不同窖龄窖泥微生物群落结构与理化指标的相关分析

doi:10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2016.07.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旨在研究不同窖龄窖泥中主要微生物群落结构的多样性和窖泥理化指标（pH、总氮、腐殖酸、有效磷和总酸）的变化规律,并进行了相关性分析。采用凯氏定氮等方法对理化指标进行测定,通过DGGE技术研究微生物群落结构的变化,结合SPSS软件对其相关性进行分析。结果表明,随着窖龄的增加,窖泥的pH基本没有变化,总酸呈缓慢下降的趋势,总氮先上升后下降,腐殖酸和有效磷都缓慢增加;细菌和古菌的多样性指数分别在1.62-2.58和1.79-2.33之间,并都随着窖龄的增加而逐渐增加;细菌的群落结构与腐殖酸、总酸、有效磷的相关系数分别为0.972（P<0.01）、-0.987（P<0.01）、0.878（P<0.05）,古菌的菌落结构与腐殖酸、总酸、有效磷的相关系数分别为0.986（P<0.01）、-0.954（P<0.05）、0.901（P<0.05）,其他指标的相关性不显著;选取细菌中11个优势条带割胶测序发现大多数都为杆菌,选取了古菌4个优势条带割胶测序发现均为产甲烷菌。窖泥的理化指标和微生物群落结构随窖龄的变化呈现一定的规律,而部分理化指标与微生物群落结构有极强的相关性,这些指标对窖泥微生物驯化有极大的关系。

关键词: 窖泥, PCR-DGGE, 群落结构, 相关性分析

Abstract: This experiment aims to study the diversity of major microbial community structure in pit mud of different ages and the variation pattern of pit mud’s physical and chemical index（pH,total nitrogen,humic acid,available phosphorus and total acid）,and to analyze the correlations among them. The results of Kjeldahl determination showed that：with the increase of pit age,pH of pit mud did not change basically,total acid tended to decrease slowly,total nitrogen rose firstly and then dropped,humic acid and available phosphorus increased slowly. The diversity index of bacteria and archaea by DGGE ranged as 1.62-2.58 and 1.79-2.33,respectively,and gradually increased with the increasing of pit age. The correlation coefficient between bacteria’s community structure and humic acid was 0.972（P<0.01）,-0.987（P<0.01）with total acid,and 0.878（P<0.05）with available phosphorus. The correlation coefficient of archaea’s community structure and humic acid was 0.986（P<0.01）,-0.954（P<0.05）with total acid,0.901（P<0.05）with available phosphorus,and no significant correlation with other indexes. Regarding bacteria,selected 11 dominant bands for sequencing,and most of them were found to be bacillus generally. Regarding archaea,selected 4 dominant bands for sequencing,and most of them were found to be methanogen. The physiochemical indexes and microbial community structure in pit mud showed a certain regular pattern with the change of the pit age,and some physiochemical indexes were strongly correlated with microbial community structure,these physiochemical indexes greatly concerned with the microbe’s domestication.

Key words: pit mud, PCR-DGGE, microbial community, correlation analysis

钟姝霞,邓杰,卫春会,罗惠波,万世旅,黄治国. 不同窖龄窖泥微生物群落结构与理化指标的相关分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32(7): 119-125.

ZHONG Shu-xia DENG Jie WEI Chun-hui LUO Hui-bo WAN Shi-lü HUANG Zhi-guo. Correlations Between Microbial Community and Physicochemical Indexes in Pit Mud of Different Ages[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2016, 32(7): 119-125.

参考文献

[1] 黄治国, 刘燕梅, 卫春会, 等. 浓香型酒醅微生物群落与理化指标的相关性分析[J]. 现代食品科技, 2014, 30（11）：38-42.
[2] 岳元媛, 张文学, 刘霞, 等. 浓香型白酒窖泥中兼性厌氧细菌的分离鉴定[J]. 微生物学通报, 2007, 34（2）：251-225.
[3] 王涛, 杜江, 陈泽军, 等. 窖泥放线菌的分离方法研究[J]. 酿酒科技, 2009（3）：26-28.
[4] Ercolini D. PCR-DGGE fingerp rinting：novel strate2gies for detec-tion ofmicrobes in food[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2004, 56：297-314.
[5] Bekaert K, Devriese L, Maes S, et al. Characterization of the dominant bacterial communities during storage of Norway lobster and Norway lobster tails（Nephrops norvegicus）based on 16S rDNA analysis by PCR-DGGE[J]. Food Microbiology, 2015, 46：132-138.
[6] Ling J, Zhang YY, Gong JD, et al. Spatial variability of cyanobacte-rial community composition in Sanya Bay as determined by DGGE fingerprinting and multivariate analysis[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58（9）：1019-1027.
[7] 王洋清, 杨红军, 李勇. DGGE技术在森林土壤微生物多样性研究中的应用[J]. 生物技术通报, 2011, 5：75-79.
[8] Hesham Ael-L, Qi R, Yang M. Comparison of bacterial community structures in two systems of a sewage treatment plant using PCR-DGGE analysis[J]. Science Direct, 2011, 23（12）：2049-2054.
[9] 刘慧杰, 杨彩云, 田蕴, 等. 基于PCR-DGGE技术的红树林区微生物群落结构[J]. 微生物学报, 2010, 50（7）：923-930.
[10] Chen HJ, Lin YZ, Fanjiang JM, Fan C. Microbial community and treatment ability investigation in AOAO process for the optoelectronic wastewater treatment using PCR-DGGE biotechnology[J]. Biodegradation, 2013, 24（2）：227-243.
[11] 陕小虎, 敖宗华, 周健, 等. 浓香型白酒窖泥原核微生物DGGE电泳条件的优化[J]. 酿酒科技, 2011（1）：37-40.
[12] 陶勇, 徐占成, 李东迅, 等. 窖泥细菌群落结构演替及其与环境因子的相关性[J]. 酿酒科技, 2011（9）：42-46.
[13] Zoet endal EG, Akkermans ADL, De Vos WM. Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S rRNA from human fecal samples reveals stable and host-specific communities of active bacteria[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1998, 64（10）：3854-3859.
[14] 余有贵, 李侦, 熊翔, 等. 窖泥微生态的主要特征研究[J]. 食品科学, 2009（1）：258-261.
[15] Hargreaves PR, Brookes PC, Ross GJS, Poulton PR. Evaluating soil mcrobial biomasscar bonasanin dicato roflong - termenviron mental change[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2003, 35：401- 407.
[16] 刘兰兰, 史春余, 梁太波, 等. 腐植酸肥料对生姜土壤微生物量和酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29：6136-6140.
[17] Staley BF, de los Reyes FL, Barlaz MA. Effect of spatial differences in microbial activity, pH, and substrate levels on methanogenesis initiation in refuse[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77（7）：2381-2391.
[18] Hao LP, Lu F, He PJ, et al. Predominant contribution of syntrophic acetate oxidation to themophilic methane formation at high acetate concentrations[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2011, 45（2）：508-513.
[19] Marteau P, Minekus M, Havenaar R, et al. Survival of Lactic acid bacteria in a dynamic model of the stomach and small intestine：validation and the effects of bile[J]. Dairy Science, 1997, 80（6）：1031-1037.
[20] 栗永乐, 李秀丽, 李传娟, 等. 内蒙古东部地区农家酸菜中乳酸菌的分离与初步鉴定[J]. 食品工业, 2012, 33：132-134.
[21] Ryan P, Forbes C, McHugh S, et al. Enrichment of acetogenic bacteria in high rate. anaerobic reactors under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions[J]. Science Direct, 2010（44）：4261-4269.
[22] Pinder RS, Patterson JA. Growth of acetogenic bacteria in response to varying pH, acetate or carbohydrate concentration. Agriculture[J]. Food and Analytical Bacteriology, 2013（3）：6-16.
[23] Parameswaran P, Torres CI, Lee HS, et al. Hydrogen consumption in microbial electrochemical systems（MXCs）：The role of homo-acetogenic bacteria[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012（102）：263-271.