家养动物基因组拷贝数变异研究进展及其育种应用展望

doi:10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2015.11.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 家养动物参考基因组组装的不断完善和群体重测序数据的持续增加促进了基因组中大量变异的发现。基因组上的变异主要包括单核苷酸变异(SNP)和拷贝数变异(CNV)两种类型。相对于数量众多，已经被广泛研究和用作分子育种标记SNP，目前已经被发现和经过实验验证其功能的CNV数量较少，鲜有被直接用作分子标记进行育种的报道。CNV片段长度大、在基因组中普遍存在且比SNP变异覆盖的基因组范围更广，所以可能对农艺性状造成很大影响，其在畜禽基因组研究和育种应用中具有广阔前景。重点讨论了家养动物CNV的研究进展，并对其在家养动物育种中的应用进行了分析展望。

关键词: 家养动物, 基因组, 拷贝数变异, 育种, 经济性状

Abstract: The significantprogress of de novo assembly and re-sequencing of agricultural animal genomes, promoted the discovery of abundant genetic variations. Globalvariations mainly include single nucleotide polymorphisms(SNPs)and copy number variations(CNVs). Unlike SNPs, which have been widely studied and applied as molecular marker in breeding, fewer CNVs have been detected and experimental validated. Therefore, CNVs rarely serve as molecular markers in breeding. However, the proportion of genome variation ascribed to CNVs are far larger than to SNPs. So CNVs may have great impacts on agronomic traits. Recently, CNV is on the cutting edge of the research studies as well as applications in livestock and poultry breeding. In this review, we discuss the research progress of CNV, and its prospects for breeding domestic animals.

Key words: domestic animal, genome, copy number variation, breeding, economic trait

程红, 姜雨. 家养动物基因组拷贝数变异研究进展及其育种应用展望[J]. 生物技术通报, 2015, 31(11): 35-42.

Cheng Hong,JiangYu. ProgressandProspects in Domestic Animals and Breeding: a Review of Genomic Copy Number Variations[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2015, 31(11): 35-42.

参考文献

[1] International Chicken Genome Sequencing, Consortium. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution[J]. Nature, 2004, 432(7018): 695-716.
[2] Consortium BH. Genome-wide survey of SNP variation uncovers the genetic structure of cattle breeds[J]. Science, 2009, 324(5926): 528-532.
[3] Groenen MA, Archibald AL, Uenishi H, et al. Analyses of pig geno-mes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution[J]. Nature, 2012, 491(7424): 393-398.
[4] Dong Y, Xie M, Jiang Y, et al. Sequencing and automated whole-genome optical mapping of the genome of a domestic goat(Capra hircus)[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31(2): 135-141.
[5] Huang Y, Li Y, Burt David W, et al. The duck genome and transcriptome provide insight into an avian influenza virus reservoir species[J]. Nature Genetics, 2013, 45(7): 776-783.
[6] Jiang Y, Xie M, Chen W, et al. The sheep genome illuminates biology of the rumen and lipid metabolism[J]. Science, 2014, 344(6188): 1168-1173.
[7] Wang Y, Lu Y, Zhang Y, et al. The draft genome of the grass carp(Ctenopharyngodon idellus)provides insights into its evolution and vegetarian adaptation[J]. Nature Genetics, 2015, 47(6): 625-631.
[8] MacDonald JR, Ziman R, Yuen R, et al. The Database of Genomic Variants: a curated collection of structural variation in the human genome[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2014, 42(D1): D986-D992.
[9] Rubin CJ, Zody M, Eriksson J, et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication[J]. Nature, 2010, 464(7288): 587-591.
[10] Daetwyler HD, Capitan A, Pausch H, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of 234 bulls facilitates mapping of monogenic and complex traits in cattle[J]. Nature Genetics, 2014, 46(8): 858-865.
[11] Carneiro M, Rubin CJ, Di Palma F, et al. Rabbit genome analysis reveals a polygenic basis for phenotypic change during domestication[J]. Science, 2014, 345(6200): 1074-1079.
[12] Sudmant PH, Mallick S, Nelson BJ, et al. Global diversity, population stratification, and selection of human copy-number variation[J]. Science, 2015, 349(6253): aab3761.
[13] Bickhart DM, Hou Y, Schroeder SG, et al. Copy number variation of individual cattle genomes using next-generation sequencing[J]. Genome Research, 2012, 22(4): 778-790.
[14] Liu GE, Hou Y, Zhu B, et al. Analysis of copy number variations among diverse cattle breeds[J]. Genome Research, 2010, 20(5): 693-703.
[15] Fontanesi L, Beretti F, Martelli PL, et al. A first comparative map of copy number variations in the sheep genome[J]. Genomics, 2011, 97(3): 158-165.
[16] Ma Y, Zhang Q, Lu Z, et al. Analysis of copy number variations by SNP50 BeadChip array in Chinese sheep[J]. Genomics, 2015, 106(5): 295-300.
[17] Chen C, Qiao R, Wei R, et al. A comprehensive survey of copy number variation in 18 diverse pig populations and identification of candidate copy number variable genes associated with complex traits[J]. BMC Genomics, 2012, 13(1): 733.
[18] Li Y, Mei S, Zhang X, et al. Identification of genome-wide copy number variations among diverse pig breeds by array CGH[J].BMC Genomics, 2012, 13(1): 725.
[19] Crooijmans RP, Fife MS, Fitzgerald TW, et al. Large scale variation in DNA copy number in chicken breeds[J]. BMC Genomics, 2013, 14(1): 398.
[20] Yi G, Qu L, Liu J, et al. Genome-wide patterns of copy number variation in the diversified chicken genomes using next-generation sequencing[J]. BMC Genomics, 2014, 15(1): 962.
[21] Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Troge J, et al. Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome[J]. Science, 2004, 305(5683): 525-528.
[22] Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome[J]. Nature, 2006, 444(7118): 444-454.
[23] Perry GH, Ben-Dor A, Tsalenko A, et al. The fine-scale and complex architecture of human copy-number variation[J]. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 2008, 82(3): 685-695.
[24] Perry GH, Yang F, Marques-Bonet T, et al. Copy number variation and evolution in humans and chimpanzees[J]. Genome Research, 2008, 18(11): 1698-1710.
[25] Perry GH, Ben-Dor A, Tsalenko A, et al. Hotspots for copy number variation in chimpanzees and humans[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006, 103(21): 8006-8011.
[26] Meisel RP, Han MV, Hahn MW. A complex suite of forces drives gene traffic from Drosophila X chromosomes[J]. Genome Biology and Evolution, 2009, 1: 176-188.
[27] Orozco LD, Cokus SJ, Ghazalpour A, et al. Copy number variation influences gene expression and metabolic traits in mice[J]. Human Molecular Genetics, 2009, 18(21): 4118-4129.
[28] Ossowski S, Schneeberger K, Clark RM, et al. Sequencing of natural strains of Arabidopsis thaliana with short reads[J]. Genome Research, 2008, 18(12): 2024-2033.
[29] Springer NM, Ying K, Fu Y, et al. Maize inbreds exhibit high levels of copy number variation(CNV)and presence/absence variation(PAV)in genome content[J]. PLoS Genet, 2009, 5(11): e1000734.
[30] Maydan JS, Lorch A, Edgley ML, et al. Copy number variation in the genomes of twelve natural isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans[J]. BMC Genomics, 2010, 11(1): 62.
[31] Poptsova M, Banerjee S, Gokcumen O, et al. Impact of constitutional copy number variants on biological pathway evolution[J]. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2013, 13(1): 19.
[32] Conrad DF, Pinto D, Redon R, et al. Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome[J]. Nature, 2010, 464(7289): 704-712.
[33] Gonzalez E, Kulkarni H, Bolivar H, et al. The influence of CCL3L1 gene-containing segmental duplications on HIV-1/AIDS susceptibility[J]. Science, 2005, 307(5714): 1434-1440.
[34] Aitman TJ, Dong R, Vyse TJ, et al. Copy number polymorphism in Fcgr3 predisposes to glomerulonephritis in rats and humans[J]. Nature, 2006, 439(7078): 851-855.
[35] Theuns J, Brouwers N, Engelborghs S, et al. Promoter mutations that increase amyloid precursor-protein expression are associated with Alzheimer disease[J]. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 2006, 78(6): 936-946.
[36] Komura D, Shen F, Ishikawa S, et al. Genome-wide detection of human copy number variations using high-density DNA oligonucleotide arrays[J]. Genome Research, 2006, 16(12): 1575-1584.
[37] Hou Y, Liu GE, Bickhart DM, et al. Genomic regions showing copy number variations associate with resistance or susceptibility to gastrointestinal nematodes in Angus cattle[J]. Functional & Integrative Genomics, 2012, 12(1): 81-92.
[38] Flisikowski K, Venhoranta H, Nowacka-Woszuk J, et al. A novel mutation in the maternally imprinted PEG3 domain results in a loss of MIMT1 expression and causes abortions and stillbirths in cattle(Bos taurus)[J]. PLoS One, 2010, 5(11): e15116.
[39] Müller D, Kausalya PJ, Claverie-Martin F, et al. A novel claudin 16 mutation associated with childhood hypercalciuria abolishes binding to ZO-1 and results in lysosomal mistargeting[J]. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 2003, 73(6): 1293-1301.
[40] Testoni S, Mazzariol S, Dr?gemüller C, et al. Renal dysplasia in grey Alpine breed cattle unrelated to CLDN16 mutations[J]. Veterinary Record, 2012, 170(1): 22.
[41] Meyers SN, McDaneld TG, Swist SL, et al. A deletion mutation in bovine SLC4A2 is associated with osteopetrosis in Red Angus cattle[J]. BMC Genomics, 2010, 11(1): 337.
[42] Bultman SJ, Michaud EJ, Woychik RP. Molecular characterization of the mouse agouti locus[J]. Cell, 1992, 71(7): 1195-1204.
[43] Norris BJ, Whan VA. A gene duplication affecting expression of the ovine ASIP gene is responsible for white and black sheep[J]. Genome Research, 2008, 18(8): 1282-1293.
[44] Fontanesi L, Beretti F, Riggio V, et al. Copy number variation and missense mutations of the agouti signaling protein(ASIP)gene in goat breeds with different coat colors[J]. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 2009, 126(4): 333-347.
[45] Dong Y, Zhang X, Xie M, et al. Reference genome of wild goat(Capra aegagrus)and sequencing of goat breeds provide insight into genic basis of goat domestication[J]. BMC Genomics, 2015, 16(1): 431.
[46] Fadista J, Nygaard M, Holm LE, et al. A snapshot of CNVs in the pig genome[J]. PLoS One, 2008, 3(12): e3916.
[47] Ramayo-Caldas Y, Castelló A, Pena RN, et al. Copy number variation in the porcine genome inferred from a 60 k SNP BeadChip[J]. BMC Genomics, 2010, 11(1): 593.
[48] Seo BY, Park EW, Ahn SJ, et al. An accurate method for quantifying and analyzing copy number variation in porcine KIT by an oligonucleotide ligation assay[J]. BMC Genetics, 2007, 8(1): 81.
[49] Wang X, Nahashon S, Feaster TK, et al. An initial map of chromosomal segmental copy number variations in the chicken[J]. BMC Genomics, 2010, 11(1): 351.
[50] Wang Y, Gu X, Feng C, et al. A genome-wide survey of copy number variation regions in various chicken breeds by array comparative genomic hybridization method[J]. Animal Genetics, 2012, 43(3): 282-289.
[51] Wright D, Boije H, Meaclows JR, et al. Copy number variation in intron 1 of SOX5 causes the Pea-comb phenotype in chickens[J]. PLoS Genet, 2009, 5(6): e1000512.
[52] Bu G, Huang G, Fu H, et al. Characterization of the novel duplicated PRLR gene at the late-feathering K locus in Lohmann chickens[J]. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, 2013, 51(2): 261-276.
[53] Elferink MG, Vallée A, Jungerius AP, et al. Partial duplication of the PRLR and SPEF2 genes at the late feathering locus in chicken[J]. BMC Genomics, 2008, 9(1): 391.
[54] Stuber CW, Polacco M, Senior ML. Synergy of empirical breeding, marker-assisted selection, and genomics to increase crop yield potential[J]. Crop Science, 1999, 39(6): 1571-1583.
[55] Moose SP, Mumm RH. Molecular plant breeding as the foundation for 21st century crop improvement[J]. Plant Physiology, 2008, 147(3): 969-977.
[56] Schaeffer L. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle[J]. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2006, 123(4): 218-223.
[57] 黎裕, 贾继增, 王天宇. 分子标记的种类及其发展[J]. 生物技术通报, 1999(4): 19-22.