苗期耐冷评价体系构建及其生理与分子机制 [D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2020. |
| Zhang H. Construction of evaluation system for cold tolerance of peanut seedlings and its physiological and molecular mechanism [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2020. | |
| 31 | 张青云. 花生种用抗逆性及相关基因的研究 [D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2016. |
| Zhang QY. Study on stress resistance and related genes of peanut seeds [D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2016. | |
| 32 | Shirasawa K, Koilkonda P, Aoki K, et al. In silico polymorphism analysis for the development of simple sequence repeat and transposon markers and construction of linkage map in cultivated peanut [J]. BMC Plant Biol, 2012, 12: 80. |
| 33 | 陈程杰, 夏瑞. TBtools‒大数据时代下的国产生物软件 [J]. 科学观察, 2022, 17(6): 33-35. |
| Chen CJ, Xia R. TBtools-domestic biological software in the age of big data [J]. Sci Focus, 2022, 17(6): 33-35. | |
| 34 | 孙海燕, 万书波, 李林, 等. 我国花生生产区域比较优势分析 [J]. 中国油脂, 2014, 39(6): 6-11. |
| Sun HY, Wan SB, Li L, et al. Analysis of regional comparative advantage of peanut production in China [J]. China Oils Fats, 2014, 39(6): 6-11. | |
| 35 | 吴甘霖. 镉对花生幼苗生长及生理生态特性的影响 [J]. 生物学杂志, 2008, 25(5): 31-33, 68. |
| Wu GL. Effects of cadmium on the growth, physiological and ecological characteristics of peanut seedling [J]. J Biol, 2008, 25(5): 31-33, 68. | |
| 36 | 牛常青. 重金属镉离子对花生幼苗的影响 [J]. 晋中学院学报, 2009, 26(3): 63-67. |
| Niu CQ. Effect of heavy metal cadmium on Arachis hypogaea's seedling growth [J]. J Jinzhong Univ, 2009, 26(3): 63-67. |
| [1] | 毛向红, 卢瑶, 范向斌, 杜培兵, 白小东. 基于SSR荧光标记毛细管电泳的马铃薯品种遗传多样性分析及分子身份证构建[J]. 生物技术通报, 2024, 40(9): 131-140. |
| [2] | 李思琪, 张文臣, 杨柳, 付庆新, 洪新, 张海旺. 基于SSR标记的文冠果遗传多样性分析及指纹图谱构建[J]. 生物技术通报, 2024, 40(5): 74-83. |
| [3] | 徐扬, 张瑞英, 戴良香, 张冠初, 丁红, 张智猛. 盐胁迫下氮素对花生种子萌发和种子际细菌菌群结构的调控[J]. 生物技术通报, 2024, 40(2): 253-265. |
| [4] | 李晴, 石雨荷, 朱珏, 李晓玲, 侯超文, 童巧珍. 基于SCoT分子标记分析白术种质资源遗传多样性及DNA指纹图谱构建[J]. 生物技术通报, 2024, 40(11): 142-151. |
| [5] | 安苗, 王彤彤, 付逸婷, 夏俊俊, 彭锁堂, 段永红. 52个马铃薯遗传多样性分析及SSR分子身份证构建[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(12): 136-147. |
| [6] | 陆育生, 彭程, 常晓晓, 邱继水, 陈喆, 陈慧琼. 基于SSR标记的广东黄皮种质资源遗传多样性分析及分子身份证构建[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(12): 187-199. |
| [7] | 李莹, 宋新颖, 何康, 郭志青, 于静, 张霞. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌ZHX-7的分离鉴定及抑菌促生效果[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(12): 229-236. |
| [8] | 徐扬, 丁红, 张冠初, 郭庆, 张智猛, 戴良香. 盐胁迫下花生种子萌发期代谢组学分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2023, 39(1): 199-213. |
| [9] | 李颖, 龙长梅, 蒋标, 韩丽珍. 两株PGPR菌株的花生定殖及对根际细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(9): 237-247. |
| [10] | 徐扬, 张冠初, 丁红, 秦斐斐, 张智猛, 戴良香. 土壤类型对花生根际土壤细菌群落多样性和产量的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(6): 221-234. |
| [11] | 周晓楠, 徐金青, 雷雨晴, 王海庆. 基于GBS-seq的青藏扁蓿豆SNP标记开发[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(4): 303-310. |
| [12] | 王衍莉, 杨义明, 范书田, 赵滢, 许培磊, 路文鹏, 李昌禹. 基于SSR分子标记的73份山葡萄及杂交后代的遗传多样性分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(1): 189-197. |
| [13] | 张乐超, 刘月琴, 段春辉, 张英杰, 王泳, 郭云霞. 7个地方山羊品种遗传多样性及遗传结构分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(6): 183-190. |
| [14] | 李勇慧, 于相丽, 马会萍, 高凯, 刘名雪. 不同品种牡丹ISSR遗传多样性分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(4): 78-83. |
| [15] | 赵昕鹏, 周云, 吕琳琳, 李锁平, 张大乐. 节节麦遗传多样性及在改良普通小麦中的应用[J]. 生物技术通报, 2019, 35(7): 181-189. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||