生菜连作及生菜-菠菜轮作对土壤细菌群落结构的影响

doi:10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2019-0182

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以生菜连作和生菜-菠菜轮作不同次数的土壤样品为材料,研究比较生菜不同种植方式下土壤细菌群落的差异。采集0-20 cm深度土壤样品,分别提取样品总DNA,采用高通量测序技术分析生菜种植前后土壤样品中细菌多样性。测序结果经过质控过滤,共获得有效序列46 865条,对相似水平为97%的OTU进行生物信息统计分析,共得到OTU 21 692个。Heatmap图和群落组成分析显示,样品共检测到细菌40个门,89个纲,190个目,371个科,693个属,其中变形菌门、厚壁菌门和放线菌门在连作过程中占比逐渐下降,而在轮作过程中较为稳定。另外,壤霉菌属、节细菌属、黄杆菌属、溶杆菌属及微细菌属等有益菌属逐渐成为轮作土壤样品中的优势菌属。主成分分析结果表明,轮作和连作土壤样品差异明显。生菜在连续种植第5次后,产量和过氧化氢酶活性分别下降了24.1%和20.7%,出现连作障碍,而轮作生菜产量和过氧化氢酶活性较连作分别提高了49.6%和10.5%。菠菜-生菜轮作土壤中细菌类群具有丰富的多样性,随着轮作的增加有上升的趋势,可在一定程度上缓解生菜连作过程中出现的问题。

关键词: 细菌群落结构, 生菜, 轮作, 连作

Abstract: The objective is to compare the differences in bacterial communities in soil between for the continuous cropping of lettuce and lettuce-spinach rotation. Soil samples were collected from depths of 0-20 cm. High-throughput sequencing technology was used to analyze the bacteria present in soil samples before and after lettuce planting. Sequencing data presented that 46 865 effective sequences were received after quality filter,and 21 692 OTUs were obtained through biological information on similar levels of 97% OTU statistical analysis. Heatmap and community composition analysis showed that bacteria 40 phylum,89 classes,190 orders,371 families,and 693 genera in the samples were detected,and the proportion of Proteobacteria,Firmicutes and Actinomycetes in the continuous process gradually reduced while the change in rotation process was stable. Moreover,the beneficial bacterial genera,including Agromyces,Arthrobacter,Flavobacterium,Lysobacter and Microbacterium,gradually became dominant in the rotation soil samples. The yield of rotating lettuce and catalase activity increased compared with that of continuous cropping. The results of principal component analysis demonstrated that there was significant difference between soil samples in rotation and continuous cropping. After the fifth consecutive planting of lettuce,the yield and catalase activity of lettuce decreased 24.1% and 20.7% respectively,and the obstacles for continuous cropping appeared;while the yield and catalase activity of lettuce in rotation were improved 49.6% and 10.5% respectively,compared with that in continuous cropping. In conclusion,there is the rich diversity of beneficial bacteria in rotating lettuce with spinach,and which increases with the increasing of rotating process,and partially alleviates the problems that occur during lettuce cultivation.

Key words: bacteria diversity, lettuce, rotation, continuous cropping

洪洁, 康建依, 刘一倩, 高秀芝, 易欣欣. 生菜连作及生菜-菠菜轮作对土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2019, 35(8): 17-26.

HONG Jie, KANG Jian-yi, LIU Yi-qian, GAO Xiu-zhi, YI Xin-xin. Effects of Continuous Cropping of Lettuce and Rotation of Lettuce-Spinach on Soil Bacterial Community Structure[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(8): 17-26.

参考文献

[1] Kim MJ, Moon Y, Kopsell DA, et al.Nutritional value of crisphead ‘Iceberg’ and Romaine Lettuces(Lactuca sativa L.)[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2016, 8(11).
[2] Gao XZ, Liu YQ, Chang Q, et al.Microbiological survey of field-grown and retail lettuce in Beijing[J]. Journal of Food Safety, 2018, 38.
[3] 杨鑫, 穆月英, 王晓东. 北京市蔬菜生产及其特征分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(13):182-190.
[4] 范双喜. 北京市叶类蔬菜产业发展研究[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2014.
[5] Qiu P, Nguyen V, Guan G, et al.Occurrence of powdery mildew caused by Golovinomyces orontii, on Lactuca sativa, var. ramosa, (lettuce)in China[J]. Crop Protection, 2018, 110:108-111.
[6] 胡俊杰, 赵文若, 刘畅. 日本莴苣引种栽培技术[J]. 北方园艺, 2008(9):80.
[7] Du JB, Han TF, Gai JY, et al.Maize-soybean strip intercropping:Achieved a balance between high productivity and sustainability[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(4):747-754.
[8] 黄锦法, 曹志洪, 李艾芬, 等. 稻麦轮作田改为保护地菜田土壤肥力质量的演变[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2003, 9(1):19.
[9] 牛倩云, 韩彦莎, 徐丽霞, 等. 作物轮作对谷田土壤理化性质及谷子根际土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(12):2802-2809.
[10] 杨威, 闫海霞, 刘廷武, 等. 黄瓜和草菇轮作对后茬黄瓜根围细菌多样性及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(5):124-128.
[11] Wright PJ, Falloon RE, Hedderley D.A long-term vegetable crop rotation study to determine effects on soil microbial communities and soilborne diseases of potato and onion[J]. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2017, 45(1):26.
[12] 崔素兰, 崔树林. 莴苣常见病害识别与防治[J]. 中国果菜, 2007(6):35-35.
[13] 黄凤莲. 蔬菜灰霉病的综合防治[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2000(4):39.
[14] 靳博红. 太白高山蔬菜轻简高效轮作模式及栽培技术研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2018.
[15] 钟连全, 王立府, 齐长红, 等. 浅谈昌平草莓种苗繁殖技术[C]. 第六届全国草莓大会论文集. 2009:259-262.
[16] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1978.
[17] 王鹏, 陈波, 张华. 基于高通量测序的鄱阳湖典型湿地土壤细菌群落特征分析[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(5):1650-1658.
[18] Ji P, Rhoads WJ, Edwards MA, et al.Impact of water heater temperature setting and water use frequency on the building plumbing microbiome[J]. The ISME Journal, 2017, 11(6):1318.
[19] Chen X, Hou F, Wu Y, et al.Bacterial and fungal community structures in loess plateau grasslands with different grazing intensities[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2017, 8:606.
[20] Leung MHY, Chan KCK, Lee PKH.Skin fungal community and its correlation with bacterial community of urban Chinese individuals[J]. Microbiome, 2016, 4(1):46.
[21] Guerrero-Preston R, Godoy-Vitorino F, Jedlicka A, et al.16S rRNA amplicon sequencing identifies microbiota associated with oral cancer, human papilloma virus infection and surgical treatment[J]. Oncotarget, 2016, 7(32):51320.
[22] Shen L, Wu H, Gao Z, et al.Comparison of community structures of Candidatus Methylomirabilis oxyfera-like bacteria of NC10 phylum in different freshwater habitats[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6:25647.
[23] Harch BD, Correll RL, Meech W, et al.Using the Gini coefficient ;with BIOLOG substrate utilisation data to provide an alternative ;quantitative measure for comparing bacterial soil communities[J]. ;Journal of Microbiological Methods, 1997, 30(1):0-101.
[24] Staddon WJ, Duchesne LC, Trevors JT.Microbial diversity and community structure of postdisturbance forest soils as determined by sole-carbon-source utilization patterns[J]. Microbial Ecology, 1997, 34(2):125-130.
[25] 杨尚东, 李荣坦, 吴俊, 等. 番茄连作与轮作土壤生物学特性及细菌群落结构的比较[J]. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(1):76-83.
[26] 殷继忠, 李亮, 接伟光, 等. 连作对大豆根际土壤细菌菌群结构的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2018, 34(1):230-238.
[27] 张立成, 肖卫华, 彭沛宇, 等. 稻-稻-油菜轮作土壤细菌群落的特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(2):276-280.
[28] Aislabie J, Saul DJ, Foght JM .Bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated polar soils[J]. Extremophiles, 2006, 10(3):171-179.
[29] 梁志婷, 邓建强, 王自奎, 等. 陇东旱塬区不同粮草轮作模式下土壤细菌群落组成特征[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(8):180-191.
[30] Zhang W, Huffman J, Li S, et al.Unusual acylation of chloramphenicol in Lysobacter enzymogenes, a biocontrol agent with intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotics[J]. BMC Biotechnology, 2017, 17(1):59.
[31] 姬广海. 溶杆菌属及其在植物病害防治中的研究进展[J]. 云南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 26(1):124-130.
[32] Fernándezgonzález AJ, Martínezhidalgo P, Cobodíaz JF, et al.The rhizosphere microbiome of burned holm-oak:potential role of the genus Arthrobacter in the recovery of burned soils[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1):6008.
[33] 彭三妹, 王博林, 徐建中, 等. 不同条件下连作杭白菊内生菌群的T-RFLP分析[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2014, 39(24):4763.
[34] 刘昌, 黄莺, 陈雪, 等. 有机、无机肥配施比例对植烟土壤细菌组成及烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2018, 47;(6):52-58.
[35] 陈力力, 刘金, 李梦丹, 杨伊磊, 邹应斌, 黄敏. 不同耕作方式稻田土壤细菌的多样性[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2018, 38(4):62-70.
[36] 苗钰婷. 设施土壤酶活性的研究进展[J]. 南方农机, 2018, 49(10):115.
[37] 王建, 祁迎春, 冯琦, 等. 黄土高原油污土壤植草恢复与土壤CAT活性的关系[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2016, 62(6):6-11.
[38] 关松荫. 土壤酶与土壤肥力[J]. 土壤通报, 1980(6):19-21.
[39] 杨凤娟, 吴焕涛, 魏珉, 等. 轮作与休闲对日光温室黄瓜连作土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(12):2983-2988.
[40] 孙正国. 连作西瓜的根际土壤酶活性和微生物多样性[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(5):46-51.
[41] 李倩, 巴图, 刘景辉, 等. 保水剂施用方式对土壤酶活性及马铃薯产量的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 45(5):116-122.
[42] 乔月静, 刘琪, 曾昭海, 等. 轮作方式对甘薯根际土壤线虫群落结构及甘薯产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(1):20-29.
[43] 陈丹梅, 陈晓明, 梁永江, 等. 种植模式对土壤酶活性和真菌群落的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(2):77-84.
[44] 徐雪风, 回振龙, 李自龙, 等. 马铃薯连作障碍与土壤环境因子变化相关研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, (4):16-23.
[45] 尹彦舒, 崔曼, 崔伟国, 等. 大蒜连作障碍形成机理的研究进展[J]. 生物资源, 2018, 40(2):141-147.