Biotechnology Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 173-184.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2022-1499
Previous Articles Next Articles
FAN Xin-qi1(), WANG Hai-yan2, CHEN Jing1, ZHANG Xiao-juan1, GUO Qi1, LIANG Du1, ZHOU Fu-ping1, NIE Meng-en1, ZHANG Yi-zhong1, LIU Qing-shan2()
Received:
2022-12-07
Online:
2023-07-26
Published:
2023-08-17
Contact:
LIU Qing-shan
E-mail:fanxq86@126.com;673673@163.com
FAN Xin-qi, WANG Hai-yan, CHEN Jing, ZHANG Xiao-juan, GUO Qi, LIANG Du, ZHOU Fu-ping, NIE Meng-en, ZHANG Yi-zhong, LIU Qing-shan. Effects of EMS Mutagenesis on the Seeding Survival and Major Agronomic Traits of Sorghum in M1 Generation[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 173-184.
EMS处理浓度 EMS treatment concentration/% | 相对成苗率 Relative seeding emergence rate/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1121R | LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 低秆L17 Digan L17 | L17 | 28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | ||
0.00 | 100.0±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | |
0.20 | 75.64±0.65Ba | 52.50±0.85Bc | 75.43±0.73Ba | 68.94±0.80Bb | 71.81±1.07Bb | 54.86±0.16Bc | |
0.25 | 74.36±0.41Ba | 51.39±0.24BCd | 65.43±0.54Cc | 68.3±0.50Bb | 63.61±0.55Cc | 50.00±0.36Cd | |
0.30 | 59.23±0.81Cb | 49.44±1.04Cd | 54.78±0.72Dc | 64.68±1.72BCa | 58.07±0.67Db | 45.71±0.36De | |
0.35 | 47.44±0.76Dd | 43.06±0.51De | 50.00±0.41Ec | 61.23±0.61Ca | 55.18±0.22Eb | 42.86±0.52Ee |
Table 1 Effects of the EMS treatments with different concentrations on the seeding emergence rate of sorghum
EMS处理浓度 EMS treatment concentration/% | 相对成苗率 Relative seeding emergence rate/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1121R | LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 低秆L17 Digan L17 | L17 | 28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | ||
0.00 | 100.0±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | |
0.20 | 75.64±0.65Ba | 52.50±0.85Bc | 75.43±0.73Ba | 68.94±0.80Bb | 71.81±1.07Bb | 54.86±0.16Bc | |
0.25 | 74.36±0.41Ba | 51.39±0.24BCd | 65.43±0.54Cc | 68.3±0.50Bb | 63.61±0.55Cc | 50.00±0.36Cd | |
0.30 | 59.23±0.81Cb | 49.44±1.04Cd | 54.78±0.72Dc | 64.68±1.72BCa | 58.07±0.67Db | 45.71±0.36De | |
0.35 | 47.44±0.76Dd | 43.06±0.51De | 50.00±0.41Ec | 61.23±0.61Ca | 55.18±0.22Eb | 42.86±0.52Ee |
EMS处理浓度 Treatments concentration/% | 影响程度 Effect degree |
---|---|
0.00 | 1121R=L早615·L17>L17=低秆L17>LgB7B大粒高=28R·吉16 |
0.20 | 1121R>低秆L17>L早615·L17= L17>LgB7B大粒高=28R·吉16 |
0.25 | 低秆L17>1121R=L17>L早615·L17> LgB7B大粒高>28R·吉16 |
0.30 | 低秆L17>L17>L早615·L17> 1121R>LgB7B大粒高=28R·吉16 |
Table 2 Comparison of affecting degrees of different EMS treatments with different concentrations on the seeding emergence of sorghum
EMS处理浓度 Treatments concentration/% | 影响程度 Effect degree |
---|---|
0.00 | 1121R=L早615·L17>L17=低秆L17>LgB7B大粒高=28R·吉16 |
0.20 | 1121R>低秆L17>L早615·L17= L17>LgB7B大粒高=28R·吉16 |
0.25 | 低秆L17>1121R=L17>L早615·L17> LgB7B大粒高>28R·吉16 |
0.30 | 低秆L17>L17>L早615·L17> 1121R>LgB7B大粒高=28R·吉16 |
EMS处理浓度 EMS treatment concentration/% | 株高变异率 Plant height mutation rate/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1121R | LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 低秆L17 Digan L17 | L17 | 28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | ||
0.00 | 100.0±0.00Aa | 100.0±0.00Aaa | 100.0±0.00Aa | 100.0±0.00Aa | 100.0±0.00Aa | 100.0±0.00Aa | |
0.20 | 17.59±0.79Bab | 21.29±0.28Ca | 7.83±0.20Cb | 23.68±0.32Ca | 21.64±4.86Ba | 11.25±0.49Bb | |
0.25 | 33.12±0.49Cb | 34.13±0.85Db | 23.92±0.13De | 27.16±0.21Dd | 39.21±0.22Ca | 30.86±0.54Cc | |
0.30 | 57.57±0.64Da | 39.61±0.36Ecd | 30.42±0.63Ee | 36.31±0.37Ed | 41.92±0.68Cc | 48.00±1.45Db |
Table 3 Effects of EMS treatments with different concentrations on the plant heights of sorghum
EMS处理浓度 EMS treatment concentration/% | 株高变异率 Plant height mutation rate/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1121R | LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 低秆L17 Digan L17 | L17 | 28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | ||
0.00 | 100.0±0.00Aa | 100.0±0.00Aaa | 100.0±0.00Aa | 100.0±0.00Aa | 100.0±0.00Aa | 100.0±0.00Aa | |
0.20 | 17.59±0.79Bab | 21.29±0.28Ca | 7.83±0.20Cb | 23.68±0.32Ca | 21.64±4.86Ba | 11.25±0.49Bb | |
0.25 | 33.12±0.49Cb | 34.13±0.85Db | 23.92±0.13De | 27.16±0.21Dd | 39.21±0.22Ca | 30.86±0.54Cc | |
0.30 | 57.57±0.64Da | 39.61±0.36Ecd | 30.42±0.63Ee | 36.31±0.37Ed | 41.92±0.68Cc | 48.00±1.45Db |
材料 Materials | EMS处理浓度 EMS treatment concentration/% | 育性变异率Fertility mutation rate/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
育性=0% Fertility=0% | 育性≤10% Fertility≤10% | 10%<育性≤50% 10%<Fertility≤50% | 育性>50% Fertility>50% | |||
1121R | 0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
0.20 | 13.79±0.39 | 25.91±0.44 | 80.40±0.97 | 89.27±1.64 | ||
0.25 | 14.85±0.37 | 25.58±0.39 | 11.60±0.29 | 5.75±0.17 | ||
0.30 | 12.47±0.37 | 21.59±0.65 | 4.40±0.10 | 3.07±0.12 | ||
0.35 | 58.89±0.33 | 26.91±0.42 | 3.60±0.08 | 1.92±0.22 | ||
LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | 0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
0.20 | 28.74±0.34 | 45.00±0.76 | 49.59±0.72 | 66.67±1.28 | ||
0.25 | 32.93±0.42 | 7.14±0.26 | 4.88±0.21 | 4.44±0.12 | ||
0.30 | 25.75±0.46 | 30.71±0.41 | 38.21±0.54 | 24.44±1.19 | ||
0.35 | 12.57±0.42 | 17.14±0.94 | 7.32±0.20 | 4.44±0.18 | ||
L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
0.20 | 16.88±0.53 | 41.94±0.7 | 68.94±0.47 | 84.11±1.14 | ||
0.25 | 8.75±0.09 | 28.39±0.57 | 9.09±0.16 | 4.67±0.20 | ||
0.30 | 5.63±0.55 | 9.68±0.25 | 6.82±0.33 | 5.61±0.21 | ||
0.35 | 68.75±0.39 | 20.00±0.59 | 15.15±0.43 | 5.61±0.45 | ||
低秆L17 Digan L17 | 0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
0.20 | 9.01±0.21 | 13.47±0.28 | 17.22±0.37 | 17.24±0.56 | ||
0.25 | 20.12±0.22 | 27.35±0.24 | 14.90±0.45 | 23.79±0.81 | ||
0.30 | 22.82±0.33 | 33.47±0.22 | 19.87±0.49 | 28.28±0.42 | ||
0.35 | 48.05±0.42 | 25.71±0.34 | 48.01±0.41 | 30.69±0.79 | ||
L17 | 0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
0.20 | 11.70±0.32 | 17.80±0.72 | 35.58±0.52 | 43.65±0.99 | ||
0.25 | 9.43±0.34 | 15.53±0.80 | 32.69±0.73 | 26.52±0.95 | ||
0.30 | 16.23±0.32 | 21.59±0.93 | 17.31±0.45 | 15.47±0.72 | ||
0.35 | 62.64±0.51 | 45.08±0.86 | 14.42±0.57 | 14.36±0.88 | ||
28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | 0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
0.20 | 34.93±1.25 | 46.63±0.65 | 50.36±0.65 | 93.55±1.51 | ||
0.25 | 32.88±0.40 | 23.03±0.47 | 22.30±0.54 | 6.45±0.14 | ||
0.30 | 23.29±1.09 | 12.92±0.51 | 17.27±0.52 | 0.00±0.00 | ||
0.35 | 8.90±0.18 | 17.42±0.61 | 10.07±0.16 | 0.00±0.00 |
Table 4 Effects of different EMS treatments with different concentrations on the plant fertility of sorghum
材料 Materials | EMS处理浓度 EMS treatment concentration/% | 育性变异率Fertility mutation rate/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
育性=0% Fertility=0% | 育性≤10% Fertility≤10% | 10%<育性≤50% 10%<Fertility≤50% | 育性>50% Fertility>50% | |||
1121R | 0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
0.20 | 13.79±0.39 | 25.91±0.44 | 80.40±0.97 | 89.27±1.64 | ||
0.25 | 14.85±0.37 | 25.58±0.39 | 11.60±0.29 | 5.75±0.17 | ||
0.30 | 12.47±0.37 | 21.59±0.65 | 4.40±0.10 | 3.07±0.12 | ||
0.35 | 58.89±0.33 | 26.91±0.42 | 3.60±0.08 | 1.92±0.22 | ||
LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | 0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
0.20 | 28.74±0.34 | 45.00±0.76 | 49.59±0.72 | 66.67±1.28 | ||
0.25 | 32.93±0.42 | 7.14±0.26 | 4.88±0.21 | 4.44±0.12 | ||
0.30 | 25.75±0.46 | 30.71±0.41 | 38.21±0.54 | 24.44±1.19 | ||
0.35 | 12.57±0.42 | 17.14±0.94 | 7.32±0.20 | 4.44±0.18 | ||
L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
0.20 | 16.88±0.53 | 41.94±0.7 | 68.94±0.47 | 84.11±1.14 | ||
0.25 | 8.75±0.09 | 28.39±0.57 | 9.09±0.16 | 4.67±0.20 | ||
0.30 | 5.63±0.55 | 9.68±0.25 | 6.82±0.33 | 5.61±0.21 | ||
0.35 | 68.75±0.39 | 20.00±0.59 | 15.15±0.43 | 5.61±0.45 | ||
低秆L17 Digan L17 | 0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
0.20 | 9.01±0.21 | 13.47±0.28 | 17.22±0.37 | 17.24±0.56 | ||
0.25 | 20.12±0.22 | 27.35±0.24 | 14.90±0.45 | 23.79±0.81 | ||
0.30 | 22.82±0.33 | 33.47±0.22 | 19.87±0.49 | 28.28±0.42 | ||
0.35 | 48.05±0.42 | 25.71±0.34 | 48.01±0.41 | 30.69±0.79 | ||
L17 | 0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
0.20 | 11.70±0.32 | 17.80±0.72 | 35.58±0.52 | 43.65±0.99 | ||
0.25 | 9.43±0.34 | 15.53±0.80 | 32.69±0.73 | 26.52±0.95 | ||
0.30 | 16.23±0.32 | 21.59±0.93 | 17.31±0.45 | 15.47±0.72 | ||
0.35 | 62.64±0.51 | 45.08±0.86 | 14.42±0.57 | 14.36±0.88 | ||
28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | 0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 | |
0.20 | 34.93±1.25 | 46.63±0.65 | 50.36±0.65 | 93.55±1.51 | ||
0.25 | 32.88±0.40 | 23.03±0.47 | 22.30±0.54 | 6.45±0.14 | ||
0.30 | 23.29±1.09 | 12.92±0.51 | 17.27±0.52 | 0.00±0.00 | ||
0.35 | 8.90±0.18 | 17.42±0.61 | 10.07±0.16 | 0.00±0.00 |
EMS处理浓度 EMS treatments concentration/% | 叶片变异率 Leaf mutation rate/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1121R | LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 低秆L17 Digan L17 | L17 | 28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | ||
0.00 | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | |
0.20 | 11.69±0.34Ba | 7.74±0.17Bc | 3.89±0.07Bd | 4.17±0.06Bd | 3.52±0.09Bd | 9.38±0.17Bb | |
0.25 | 22.76±0.32Ca | 7.94±0.32Bd | 12.92±0.64Cb | 4.98±0.34Cf | 6.02±0.13Ce | 9.38±0.16Bc | |
0.30 | 29.22±0.91Da | 19.19±0.50Cc | 16.96±0.60Dd | 7.89±0.34De | 7.86±0.35De | 21.00±0.51Cb | |
0.35 | 34.86±0.74Ea | 26.12±0.83Db | 19.05±0.28Ed | 9.5±0.28Ee | 11.36±0.27Ee | 24.00±0.78Dc |
Table 5 Effects of EMS treatments with different concentrations on the plant leaf mutation rates of sorghum
EMS处理浓度 EMS treatments concentration/% | 叶片变异率 Leaf mutation rate/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1121R | LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 低秆L17 Digan L17 | L17 | 28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | ||
0.00 | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | |
0.20 | 11.69±0.34Ba | 7.74±0.17Bc | 3.89±0.07Bd | 4.17±0.06Bd | 3.52±0.09Bd | 9.38±0.17Bb | |
0.25 | 22.76±0.32Ca | 7.94±0.32Bd | 12.92±0.64Cb | 4.98±0.34Cf | 6.02±0.13Ce | 9.38±0.16Bc | |
0.30 | 29.22±0.91Da | 19.19±0.50Cc | 16.96±0.60Dd | 7.89±0.34De | 7.86±0.35De | 21.00±0.51Cb | |
0.35 | 34.86±0.74Ea | 26.12±0.83Db | 19.05±0.28Ed | 9.5±0.28Ee | 11.36±0.27Ee | 24.00±0.78Dc |
EMS处理浓度 EMS treatments concentration/% | 穗型变异率 Panicle type mutation rate/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1121R | LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 低秆L17 Digan L17 | L17 | 28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | ||
0.00 | 0.00±0.00A a | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00A | 0.00±0.00A | |
0.20 | 2.03±0.02 Bb | 1.05±0.02Bc | 2.59±0.20Ba | 2.62±0.15Ba | 0.00±0.00Ad | 1.00±0.04Bc | |
0.25 | 2.60±0.23BCc | 3.87±0.22Cb | 3.57±0.31Dd | 3.13±0.05Bc | 1.51±0.04Bd | 4.29±0.12Cb | |
0.30 | 3.1±0.16CBe | 7.58±0.06Da | 4.98±0.31Ca | 5.64±0.15Cb | 2.8±0.044Ce | 4.69±0.19Cc | |
0.35 | 8.38±0.21Da | 8.51±0.22Ea | 8.81±0.20Ea | 5.85±0.31Cb | 3.91±0.36Dc | 5.75±0.27Db |
Table 6 Effects of EMS treatments with different concentrations on the plant panicle types of sorghum
EMS处理浓度 EMS treatments concentration/% | 穗型变异率 Panicle type mutation rate/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1121R | LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 低秆L17 Digan L17 | L17 | 28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | ||
0.00 | 0.00±0.00A a | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00A | 0.00±0.00A | |
0.20 | 2.03±0.02 Bb | 1.05±0.02Bc | 2.59±0.20Ba | 2.62±0.15Ba | 0.00±0.00Ad | 1.00±0.04Bc | |
0.25 | 2.60±0.23BCc | 3.87±0.22Cb | 3.57±0.31Dd | 3.13±0.05Bc | 1.51±0.04Bd | 4.29±0.12Cb | |
0.30 | 3.1±0.16CBe | 7.58±0.06Da | 4.98±0.31Ca | 5.64±0.15Cb | 2.8±0.044Ce | 4.69±0.19Cc | |
0.35 | 8.38±0.21Da | 8.51±0.22Ea | 8.81±0.20Ea | 5.85±0.31Cb | 3.91±0.36Dc | 5.75±0.27Db |
EMS处理浓度 EMS treatments concentration/% | 成熟期变异率 Maturity stage mutation rate/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1121R | LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 低秆L17 Digan L17 | L17 | 28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | ||
0.00 | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | |
0.20 | 1.03±0.06Bd | 1.58±0.07Bc | 2.59±0.24Bb | 1.00±0.00Bd | 3.93±0.04Ba | 1.67±0.03Bc | |
0.25 | 2.58±0.14Cd | 3.87±0.12Cb | 2.96±0.21Bc | 2.08±0.05Be | 6.25±0.14Ca | 4.17±0.05Cb | |
0.30 | 2.60±0.19Cc | 7.30±0.18Da | 5.95±0.21Cb | 2.47±0.03Bc | 7.05±0.13Da | 5.63±0.09Db | |
0.35 | 11.35±0.20Db | 14.33±0.28Ea | 7.89±0.44Cde | 7.17±0.28De | 9.06±0.10Ec | 8.57±0.30Ecd |
Table 7 Effect of different EMS treatments with different concentrations on the plant maturity stage of sorghum
EMS处理浓度 EMS treatments concentration/% | 成熟期变异率 Maturity stage mutation rate/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1121R | LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 低秆L17 Digan L17 | L17 | 28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | ||
0.00 | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | 0.00±0.00Aa | |
0.20 | 1.03±0.06Bd | 1.58±0.07Bc | 2.59±0.24Bb | 1.00±0.00Bd | 3.93±0.04Ba | 1.67±0.03Bc | |
0.25 | 2.58±0.14Cd | 3.87±0.12Cb | 2.96±0.21Bc | 2.08±0.05Be | 6.25±0.14Ca | 4.17±0.05Cb | |
0.30 | 2.60±0.19Cc | 7.30±0.18Da | 5.95±0.21Cb | 2.47±0.03Bc | 7.05±0.13Da | 5.63±0.09Db | |
0.35 | 11.35±0.20Db | 14.33±0.28Ea | 7.89±0.44Cde | 7.17±0.28De | 9.06±0.10Ec | 8.57±0.30Ecd |
性状 Traits | EMS处理浓度Treatments concentration/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1121R | LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 低秆L17 Digan L17 | L17 | 28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | ||
成苗率Seeding survival rate | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.35 | >0.35 | 0.35 | 0.25 | |
育性 Fertility | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.25 | >0.35 | 0.35 | 0.25 | |
综合Comprehensiveness | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | >0.35 | 0.35 | 0.25 |
Table 8 Optimal concentrations of sorghum treated with EMS
性状 Traits | EMS处理浓度Treatments concentration/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1121R | LgB7B大粒高 LgB7B Daligao | L早615·L17 L Zao 615·L17 | 低秆L17 Digan L17 | L17 | 28R·吉16 28R·Ji16 | ||
成苗率Seeding survival rate | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.35 | >0.35 | 0.35 | 0.25 | |
育性 Fertility | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.25 | >0.35 | 0.35 | 0.25 | |
综合Comprehensiveness | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | >0.35 | 0.35 | 0.25 |
[1] | 卢庆善. 高粱学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999: 225-230. |
Lu QS. Sorghum[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999: 225-230. | |
[2] | 卢庆善, 邹剑秋, 朱凯, 等. 试论我国高粱产业发展——一论全国高粱生产优势区[J]. 杂粮作物, 2009, 29(2): 78-80 |
Lu QS, Zou JQ, Zhu K, et al. A discussion on development of sorghum industries in China[J]. Rain Fed Crops, 2009, 29(2): 78-80 | |
[3] | 樊双虎, 郭文柱, 路小铎, 等. 玉米EMS突变体库构建及突变体初步鉴定[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(11): 3162-3165, 3185. |
Fan SH, Guo WZ, Lu XD, et al. Construction and preliminary identification of EMS mutant library in maize[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2014, 42(11): 3162-3165, 3185. | |
[4] | 王黎明, 陈君燚, 姬敬敬, 等. 小麦穗型突变体(库)的创制、鉴定及其遗传分析[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(1): 117-122, 132. |
Wang LM, Chen JY, Ji JJ, et al. Creation, identification and genetic analysis of library of spike-type wheat mutants[J]. Seed, 2022, 41(1): 117-122, 132. | |
[5] | 刘叶, 顾爱星, 朱琦. 棉花枯萎病菌突变体库的构建及分析[J]. 微生物学通报, 2022, 49(1): 125-138. |
Liu Y, Gu AX, Zhu Q. Construction and analysis of mutant library of cotton Fusarium wilt[J]. Microbiol China, 2022, 49(1): 125-138. | |
[6] |
Hossen QMM, Rahman SMB, Rahman MN, et al. Development of early flowering, short life-spanned jute(Corchorus spp.) mutant via ethyl methane sulfonate mutagenesis[J]. J Crop Sci Biotechnol, 2022, 25(4): 489-500.
doi: 10.1007/s12892-022-00146-4 |
[7] |
Chhabra B, Singh L, Wallace S, et al. Screening of an ethyl methane sulfonate mutagenized population of a wheat cultivar susceptible to Fusarium head blight identifies resistant variants[J]. Plant Dis, 2021, 105(11): 3669-3676.
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-21-0670-RE URL |
[8] |
Chen JG, Wang F, Lei BQ, et al. Modulation of growth duration, grain yield and nitrogen recovery efficiency by EMS mutagenesis under OsNRT2.3b overexpression background in rice[J]. Agriculture, 2022, 12(6): 799.
doi: 10.3390/agriculture12060799 URL |
[9] | 吴茜, 蒋丹, 文欢, 等. 水稻‘9311’突变体库构建及磷响应突变体筛选[J]. 分子植物育种, 2023, 21(1): 168-173. |
Wu Q, Jiang D, Wen H, et al. Construction of rice‘9311’ mutant library and screening of mutants response to phosphorus[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2023, 21(1): 168-173. | |
[10] | 韩锁义, 杨玛丽, 陈远东, 等. 大豆 “南农94-16” 突变体库的构建及部分性状分析[J]. 核农学报, 2008, 22(2): 131-135. |
Han SY, Yang ML, Chen YD, et al. Construction of mutant library for soybean “Nannong 94-16” and analysis of some characters[J]. Acta Agric Nucleatae Sin, 2008, 22(2): 131-135. | |
[11] |
Fang CQ, Wang CT, Wang PW, et al. Identification of a novel mutation in FAD2B from a peanut EMS mutant with elevated oleate content[J]. J Oleo Sci, 2012, 61(3): 143-148.
pmid: 22362145 |
[12] | 赵明. 水稻收获时休眠性(穗发芽抗性)的鉴定、遗传与育种应用[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学. |
Zhao M. Identification, inheritance and breeding application of dormancy(pre-harvest germination resistance)in rice[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University. | |
[13] | 徐艳花, 陈锋, 董中东, 等. EMS诱变的普通小麦豫农201突变体库的构建与初步分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2010, 30(4): 625-629. |
Xu YH, Chen F, Dong ZD, et al. Construction and analysis of EMS induced mutant library of hexaploid wheat cultivar Yunong 201[J]. J Triticeae Crops, 2010, 30(4): 625-629. | |
[14] | 孙加焱, 涂进东, 范叔味, 等. 甘蓝型油菜理化诱变和突变体库的构建[J]. 遗传, 2007, 29(4): 475-482. |
Sun JY, Tu JD, Fan SW, et al. The screening of mutants induced by physical and chemical factors and construction of mutant population for Brassica napus L[J]. J Distance Educ, 2007, 29(4): 475-482. | |
[15] | 王春语, 朱振兴, 李丹, 等. 高粱EMS诱变及突变体筛选、鉴定[J]. 生物技术通报, 2014(9): 78-83. |
Wang CY, Zhu ZX, Li D, et al. EMS mutagenesis, mutant screening and identification of sorghum[J]. Biotechnol Bull, 2014(9): 78-83. | |
[16] | 刘言龙, 安亚飞, 李杰勤, 等. 高粱EMS诱变及突变体种质库的构建[C]// 2018中国草学会年会论文集. 成都: 中国草学会, 2018: 15-20. |
Liu YL, An YF, Li JQ, et al. The screening of mutants induced by EMS and construction of mutant population for sorghum[C]// Proceedings of 2018 annual meeting of China grass society. Chengdu: China Grassland Science Press, 2018: 15-20. | |
[17] |
王炜, 陈琛, 葛玉彬, 等. 甜高粱EMS诱变获得新种质的研究[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(1): 7-13.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.01.0007 |
Wang W, Chen C, Ge YB, et al. EMS mutagenesis of sweet sorghum to create new germplasm[J]. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2022, 36(1): 7-13.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.01.0007 |
|
[18] |
张伟, 赵威军, 白文斌, 等. EMS诱变甜高粱突变体筛选与鉴定[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(36): 22-25.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20200200084 |
Zhang W, Zhao WJ, Bai WB, et al. Screening and identification of EMS mutants from sweet sorghum[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2020, 36(36): 22-25.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20200200084 |
|
[19] |
于淼, 陈冰嬬, 石贵山, 等. EMS诱导粒用高粱的突变体筛选和鉴定[J]. 核农学报, 2023, 37(1): 1-7.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.1000-8551.2023.01.0001 |
Yu M, Chen BR, Shi GS, et al. Screening and identification of grain sorghum mutants induced with EMS[J]. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2023, 37(1): 1-7.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.1000-8551.2023.01.0001 |
|
[20] | 李辉, 段明禹, 张小微, 等. EMS诱变对酒用糯高粱出苗及产量相关农艺性状的影响[J]. 农业与技术, 2022, 42(13): 26-29. |
Li H, Duan MY, Zhang XW, et al. Effects of EMS mutation on emergence and yield-related agronomic characters of waxy sorghum for wine[J]. Agric Technol, 2022, 42(13): 26-29. | |
[21] | 丁延庆, 曹宁, 周棱波, 等. 不同浓度EMS诱变剂对红缨子高粱种子萌发影响[J]. 农技服务, 2018, 35(2): 51-52. |
Ding YQ, Cao N, Zhou LB, et al. Effect of EMS mutagen with different concentration on seed germination of red tassel sorghum[J]. Agric Technol Serv, 2018, 35(2): 51-52. | |
[22] | 范昕琦, 王海燕, 聂萌恩, 等. EMS诱变对高粱出苗及农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(1): 47-54. |
Fan XQ, Wang HY, Nie ME, et al. Effects of EMS mutagenesis on emergence and agronomic traits in sorghum[J]. Crops, 2020(1): 47-54. | |
[23] | 聂萌恩, 柳青山, 范昕琦, 等. EMS诱变对高粱种子萌发及农艺性状的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2021, 49(7)802-806. |
Nie ME, Liu QS, Fan XQ, et al. Effects of EMS mutagenesis inducing treatment on seed germination and agronomic traits of sorghum[J]. J Shanxi Agric Sci, 2021, 49(7): 802-806. | |
[24] | Surashe SM, Kalpande HV, Badignnavar A, et al. Mutation induced phenotypic variation for yield traits in sorghum[Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench[J]. Electronic J Plant Breed, 2022, 13(2): 312-318. |
[25] |
Kalpande HV, Surashe SM, Badigannavar A, et al. Induced variability and assessment of mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency in sorghum genotypes[Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench[J]. Int J Radiat Biol, 2022, 98(2): 230-243.
doi: 10.1080/09553002.2022.2003466 URL |
[26] | Wanga MA, Shimelis H, Horn LN, et al. The effect of single and combined use of gamma radiation and ethylmethane sulfonate on early growth parameters in sorghum[J]. Plants(Basel), 2020, 9(7): 827. |
[27] |
卢银, 刘梦洋, 王超硕, 等. EMS处理对大白菜种子和幼苗活力的影响及M2表型变异分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(2): 349-358.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2015.02.020 |
Lu Y, Liu MY, Wang CS, et al. Effects of EMS mutagenesis on seed and seedling vigor and phenotypic variation of M2 population in Chinese cabbage[J]. J Plant Genet Resour, 2015, 16(2): 349-358. | |
[28] | 伊风艳, 孙海莲, 王晓娟, 等. EMS诱变对蒙古国黄花苜蓿种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 种子, 2018, 37(10): 41-44. |
Yi FY, Sun HL, Wang XJ, et al. Effect of EMS mutagenesis on seed germination and seedling growth of Medicago falcata L. in Mongolia[J]. Seed, 2018, 37(10): 41-44. | |
[29] | 黎诗艳, 阮景军, 范昱, 等. EMS诱变剂处理对苦荞种子萌发及主要农艺性状的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(3): 914-922. |
Li SY, Ruan JJ, Fan Y, et al. Effects of EMS mutagenesis inducing treatment on seed germination and main agronomic traits of Tartary buckwheat[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2021, 19(3): 914-922. | |
[30] | 张晓勤, 薛大伟, 周伟辉, 等. 用甲基磺酸乙酯(EMS)诱变的大麦浙农大3号突变体的筛选和鉴定[J]. 浙江大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2011, 37(2): 169-174. |
Zhang XQ, Xue DW, Zhou WH, et al. Screening and identification of the mutants from two-row barley cultivar ZJU3 induced by ethyl methane sulfonate(EMS)[J]. J Zhejiang Univ Agric Life Sci, 2011, 37(2): 169-174. | |
[31] |
Mizuno H, Kawahigashi H, Kawahara Y, et al. Global transcriptome analysis reveals distinct expression among duplicated genes during sorghum-interaction[J]. BMC Plant Biol, 2012, 12: 121.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-121 pmid: 22838966 |
[32] |
Hilley JL, Weers BD, Truong SK, et al. Sorghum Dw2 encodes a protein kinase regulator of stem internode length[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 4616.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04609-5 pmid: 28676627 |
[33] | Brown P, Paterson A. Bridging classical and molecular genetics of sorghum plant stature and maturity[J]. Genomics of the Saccharinae, 2013, 11: 333-345. |
[1] | LU Zhen-wan, LI Xue-qi, HUANG Jin-guang, ZHOU Huan-bin. Creation of Glyphosate-tolerant Rice by Cytosine Base Editing [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 63-69. |
[2] | LI Peng-cheng, ZHANG Ming-jun, WANG Yin-xiao, LI Xiang-yin, LI Sheng-yan, LANG Zhi-hong. Insect Resistance Identification and Agronomy Traits Analysis of Transgenic Maize HGK60 with Different Genetic Backgrounds [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 40-47. |
[3] | WANG Cui-cui, FU Da-qi. Research Progress in the Effects of Ubiquitin-proteasome System on Plant Agronomic Traits [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 72-83. |
[4] | SUN De-quan, LU Xin-hua, LI Wei-ming, HU Yu-lin, DUAN Ya-jie, PANG Zhen-cai, HU Hui-gang. Application of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles in Agriculture [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 228-239. |
[5] | ZHANG Hai-miao, LI Yang, LIU Hai-feng, KONG Ling-guang, DING Xin-hua. Research Progress on Regulatory Genes of Important Agronomic Traits and Breeding Utilization in Rice [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2020, 36(12): 155-169. |
[6] | LI Ai-guo, LI Ji-ming, LI He-ping, LIU Gui-hua, SONG Cong-min, WU Jun-yan. Selection of Winter Rape Varieties Suitable for Cold and Dry Areas in Hebei Province [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2020, 36(1): 95-100. |
[7] | DUAN Min-jie, YI Hong-wei, WANG Jin, WU Zheng. Cloning and Expression Analysis of the Pear Black Spot Resistant Gene PpEMS1 [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(11): 16-21. |
[8] | HU Ya-ping, ZHOU Xu, CHEN Shui-fei, GE Xiao-min, DING Hui. Effects of Plant Virus Infection on Biological Factors and Their Interactions in the Ecosystem [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(10): 180-188. |
[9] | LIANG Hai-sheng, LI Meng-tao, LI Sheng-yan, WANG Hai, ZHANG Jie, LANG Zhi-hong. Agronomic Traits Analysis of Transgenic Bt cry1Ah Maize HGK60 Line [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2018, 34(7): 92-100. |
[10] | LI Su-zhen, YANG Wen-zhu, CHEN Ru-mei. An Overview on Yellow Green Leaf Mutants in Rice [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2018, 34(11): 15-21. |
[11] | SONG Yan-chao, An Fei-fei, Xue Jing-jing, Qin Yu-ling, Li Kai-mian, CHEN Song-bi. Proteomic Analysis on Tuberous Roots of Cassava Cultivar ZM-Seaside and Mosaic-leaf Mutation [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2017, 33(3): 78-85. |
[12] | WANG Wei-guo, DENG Qian, JI Qiao-ling, WANG Wei. Orthogonal Test of EMS Mutation and NaCl Stress and Screening of Salt-tolerant Fiber Flax Germplasm in Vitro [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2016, 32(6): 103-110. |
[13] | Wang Chunyu,Zhu Zhenxing, Li Dan, Cong ling,Zhang Lixia. EMS Mutagenesis,Mutant Screening and Identification of Sorghum [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2014, 0(9): 78-83. |
[14] | Liu Hongquan, Lin Xiaoyuan, Li Jieqiong, Pan Yihua. The Research on Mutagenesis Breeding of Phaeodactylum tricornutum and the Condition of EPA Producing [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2014, 0(9): 114-119. |
[15] | Dai Jun, Li Xiuying, Zhu Li, Wang Hai, Zhang Jie, He Kanglai, Lang Zhihong, Huang Dafang. Molecular Detection and Agronomic Traits Analysis of Insect-resistant Transgenic Maize Harboring Bt cry1Ah Gene [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2014, 0(5): 62-68. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||