Biotechnology Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 284-294.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2024-0591
YU Jing1(
), YU Gui-shuang1, SUN Hao-jie1, JIANG Chun-jiao1, YUAN Guang-di1, YANG Zhen1, WANG Zhi-wei1, WANG Chao2, WANG Chuan-tang1(
)
Received:2024-06-20
Online:2025-02-26
Published:2025-02-28
Contact:
WANG Chuan-tang
E-mail:iamyujing2008@126.com;chinapeanut@126.com
YU Jing, YU Gui-shuang, SUN Hao-jie, JIANG Chun-jiao, YUAN Guang-di, YANG Zhen, WANG Zhi-wei, WANG Chao, WANG Chuan-tang. Affecting Factors and Relevant Marker Study on Peanut Seed Quality[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 284-294.
| 变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | |||
| 地点 Location | 9 | 0.08 | 5.54 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 3.37 | 0.00 | 39.58 | 8.66 | 0.00 | 5 913.88 | 6.79 | 0.00 | |
| 品种 Variety | 10 | 0.02 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 12.42 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 2 365.60 | 2.72 | 0.00 | |
地点×品种 Location × variety | 90 | 0.01 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 4.57 | 4.08 | 0.00 | 870.48 | 4.05 | 0.00 | |
| 误差 Error | 220 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 1.12 | 215.06 | |||||||||
Table 1 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the seed quality of large-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
| 变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | |||
| 地点 Location | 9 | 0.08 | 5.54 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 3.37 | 0.00 | 39.58 | 8.66 | 0.00 | 5 913.88 | 6.79 | 0.00 | |
| 品种 Variety | 10 | 0.02 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 12.42 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 2 365.60 | 2.72 | 0.00 | |
地点×品种 Location × variety | 90 | 0.01 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 4.57 | 4.08 | 0.00 | 870.48 | 4.05 | 0.00 | |
| 误差 Error | 220 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 1.12 | 215.06 | |||||||||
地点 Location | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 合肥 Hefei | 0.98±0.05AB | 0.98±0.05AB | 13.41±1.34B | 73.40±18.12D |
| 菏泽 Heze | 0.85±0.13C | 0.90±0.11C | 10.79±2.05D | 50.55±19.99F |
| 漯河 Louhe | 0.98±0.05AB | 0.98±0.05AB | 14.40±1.22A | 90.01±22.46AB |
| 商丘 Shangqiu | 0.98±0.04AB | 0.98±0.04A | 13.45±1.27B | 85.05±19.02BC |
| 青岛 Qingdao | 0.99±0.03A | 0.99±0.03A | 14.76±1.37A | 76.01±14.07CD |
| 泰安 Tai’an | 0.98±0.04AB | 0.98±0.04AB | 12.85±0.75BC | 73.04±15.27D |
| 潍坊 Weifang | 0.94±0.11AB | 0.97±0.08AB | 12.80±1.30BC | 62.37±16.37E |
| 烟台 Yantai | 0.94±0.08B | 0.98±0.04AB | 12.90±1.25BC | 66.76±12.95DE |
| 郑州 Zhengzhou | 0.95±0.09AB | 0.95±0.09B | 12.33±1.26C | 71.40±21.63DE |
| 唐山 Tangshan | 0.87±0.16C | 0.91±0.13C | 13.19±2.84B | 96.06±41.68A |
Table 2 Comparison of differences in seed quality of large-seeded peanut among locations in the northern regional test
地点 Location | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 合肥 Hefei | 0.98±0.05AB | 0.98±0.05AB | 13.41±1.34B | 73.40±18.12D |
| 菏泽 Heze | 0.85±0.13C | 0.90±0.11C | 10.79±2.05D | 50.55±19.99F |
| 漯河 Louhe | 0.98±0.05AB | 0.98±0.05AB | 14.40±1.22A | 90.01±22.46AB |
| 商丘 Shangqiu | 0.98±0.04AB | 0.98±0.04A | 13.45±1.27B | 85.05±19.02BC |
| 青岛 Qingdao | 0.99±0.03A | 0.99±0.03A | 14.76±1.37A | 76.01±14.07CD |
| 泰安 Tai’an | 0.98±0.04AB | 0.98±0.04AB | 12.85±0.75BC | 73.04±15.27D |
| 潍坊 Weifang | 0.94±0.11AB | 0.97±0.08AB | 12.80±1.30BC | 62.37±16.37E |
| 烟台 Yantai | 0.94±0.08B | 0.98±0.04AB | 12.90±1.25BC | 66.76±12.95DE |
| 郑州 Zhengzhou | 0.95±0.09AB | 0.95±0.09B | 12.33±1.26C | 71.40±21.63DE |
| 唐山 Tangshan | 0.87±0.16C | 0.91±0.13C | 13.19±2.84B | 96.06±41.68A |
品种 Variety | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花育33号 Huayu 33 | 0.97±0.07A | 0.98±0.04A | 13.52±1.33AB | 72.08±16.94CDE |
| 花小宝108 Hua Xiaobao 108 | 0.93±0.11A | 0.94±0.09BC | 12.88±1.95BCD | 64.43±20.76EF |
| 冀花1353 Jihua 1353 | 0.94±0.09A | 0.97±0.05AB | 12.69±1.61CD | 73.35±26.51BCDE |
| 漯花28号 Luohua 28 | 0.94±0.10A | 0.96±0.07AB | 12.99±1.97ABCD | 78.43±23.25ABCD |
| 农大429 Nongda 429 | 0.95±0.09A | 0.97±0.06AB | 12.57±1.61D | 67.94±20.54DE |
| 中育花134号 Zhong Yuhua 134 | 0.88±0.16B | 0.92±0.14C | 11.57±2.39E | 57.17±21.90F |
| 囤花207 Tunhua 207 | 0.98±0.05A | 0.99±0.03A | 13.531±1.72AB | 84.14±29.57AB |
| 花育9137 Huayu 9137 | 0.96±0.08A | 0.98±0.06AB | 13.76±1.75A | 86.87±28.63A |
| 农大D3313 Nongda D3313 | 0.96±0.10A | 0.96±0.10ABC | 13.66±2.11AB | 73.52±20.78BCDE |
| 中育花135号 Zhongyuhua 135 | 0.93±0.11A | 0.95±0.08ABC | 13.44±1.54ABC | 80.45±25.03ABC |
| 周科花18 Zhou Kehua 18 | 0.97±0.08A | 0.98±0.05A | 13.36±1.42ABC | 80.75±23.51ABC |
Table 3 Comparison of differences in seed quality among large-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
品种 Variety | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花育33号 Huayu 33 | 0.97±0.07A | 0.98±0.04A | 13.52±1.33AB | 72.08±16.94CDE |
| 花小宝108 Hua Xiaobao 108 | 0.93±0.11A | 0.94±0.09BC | 12.88±1.95BCD | 64.43±20.76EF |
| 冀花1353 Jihua 1353 | 0.94±0.09A | 0.97±0.05AB | 12.69±1.61CD | 73.35±26.51BCDE |
| 漯花28号 Luohua 28 | 0.94±0.10A | 0.96±0.07AB | 12.99±1.97ABCD | 78.43±23.25ABCD |
| 农大429 Nongda 429 | 0.95±0.09A | 0.97±0.06AB | 12.57±1.61D | 67.94±20.54DE |
| 中育花134号 Zhong Yuhua 134 | 0.88±0.16B | 0.92±0.14C | 11.57±2.39E | 57.17±21.90F |
| 囤花207 Tunhua 207 | 0.98±0.05A | 0.99±0.03A | 13.531±1.72AB | 84.14±29.57AB |
| 花育9137 Huayu 9137 | 0.96±0.08A | 0.98±0.06AB | 13.76±1.75A | 86.87±28.63A |
| 农大D3313 Nongda D3313 | 0.96±0.10A | 0.96±0.10ABC | 13.66±2.11AB | 73.52±20.78BCDE |
| 中育花135号 Zhongyuhua 135 | 0.93±0.11A | 0.95±0.08ABC | 13.44±1.54ABC | 80.45±25.03ABC |
| 周科花18 Zhou Kehua 18 | 0.97±0.08A | 0.98±0.05A | 13.36±1.42ABC | 80.75±23.51ABC |
变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | |||
| 地点 Location | 11 | 0.029 4 | 4.113 | 0.000 | 0.024 1 | 4.746 | 0.000 0 | 27.163 9 | 13.608 | 0.000 0 | 4 741.735 4 | 15.487 | 0.000 0 | |
| 品种 Variety | 6 | 0.038 3 | 5.359 | 0.000 | 0.025 4 | 4.995 | 0.000 1 | 10.354 1 | 5.187 | 0.000 1 | 5 552.077 2 | 18.134 | 0.000 0 | |
地点×品种 Location × variety | 66 | 0.011 4 | 1.594 | 0.009 1 | 0.008 4 | 1.662 | 0.004 9 | 3.678 4 | 1.843 | 0.000 9 | 541.647 9 | 1.769 | 0.001 9 | |
| 误差 Error | 168 | 0.007 | 0.005 1 | 1.996 2 | 306.170 0 | |||||||||
Table 4 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for seed quality of small-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | 均方 | F | P | |||
| 地点 Location | 11 | 0.029 4 | 4.113 | 0.000 | 0.024 1 | 4.746 | 0.000 0 | 27.163 9 | 13.608 | 0.000 0 | 4 741.735 4 | 15.487 | 0.000 0 | |
| 品种 Variety | 6 | 0.038 3 | 5.359 | 0.000 | 0.025 4 | 4.995 | 0.000 1 | 10.354 1 | 5.187 | 0.000 1 | 5 552.077 2 | 18.134 | 0.000 0 | |
地点×品种 Location × variety | 66 | 0.011 4 | 1.594 | 0.009 1 | 0.008 4 | 1.662 | 0.004 9 | 3.678 4 | 1.843 | 0.000 9 | 541.647 9 | 1.769 | 0.001 9 | |
| 误差 Error | 168 | 0.007 | 0.005 1 | 1.996 2 | 306.170 0 | |||||||||
地点 Location | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白城 Baicheng | 0.86±0.17D | 88±0.13C | 11.72±2.31EF | 64.39±30.38EF |
| 阜新 Fuxin | 0.95±0.09ABC | 96±0.09AB | 13.97±1.85ABC | 87.96±25.90BC |
| 菏泽 Heze | 0.88±0.13CD | 94±0.10AB | 11.52±1.66F | 61.44±13.39F |
| 锦州 Jinzhou | 0.94±0.11ABC | 94±0.10AB | 12.07±1.91DEF | 60.78±20.40F |
| 青岛 Qingdao | 0.98±0.04A | 98±0.04A | 14.84±1.09A | 105.19±30.69A |
| 濮阳 Puyang | 0.90±0.10BCD | 90±0.10BC | 13.15±2.08BCD | 68.60±31.39DEF |
| 泰安 Tai’an | 0.95±0.08ABC | 97±0.05A | 11.29±1.17F | 71.67±16.61DEF |
| 唐山 Tangshan | 0.98±0.04AB | 98±0.04A | 12.84±1.16CDE | 69.07±14.18DEF |
| 潍坊 Weifang | 0.97±0.08AB | 97±0.08A | 13.15±1.44BCD | 62.04±15.96F |
| 烟台 Yantai | 0.94±0.07ABC | 97±0.04A | 13.04±1.57BCD | 80.78±21.84CD |
| 驻马店 Zhumadian | 0.95±0.08ABC | 95±0.08AB | 13.79±1.33ABC | 77.82±15.04CDE |
| 漯河 Luohe | 0.94±0.08ABC | 97±0.05A | 14.27±1.52AB | 99.84±21.76AB |
Table 5 Comparison of differences in seed quality of small-seeded peanut among locations in the northern regional test
地点 Location | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白城 Baicheng | 0.86±0.17D | 88±0.13C | 11.72±2.31EF | 64.39±30.38EF |
| 阜新 Fuxin | 0.95±0.09ABC | 96±0.09AB | 13.97±1.85ABC | 87.96±25.90BC |
| 菏泽 Heze | 0.88±0.13CD | 94±0.10AB | 11.52±1.66F | 61.44±13.39F |
| 锦州 Jinzhou | 0.94±0.11ABC | 94±0.10AB | 12.07±1.91DEF | 60.78±20.40F |
| 青岛 Qingdao | 0.98±0.04A | 98±0.04A | 14.84±1.09A | 105.19±30.69A |
| 濮阳 Puyang | 0.90±0.10BCD | 90±0.10BC | 13.15±2.08BCD | 68.60±31.39DEF |
| 泰安 Tai’an | 0.95±0.08ABC | 97±0.05A | 11.29±1.17F | 71.67±16.61DEF |
| 唐山 Tangshan | 0.98±0.04AB | 98±0.04A | 12.84±1.16CDE | 69.07±14.18DEF |
| 潍坊 Weifang | 0.97±0.08AB | 97±0.08A | 13.15±1.44BCD | 62.04±15.96F |
| 烟台 Yantai | 0.94±0.07ABC | 97±0.04A | 13.04±1.57BCD | 80.78±21.84CD |
| 驻马店 Zhumadian | 0.95±0.08ABC | 95±0.08AB | 13.79±1.33ABC | 77.82±15.04CDE |
| 漯河 Luohe | 0.94±0.08ABC | 97±0.05A | 14.27±1.52AB | 99.84±21.76AB |
品种 Variety | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花育20号 Huayu 20 | 0.94±0.10A | 0.96±0.07A | 13.39±1.95A | 84.54±24.26B |
| 冀花714 Jihua 714 | 0.87±0.15B | 0.9±0.13B | 11.98±2.44B | 58.11±23.79D |
| 农大6037 Nongda 6037 | 0.97±0.06A | 0.98±0.05A | 13.49±1.57A | 96.27±30.66A |
| 安花9号 Anhua 9 | 0.93±0.12A | 0.94±0.11AB | 13.29±2.27A | 78.23±28.31BC |
| 囤花257 Tunhua 257 | 0.95±0.08A | 0.96±0.07A | 12.84±1.69AB | 69.91±18.99C |
| 潍花30 Weihua 30 | 0.94±0.08A | 0.96±0.07A | 12.62±1.62AB | 67.10±16.73CD |
| 郑农花32号 Zheng Nonghua 32 | 0.97±0.06A | 0.97±0.06A | 13.20±1.46A | 76.43±21.09BC |
Table 6 Comparison of differences in seed quality among small-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
品种 Variety | 发芽势 Germinative force | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vital index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 花育20号 Huayu 20 | 0.94±0.10A | 0.96±0.07A | 13.39±1.95A | 84.54±24.26B |
| 冀花714 Jihua 714 | 0.87±0.15B | 0.9±0.13B | 11.98±2.44B | 58.11±23.79D |
| 农大6037 Nongda 6037 | 0.97±0.06A | 0.98±0.05A | 13.49±1.57A | 96.27±30.66A |
| 安花9号 Anhua 9 | 0.93±0.12A | 0.94±0.11AB | 13.29±2.27A | 78.23±28.31BC |
| 囤花257 Tunhua 257 | 0.95±0.08A | 0.96±0.07A | 12.84±1.69AB | 69.91±18.99C |
| 潍花30 Weihua 30 | 0.94±0.08A | 0.96±0.07A | 12.62±1.62AB | 67.10±16.73CD |
| 郑农花32号 Zheng Nonghua 32 | 0.97±0.06A | 0.97±0.06A | 13.20±1.46A | 76.43±21.09BC |
种用品质 Seed peanut quality | 气象因子 Meteorological factor | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 标准回归系数 Standard regression coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t值 t-value | P值 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发芽势 Germination potential | 海拔 Altitude | 0.000 5 | 0.445 7 | 0.299 0 | 3.225 9 | 0.001 7 |
| 温差 Temperature difference | -0.065 4 | -0.719 8 | -0.397 5 | 4.460 0 | 0.000 0 | |
| 平均风速 Average wind velocity | -0.034 8 | -0.525 2 | -0.268 0 | 2.863 6 | 0.005 0 | |
发芽率 Germination rate | 经度 Longitude | 0.027 7 | 1.067 5 | 0.227 7 | 2.361 9 | 0.020 1 |
| 纬度 Latitude | -0.024 4 | -0.763 8 | -0.220 0 | 2.277 6 | 0.024 8 | |
| 海拔 Altitude | 0.000 7 | 0.805 8 | 0.215 9 | 2.233 1 | 0.027 7 | |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 4.052 8 | 56.011 9 | 0.230 5 | 2.392 4 | 0.018 6 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -4.125 3 | -81.542 0 | -0.232 6 | 2.415 4 | 0.017 5 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | 4.036 7 | 56.714 5 | 0.229 6 | 2.382 2 | 0.019 1 | |
| 平均风速 Mean wind speed | -0.118 5 | -2.283 3 | -0.274 4 | 2.881 8 | 0.004 8 | |
发芽指数 Germination index | 经度 Longitude | 1.268 3 | 1.930 7 | 0.321 8 | 3.449 3 | 0.000 8 |
| 纬度 Latitude | -0.624 9 | -0.772 2 | -0.337 1 | 3.634 5 | 0.000 4 | |
| 海拔 Altitude | 0.026 0 | 1.145 6 | 0.291 6 | 3.093 7 | 0.002 5 | |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | -1.493 1 | -1.164 3 | -0.269 4 | 2.838 6 | 0.005 5 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | 0.834 7 | 0.493 4 | 0.200 9 | 2.081 6 | 0.039 9 | |
| 平均风速 Mean wind speed | -3.493 4 | -2.654 7 | -0.348 3 | 3.770 8 | 0.000 3 | |
活力指数 Vitality index | 纬度 Latitude | -18.600 0 | -1.742 4 | -0.450 5 | 5.070 6 | 0.000 0 |
| 海拔 Altitude | -0.338 6 | -1.131 4 | -0.370 6 | 4.010 7 | 0.000 1 | |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | -3 886.817 9 | -229.777 3 | -0.488 4 | 5.624 2 | 0.000 0 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | 4 376.925 1 | 180.918 3 | 0.502 8 | 5.845 1 | 0.000 0 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | 4 173.234 3 | 175.356 3 | 0.498 0 | 5.771 4 | 0.000 0 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | 45.394 0 | 2.034 2 | 0.457 6 | 5.172 7 | 0.000 0 | |
| 平均气温 Mean temperature | -648.074 9 | -29.521 9 | -0.532 7 | 6.325 2 | 0.000 0 | |
| 平均风速 Mean wind speed | -86.673 2 | -4.993 5 | -0.548 0 | 6.583 4 | 0.000 0 |
Table 7 Effect of meteorological factors on seed quality of large-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
种用品质 Seed peanut quality | 气象因子 Meteorological factor | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 标准回归系数 Standard regression coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t值 t-value | P值 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发芽势 Germination potential | 海拔 Altitude | 0.000 5 | 0.445 7 | 0.299 0 | 3.225 9 | 0.001 7 |
| 温差 Temperature difference | -0.065 4 | -0.719 8 | -0.397 5 | 4.460 0 | 0.000 0 | |
| 平均风速 Average wind velocity | -0.034 8 | -0.525 2 | -0.268 0 | 2.863 6 | 0.005 0 | |
发芽率 Germination rate | 经度 Longitude | 0.027 7 | 1.067 5 | 0.227 7 | 2.361 9 | 0.020 1 |
| 纬度 Latitude | -0.024 4 | -0.763 8 | -0.220 0 | 2.277 6 | 0.024 8 | |
| 海拔 Altitude | 0.000 7 | 0.805 8 | 0.215 9 | 2.233 1 | 0.027 7 | |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 4.052 8 | 56.011 9 | 0.230 5 | 2.392 4 | 0.018 6 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -4.125 3 | -81.542 0 | -0.232 6 | 2.415 4 | 0.017 5 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | 4.036 7 | 56.714 5 | 0.229 6 | 2.382 2 | 0.019 1 | |
| 平均风速 Mean wind speed | -0.118 5 | -2.283 3 | -0.274 4 | 2.881 8 | 0.004 8 | |
发芽指数 Germination index | 经度 Longitude | 1.268 3 | 1.930 7 | 0.321 8 | 3.449 3 | 0.000 8 |
| 纬度 Latitude | -0.624 9 | -0.772 2 | -0.337 1 | 3.634 5 | 0.000 4 | |
| 海拔 Altitude | 0.026 0 | 1.145 6 | 0.291 6 | 3.093 7 | 0.002 5 | |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | -1.493 1 | -1.164 3 | -0.269 4 | 2.838 6 | 0.005 5 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | 0.834 7 | 0.493 4 | 0.200 9 | 2.081 6 | 0.039 9 | |
| 平均风速 Mean wind speed | -3.493 4 | -2.654 7 | -0.348 3 | 3.770 8 | 0.000 3 | |
活力指数 Vitality index | 纬度 Latitude | -18.600 0 | -1.742 4 | -0.450 5 | 5.070 6 | 0.000 0 |
| 海拔 Altitude | -0.338 6 | -1.131 4 | -0.370 6 | 4.010 7 | 0.000 1 | |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | -3 886.817 9 | -229.777 3 | -0.488 4 | 5.624 2 | 0.000 0 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | 4 376.925 1 | 180.918 3 | 0.502 8 | 5.845 1 | 0.000 0 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | 4 173.234 3 | 175.356 3 | 0.498 0 | 5.771 4 | 0.000 0 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | 45.394 0 | 2.034 2 | 0.457 6 | 5.172 7 | 0.000 0 | |
| 平均气温 Mean temperature | -648.074 9 | -29.521 9 | -0.532 7 | 6.325 2 | 0.000 0 | |
| 平均风速 Mean wind speed | -86.673 2 | -4.993 5 | -0.548 0 | 6.583 4 | 0.000 0 |
种用品质 Seed peanut quality | 气象因子 Meteorological factor | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 标准回归系数Standard regression coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t值 t-value | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发芽势Germinative force | 纬度 Latitude | -0.029 2 | -1.464 0 | -0.320 6 | 2.989 2 | 0.003 7 |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 3.840 9 | 77.902 8 | 0.263 3 | 2.410 3 | 0.018 3 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -3.365 4 | -80.365 5 | -0.235 2 | 2.137 0 | 0.005 7 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | -3.534 9 | -50.216 3 | -0.245 9 | 2.240 6 | 0.027 9 | |
| 平均气温 Average temperature | -0.537 7 | -10.884 8 | -0.367 3 | 3.487 7 | 0.000 8 | |
| 发芽率Germination rate | 纬度 Latitude | -0.022 2 | -1.277 2 | -0.287 8 | 2.671 4 | 0.009 2 |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 0.364 8 | 8.486 8 | 0.327 1 | 3.076 8 | 0.002 9 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -0.137 0 | -2.232 0 | -0.347 2 | 3.291 0 | 0.001 5 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | -0.412 2 | -7.572 5 | -0.326 8 | 3.073 4 | 0.002 9 | |
发芽指数 Germination index | 纬度 Latitude | -1.323 4 | -2.690 4 | -0.243 1 | 2.199 5 | 0.030 8 |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 0.015 6 | 0.765 5 | 0.408 1 | 3.922 7 | 0.000 2 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -161.157 1 | -152.164 4 | -0.388 7 | 3.702 0 | 0.000 4 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | 160.455 7 | 178.374 2 | 0.390 4 | 3.721 1 | 0.000 4 | |
| 平均气温 Average temperature | 159.328 7 | 105.367 2 | 0.389 1 | 3.705 9 | 0.000 4 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | -4.378 0 | -2.631 2 | -0.331 4 | 3.082 1 | 0.002 9 | |
活力指数 Vital index | 纬度 Latitude | -15.652 3 | -2.577 6 | -0.383 9 | 3.718 8 | 0.000 4 |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -23.138 8 | -1.814 9 | -0.350 1 | 3.343 0 | 0.001 3 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | -22.775 7 | -0.965 8 | -0.351 7 | 3.360 2 | 0.001 2 |
Table 8 Influence of meteorological factors on seed quality of small-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
种用品质 Seed peanut quality | 气象因子 Meteorological factor | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 标准回归系数Standard regression coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t值 t-value | P值 P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发芽势Germinative force | 纬度 Latitude | -0.029 2 | -1.464 0 | -0.320 6 | 2.989 2 | 0.003 7 |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 3.840 9 | 77.902 8 | 0.263 3 | 2.410 3 | 0.018 3 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -3.365 4 | -80.365 5 | -0.235 2 | 2.137 0 | 0.005 7 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | -3.534 9 | -50.216 3 | -0.245 9 | 2.240 6 | 0.027 9 | |
| 平均气温 Average temperature | -0.537 7 | -10.884 8 | -0.367 3 | 3.487 7 | 0.000 8 | |
| 发芽率Germination rate | 纬度 Latitude | -0.022 2 | -1.277 2 | -0.287 8 | 2.671 4 | 0.009 2 |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 0.364 8 | 8.486 8 | 0.327 1 | 3.076 8 | 0.002 9 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -0.137 0 | -2.232 0 | -0.347 2 | 3.291 0 | 0.001 5 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | -0.412 2 | -7.572 5 | -0.326 8 | 3.073 4 | 0.002 9 | |
发芽指数 Germination index | 纬度 Latitude | -1.323 4 | -2.690 4 | -0.243 1 | 2.199 5 | 0.030 8 |
| 最高气温 Maximum temperature | 0.015 6 | 0.765 5 | 0.408 1 | 3.922 7 | 0.000 2 | |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -161.157 1 | -152.164 4 | -0.388 7 | 3.702 0 | 0.000 4 | |
| 温差 Temperature difference | 160.455 7 | 178.374 2 | 0.390 4 | 3.721 1 | 0.000 4 | |
| 平均气温 Average temperature | 159.328 7 | 105.367 2 | 0.389 1 | 3.705 9 | 0.000 4 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | -4.378 0 | -2.631 2 | -0.331 4 | 3.082 1 | 0.002 9 | |
活力指数 Vital index | 纬度 Latitude | -15.652 3 | -2.577 6 | -0.383 9 | 3.718 8 | 0.000 4 |
| 最低气温 Minimum temperature | -23.138 8 | -1.814 9 | -0.350 1 | 3.343 0 | 0.001 3 | |
| 降水量 Precipitation | -22.775 7 | -0.965 8 | -0.351 7 | 3.360 2 | 0.001 2 |
种用品质 Seed peanut quality | 镉含量 Cadmium content | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
大粒花生 Large-seeded peanut | 小粒花生 Small-seeded peanut | |||
发芽势 Germinative force | -0.277 6** | 0.153 1 | ||
发芽率 Germination rate | -0.230 7* | 0.070 5 | ||
活力指数 Vital index | -0.218 6* | 0.183 5 | ||
发芽指数 Germination index | -0.275 9** | 0.318 0** | ||
Table 9 Pearson correlation analysis of cadmium content and seed quality of large-and small-seeded peanut in the northern regional test
种用品质 Seed peanut quality | 镉含量 Cadmium content | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
大粒花生 Large-seeded peanut | 小粒花生 Small-seeded peanut | |||
发芽势 Germinative force | -0.277 6** | 0.153 1 | ||
发芽率 Germination rate | -0.230 7* | 0.070 5 | ||
活力指数 Vital index | -0.218 6* | 0.183 5 | ||
发芽指数 Germination index | -0.275 9** | 0.318 0** | ||
关联模型 Correlation model | 标记 Marker | 连锁群 Linkage group (LG) | 关联性状 Associated character | R2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0003 | A14 | VI | 0.102 1‒0.149 9 | 0.007 7‒0.009 4 |
| GLM | AhTE0422 | A17 | GI | 0.077 5 | 0.007 9 |
| GLM | AhTE0498 | A13 | VI | 0.046 7 | 0.018 4 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0556 | A17 | GI | 0.063 3‒0.071 6 | 0.021 2‒0.021 4 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0191 | A14 | GI | 0.087 8‒0.109 2 | 0.010 2‒0.025 2 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0634 | A13 | GF | 0.042 2‒0.044 9 | 0.026 7‒0.029 2 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0634 | A13 | VI | 0.041 8‒0.047 5 | 0.023 9‒0.029 9 |
| GLM | AhTE0097 | A20 | GF | 0.044 2 | 0.032 5 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0013 | A13 | GR | 0.058 7‒0.060 8 | 0.041 5‒0.033 0 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0122 | A9 | GR | 0.036 5‒0.040 2 | 0.033 7‒0.045 5 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0013 | A13 | GF | 0.054 8‒0.055 9 | 0.039 9‒0.044 9 |
| GLM | AhTE0006 | A18 | GF | 0.054 3 | 0.042 4 |
| GLM | AhTE0097 | A20 | GR | 0.039 0 | 0.044 6 |
| GLM | AhTE0019 | A17 | VI | 0.034 0 | 0.046 0 |
| GLM | AhTE0143 | A17 | VI | 0.033 3 | 0.049 0 |
| MLM | AhTE0003 | A14 | GR | 0.124 4 | 0.022 9 |
| MLM | AhTE0003 | A14 | GF | 0.106 2 | 0.043 4 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0573 | A13 | GI | 0.059 4‒0.068 1 | 0.031 6‒0.041 4 |
Table 10 Summary of associations of major molecular markers with seed quality
关联模型 Correlation model | 标记 Marker | 连锁群 Linkage group (LG) | 关联性状 Associated character | R2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0003 | A14 | VI | 0.102 1‒0.149 9 | 0.007 7‒0.009 4 |
| GLM | AhTE0422 | A17 | GI | 0.077 5 | 0.007 9 |
| GLM | AhTE0498 | A13 | VI | 0.046 7 | 0.018 4 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0556 | A17 | GI | 0.063 3‒0.071 6 | 0.021 2‒0.021 4 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0191 | A14 | GI | 0.087 8‒0.109 2 | 0.010 2‒0.025 2 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0634 | A13 | GF | 0.042 2‒0.044 9 | 0.026 7‒0.029 2 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0634 | A13 | VI | 0.041 8‒0.047 5 | 0.023 9‒0.029 9 |
| GLM | AhTE0097 | A20 | GF | 0.044 2 | 0.032 5 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0013 | A13 | GR | 0.058 7‒0.060 8 | 0.041 5‒0.033 0 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0122 | A9 | GR | 0.036 5‒0.040 2 | 0.033 7‒0.045 5 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0013 | A13 | GF | 0.054 8‒0.055 9 | 0.039 9‒0.044 9 |
| GLM | AhTE0006 | A18 | GF | 0.054 3 | 0.042 4 |
| GLM | AhTE0097 | A20 | GR | 0.039 0 | 0.044 6 |
| GLM | AhTE0019 | A17 | VI | 0.034 0 | 0.046 0 |
| GLM | AhTE0143 | A17 | VI | 0.033 3 | 0.049 0 |
| MLM | AhTE0003 | A14 | GR | 0.124 4 | 0.022 9 |
| MLM | AhTE0003 | A14 | GF | 0.106 2 | 0.043 4 |
| GLM, MLM | AhTE0573 | A13 | GI | 0.059 4‒0.068 1 | 0.031 6‒0.041 4 |
| 1 | 徐秀娟. 中国花生病虫草鼠害 [M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2009. |
| Xu XJ. Diseases, pests, weeds and damage in rats of peanuts in China [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009. | |
| 2 | 孙大容. 花生育种学 [M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998. |
| Sun DR. Peanut breeding [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998. | |
| 3 | 张满良. 农业植物病理学(北方本)[M]. 北京: 世界图书出版公司, 1997. |
| Zhang ML. Agricultural Plant Pathology (Boreal) [M]. Beijing: World Book Press, 1997. | |
| 4 | 成广雷, 张海娇, 赵久然, 等. 临界胁迫贮藏条件下不同基因型玉米种子活力及生理变化 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(1): 33-42. |
| Cheng GL, Zhang HJ, Zhao JR, et al. Vigor and physiological changes of different genotypes of maize seed (Zea mays L.) under critical stress storage conditions [J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48(1): 33-42. | |
| 5 | 崔婷, 唐启源. 种子活力保持与提高技术研究进展 [J]. 作物研究, 2014, 28(4): 435-439, 446. |
| Cui T, Tang QY. Research progress on measures of maintaining and improving seed vigor [J]. Crop Res, 2014, 28(4): 435-439, 446. | |
| 6 | 梁煜莹, 张加羽, 姜骁, 等. 花生品质与气候环境的关系研究 [J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2024, 25(2): 227-244. |
| Liang YY, Zhang JY, Jiang X, et al. Study on the relationship between peanut quality and climatic environments [J]. J Plant Genet Resour, 2024, 25(2): 227-244. | |
| 7 | 陈娜, 程果, 潘丽娟, 等. 东北地区收获期低温对花生品质影响及耐低温品种筛选 [J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(11): 2417-2427. |
| Chen N, Cheng G, Pan LJ, et al. Effect of low temperature on peanut quality and screening of low temperature tolerant varieties in Northeast China [J]. Plant Physiol J, 2020, 56(11): 2417-2427. | |
| 8 | 姜骁, 许静, 潘丽娟, 等. 花生产量相关性状与气象因子多环境相关性分析 [J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(11): 3110-3121. |
| Jiang X, Xu J, Pan LJ, et al. Peanut yield-related traits and meteorological factors correlation analysis in multiple environments [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2023, 49(11): 3110-3121. | |
| 9 | 秦美林, 罗枫雪, 刘连胜, 等. miR164c和miR168b的表达与水稻种子活力的相关性研究 [J]. 激光生物学报, 2013, 22(2): 166-173. |
| Qin ML, Luo FX, Liu LS, et al. A study on the relationship between the expression of miR164c and miR168b and seed vigor of rice [J]. Acta Laser Biol Sin, 2013, 22(2): 166-173. | |
| 10 | Kim JY, Kwak KJ, Jung HJ, et al. MicroRNA402 affects seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana under stress conditions via targeting DEMETER-LIKE Protein3 mRNA [J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 2010, 51(6): 1079-1083. |
| 11 | Feng XM, Qiao Y, Mao K, et al. Ectopic overexpression of AtmiR398b gene in tobacco influences seed germination and seedling growth [J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult PCTOC, 2010, 102(1): 53-59. |
| 12 | 孙彩霞, 沈秀瑛, 谷铁实. 不同基因型玉米种子萌发特性与芽、苗期抗旱性的关系 [J]. 种子, 2001, 20(5): 32-35. |
| Sun CX, Shen XY, Gu TS. Relationship between seed germination and its drought resistance of shoot-seedling in different genotype maize [J]. Seed, 2001, 20(5): 32-35. | |
| 13 | TeKrony DM, Hunter JL. Effect of seed maturation and genotype on seed vigor in maize [J]. Crop Sci, 1995, 35(3): 857-862. |
| 14 | 汤学军, 傅家瑞, 黄上志. 决定种子寿命的生理机制研究进展 [J]. 种子, 1996, 15(6): 29-32. |
| Tang XJ, Fu JR, Huang SZ. Research progress on physiological mechanism of determining seed longevity [J]. Seed, 1996, 15(6): 29-32. | |
| 15 | 马守才, 张改生, 王军卫, 等. 小麦种子活力性状的遗传变异和相关研究 [J]. 西北植物学报, 2004, 24(9): 1674-1679. |
| Ma SC, Zhang GS, Wang JW, et al. Genetic difference and interrelationship among seed vigor traits in wheat [J]. Acta Bot Boreali Occidentalia Sin, 2004, 24(9): 1674-1679. | |
| 16 | 徐彪, 李玉发, 牛海龙, 等. 利用AhMITE分子标记对花生杂交F1代的真伪鉴定 [J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(11): 94-97. |
| Xu B, Li YF, Niu HL, et al. Identification of F1 generation peanut hybrids using AhMITE molecular markers [J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2022, 50(11): 94-97. | |
| 17 | 许梦琦. 花生SNP分子标记的开发及应用 [D]. 大连: 大连工业大学, 2015. |
| Xu MQ. Development and application of SNP molecular markers in peanut [D]. Dalian: Dalian Polytechnic University, 2015. | |
| 18 | Ashwini, Nayidu NK, Rakesh JL, et al. Validation of yield associated molecular markers in a groundnut minicore collection [J]. S Afr N J Bot, 2023, 159: 26-34. |
| 19 | 房元瑾, 孙子淇, 齐飞艳, 等. 花生分子标记辅助育种研究进展与展望 [J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2024, 46(4): 728-736. |
| Fang YJ, Sun ZQ, Qi FY, et al. Advances of marker-assisted selection in peanut breeding [J]. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2024, 46(4): 728-736. | |
| 20 | 严玫, 张新友, 韩锁义, 等. 花生重要农艺及产量性状的全基因组关联分析 [J]. 植物学报, 2015, 50(4): 460-472. |
| Yan M, Zhang XY, Han SY, et al. Genome-wide association study of agronomic and yield traits in a worldwide collection of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) germplasm [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2015, 50(4): 460-472. | |
| 21 | 刘文童, 赵永锋, 郭晋杰, 等. 玉米种子活力相关性状的全基因组关联分析 [J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2020, 43(6): 6-14. |
| Liu WT, Zhao YF, Guo JJ, et al. Genome-wide association studies of seed vigor related traits in maize [J]. J Hebei Agric Univ, 2020, 43(6): 6-14. | |
| 22 | 杨彬, 周嘉润, 沈玉婷, 等. 水稻种子活力性状全基因组关联分析研究进展 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(3): 16-21. |
| Yang B, Zhou JR, Shen YT, et al. Research progress on genome-wide association analysis of rice seed vigor [J]. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2023, 51(3): 16-21. | |
| 23 | 石冰欣. 小麦种子活力相关性状全基因组关联分析及其优异种质鉴定 [D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2023. |
| Shi BX. Genome-wide association study and excellent germplasm identification of wheat seed vigor related traits [D]. Ya'an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2023. | |
| 24 | 张红梅, 张威, 王琼, 等. 大豆籽粒Ve含量的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报: 2024, 50(5):1223-1235. |
| Zhang HM, Zhang W, Wang Q, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of Ve content in soybean grains [J]. Acta Cropologica Sinica: 2024, 50(5): 1223-1235. | |
| 25 | Zhang H, Wang ML, Dang P, et al. Identification of potential QTLs and genes associated with seed composition traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using GWAS and RNA-Seq analysis [J]. Gene, 2021, 769: 145215. |
| 26 | 李丽. 利用连锁和全基因组关联分析鉴定花生株型相关性状的QTLs [D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2019. |
| Li L. Quantitative trait loci identification for growth habit-related traits using the linkage and genome-wide association analysis in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) [D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2019. | |
| 27 | 张秀荣, 张昆, 骆璐, 等. 花生抗旱相关SSR标记及优异等位变异分析 [J/OL]. 分子植物育种, 2023. . |
| Zhang XR, Zhang K, Luo L, et al. Analysis of drought resistance related SSR markers and superior allelic variation in peanut [J/OL]. Mol Plant Breed, 2023. . | |
| 28 | McLaughlin MJ, Bell MJ, Wright GC, et al. Inter- and intra-specific variation in accumulation of cadmium by peanut, soybean, and navybean [J]. Aust J Agric Res, 1997, 48(8): 1151. |
| 29 | 国家技术监督局. 农作物种子检验规程 发芽试验: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 1995. |
| The State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. Rules for agricultural seed testing-germination test: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1995. | |
| 30 | 张鹤. 花生苗期耐冷评价体系构建及其生理与分子机制 [D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2020. |
| Zhang H. Construction of evaluation system for cold tolerance of peanut seedlings and its physiological and molecular mechanism [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2020. | |
| 31 | 张青云. 花生种用抗逆性及相关基因的研究 [D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2016. |
| Zhang QY. Study on stress resistance and related genes of peanut seeds [D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2016. | |
| 32 | Shirasawa K, Koilkonda P, Aoki K, et al. In silico polymorphism analysis for the development of simple sequence repeat and transposon markers and construction of linkage map in cultivated peanut [J]. BMC Plant Biol, 2012, 12: 80. |
| 33 | 陈程杰, 夏瑞. TBtools‒大数据时代下的国产生物软件 [J]. 科学观察, 2022, 17(6): 33-35. |
| Chen CJ, Xia R. TBtools-domestic biological software in the age of big data [J]. Sci Focus, 2022, 17(6): 33-35. | |
| 34 | 孙海燕, 万书波, 李林, 等. 我国花生生产区域比较优势分析 [J]. 中国油脂, 2014, 39(6): 6-11. |
| Sun HY, Wan SB, Li L, et al. Analysis of regional comparative advantage of peanut production in China [J]. China Oils Fats, 2014, 39(6): 6-11. | |
| 35 | 吴甘霖. 镉对花生幼苗生长及生理生态特性的影响 [J]. 生物学杂志, 2008, 25(5): 31-33, 68. |
| Wu GL. Effects of cadmium on the growth, physiological and ecological characteristics of peanut seedling [J]. J Biol, 2008, 25(5): 31-33, 68. | |
| 36 | 牛常青. 重金属镉离子对花生幼苗的影响 [J]. 晋中学院学报, 2009, 26(3): 63-67. |
| Niu CQ. Effect of heavy metal cadmium on Arachis hypogaea's seedling growth [J]. J Jinzhong Univ, 2009, 26(3): 63-67. |
| [1] | MAO Xiang-hong, LU Yao, FAN Xiang-bin, DU Pei-bing, BAI Xiao-dong. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Potato Varieties Based on SSR Fluorescent Marker Capillary Electrophoresis and Construction of Molecular Identity Card [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 131-140. |
| [2] | LI Si-qi, ZHANG Wen-chen, YANG Liu, FU Qing-xin, HONG Xin, ZHANG Hai-wang. Genetic Diversity Analysis and DNA Fingerprint Construction Based on SSR Markers for Xanthoceras sorbifolia [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 74-83. |
| [3] | LI Qing, SHI Yu-he, ZHU Jue, LI Xiao-ling, HOU Chao-wen, TONG Qiao-zhen. Genetic Diversity Analysis and DNA Fingerprint Construction of Atractylodes macrocephala Germplasm Resources Based on SCoT Molecular Markers [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2024, 40(11): 142-151. |
| [4] | AN Miao, WANG Tong-tong, FU Yi-ting, XIA Jun-jun, PENG Suo-tang, DUAN Yong-hong. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Molecular Identity Card Construction by SSR Markers of 52 Solanum tuberosum L. Varieties(Lines) [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(12): 136-147. |
| [5] | LU Yu-sheng, PENG Cheng, CHANG Xiao-xiao, QIU Ji-shui, CHEN Zhe, CHEN Hui-qiong. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Molecular Identity Establishment of Clausena lansium Germplasm Resources from Guangdong Province Based on SSR Markers [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(12): 187-199. |
| [6] | ZHOU Xiao-nan, XU Jin-qing, LEI Yu-qing, WANG Hai-qing. Development of SNP Markers in Medicago archiducis-nicolai Based on GBS-seq [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 303-310. |
| [7] | WANG Yan-li, YANG Yi-ming, FAN Shu-tian, ZHAO Ying, XU Pei-lei, LU Wen-peng, LI Chang-yu. Genetic Diversity Analysis of 73 Vitis amurensis and Its Hybrids Offsprings Based on SSR Molecular Markers [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2021, 37(1): 189-197. |
| [8] | ZHANG Le-chao, LIU Yue-qin, DUAN Chun-hui, ZHANG Ying-jie, WANG Yong, GUO Yun-xia. Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Genetic Structure in 7 Local Goat Breeds [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2020, 36(6): 183-190. |
| [9] | LI Yong-hui, YU Xiáng-li, Má Hui-ping, GáO Kái, LIU Ming-xue. ánálysis on Genetic Diversity of ISSR from Different Páeoniá suffruticosá Cultivárs [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2020, 36(4): 78-83. |
| [10] | ZHAO Xin-peng, ZHOU Yun, LÜ Lin-lin, LI Suo-ping, ZHANG Da-le. Genetic Diversity of Aegilops tauschii Coss. and Its Utilization in Improving Common Wheat [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(7): 181-189. |
| [11] | SHI Jian-bin, ZHOU Hong, WANG Ning, XU Qing-hua, QIAO Wen-qing, YAN Gen-tu. Purity Identification and Genetic Diversity Analysis of Cotton Germplasm Resources Using SSR Markers [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2018, 34(7): 138-146. |
| [12] | ZHAO Ning, CHEN Shuang-lin. Research Progress on Genetic Diversity of Shiraia bambusicola,Biosynthesis and Anticancer Activity of Hypocrellin [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2018, 34(4): 16-23. |
| [13] | WU Hai-yue, ZHAO Shuang, LIU Yu, LI Hua-min, SONG Shuang, NIU Yu-rong, RONG Cheng-bo. Evaluation of the Genetic Diversity of Pleurotus citrinopileatus by Combined ISSR and SRAP Analyses [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2018, 34(4): 121-126. |
| [14] | GUAN Jun-jiao, YANG Xiao-hong, ZHANG Jian-hua, WANG Jiang-min, ZHANG Peng, Li Yan-gang. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis of Japonica Rice Varieties from Yunnan Province [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2018, 34(1): 90-96. |
| [15] | LIU Ye, LIU Xiao-dan, ZHANG Lin-li, WU Yue, WANG Guo-wen, WANG iang, JIANG Ying. Screening,Identification of Multifunctional Peanut Root-promoting Rhizobacteria and Its Promoting Effects on Peanuts(Arachis hypogaea L.) [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2017, 33(10): 125-134. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||