Biotechnology Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 21-33.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2020-0344
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Yi-zhong1,2(), FAN Xin-qi1, YANG Hui-yong1, ZHANG Xiao-juan1, SHAO Qiang1, LIANG Du1, GUO Qi1, LIU Qing-shan1(), DU Wei-jun2()
Received:
2020-03-25
Online:
2020-12-26
Published:
2020-12-22
Contact:
LIU Qing-shan,DU Wei-jun
E-mail:zhyzh225@163.com;673673@126.com;duweijun68@126.com
ZHANG Yi-zhong, FAN Xin-qi, YANG Hui-yong, ZHANG Xiao-juan, SHAO Qiang, LIANG Du, GUO Qi, LIU Qing-shan, DU Wei-jun. Genetic Relationship Analysis of Sorghum Breeding Materials Based on Simplified Genome Sequencing[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2020, 36(12): 21-33.
编号 | 材料名称 | 类型 | 来源 | 编号 | 材料名称 | 类型 | 来源 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | L2R | 恢复系 | 中国四川 | 20 | 10480B | 保持系 | 中国山西 | |
2 | L17R | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | 21 | 1383-2 | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | |
3 | 忻粱7号 | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | 22 | 5-26 | 恢复系 | 中国辽宁 | |
4 | LNR-4 | 恢复系 | 中国辽宁 | 23 | LgB/R5M874B-I | 保持系 | 中国山西 | |
5 | 3560R | 恢复系 | 中国四川 | 24 | LgB/R5M874B-III | 保持系 | 中国山西 | |
6 | R111 | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | 25 | 11494B | 保持系 | 中国山西 | |
7 | 锦Y15 | 恢复系 | 中国辽宁 | 26 | 7B大粒/TB | 保持系 | 中国山西 | |
8 | LR233 | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | 27 | 5-27 | 恢复系 | 中国辽宁 | |
9 | 铁10612 | 保持系 | 中国辽宁 | 28 | 0-30 | 恢复系 | 中国辽宁 | |
10 | L早615 | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | 29 | 非洲高粱 | 地方品种 | 马达加斯加 | |
11 | 吉12 | 恢复系 | 中国吉林 | 30 | 吉2055B | 保持系 | 中国吉林 | |
12 | H02079 | 恢复系 | 中国黑龙江 | 31 | L407B | 保持系 | 中国辽宁 | |
13 | 072198 | 恢复系 | 中国黑龙江 | 32 | AGR-1B | 保持系 | 中国四川 | |
14 | 晋粱5号 | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | 33 | 棒洛三 | 地方品种 | 中国山西 | |
15 | V4B | 保持系 | 印度 | 34 | 三尺三 | 地方品种 | 中国山西 | |
16 | 8808B | 保持系 | 中国四川 | 35 | 吉R105 | 恢复系 | 中国吉林 | |
17 | 45B | 保持系 | 中国四川 | 36 | Tx3197B | 保持系 | 美国 | |
18 | 3765红B | 保持系 | 中国山西 | 37 | Tx623B | 保持系 | 美国 | |
19 | 3765白B | 保持系 | 中国山西 |
编号 | 材料名称 | 类型 | 来源 | 编号 | 材料名称 | 类型 | 来源 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | L2R | 恢复系 | 中国四川 | 20 | 10480B | 保持系 | 中国山西 | |
2 | L17R | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | 21 | 1383-2 | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | |
3 | 忻粱7号 | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | 22 | 5-26 | 恢复系 | 中国辽宁 | |
4 | LNR-4 | 恢复系 | 中国辽宁 | 23 | LgB/R5M874B-I | 保持系 | 中国山西 | |
5 | 3560R | 恢复系 | 中国四川 | 24 | LgB/R5M874B-III | 保持系 | 中国山西 | |
6 | R111 | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | 25 | 11494B | 保持系 | 中国山西 | |
7 | 锦Y15 | 恢复系 | 中国辽宁 | 26 | 7B大粒/TB | 保持系 | 中国山西 | |
8 | LR233 | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | 27 | 5-27 | 恢复系 | 中国辽宁 | |
9 | 铁10612 | 保持系 | 中国辽宁 | 28 | 0-30 | 恢复系 | 中国辽宁 | |
10 | L早615 | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | 29 | 非洲高粱 | 地方品种 | 马达加斯加 | |
11 | 吉12 | 恢复系 | 中国吉林 | 30 | 吉2055B | 保持系 | 中国吉林 | |
12 | H02079 | 恢复系 | 中国黑龙江 | 31 | L407B | 保持系 | 中国辽宁 | |
13 | 072198 | 恢复系 | 中国黑龙江 | 32 | AGR-1B | 保持系 | 中国四川 | |
14 | 晋粱5号 | 恢复系 | 中国山西 | 33 | 棒洛三 | 地方品种 | 中国山西 | |
15 | V4B | 保持系 | 印度 | 34 | 三尺三 | 地方品种 | 中国山西 | |
16 | 8808B | 保持系 | 中国四川 | 35 | 吉R105 | 恢复系 | 中国吉林 | |
17 | 45B | 保持系 | 中国四川 | 36 | Tx3197B | 保持系 | 美国 | |
18 | 3765红B | 保持系 | 中国山西 | 37 | Tx623B | 保持系 | 美国 | |
19 | 3765白B | 保持系 | 中国山西 |
样品 | 双端比 对/% | 单端比 对/% | 未比对 成功/% | 正常酶切 比例/% | 部分酶切 比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水稻 | 92.15 | 1.90 | 5.95 | 89.69 | 10.31 |
样品 | 双端比 对/% | 单端比 对/% | 未比对 成功/% | 正常酶切 比例/% | 部分酶切 比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水稻 | 92.15 | 1.90 | 5.95 | 89.69 | 10.31 |
编号 | 测序片段数/个 | GC含量/% | Q30值/% | 编号 | 测序片段数/个 | GC含量/% | Q30值/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 567 939 | 46.21 | 89.83 | 20 | 1 946 504 | 45.94 | 89.49 | |
2 | 4 628 462 | 45.53 | 89.73 | 21 | 2 460 604 | 45.70 | 90.16 | |
3 | 3 166 760 | 46.23 | 89.80 | 22 | 2 646 261 | 45.80 | 89.97 | |
4 | 3 885 523 | 45.36 | 90.09 | 23 | 2 440 775 | 45.58 | 89.38 | |
5 | 3 933 701 | 46.01 | 90.26 | 24 | 2 601 176 | 45.37 | 90.05 | |
6 | 3 024 122 | 46.41 | 89.90 | 25 | 2 282 802 | 45.97 | 89.35 | |
7 | 3 579 391 | 45.64 | 90.00 | 26 | 2 952 467 | 45.34 | 89.93 | |
8 | 3 532 436 | 45.20 | 90.12 | 27 | 2 353 719 | 45.80 | 89.67 | |
9 | 2 734 469 | 45.80 | 89.70 | 28 | 3 851 721 | 45.29 | 89.22 | |
10 | 1 497 466 | 46.53 | 90.16 | 29 | 3 927 558 | 44.51 | 90.26 | |
11 | 2 022 644 | 46.15 | 89.63 | 30 | 3 133 975 | 45.48 | 89.27 | |
12 | 1 461 206 | 46.28 | 90.91 | 31 | 2 745 391 | 45.41 | 89.09 | |
13 | 1 633 119 | 46.08 | 89.54 | 32 | 3 952 510 | 45.16 | 88.96 | |
14 | 2 323 181 | 46.77 | 89.30 | 33 | 3 014 449 | 45.64 | 89.42 | |
15 | 1 919 156 | 46.26 | 90.03 | 34 | 2 963 041 | 45.71 | 89.35 | |
16 | 2 224 406 | 46.14 | 90.15 | 35 | 3 311 922 | 45.26 | 88.00 | |
17 | 2 375 725 | 45.73 | 89.44 | 36 | 3 862 422 | 44.58 | 88.47 | |
18 | 2 275 153 | 46.14 | 88.83 | 37 | 3 680 028 | 44.73 | 88.38 | |
19 | 2 285 308 | 45.66 | 89.31 | 对照 | 484 025 | 43.18 | 88.87 |
编号 | 测序片段数/个 | GC含量/% | Q30值/% | 编号 | 测序片段数/个 | GC含量/% | Q30值/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 567 939 | 46.21 | 89.83 | 20 | 1 946 504 | 45.94 | 89.49 | |
2 | 4 628 462 | 45.53 | 89.73 | 21 | 2 460 604 | 45.70 | 90.16 | |
3 | 3 166 760 | 46.23 | 89.80 | 22 | 2 646 261 | 45.80 | 89.97 | |
4 | 3 885 523 | 45.36 | 90.09 | 23 | 2 440 775 | 45.58 | 89.38 | |
5 | 3 933 701 | 46.01 | 90.26 | 24 | 2 601 176 | 45.37 | 90.05 | |
6 | 3 024 122 | 46.41 | 89.90 | 25 | 2 282 802 | 45.97 | 89.35 | |
7 | 3 579 391 | 45.64 | 90.00 | 26 | 2 952 467 | 45.34 | 89.93 | |
8 | 3 532 436 | 45.20 | 90.12 | 27 | 2 353 719 | 45.80 | 89.67 | |
9 | 2 734 469 | 45.80 | 89.70 | 28 | 3 851 721 | 45.29 | 89.22 | |
10 | 1 497 466 | 46.53 | 90.16 | 29 | 3 927 558 | 44.51 | 90.26 | |
11 | 2 022 644 | 46.15 | 89.63 | 30 | 3 133 975 | 45.48 | 89.27 | |
12 | 1 461 206 | 46.28 | 90.91 | 31 | 2 745 391 | 45.41 | 89.09 | |
13 | 1 633 119 | 46.08 | 89.54 | 32 | 3 952 510 | 45.16 | 88.96 | |
14 | 2 323 181 | 46.77 | 89.30 | 33 | 3 014 449 | 45.64 | 89.42 | |
15 | 1 919 156 | 46.26 | 90.03 | 34 | 2 963 041 | 45.71 | 89.35 | |
16 | 2 224 406 | 46.14 | 90.15 | 35 | 3 311 922 | 45.26 | 88.00 | |
17 | 2 375 725 | 45.73 | 89.44 | 36 | 3 862 422 | 44.58 | 88.47 | |
18 | 2 275 153 | 46.14 | 88.83 | 37 | 3 680 028 | 44.73 | 88.38 | |
19 | 2 285 308 | 45.66 | 89.31 | 对照 | 484 025 | 43.18 | 88.87 |
编号 | SLAF标 签数/个 | 平均测序 深度/× | SNP个 数/个 | SNP完 整度/% | SNP杂 合率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 183 156 | 15.90 | 333 872 | 47.26 | 5.11 |
2 | 185 016 | 21.61 | 311 459 | 44.09 | 4.79 |
3 | 180 402 | 14.77 | 297 415 | 42.10 | 4.50 |
4 | 190 803 | 17.56 | 302 139 | 42.77 | 12.81 |
5 | 187 939 | 17.25 | 342 316 | 48.46 | 5.48 |
6 | 183 062 | 13.51 | 321 331 | 45.49 | 7.91 |
7 | 182 682 | 16.60 | 308 210 | 43.63 | 4.88 |
8 | 184 786 | 15.90 | 316 840 | 44.85 | 4.41 |
9 | 181 967 | 12.61 | 293 483 | 41.54 | 3.13 |
10 | 155 692 | 7.15 | 263 779 | 37.34 | 4.91 |
11 | 165 815 | 9.55 | 272 674 | 38.60 | 4.95 |
12 | 154 623 | 7.05 | 256 240 | 36.27 | 4.27 |
13 | 160 222 | 8.28 | 239 963 | 33.97 | 5.14 |
14 | 167 159 | 11.39 | 264 921 | 37.50 | 4.49 |
15 | 166 553 | 8.99 | 276 512 | 39.14 | 3.75 |
16 | 176 033 | 9.81 | 304 536 | 43.11 | 3.31 |
17 | 175 330 | 11.26 | 273 048 | 38.65 | 2.49 |
18 | 175 129 | 10.63 | 275 800 | 39.04 | 2.58 |
19 | 172 299 | 11.05 | 263 219 | 37.26 | 2.73 |
20 | 169 084 | 9.35 | 261 891 | 37.07 | 3.57 |
21 | 171 602 | 11.85 | 272 682 | 38.60 | 4.29 |
22 | 177 676 | 12.00 | 298 725 | 42.29 | 3.80 |
23 | 175 244 | 11.61 | 269 964 | 38.21 | 5.11 |
24 | 175 560 | 12.20 | 283 319 | 40.10 | 3.71 |
25 | 177 840 | 10.40 | 284 973 | 40.34 | 3.22 |
26 | 181 621 | 13.63 | 290 251 | 41.09 | 2.95 |
27 | 172 939 | 10.99 | 283 654 | 40.15 | 3.88 |
28 | 183 861 | 17.91 | 291 301 | 41.23 | 4.59 |
29 | 184 381 | 18.14 | 300 566 | 42.55 | 3.76 |
30 | 184 919 | 14.17 | 309 217 | 43.77 | 3.42 |
31 | 181 436 | 12.87 | 273 308 | 38.69 | 3.42 |
32 | 190 434 | 17.71 | 315 042 | 44.60 | 2.70 |
33 | 181 663 | 13.58 | 310 318 | 43.93 | 4.44 |
34 | 191 999 | 12.83 | 308 762 | 43.71 | 13.32 |
35 | 182 399 | 15.28 | 296 553 | 41.98 | 4.73 |
36 | 185 333 | 18.20 | 278 585 | 39.43 | 3.30 |
37 | 191 557 | 16.65 | 294 393 | 41.67 | 1.79 |
编号 | SLAF标 签数/个 | 平均测序 深度/× | SNP个 数/个 | SNP完 整度/% | SNP杂 合率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 183 156 | 15.90 | 333 872 | 47.26 | 5.11 |
2 | 185 016 | 21.61 | 311 459 | 44.09 | 4.79 |
3 | 180 402 | 14.77 | 297 415 | 42.10 | 4.50 |
4 | 190 803 | 17.56 | 302 139 | 42.77 | 12.81 |
5 | 187 939 | 17.25 | 342 316 | 48.46 | 5.48 |
6 | 183 062 | 13.51 | 321 331 | 45.49 | 7.91 |
7 | 182 682 | 16.60 | 308 210 | 43.63 | 4.88 |
8 | 184 786 | 15.90 | 316 840 | 44.85 | 4.41 |
9 | 181 967 | 12.61 | 293 483 | 41.54 | 3.13 |
10 | 155 692 | 7.15 | 263 779 | 37.34 | 4.91 |
11 | 165 815 | 9.55 | 272 674 | 38.60 | 4.95 |
12 | 154 623 | 7.05 | 256 240 | 36.27 | 4.27 |
13 | 160 222 | 8.28 | 239 963 | 33.97 | 5.14 |
14 | 167 159 | 11.39 | 264 921 | 37.50 | 4.49 |
15 | 166 553 | 8.99 | 276 512 | 39.14 | 3.75 |
16 | 176 033 | 9.81 | 304 536 | 43.11 | 3.31 |
17 | 175 330 | 11.26 | 273 048 | 38.65 | 2.49 |
18 | 175 129 | 10.63 | 275 800 | 39.04 | 2.58 |
19 | 172 299 | 11.05 | 263 219 | 37.26 | 2.73 |
20 | 169 084 | 9.35 | 261 891 | 37.07 | 3.57 |
21 | 171 602 | 11.85 | 272 682 | 38.60 | 4.29 |
22 | 177 676 | 12.00 | 298 725 | 42.29 | 3.80 |
23 | 175 244 | 11.61 | 269 964 | 38.21 | 5.11 |
24 | 175 560 | 12.20 | 283 319 | 40.10 | 3.71 |
25 | 177 840 | 10.40 | 284 973 | 40.34 | 3.22 |
26 | 181 621 | 13.63 | 290 251 | 41.09 | 2.95 |
27 | 172 939 | 10.99 | 283 654 | 40.15 | 3.88 |
28 | 183 861 | 17.91 | 291 301 | 41.23 | 4.59 |
29 | 184 381 | 18.14 | 300 566 | 42.55 | 3.76 |
30 | 184 919 | 14.17 | 309 217 | 43.77 | 3.42 |
31 | 181 436 | 12.87 | 273 308 | 38.69 | 3.42 |
32 | 190 434 | 17.71 | 315 042 | 44.60 | 2.70 |
33 | 181 663 | 13.58 | 310 318 | 43.93 | 4.44 |
34 | 191 999 | 12.83 | 308 762 | 43.71 | 13.32 |
35 | 182 399 | 15.28 | 296 553 | 41.98 | 4.73 |
36 | 185 333 | 18.20 | 278 585 | 39.43 | 3.30 |
37 | 191 557 | 16.65 | 294 393 | 41.67 | 1.79 |
类群 | 份数 | 材料名称(编号) |
---|---|---|
Ⅰ-1 | 1 | 8808B(16) |
Ⅰ-2 | 2 | Tx3197B(36)、L407B(31) |
Ⅰ-3 | 6 | 非洲高粱(29)、吉2055B(30)、AGR-1B(32)、LgBR5M874B-I(23)、V4B(15)、LgBR5M874B-III(24) |
Ⅰ-4 | 2 | 10480B(20)、11494B(25) |
Ⅰ-5 | 6 | 45B(17)、7B大粒/TB(26)、铁10612(9)、Tx623B(37)、3765红B(18)、3765白B(19) |
Ⅱ-1 | 2 | 5-26(22)、5-27(27) |
Ⅱ-2 | 1 | 072198(13) |
Ⅱ-3 | 1 | LNR-4(4) |
Ⅱ-4 | 7 | L早615(10)、0-30(28)、R111(6)、L2R(1)、L17R(2)、吉12(11)、吉R105(35) |
Ⅱ-5 | 9 | LR233(8)、忻粱7号(3)、晋粱5号(14)、1383-2(21)、棒洛三(33)、三尺三(34)、H02079(12)、3560R(5)、锦Y15(7) |
类群 | 份数 | 材料名称(编号) |
---|---|---|
Ⅰ-1 | 1 | 8808B(16) |
Ⅰ-2 | 2 | Tx3197B(36)、L407B(31) |
Ⅰ-3 | 6 | 非洲高粱(29)、吉2055B(30)、AGR-1B(32)、LgBR5M874B-I(23)、V4B(15)、LgBR5M874B-III(24) |
Ⅰ-4 | 2 | 10480B(20)、11494B(25) |
Ⅰ-5 | 6 | 45B(17)、7B大粒/TB(26)、铁10612(9)、Tx623B(37)、3765红B(18)、3765白B(19) |
Ⅱ-1 | 2 | 5-26(22)、5-27(27) |
Ⅱ-2 | 1 | 072198(13) |
Ⅱ-3 | 1 | LNR-4(4) |
Ⅱ-4 | 7 | L早615(10)、0-30(28)、R111(6)、L2R(1)、L17R(2)、吉12(11)、吉R105(35) |
Ⅱ-5 | 9 | LR233(8)、忻粱7号(3)、晋粱5号(14)、1383-2(21)、棒洛三(33)、三尺三(34)、H02079(12)、3560R(5)、锦Y15(7) |
类群 | Ⅰ-1 | Ⅰ-2 | Ⅰ-3 | Ⅰ-4 | Ⅰ-5 | Ⅱ-1 | Ⅱ-2 | Ⅱ-3 | Ⅱ-4 | Ⅱ-5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ-1 | ||||||||||
Ⅰ-2 | 0.2927 | 0.2173 | ||||||||
Ⅰ-3 | 0.4161 | 0.4454 | 0.2872 | |||||||
Ⅰ-4 | 0.2907 | 0.3829 | 0.2743 | 0.0833 | ||||||
Ⅰ-5 | 0.2664 | 0.2567 | 0.3644 | 0.2479 | 0.1792 | |||||
Ⅱ-1 | 0.4258 | 0.4393 | 0.4833 | 0.4054 | 0.4332 | 0.1965 | ||||
Ⅱ-2 | 0.4535 | 0.3772 | 0.5690 | 0.4929 | 0.4000 | 0.5551 | ||||
Ⅱ-3 | 0.4078 | 0.4833 | 0.5607 | 0.5073 | 0.5468 | 0.3240 | 0.3463 | |||
Ⅱ-4 | 0.5458 | 0.5685 | 0.7297 | 0.6091 | 0.7303 | 0.4284 | 0.4704 | 0.2142 | 0.2272 | |
Ⅱ-5 | 0.4894 | 0.6483 | 0.6785 | 0.5531 | 0.6418 | 0.4558 | 0.3614 | 0.2103 | 0.2618 | 0.2035 |
类群 | Ⅰ-1 | Ⅰ-2 | Ⅰ-3 | Ⅰ-4 | Ⅰ-5 | Ⅱ-1 | Ⅱ-2 | Ⅱ-3 | Ⅱ-4 | Ⅱ-5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ-1 | ||||||||||
Ⅰ-2 | 0.2927 | 0.2173 | ||||||||
Ⅰ-3 | 0.4161 | 0.4454 | 0.2872 | |||||||
Ⅰ-4 | 0.2907 | 0.3829 | 0.2743 | 0.0833 | ||||||
Ⅰ-5 | 0.2664 | 0.2567 | 0.3644 | 0.2479 | 0.1792 | |||||
Ⅱ-1 | 0.4258 | 0.4393 | 0.4833 | 0.4054 | 0.4332 | 0.1965 | ||||
Ⅱ-2 | 0.4535 | 0.3772 | 0.5690 | 0.4929 | 0.4000 | 0.5551 | ||||
Ⅱ-3 | 0.4078 | 0.4833 | 0.5607 | 0.5073 | 0.5468 | 0.3240 | 0.3463 | |||
Ⅱ-4 | 0.5458 | 0.5685 | 0.7297 | 0.6091 | 0.7303 | 0.4284 | 0.4704 | 0.2142 | 0.2272 | |
Ⅱ-5 | 0.4894 | 0.6483 | 0.6785 | 0.5531 | 0.6418 | 0.4558 | 0.3614 | 0.2103 | 0.2618 | 0.2035 |
材料名称 (编号) | 类群 | 与其他材料的遗传距离平均值 | 组合个数 | 材料名称 (编号) | 类群 | 与其他材料的遗传距离平均值 | 组合个数 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tx3197B(36) | I-2 | 0.7564 | 8 | R111(6) | II-4 | 0.7790 | 9 | |
LgB/R5M874B-III(24) | I-3 | 0.7976 | 13 | L早615(10) | II-4 | 0.7731 | 9 | |
吉2055B(30) | I-3 | 0.7722 | 12 | 0-30(28) | II-4 | 0.7608 | 9 | |
AGR-1B(32) | I-3 | 0.7713 | 10 | 吉12(11) | II-4 | 0.7559 | 5 | |
V4B(15) | I-3 | 0.7599 | 11 | 吉R105(35) | II-4 | 0.7316 | 5 | |
LgB/R5M874B-I(23) | I-3 | 0.7249 | 1 | 锦Y15(7) | II-5 | 0.7602 | 6 | |
3765白B(19) | I-5 | 0.7871 | 11 | H02079(12) | II-5 | 0.7590 | 1 | |
Tx623B(37) | I-5 | 0.7736 | 8 | 晋粱5号(14) | II-5 | 0.7531 | 8 | |
3765红B(18) | I-5 | 0.7668 | 9 | 棒洛三(33) | II-5 | 0.7499 | 8 | |
铁10612(9) | I-5 | 0.7577 | 11 | 1383-2(21) | II-5 | 0.7432 | 8 | |
7B大粒/TB(26) | I-5 | 0.7267 | 4 | 3560R(5) | II-5 | 0.7421 | 8 | |
L17R(2) | II-4 | 0.8260 | 11 | LR233(8) | II-5 | 0.7386 | 3 | |
L2R(1) | II-4 | 0.8221 | 10 | 忻粱7号(3) | II-5 | 0.7040 | 1 |
材料名称 (编号) | 类群 | 与其他材料的遗传距离平均值 | 组合个数 | 材料名称 (编号) | 类群 | 与其他材料的遗传距离平均值 | 组合个数 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tx3197B(36) | I-2 | 0.7564 | 8 | R111(6) | II-4 | 0.7790 | 9 | |
LgB/R5M874B-III(24) | I-3 | 0.7976 | 13 | L早615(10) | II-4 | 0.7731 | 9 | |
吉2055B(30) | I-3 | 0.7722 | 12 | 0-30(28) | II-4 | 0.7608 | 9 | |
AGR-1B(32) | I-3 | 0.7713 | 10 | 吉12(11) | II-4 | 0.7559 | 5 | |
V4B(15) | I-3 | 0.7599 | 11 | 吉R105(35) | II-4 | 0.7316 | 5 | |
LgB/R5M874B-I(23) | I-3 | 0.7249 | 1 | 锦Y15(7) | II-5 | 0.7602 | 6 | |
3765白B(19) | I-5 | 0.7871 | 11 | H02079(12) | II-5 | 0.7590 | 1 | |
Tx623B(37) | I-5 | 0.7736 | 8 | 晋粱5号(14) | II-5 | 0.7531 | 8 | |
3765红B(18) | I-5 | 0.7668 | 9 | 棒洛三(33) | II-5 | 0.7499 | 8 | |
铁10612(9) | I-5 | 0.7577 | 11 | 1383-2(21) | II-5 | 0.7432 | 8 | |
7B大粒/TB(26) | I-5 | 0.7267 | 4 | 3560R(5) | II-5 | 0.7421 | 8 | |
L17R(2) | II-4 | 0.8260 | 11 | LR233(8) | II-5 | 0.7386 | 3 | |
L2R(1) | II-4 | 0.8221 | 10 | 忻粱7号(3) | II-5 | 0.7040 | 1 |
[1] | Huang RD. Research progress on plant tolerance to soil salinity and alkalinity in sorghum[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018,17(4):739-746. |
[2] |
Fujimoto R, Uezono K, Ishikura S, et al. Recent research on the mechanism of heterosis is important for crop and vegetable breeding systems[J]. Breeding Science, 2018,68(2):145-158.
URL pmid: 29875598 |
[3] | Rakshit S, Hariprasanna K, Gomashe S, et al. Changes in area, yield gains, and yield stability of sorghum in major sorghum-producing countries, 1970 to 2009[J]. Crop Science, 2014,54:1571-1584. |
[4] | 王瑞, 王金胜, 张福耀, 等. 1970s—2000s中国高粱杂交种亲本遗传距离演变的SSR分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(3):415-425. |
Wang R, Wang JS, Zhang FY, et al. Evolution of genetic distance between parental lines of Chinese sorghum hybrids from1970s-2000s based on SSR analysis[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015,48(3):415-425. | |
[5] | 侯荷亭, 杜志宏, 赵根弟. 高粱亲本遗传距离与杂种优势和特殊配合力的关系[J]. 遗传, 1995,17(1):30-33. |
Hou HT, Du ZH, Zhao GD. Studies on the relationships of genetic distance of sorghum parental lines with heterosis and specific combining ability[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 1995,17(1):30-33. | |
[6] | Wang LM, Jiao SJ, Jiang YX, et al. Genetic diversity in parent lines of sweet sorghum based on agronomical traits and SSR markers[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013,149:11-19. |
[7] |
Basahi MA. ISSR-based analysis of genetic diversity among sorghum landraces growing in some parts of Saudi Arabia and Yemen[J]. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 2015,338(11):723-727.
URL pmid: 26496867 |
[8] | 高旭, 周棱波, 张国兵, 等. 基于SSR标记的粒用高粱资源遗传多样性及群体结构[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2016,44(9):13-19. |
Gao X, Zhou LB, Zhang GB, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of grain sorghum germplasm resources based on SSR marker[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2016,44(9):13-19. | |
[9] |
李萌, 秦慧彬, 王宇楠, 等. 基于SSR标记的山西高粱地方品种遗传多样性和遗传结构分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020-06-01, http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20191011.0902.002.html.
URL pmid: 31598026 |
Li M, Qin HB, Wang YN, et al. Genetic diversity and structure of sorghum landrace germplasm in Shanxi based on SSR markers[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020-06-01, http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20191011.0902.002.html.
URL pmid: 31598026 |
|
[10] | 石璇, 王茹媛, 唐君, 等. 利用简化基因组技术分析甘薯种间单核苷酸多态性[J]. 作物学报, 2016,42(5):641-647. |
Shi X, Wang RY, Tang J, et al. Analysis of interspecific SNPs in sweet potato using a reduced-representation genotyping technology[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016,42(5):641-647. | |
[11] |
Sun XW, Liu DY, Zhang XF, et al. SLAF-seq:an efficient method of large-scale de novo SNP discovery and genotyping using high-throughput sequencing[J]. PLoS One, 2013,8(3):e58700.
URL pmid: 23527008 |
[12] | 杨光, 孙兰英, 段亚东, 等. 基于简化基因组测序的树莓(Rubus corchorifolius)遗传分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019,17(22):7338-7343. |
Yang G, Sun LY, Duan YD, et al. Genetic analysis of Rubus corchorifolius based on simplified genome sequencing[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019,17(22):7338-7343. | |
[13] | Shen C, Jin X, Zhu D, et al. Uncovering SNP and indel variations of tetraploid cottons by SLAF-seq[J]. BMC Genomics, 2017,18:247. |
[14] | Su WJ, Wang LJ, Lei J, et al. Genome-wide assessment of population structure and genetic diversity and development of a core germplasm set for sweet potato based on specific length amplified fragment(SLAF)sequencing[J]. PLoS One, 2017,12(2):e0172066. |
[15] | 籍贵苏, 吕芃, 杜瑞恒, 等. 高粱单核苷酸多态性(SNP)标记开发研究初报[J]. 华北农学报, 2018,33(2):119-125. |
Ji GS, Lv P, Du RH, et al. A primary study on developing SNP markers in sorghum[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2018,33(2):119-125. | |
[16] |
Ji GS, Zhang QS, Du RH, et al. Construction of a high-density genetic map using specific-locus amplified fragments in sorghum[J]. BMC Genomics, 2017,18(1):51.
URL pmid: 28061813 |
[17] |
Han YC, Lv P, Hou SL, et al. Combining next generation sequencing with bulked segregant analysis to fine map a stem moisture locus in Sorghum(Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)[J]. PLoS One, 2015,10(5):e0127065.
URL pmid: 25984727 |
[18] | 王瑞, 凌亮, 詹鹏杰, 等. 控制高粱分蘖与主茎株高一致性的基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2019,45(6):829-838. |
Wang R, Ling L, Zhan PJ, et al. Mapping of genes confessing same height of tiller and main stem in sorghum[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019,45(6):829-838. | |
[19] | 张一中. 高粱育种材料主要性状综合评价及骨干亲本亲缘关系鉴定[D]. 太谷:山西农业大学, 2017. |
Zhang YZ. Comprehensive evaluation of main characters of sorghum breeding materials and identification of genetic relationships among the backone parents[D]. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2017. | |
[20] |
Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, et al. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the Miseq Illumina sequencing platform[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2013,79(17):5112-5120.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.01043-13 URL pmid: 23793624 |
[21] | 俞奔驰, 韦丽君, 雷开文, 等. 基于SLAF-seq技术的木薯SNP标记开发[J]. 植物生理学报, 2018,54(6):1029-1037. |
Yu BC, Wei LJ, Lei KW, et al. Development of SNP markers in cas-sava(Manihot esculenta Crantz)based on SLAF-seq technology[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2018,54(6):1029-1037. | |
[22] |
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and samtools[J]. Bioinformatics, 2009,25(16):2078-2079.
URL pmid: 19505943 |
[23] |
Mckenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit:A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data[J]. Genome Research, 2010,20(9):1297-1303.
doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110 URL pmid: 20644199 |
[24] |
Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals[J]. Genome Research, 2009,19(9):1655-1664.
URL pmid: 19648217 |
[25] |
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, et al. MEGA5:Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods[J]. Molecular Biology & Evolution, 2011,28(10):2731-2739.
URL pmid: 21546353 |
[26] | Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies[J]. Nature Genetics, 2006,38(8):904-909. |
[27] | Li RQ, Yu C, Li YR, et al. SOAP2:an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment[J]. Bioinformatics, 2009,25(15):1966-1967. |
[28] | 赵秀华, 刘家裕, 柏德华, 等. 高粱恢复系“4003”及其衍生系的选育与利用研究[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 1995(1):37-41. |
Zhao XH, Liu JY, Bai DH, et al. Breeding and utilization of sorghum restorer line ‘4003' and its derivative lines[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 1995(1):37-41. | |
[29] | 王瑞, 张福耀, 王花云, 等. 高粱抗旱种质筛选及遗传多样性的SSR分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2014,15(4):871-876. |
Wang R, Zhang FY, Wang HY, et al. Drought resistance screening and genetic diversity by SSR markers in sorghum[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2014,15(1):871-876. | |
[30] | 倪先林, 赵甘霖, 刘天朋, 等. SSR分子标记在糯高粱种质资源遗传多样性分析中的应用[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2015,31(1):16-22. |
Ni XL, Zhao GL, Liu TP, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of glutinous sorghum germplasm by simple sequence repeat[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015,31(1):16-22. | |
[31] |
Adugna A. Analysis of in situ diversity and population structure in ethiopian cultivated Sorghum bicolor(L.)landraces using phenotypic traits and SSR markers[J]. Springer Plus, 2014,3:212.
URL pmid: 24877027 |
[32] |
Wang YH, Upadhyaya HD, Burrell AM, et al. Genetic structure and linkage disequilibrium in a diverse, representative collection of the C4 model plant, Sorghum bicolor[J]. Genes Genomes Genetics, 2013,3:783-793.
doi: 10.1534/g3.112.004861 URL pmid: 23704283 |
[33] | 屈洋, 周瑜, 王钊, 等. 苦荞产区种质资源遗传多样性和遗传结构分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(11):2049-2062. |
Qu Y, Zhou Y, Wang Z, et al. Analysis of genetic diversity and structure of tartary buckwheat resources from production regions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(11):2049-2062. | |
[34] | 蒙祖庆, 宋丰萍, 刘婷. 西藏玉米地方品种与国内骨干自交系间的遗传关系分析[J]. 核农学报, 2018,32(7):1298-1308. |
Meng ZQ, Song FP, Liu T. Analysis of genetic relationship between the Tibetan maize landraces and the key inbred lines[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018,32(7):1298-1308. | |
[35] | Xu Q, Yuan XP, Wang S, et al. The genetic diversity and structure of indica rice in China as detected by single nucleotide polymorphism analysis[J]. BMC Genetics, 2016,17(1):53. |
[36] | 高士杰, 刘晓辉, 郭中校, 等. 中国杂交高粱的种质基础及优势利用模式研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005,21(10):106-108. |
Gao SJ, Liu XH, Guo ZX, et al. Chinese hybrid sorghum idioplasm foundation and superiority use pattern[J]. Chinses Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005,21(10):106-108. |
[1] | FAN Xin-qi, WANG Hai-yan, CHEN Jing, ZHANG Xiao-juan, GUO Qi, LIANG Du, ZHOU Fu-ping, NIE Meng-en, ZHANG Yi-zhong, LIU Qing-shan. Effects of EMS Mutagenesis on the Seeding Survival and Major Agronomic Traits of Sorghum in M1 Generation [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 173-184. |
[2] | XU Jian-xia, DING Yan-qing, FENG Zhou, CAO Ning, CHENG Bin, GAO Xu, ZOU Gui-hua, ZHANG Li-yi. QTL Mapping of Sorghum Plant Height and Internode Numbers Based on Super-GBS Technique [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 185-194. |
[3] | CUI Xue-qiang, HUANG Chang-yan, DENG Jie-ling, LI Xian-min, LI Xiu-ling, ZHANG Zi-bin. SNP Markers Development and Genetic Relationship Analysis of Dendrobium Germplasms Using SLAF-seq Technology [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 141-148. |
[4] | KONG De-zhen, DUAN Zhen-yu, WANG Gang, ZHANG Xin, XI Lin-qiao. Physiological Characteristics and Transcriptome Analysis of Sorghum bicolor × S. Sudanense Seedlings Under Salt-alkali Stress [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 199-207. |
[5] | WANG Chun-yu, LI Zheng-jun, WANG Ping, ZHANG Li-xia. Physiological and Biochemical Analysis of Drought Resistance in Sorghum Cuticular Wax-deficient Mutant sb1 [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 160-167. |
[6] | ZHOU Shi-chen, YI Zhi-ben, WANG Xin-yi, YANG Xiao-ying, SUN Li-na, LUAN Wei-jiang, LIANG Shan-shan. Genetic Analysis and Gene Mapping of Sorghum Double-grain Mutant Dgs [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 171-177. |
[7] | QIAN Fang, GAO Zuo-min, HU Li-juan, WANG Hong-cheng. Characteristics of Crambe abyssinica Chloroplast Genome and Its Phylogenetic Relationship in Brassicaceae [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 174-186. |
[8] | ZHOU Xiao-nan, XU Jin-qing, LEI Yu-qing, WANG Hai-qing. Development of SNP Markers in Medicago archiducis-nicolai Based on GBS-seq [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 303-310. |
[9] | JIANG Bai-yang, BAI Wen-bin, ZHANG Jiang-hua, FAN Na, SHI Li-juan. Advances in Studies on Identification Methods and Molecular Biology of Drought Resistance in Sorghum [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2021, 37(4): 260-272. |
[10] | ZHANG Dan, WANG Nan, LI Chao, XIE Qi, TANG San-yuan. Sweet Sorghum—a High Efficient and Quality Forage Crop [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(5): 2-8. |
[11] | LENG Chuan-yuan, HAO Huai-qing, JING Hai-chun. Research Progress on the Stem Juiciness of Sweet Sorghum [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(5): 9-14. |
[12] | HAN Li-jie, CAI Hong-wei. Progress on Genetic Research of Sorghum Grain Weight [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(5): 15-27. |
[13] | DING Yan-qing, ZHOU Leng-bo, WANG Can, CAO Ning, CHENG Bin, GAO Xu, PENG Qiu, SHAO Ming-bo, ZHANG Li-yi. Research Advance in Glutinous Sorghum for Making Sauce-flavor Liquor in China [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(5): 28-34. |
[14] | SONG Yu-shuang, SUI Na. Functional Analysis of FAD7 Gene in Sweet Sorghum [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(5): 35-41. |
[15] | WANG Ping, CONG Ling, WANG Chun-yu, ZHU Zhen-xing, A Ashok KUMAR, ZHANG Li-xia, LU Xiao-chun. Comparison of Mitochondrial Genome Between A1 Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Line and Maintainer Line of Sorghum bicolor [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(5): 42-47. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||