Biotechnology Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 56-63.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2021-0305
Previous Articles Next Articles
YU Guo-hong(), LIU Peng-cheng, LI Lei, LI Ming-zhe, CUI Hai-ying, HAO Hong-bo(), GUO An-qiang()
Received:
2021-03-12
Online:
2022-05-26
Published:
2022-06-10
Contact:
HAO Hong-bo,GUO An-qiang
E-mail:guangwen19840104@163.com;15603188929@126.com;gaq83@126.com
YU Guo-hong, LIU Peng-cheng, LI Lei, LI Ming-zhe, CUI Hai-ying, HAO Hong-bo, GUO An-qiang. Physiological Responses of Potato in Different Genotypes to Drought Stress[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 56-63.
Fig.1 Effect on the chlorophyll content in potato with different genotypes under drought stress Different letter indicates that there is a significant difference with other samples at 0.05 level,respectively. The same below
材料 Material | 抗旱系数 Drought-resistant coefficients | 综合抗旱系数 Comprehensive drought-resistant coefficient | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content | 丙二醛含量 MDA content | SOD 活性 SOD activity | POD 活性 POD activity | CAT 活性 CAT activity | ||
135 | 0.9891 | 2.8210 | 2.1743 | 1.3006 | 1.3507 | 7.1739 | 2.6350 |
16 | 0.7895 | 2.2612 | 2.3557 | 1.1914 | 2.5567 | 2.2593 | 1.9023 |
费乌瑞它Feiwuruita | 0.6343 | 2.1322 | 1.5417 | 1.1017 | 1.5387 | 4.7619 | 1.9518 |
SOLARA | 0.8229 | 4.3188 | 1.4547 | 1.2218 | 1.8907 | 7.5517 | 2.8768 |
TACNA | 0.8403 | 3.1461 | 1.7186 | 1.4415 | 1.6353 | 4.7407 | 2.2537 |
克新23号Kexin23 | 0.9231 | 3.4006 | 1.5005 | 1.3425 | 1.2986 | 6.7143 | 2.5299 |
SOSNA | 0.5142 | 2.6919 | 1.5135 | 1.1975 | 1.0985 | 1.8161 | 1.4719 |
冀张14号Jizhang14 | 0.7367 | 1.8275 | 1.0059 | 1.0732 | 1.3394 | 0.9620 | 1.1575 |
F8 | 0.6853 | 2.2574 | 2.1830 | 1.1330 | 1.9472 | 5.9667 | 2.3621 |
P | 0.9343 | 1.5811 | 2.5692 | 1.1487 | 1.5296 | 1.5500 | 1.5522 |
VITESSE | 0.6186 | 1.6848 | 1.0750 | 1.3854 | 1.7686 | 2.8200 | 1.5587 |
ZORA | 0.7855 | 1.7074 | 1.1373 | 1.3396 | 1.3551 | 3.0101 | 1.5559 |
Table 1 Drought-resistant coefficients in potato with different genotypes
材料 Material | 抗旱系数 Drought-resistant coefficients | 综合抗旱系数 Comprehensive drought-resistant coefficient | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content | 丙二醛含量 MDA content | SOD 活性 SOD activity | POD 活性 POD activity | CAT 活性 CAT activity | ||
135 | 0.9891 | 2.8210 | 2.1743 | 1.3006 | 1.3507 | 7.1739 | 2.6350 |
16 | 0.7895 | 2.2612 | 2.3557 | 1.1914 | 2.5567 | 2.2593 | 1.9023 |
费乌瑞它Feiwuruita | 0.6343 | 2.1322 | 1.5417 | 1.1017 | 1.5387 | 4.7619 | 1.9518 |
SOLARA | 0.8229 | 4.3188 | 1.4547 | 1.2218 | 1.8907 | 7.5517 | 2.8768 |
TACNA | 0.8403 | 3.1461 | 1.7186 | 1.4415 | 1.6353 | 4.7407 | 2.2537 |
克新23号Kexin23 | 0.9231 | 3.4006 | 1.5005 | 1.3425 | 1.2986 | 6.7143 | 2.5299 |
SOSNA | 0.5142 | 2.6919 | 1.5135 | 1.1975 | 1.0985 | 1.8161 | 1.4719 |
冀张14号Jizhang14 | 0.7367 | 1.8275 | 1.0059 | 1.0732 | 1.3394 | 0.9620 | 1.1575 |
F8 | 0.6853 | 2.2574 | 2.1830 | 1.1330 | 1.9472 | 5.9667 | 2.3621 |
P | 0.9343 | 1.5811 | 2.5692 | 1.1487 | 1.5296 | 1.5500 | 1.5522 |
VITESSE | 0.6186 | 1.6848 | 1.0750 | 1.3854 | 1.7686 | 2.8200 | 1.5587 |
ZORA | 0.7855 | 1.7074 | 1.1373 | 1.3396 | 1.3551 | 3.0101 | 1.5559 |
指标 Parameter | 次数 Times | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4≤PI | 3.5≤PI<4.0 | 3≤PI<3.5 | 2.5≤PI<3.0 | 2.0≤PI<2.5 | 1.5≤PI<2.0 | 1.0≤PI<1.5 | 0.5≤PI<1.0 | 0≤PI<0.5 | |
叶绿素Chlorophyll | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
可溶性糖Soluble sugar | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MDA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
SOD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
POD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
CAT | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Table 2 Distribution of drought-resistant coefficient of different trait index in potato with different genotypes in different regions
指标 Parameter | 次数 Times | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4≤PI | 3.5≤PI<4.0 | 3≤PI<3.5 | 2.5≤PI<3.0 | 2.0≤PI<2.5 | 1.5≤PI<2.0 | 1.0≤PI<1.5 | 0.5≤PI<1.0 | 0≤PI<0.5 | |
叶绿素Chlorophyll | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
可溶性糖Soluble sugar | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MDA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
SOD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
POD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
CAT | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
材料Material | D值 D value | 排序 Ranking | 抗旱性等级 Drought-resistance grade |
---|---|---|---|
135 | 0.8058 | 1 | 强High |
16 | 0.4654 | 6 | 中Moderate |
费乌瑞它Feiwuruita | 0.3566 | 9 | 中Moderate |
SOLARA | 0.7307 | 2 | 强High |
TACNA | 0.6241 | 4 | 强High |
克新23号Kexin23 | 0.7281 | 3 | 强High |
SOSNA | 0.1219 | 12 | 差Low |
冀张14号Jizhang14 | 0.1735 | 11 | 差Low |
F8 | 0.5229 | 5 | 中Moderate |
P | 0.4327 | 7 | 中Moderate |
VITESSE | 0.3122 | 10 | 中Moderate |
ZORA | 0.3946 | 8 | 中Moderate |
Table 3 Ranking of drought resistance in potato with different genotypes
材料Material | D值 D value | 排序 Ranking | 抗旱性等级 Drought-resistance grade |
---|---|---|---|
135 | 0.8058 | 1 | 强High |
16 | 0.4654 | 6 | 中Moderate |
费乌瑞它Feiwuruita | 0.3566 | 9 | 中Moderate |
SOLARA | 0.7307 | 2 | 强High |
TACNA | 0.6241 | 4 | 强High |
克新23号Kexin23 | 0.7281 | 3 | 强High |
SOSNA | 0.1219 | 12 | 差Low |
冀张14号Jizhang14 | 0.1735 | 11 | 差Low |
F8 | 0.5229 | 5 | 中Moderate |
P | 0.4327 | 7 | 中Moderate |
VITESSE | 0.3122 | 10 | 中Moderate |
ZORA | 0.3946 | 8 | 中Moderate |
项目Item | 叶绿素 Chlorophyll | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | MDA | SOD | POD | CAT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
关联度Correlation degree | 0.409 | 0.3061 | 0.3534 | 0.3227 | 0.2577 | 0.3933 |
关联序Correlative order | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 |
Table 4 Correlation degree and correlation order of indexes and comprehensive drought-resistant index in potato
项目Item | 叶绿素 Chlorophyll | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | MDA | SOD | POD | CAT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
关联度Correlation degree | 0.409 | 0.3061 | 0.3534 | 0.3227 | 0.2577 | 0.3933 |
关联序Correlative order | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 |
处理条件 Treatment condition | 品种名称 Species name | 整齐度 Uniformity | 薯形 Potato shape | 皮色 Skin color | 肉色 Flash color | 薯皮类型 Potato skin type | 芽眼深度 Bud eye depth | 取样面积 Square meter/m2 | 产量Yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
正常浇水 1 800 m3/hm2 | 冀张14号 | 整齐 | 扁圆形 | 淡黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 13 320±690d |
克新23号 | 整齐 | 卵圆形 | 浅黄色 | 淡黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 20 445±1 275ab | |
费乌瑞它 | 整齐 | 长椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 略麻 | 浅 | 14 | 21 120±420a | |
135 | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 15 390±1 650bc | |
16 | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 15 090±1 320bc | |
SOSNA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 淡黄色 | 略麻 | 浅 | 14 | 14 190±1 125c | |
SOLARA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 麻皮 | 浅 | 14 | 16 185±1 395bc | |
TACNA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 麻皮 | 浅 | 14 | 15 885±840bc | |
F8 | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 14 205±495c | |
P | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 14 550±990c | |
VITESSE | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 17 085±735b | |
ZORA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 淡黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 17 355±675b | |
干旱处理 600 m3/hm2 | 冀张14号 | 整齐 | 扁圆形 | 淡黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 5 025±1 050ef |
克新23号 | 整齐 | 卵圆形 | 浅黄色 | 淡黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 10 125±1 005a | |
费乌瑞它 | 整齐 | 长椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 略麻 | 浅 | 14 | 10 065±825a | |
135 | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 9 330±465ab | |
16 | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 8 190±1 320bc | |
SOSNA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 淡黄色 | 略麻 | 浅 | 14 | 5 550±1 335ef | |
SOLARA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 麻皮 | 浅 | 14 | 8 340±1 185bc | |
TACNA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 麻皮 | 浅 | 14 | 8 700±900bc | |
F8 | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 6 375±1 005de | |
P | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 6 810±660d | |
VITESSE | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 7 740±1 335c | |
ZORA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 淡黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 7 785±1 695c |
Table 5 The questionnaire of yield related traits in potato with different genotypes under different conditions
处理条件 Treatment condition | 品种名称 Species name | 整齐度 Uniformity | 薯形 Potato shape | 皮色 Skin color | 肉色 Flash color | 薯皮类型 Potato skin type | 芽眼深度 Bud eye depth | 取样面积 Square meter/m2 | 产量Yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
正常浇水 1 800 m3/hm2 | 冀张14号 | 整齐 | 扁圆形 | 淡黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 13 320±690d |
克新23号 | 整齐 | 卵圆形 | 浅黄色 | 淡黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 20 445±1 275ab | |
费乌瑞它 | 整齐 | 长椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 略麻 | 浅 | 14 | 21 120±420a | |
135 | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 15 390±1 650bc | |
16 | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 15 090±1 320bc | |
SOSNA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 淡黄色 | 略麻 | 浅 | 14 | 14 190±1 125c | |
SOLARA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 麻皮 | 浅 | 14 | 16 185±1 395bc | |
TACNA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 麻皮 | 浅 | 14 | 15 885±840bc | |
F8 | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 14 205±495c | |
P | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 14 550±990c | |
VITESSE | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 17 085±735b | |
ZORA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 淡黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 17 355±675b | |
干旱处理 600 m3/hm2 | 冀张14号 | 整齐 | 扁圆形 | 淡黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 5 025±1 050ef |
克新23号 | 整齐 | 卵圆形 | 浅黄色 | 淡黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 10 125±1 005a | |
费乌瑞它 | 整齐 | 长椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 略麻 | 浅 | 14 | 10 065±825a | |
135 | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 9 330±465ab | |
16 | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 8 190±1 320bc | |
SOSNA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 淡黄色 | 略麻 | 浅 | 14 | 5 550±1 335ef | |
SOLARA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 麻皮 | 浅 | 14 | 8 340±1 185bc | |
TACNA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 麻皮 | 浅 | 14 | 8 700±900bc | |
F8 | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 白色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 6 375±1 005de | |
P | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 6 810±660d | |
VITESSE | 整齐 | 圆形 | 黄色 | 黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 7 740±1 335c | |
ZORA | 整齐 | 椭圆形 | 黄色 | 淡黄色 | 光滑 | 浅 | 14 | 7 785±1 695c |
[1] | 唐洪明. 试论我国马铃薯实生种子(薯)的利用及其生产发展的前景[J]. 中国马铃薯, 1987, 1(3):44-48. |
Tang HM. The utilization of potato seed(tuber)in China and the prospect of its production and development[J]. Chin Potato J, 1987, 1(3):44-48. | |
[2] | 卢福顺. 水分胁迫对马铃薯生理指标和叶片结构的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2013. |
Lu FS. Effect of drought stress on physiological indexes and structure in leaves of potato(Solanum tuberosum L.)[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2013. | |
[3] | 谢小玉, 张霞, 张兵. 油菜苗期抗旱性评价及抗旱相关指标变化分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(3):476-485. |
Xie XY, Zhang X, Zhang B. Evaluation of drought resistance and analysis of variation of relevant parameters at seedling stage of rapeseed(Brassica napus L.)[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46(3):476-485. | |
[4] | 姚春馨, 丁玉梅, 周晓罡, 等. 水分胁迫下马铃薯抗旱相关表型性状的分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2013, 26(4):1416-1419. |
Yao CX, Ding YM, Zhou XG, et al. Analysis on phenotypic trait of drought resistance of potato under moisture starvation[J]. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2013, 26(4):1416-1419. | |
[5] | 孙业民, 张俊莲, 王文, 等. PP333对干旱胁迫下马铃薯幼苗抗旱性及块茎营养的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(6):118-123. |
Sun YM, Zhang JL, Wang W, et al. Influences of PP333 on potato seedling drought resistance and tuber nutrient under drought stress[J]. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2012, 30(6):118-123. | |
[6] | 徐红云. 拟南芥Trihelix转录因子AST1调控植物抗旱、耐盐的机制研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2017. |
Xu HY. The mechanism of Arabidopsis Trihelix transcription factor AST1 in drought or salt stress response regulation[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2017. | |
[7] |
Scaramagli S, Biondi S, Leone A, et al. Acclimation to low water potential in potato cell suspension cultures leads to changes in putrescine metabolism[J]. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2000, 38(4):345-351.
doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(00)00750-6 URL |
[8] | 黎冬华, 刘文萍, 张艳欣, 等. 芝麻耐旱性的鉴定方法及关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(8):1425-1433. |
Li DH, Liu WP, Zhang YX, et al. Identification method of drought tolerance and association mapping for sesame(Sesamum indicum L.)[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39(8):1425-1433.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01425 URL |
|
[9] | 田又升, 谢宗铭, 吴向东, 等. 水稻种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合鉴定[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(4):173-180. |
Tian YS, Xie ZM, Wu XD, et al. Identification of drought tolerance of rice germplasm during germination period[J]. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2015, 33(4):173-180. | |
[10] | 李国瑞, 马宏亮, 胡雯媚, 等. 西南麦区小麦品种萌发期抗旱性的综合鉴定及评价[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 35(4):479-487. |
Li GR, Ma HL, Hu WM, et al. Identification and evaluation of wheat cultivars for drought resistance during germination in southwest area[J]. J Triticeae Crop, 2015, 35(4):479-487. | |
[11] | 高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006. |
Gao JF. Experimental guidance for plant physiology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006. | |
[12] | 祁旭升, 王兴荣, 许军, 等. 胡麻种质资源成株期抗旱性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(15):3076-3087. |
Qi XS, Wang XR, Xu J, et al. Drought-resistance evaluation of flax germplasm at adult plant stage[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(15):3076-3087. | |
[13] | 尹利, 逯晓萍, 傅晓峰, 等. 高丹草杂交种灰色关联分析与评判[J]. 中国草地学报, 2006, 28(3):21-25, 43. |
Yin L, Lu XP, Fu XF, et al. The grey relation analysis and evaluation of hybrid pacesetter[J]. Chin J Grassland, 2006, 28(3):21-25, 43. | |
[14] | 胡秉民, 张全德. 农业试验统计分析方法[M]. 杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社, 1985. |
Hu BM, Zhang QD. Methods for statistical analysis of agricultural experiments[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Science & Technology Press, 1985. | |
[15] |
Wright PR, Morgan JM, Jessop RS. Turgor maintenance by osmoregulation in Brassica napus and B. juncea under field conditions[J]. Ann Bot, 1997, 80(3):313-319.
doi: 10.1006/anbo.1997.0444 URL |
[16] | Norouzi M, Toorchi M, Salekdeh G H, etal. Effect of water deficit on growth, grain yield and osmotic adjustment in rapeseed[J]. J Food Agri Environ, 2008, 6(2):312-318. |
[17] | 张金凤, 陈佩珍, 孙晓波, 等. 干旱对马尾松幼苗光合作用及相关生理的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(1):32-38. |
Zhang JF, Chen PZ, Sun XB, et al. Effects on photosynthetic and resistant physiological characteristics of Pinus massoniana seedlings under drought stress[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2021, 37(1):32-38. | |
[18] | 晁漫宁, 史新月, 张健龙, 等. 灌浆期持续干旱对小麦光合、抗氧化酶活性、籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(4):494-502. |
Chao MN, Shi XY, Zhang JL, et al. Effects of persistent drought at grain filling stage on flag leaf photosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme activity, grain yield and quality of wheat[J]. J Triticeae Crop, 2020, 40(4):494-502. | |
[19] | 刘芬, 屈成, 王悦, 等. 抽穗期干旱复水对机插水稻抗氧化酶活性及根系活力的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(1):65-71. |
Liu F, Qu C, Wang Y, et al. Effects of drought rewatering at heading stage on antioxidant enzyme activity and root activity of machine-transplanted rice[J]. J South Agric, 2020, 51(1):65-71. | |
[20] | 邵艳军. 高粱、 玉米苗期抗旱生理与分子机制的比较研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2005. |
Shao YJ. A comparative study between sorghum and maize on the physiological and molecular mechanism of water stress resistance[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2005. | |
[21] | 李玉华, 范春丽, 雷志华, 等. 两个玉米品种在萌芽期和苗期的干旱耐性比较分析[J]. 西北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 50(5):703-710. |
Li YH, Fan CL, Lei ZH, et al. Comparative analysis on drought tolerance of two maize cultivars at germination and seedling stages[J]. J Northwest Univ:Nat Sci Ed, 2020, 50(5):703-710. | |
[22] | 孟庆立, 关周博, 冯佰利, 等. 谷子抗旱相关性状的主成分与模糊聚类分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(8):2667-2675. |
Meng QL, Guan ZB, Feng BL, et al. Principal component analysis and fuzzy clustering on drought-tolerance related traits of foxtail millet(Setaria italica)[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42(8):2667-2675. | |
[23] |
徐银萍, 潘永东, 刘强德, 等. 大麦种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3):448-461.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.91031 |
Xu YP, Pan YD, Liu QD, et al. Drought resistance identification and drought resistance indexes screening of barley resources at mature period[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2020, 46(3):448-461.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.91031 URL |
|
[24] | 罗俊杰, 欧巧明, 叶春雷, 等. 重要胡麻栽培品种的抗旱性综合评价及指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(7):1259-1273. |
Luo JJ, Ou QM, Ye CL, et al. Comprehensive valuation of drought resistance and screening of indices of important flax cultivars[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(7):1259-1273.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01259 URL |
[1] | WANG Zi-ying, LONG Chen-jie, FAN Zhao-yu, ZHANG Lei. Screening of OsCRK5-interacted Proteins in Rice Using Yeast Two-hybrid System [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 117-125. |
[2] | LIU Wen-jin, MA Rui, LIU Sheng-yan, YANG Jiang-wei, ZHANG Ning, SI Huai-jun. Cloning of StCIPK11 Gene and Analysis of Its Response to Drought Stress in Solanum tuberosum [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 147-155. |
[3] | XU Jing, ZHU Hong-lin, LIN Yan-hui, TANG Li-qiong, TANG Qing-jie, WANG Xiao-ning. Cloning of IbHQT1 Promoter and Identification of Upstream Regulatory Factors in Sweet Potato [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 213-219. |
[4] | DING Kai-xin, WANG Li-chun, TIAN Guo-kui, WANG Hai-yan, LI Feng-yun, PAN Yang, PANG Ze, SHAN Ying. Research Progress in Uniconazole Alleviating Plant Drought Damage [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 1-11. |
[5] | WANG Chun-yu, LI Zheng-jun, WANG Ping, ZHANG Li-xia. Physiological and Biochemical Analysis of Drought Resistance in Sorghum Cuticular Wax-deficient Mutant sb1 [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 160-167. |
[6] | WANG Hai-long, LI Yu-qian, WANG Bo, XING Guo-fang, ZHANG Jie-wei. Isolation and Expression Analysis of SiMAPK3 in Setaria italica L. [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 123-132. |
[7] | WANG Qi, HU Zhe, FU Wei, LI Guang-zhe, HAO Lin. Regulation of Burkholderia sp. GD17 on the Drought Tolerance of Cucumber Seedlings [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 163-175. |
[8] | YU Bo, QIN Xiao-hui, ZHAO Yang. Mechanisms of Plant Sensing Drought Signals [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(11): 6-17. |
[9] | CHEN Chu-yi, YANG Xiao-mei, CHEN Sheng-yan, CHEN Bin, YUE Li-ran. Expression Analysis of the ZF-HD Gene Family in Chrysanthemum nankingense Under Drought and ABA Treatment [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(11): 270-282. |
[10] | FENG Ce-ting, JIANG Lyu, LIU Xing-ying, LUO Le, PAN Hui-tang, ZHANG Qi-xiang, YU Chao. Identification of the NAC Gene Family in Rosa persica and Response Analysis Under Drought Stress [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(11): 283-296. |
[11] | YAN Meng-yu, WEI Xiao-wei, CAO Jing, LAN Hai-yan. Cloning of Basic Helix-loop-helix(bHLH)Transcription Factor Gene SabHLH169 in Suaeda aralocaspica and Analysis of Its Resistances to Drought Stress [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(11): 328-339. |
[12] | TAO Na, LI Mao-xing, GUO Hua-chun. Optimization of Sweet Potato Genetic Transformation System Mediated by Agrobacterium rhizogenes [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2023, 39(10): 175-183. |
[13] | GUAN Zhi-xiu, WANG Yan, LIANG Cheng-gang, WEI Chun-yu, HUANG Juan, CHEN Qing-fu. Identification of FtCBL Genes in Fagopyrum tataricum and Their Stress Responses to Drought and High Calcium [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 101-109. |
[14] | CHEN Jia-min, LIU Yong-jie, MA Jin-xiu, LI Dan, GONG Jie, ZHAO Chang-ping, GENG Hong-wei, GAO Shi-qing. Expression Pattern Analysis of Histone Methyltransferase Under Drought Stress in Hybrid Wheat [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 51-61. |
[15] | DONG Ya-ru, ZHAO Dong-xiao, GENG Bing, LI Yun-zhi, WANG Zhao-hong. Expression Analysis of MnERF2 in Mulberry [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38(11): 112-121. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||