生物技术通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 279-291.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2025-1076
• 研究报告 • 上一篇
危潇1,2, 黎妍妍3, 袁勤峰1, 姚经武1, 曹春霞1(
), 黄大野1(
)
收稿日期:2025-10-10
出版日期:2026-07-26
发布日期:2026-07-20
通讯作者:
曹春霞CAOChunxia@163.com作者简介:第一联系人:同等贡献
基金资助:
WEI Xiao1,2, LI Yan-yan3, YUAN Qin-feng1, YAO Jing-wu1, CAO Chun-xia1(
), HUANG Da-ye1(
)
Received:2025-10-10
Published:2026-07-26
Online:2026-07-20
摘要:
目的 确定生防菌株YC25的分类地位,评估其抑菌能力,深入解析其基因组特征与次级代谢产物潜力,并阐明其对烟草植株的诱导抗病作用机制,为开发高效、环保的烟草土传病害生防制剂提供理论依据和技术支撑。 方法 采用形态学、生理生化和分子生物学方法对菌株YC25进行鉴定;通过对峙试验评估其抑菌能力,并进行全基因组测序和次级代谢产物预测;利用转录组学分析YC25处理对烟草植株基因表达的影响。 结果 菌株YC25被鉴定为斯氏芽胞杆菌(Bacillus spizizenii),对9种植物病原真菌具有广谱拮抗活性。田间试验表明,菌株YC25与甲霜恶霉灵联用可有效防治烟草根腐病,同时减少甲霜恶霉灵的用量。全基因组测序显示,YC25基因组总长4 120 588 bp,平均GC含量43.85%,编码基因4 045个。预测到13个次级代谢产物合成基因簇,编码surfactin、bacillaene、fengycin、bacillibactin、subtilosin和bacilysin等抑菌活性物质。转录组分析表明,施用YC25后,烟草中共诱导205个差异表达基因(DEGs),其中119个上调,86个下调。多个参与植物抗逆响应和免疫反应基因上调表达,包括FLS2、CaM、CYP84A、ERF1、ERF038、bHLH041、bHLH92和PR-1等。 结论 YC25表现出抑制病原菌和诱导植物抗病性的综合能力,具有进一步开发为生物农药的应用潜力。
危潇, 黎妍妍, 袁勤峰, 姚经武, 曹春霞, 黄大野. 一株分离自烟草根际的生防菌株鉴定及其生防潜力研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(7): 279-291.
WEI Xiao, LI Yan-yan, YUAN Qin-feng, YAO Jing-wu, CAO Chun-xia, HUANG Da-ye. Identification of a Biocontrol Strain Isolated from Tobacco Rhizosphere and Its Biocontrol Potential Analysis[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 279-291.
基因名称 Gene name | 引物名称 Primer name | 序列 Sequence(5'-3') |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | N. tabacumGAPDH F | ATGAGAGAGTGCATATCGAT |
| N. tabacumGAPDH R | TTCACTGAAGAAGGTGTTGAA | |
| PR-1 | N. tabacum PR-1 F | ATTGGAGAGGACAACGTCCC |
| N. tabacum PR-1 R | ACACACCTCCATAATACCACC | |
| PR-3 | N. tabacum PR-3 F | ACAGATTCTGCCGGACACAC |
| N. tabacum PR-3 R | AAGGAAGGTCCCAAAAGGGT | |
| NPR-1 | N. tabacumNPR1 F | GGATGCGGATGACTTGTCTGA |
| N. tabacumNPR1 R | GGAACAAGATGACGAGAGGTG | |
| PAL | N. tabacumPAL F | AAGCATCACCCCGGACAAAT |
| N. tabacumPAL R | GGTGATGTTCTGAGGGCGTA | |
| GST | N. tabacumGST F | CCTCACCCCCTCCCTCATAA |
| N. tabacumGST R | TCGCCTTGATCTGTTTGTAGACT | |
| SOD | N. tabacumSOD F | TAGCACCACACGCACAGAAG |
| N. tabacumSOD R | TGAAGGCTTCTCTTCTGCCT | |
| CAT | N. tabacumCAT F | TGAAGGCTTCTCTTCTGCCT |
| N. tabacumCAT R | TGGAGGCCTTGTCTGATCCT |
表1 RT-qPCR引物信息
Table 1 Information of RT-qPCR primers
基因名称 Gene name | 引物名称 Primer name | 序列 Sequence(5'-3') |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | N. tabacumGAPDH F | ATGAGAGAGTGCATATCGAT |
| N. tabacumGAPDH R | TTCACTGAAGAAGGTGTTGAA | |
| PR-1 | N. tabacum PR-1 F | ATTGGAGAGGACAACGTCCC |
| N. tabacum PR-1 R | ACACACCTCCATAATACCACC | |
| PR-3 | N. tabacum PR-3 F | ACAGATTCTGCCGGACACAC |
| N. tabacum PR-3 R | AAGGAAGGTCCCAAAAGGGT | |
| NPR-1 | N. tabacumNPR1 F | GGATGCGGATGACTTGTCTGA |
| N. tabacumNPR1 R | GGAACAAGATGACGAGAGGTG | |
| PAL | N. tabacumPAL F | AAGCATCACCCCGGACAAAT |
| N. tabacumPAL R | GGTGATGTTCTGAGGGCGTA | |
| GST | N. tabacumGST F | CCTCACCCCCTCCCTCATAA |
| N. tabacumGST R | TCGCCTTGATCTGTTTGTAGACT | |
| SOD | N. tabacumSOD F | TAGCACCACACGCACAGAAG |
| N. tabacumSOD R | TGAAGGCTTCTCTTCTGCCT | |
| CAT | N. tabacumCAT F | TGAAGGCTTCTCTTCTGCCT |
| N. tabacumCAT R | TGGAGGCCTTGTCTGATCCT |
生理生化指标 Physiological and biochemical index | 结果 Result | 生理生化指标 Physiological and biochemical index | 结果 Result |
|---|---|---|---|
淀粉水解 Starch hydrolysis | + | L-苹果酸 | + |
| 接触酶 | + | 好氧生长 | + |
| 氧化酶 | + | D-乳糖 | - |
| 蔗糖Sucrose | + | D-岩藻糖 | - |
| D-甘露醇 | + | L-鼠李糖 | - |
| 柠檬酸 | + | pH 5.0 | + |
| D-山梨糖醇 | + | 8% NaCl | + |
表2 菌株YC25的生理生化鉴定
Table 2 Physiological and biochemical identification of strain YC25
生理生化指标 Physiological and biochemical index | 结果 Result | 生理生化指标 Physiological and biochemical index | 结果 Result |
|---|---|---|---|
淀粉水解 Starch hydrolysis | + | L-苹果酸 | + |
| 接触酶 | + | 好氧生长 | + |
| 氧化酶 | + | D-乳糖 | - |
| 蔗糖Sucrose | + | D-岩藻糖 | - |
| D-甘露醇 | + | L-鼠李糖 | - |
| 柠檬酸 | + | pH 5.0 | + |
| D-山梨糖醇 | + | 8% NaCl | + |
编号 Number | 病原菌名称 Name of pathogens | 抑制率 Inhibition rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| A | 尖孢镰孢菌 Fusarium oxysporum | 67.45±1.47d |
| B | 核盘菌 Sclerotinia sclerotiorum | 72.55±1.47bcd |
| C | 灰葡萄孢菌 Botrytis cinerea | 83.92±2.93a |
| D | 烟草炭疽菌 Colletotrichum micotianae | 69.02±2.42cd |
| E | 茶拟盘多毛孢菌 Pestalotiopsis theae | 74.90±2.00bc |
| F | 烟草疫霉菌 Phytophthora nicotianae | 70.20±0.55bcd |
| G | 互隔链格孢菌 Alternaria alternata | 76.08±1.47b |
| H | 立枯丝核菌 Rhizoctonia solani | 74.90±1.47bc |
| I | 多主棒孢菌 Corynespora cassiicola | 72.94±0.96bcd |
表3 菌株YC25对多种病原菌的抑菌效果
Table 3 Antibacterial effects of strain YC25 on various pathogenic bacteria
编号 Number | 病原菌名称 Name of pathogens | 抑制率 Inhibition rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| A | 尖孢镰孢菌 Fusarium oxysporum | 67.45±1.47d |
| B | 核盘菌 Sclerotinia sclerotiorum | 72.55±1.47bcd |
| C | 灰葡萄孢菌 Botrytis cinerea | 83.92±2.93a |
| D | 烟草炭疽菌 Colletotrichum micotianae | 69.02±2.42cd |
| E | 茶拟盘多毛孢菌 Pestalotiopsis theae | 74.90±2.00bc |
| F | 烟草疫霉菌 Phytophthora nicotianae | 70.20±0.55bcd |
| G | 互隔链格孢菌 Alternaria alternata | 76.08±1.47b |
| H | 立枯丝核菌 Rhizoctonia solani | 74.90±1.47bc |
| I | 多主棒孢菌 Corynespora cassiicola | 72.94±0.96bcd |
图3 菌株YC25对植物病原真菌的拮抗能力A:尖孢镰孢菌;B:核盘菌;C:灰葡萄孢菌;D:烟草炭疽菌;E:茶拟盘多毛孢菌;F:烟草疫霉菌;G:互隔链格孢菌;H:立枯丝核菌;I:多主棒孢菌
Fig. 3 Antagonistic ability of strain YC25 against plant fungal pathogensA: F. oxysporum; B: S. sclerotiorum; C: B. cinerea; D: C. micotianae; E: P. theae; F: P. nicotianae; G: A. alternata; H: R. solani; I: C. cassiicola
处理 Treatment | 末次用药后30 d 30 d after the last administration | 末次用药后50 d 50 d after the last administration | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
病情指数 Disease index | 防效(%) Control effect | 病情指数 Disease index | 防效(%) Control effect | |
| T1 | 8.61±0.87b | 65.83±3.82b | 35.83±2.68b | 45.42±2.63b |
| T2 | 1.06±0.18d | 95.79±2.31a | 8.89±2.41c | 83.14±1.05a |
| T3 | 1.44±0.23c | 94.29±2.58a | 9.83±3.73c | 81.36±2.97a |
| CK | 25.20±3.16a | / | 52.73±2.11a | / |
表4 菌株YC25与化学药剂的田间防治效果
Table 4 Field control effects of strain YC25 on various pathogenic bacteria
处理 Treatment | 末次用药后30 d 30 d after the last administration | 末次用药后50 d 50 d after the last administration | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
病情指数 Disease index | 防效(%) Control effect | 病情指数 Disease index | 防效(%) Control effect | |
| T1 | 8.61±0.87b | 65.83±3.82b | 35.83±2.68b | 45.42±2.63b |
| T2 | 1.06±0.18d | 95.79±2.31a | 8.89±2.41c | 83.14±1.05a |
| T3 | 1.44±0.23c | 94.29±2.58a | 9.83±3.73c | 81.36±2.97a |
| CK | 25.20±3.16a | / | 52.73±2.11a | / |
| [1] | Chen YD, Yang L, Zhang LM, et al. Autotoxins in continuous tobacco cropping soils and their management [J]. Front Plant Sci, 2023, 14: 1106033. |
| [2] | Wei CJ, Liang JC, Wang R, et al. Response of bacterial community metabolites to bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum: a multi-omics analysis [J]. Front Plant Sci, 2024, 14: 1339478. |
| [3] | 曹坳程, 刘晓漫, 郭美霞, 等. 作物土传病害的危害及防治技术 [J]. 植物保护, 2017, 43(2): 6-16. |
| Cao AC, Liu XM, Guo MX, et al. Incidences of soil-borne diseases and control measures [J]. Plant Prot, 2017, 43(2): 6-16. | |
| [4] | 李行善, 王娜娜, 崔传斌, 等. 烟草赤星病拮抗菌株的筛选鉴定及防治效果研究 [J]. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2025, 53(2): 91-101. |
| Li XS, Wang NN, Cui CB, et al. Screening, identification and biocontrol effect of the antagonistic bacteria against tobacco brown spot [J]. J Northwest A F Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2025, 53(2): 91-101. | |
| [5] | 谭本奎, 王君, 刘志敏. 枯草芽胞杆菌可分散油悬浮剂对烟草赤星病的田间防效试验 [J]. 南方农业, 2023, 17(24): 5-7, 11. |
| Tan BK, Wang J, Liu ZM. Field control effect of Bacillus subtilis dispersible oil suspension on tobacco brown spot disease [J]. South China Agric, 2023, 17(24): 5-7, 11. | |
| [6] | 濮永瑜, 包玲凤, 何翔, 等. 烟草青枯病和黑胫病拮抗细菌的筛选、鉴定及防效研究 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 116-123. |
| Pu YY, Bao LF, He X, et al. Screening, identification and control efficacy of antagonistic bacteria against Ralstonia solanacearum and Phytophthora [J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2022, 38(7): 116-123. | |
| [7] | 何明川, 曾舒泉, 王志江, 等. 一株烟草疫霉拮抗菌MC4-2的鉴定、发酵条件优化及防效测定 [J]. 微生物学通报, 2021, 48(12): 4636-4648. |
| He MC, Zeng SQ, Wang ZJ, et al. Identification, fermentation condition optimization and control effect of an antagonistic strain MC4-2 against Phytophthora var. nicotianae [J]. Microbiol China, 2021, 48(12): 4636-4648. | |
| [8] | Klich MA, Lax AR, Bland JM. Inhibition of some mycotoxigenic fungi by iturin A, a peptidolipid produced by Bacillus subtilis [J]. Mycopathologia, 1991, 116(2): 77-80. |
| [9] | Park G, Nam J, Kim J, et al. Structure and mechanism of surfactin peptide from Bacillus velezensis antagonistic to fungi plant pathogens [J]. Bull Korean Chem Soc, 2019, 40(7): 704-709. |
| [10] | Chen MC, Wang JP, Zhu YJ, et al. Antibacterial activity against Ralstonia solanacearum of the lipopeptides secreted from the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FJAT-2349 [J]. J Appl Microbiol, 2019, 126(5): 1519-1529. |
| [11] | Um S, Fraimout A, Sapountzis P, et al. The fungus-growing termite Macrotermes natalensis harbors bacillaene-producing Bacillus sp. that inhibit potentially antagonistic fungi [J]. Sci Rep, 2013, 3: 3250. |
| [12] | Im SM, Yu NH, Joen HW, et al. Biological control of tomato bacterial wilt by oxydifficidin and difficidin-producing Bacillus methylotrophicus DR-08 [J]. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2020, 163: 130-137. |
| [13] | Stein T, Borchert S, Conrad B, et al. Two different lantibiotic-like peptides originate from the ericin gene cluster of Bacillus subtilis A1/3 [J]. J Bacteriol, 2002, 184(6): 1703-1711. |
| [14] | Ji SY, Li WL, Xin HY, et al. Improved production of sublancin 168 biosynthesized by Bacillus subtilis 168 using chemometric methodology and statistical experimental designs [J]. BioMed Res Int, 2015, 2015: 687915. |
| [15] | Hossain MT, Chung YR. Endophytic Bacillus species induce systemic resistance to plant diseases [M]//Islam MT, Rahman MM, Pandey P, et al.Bacilli and agrobiotechnology: Phytostimulation and biocontrol: Volume 2. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 151-160. |
| [16] | Hossain MT, Akhter MS, Islam MM, et al. Cross-talks about hemibiotrophic-necrotrophic pathogens by endophytic Bacillus-based EMOs [M]//Plant Endophytes and Secondary Metabolites. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2024: 235-253. |
| [17] | 危潇, 黎妍妍, 袁勤峰, 等. 枯草芽胞杆菌斯氏亚种YC25发酵条件优化及防效测定 [J]. 微生物学报, 2025, 65(7): 3208-3220. |
| Wei X, Li YY, Yuan QF, et al. Fermentation condition optimization and biocontrol effect determination of Bacillus subtilis subsp.spizizenii YC25 [J]. Acta Microbiol Sin, 2025, 65(7): 3208-3220. | |
| [18] | 东秀珠, 周宇光, 朱红惠, 等. 常见细菌与古菌系统分类鉴定手册 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2023. |
| Dong XZ, Zhou YG, Zhu HH. Handbook of systematic classification and identification of common bacteria and Archaea [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2023. | |
| [19] | Ayaz M, Li CH, Ali Q, et al. Bacterial and fungal biocontrol agents for plant disease protection: journey from lab to field, current status, challenges, and global perspectives [J]. Molecules, 2023, 28(18): 6735. |
| [20] | Tudi M, Daniel Ruan H, Wang L, et al. Agriculture development, pesticide application and its impact on the environment [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(3): 1112. |
| [21] | Huang YH, Zhang XR, Xu H, et al. Isolation of lipopeptide antibiotics from Bacillus siamensis: a potential biocontrol agent for Fusarium graminearum [J]. Can J Microbiol, 2022, 68(6): 403-411. |
| [22] | 黄慧婧, 罗坤. 芽胞杆菌与杀菌剂复配防治植物病害的研究进展 [J]. 微生物学通报, 2021, 48(3): 938-947. |
| Huang HJ, Luo K. Research progress in the control of plant diseases by the combination of Bacillus and fungicides [J]. Microbiol China, 2021, 48(3): 938-947. | |
| [23] | 高强, 张晓阳, 张渐隆, 等. 生防菌CY2的筛选鉴定及其与氟噻唑吡乙酮复配防治烟草黑胫病的效果 [J]. 烟草科技, 2025, 58(3): 70-79. |
| Gao Q, Zhang XY, Zhang JL, et al. Screening and identification of bacterium CY2 and its biocontrol effect on tobacco black shank in combination with oxathiapiprolin [J]. Tob Sci Technol, 2025, 58(3): 70-79. | |
| [24] | 芶剑渝, 王浩强, 杨相, 等. 贝莱斯芽胞杆菌与化学药剂协同防治烟草棒孢霉叶斑病 [J]. 中国烟草科学, 2025, 46(1): 56-63, 69. |
| Gou JY, Wang HQ, Yang X, et al. Control effect of Bacillus velezensis combined with chemical fungicide on tobacco leaf spot caused by Corynespora cassiicola [J]. Chin Tob Sci, 2025, 46(1): 56-63, 69. | |
| [25] | 张世杰, 刘云, 陈勇华, 等. 解淀粉芽胞杆菌Cas02与菌核净复配协同防治烟草赤星病 [J]. 中国烟草科学, 2024, 45(4): 52-57. |
| Zhang SJ, Liu Y, Chen YH, et al. Synergistic effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Cas02 and dimetachlone for control of tobacco brown spot disease [J]. Chin Tob Sci, 2024, 45(4): 52-57. | |
| [26] | Alamri SA. Enhancing the efficiency of the bioagent Bacillus subtilis JF419701 against soil-borne phytopathogens by increasing the productivity of fungal cell wall degrading enzymes [J]. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot, 2015, 48(2): 159-170. |
| [27] | Renna MC, Najimudin N, Winik LR, et al. Regulation of the Bacillus subtilis alsS, alsD, and alsR genes involved in post-exponential-phase production of acetoin [J]. J Bacteriol, 1993, 175(12): 3863-3875. |
| [28] | Qi MD, Zheng X, Niu GL, et al. Supplementation of acetylcholine mediates physiological and biochemical changes in tobacco lead to alleviation of damaging effects of drought stress on growth and photosynthesis [J]. J Plant Growth Regul, 2023, 42(8): 4616-4628. |
| [29] | Kong HG, Shin TS, Kim TH, et al. Stereoisomers of the bacterial volatile compound 2, 3-butanediol differently elicit systemic defense responses of pepper against multiple viruses in the field [J]. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9: 90. |
| [30] | Park KY, Seo SY, Oh BR, et al. 2, 3-butanediol induces systemic acquired resistance in the plant immune response [J]. J Plant Biol, 2018, 61(6): 424-434. |
| [31] | Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, et al. Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003, 100(8): 4927-4932. |
| [32] | Erega A, Stefanic P, Dogsa I, et al. Bacillaene mediates the inhibitory effect of Bacillus subtilis on Campylobacter jejuni biofilms [J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2021, 87(12): e02955-e02920. |
| [33] | Thennarasu S, Lee DK, Poon A, et al. Membrane permeabilization, orientation, and antimicrobial mechanism of subtilosin A [J]. Chem Phys Lipds, 2005, 137(1/2): 38-51. |
| [34] | 吴黎明, 李曦, 伍辉军, 等. 芽胞杆菌抗菌二肽溶杆菌素的研究进展 [J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2018, 41(5): 778-783. |
| Wu LM, Li X, Wu HJ, et al. Research advances on bacilysin from Bacillus [J]. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2018, 41(5): 778-783. | |
| [35] | Yu XM, Ai CX, Xin L, et al. The siderophore-producing bacterium, Bacillus subtilis CAS15, has a biocontrol effect on Fusarium wilt and promotes the growth of pepper [J]. Eur J Soil Biol, 2011, 47(2): 138-145. |
| [36] | 冯蕾, 张海文, 黄荣峰. 植物LRR类受体蛋白激酶的研究进展 [J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2012, 14(6): 43-48. |
| Feng L, Zhang HW, Huang RF. Research progress on LRR receptor-like protein kinase in plant [J]. J Agric Sci Technol, 2012, 14(6): 43-48. | |
| [37] | DeFalco TA, Anne P, James SR, et al. A conserved module regulates receptor kinase signalling in immunity and development [J]. Nat Plants, 2022, 8(4): 356-365. |
| [38] | Takabatake R, Karita E, Seo S, et al. Pathogen-induced calmodulin isoforms in basal resistance against bacterial and fungal pathogens in tobacco [J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 2007, 48(3): 414-423. |
| [39] | Choi HW, Lee DH, Hwang BK. The pepper calmodulin gene CaCaM1 is involved in reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide generation required for cell death and the defense response [J]. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2009, 22(11): 1389-1400. |
| [40] | Liu QQ, Luo L, Zheng LQ. Lignins: biosynthesis and biological functions in plants [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19(2): 335. |
| [41] | Zhuang WB, Li YH, Shu XC, et al. The classification, molecular structure and biological biosynthesis of flavonoids, and their roles in biotic and abiotic stresses [J]. Molecules, 2023, 28(8): 3599. |
| [42] | Zhang JF, Wang DB, Chen PZ, et al. The transcriptomic analysis of the response of Pinus massoniana to drought stress and a functional study on the ERF1 transcription factor [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(13): 11103. |
| [43] | Fu PN, Wu W, Lai GT, et al. Identifying Plasmopara viticola resistance Loci in grapevine (Vitis amurensis) via genotyping-by-sequencing-based QTL mapping [J]. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2020, 154: 75-84. |
| [44] | Dhokane D, Karre S, Kushalappa AC, et al. Integrated metabolo-transcriptomics reveals Fusarium head blight candidate resistance genes in wheat QTL-Fhb2 [J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(5): e0155851. |
| [45] | Jiang YQ, Yang B, Deyholos MK. Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis bHLH92 transcription factor in abiotic stress [J]. Mol Genet Genomics, 2009, 282(5): 503-516. |
| [46] | Wang CG, Zhang MY, Zhou JJ, et al. Transcriptome analysis and differential gene expression profiling of Wucai (Brassica campestris L.) in response to cold stress [J]. BMC Genom, 2022, 23: 137. |
| [1] | 郭家鑫, 王梦霞, 马耀武, 张麒宇, 张振宇, 柳海涛, 裴久渤, 姜瑛. 一株耐镉促生菌的筛选、鉴定及全基因组分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(7): 257-268. |
| [2] | 郭道祥, 苏全, 李奥婷, 王燕, 陈清, 王小蓉, 何文. 柚MYB基因家族的鉴定及其在砧穗不亲和叶片黄化中的功能分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(4): 170-181. |
| [3] | 刘青媛, 吴洪启, 陈秀娥, 陈剑, 姜远泽, 何燕子, 喻奇伟, 刘仁祥. 转录因子NtMYB96a调控烟草耐旱性的功能研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(4): 239-250. |
| [4] | 刘长命, 张新悦, 杨昕萌, 刘阳, 李玥涵, 汪可清. 一株新的魔芋软腐病致病菌的生物学特性及基因组分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(1): 294-304. |
| [5] | 李成花, 豆飞飞, 任毓昭, 刘彩霞, 刘凤楼, 王掌军, 李清峰. 外施水杨酸对白粉菌侵染小麦的影响及白粉菌转录组分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2025, 41(7): 272-280. |
| [6] | 吴泽银, 黄晨阳, 赵梦然, 张利姣, 姚方杰. 短柄白黄侧耳CCMSSC 04611基因组特异性分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2025, 41(5): 320-332. |
| [7] | 李艳伟, 杨妍妍, 孙亚玲, 霍雨猛, 王振宝, 刘冰江. 基于转录组分析植物激素对洋葱鳞茎膨大发育的调控机制[J]. 生物技术通报, 2025, 41(2): 187-201. |
| [8] | 文畅, 刘晨, 卢诗韵, 许忠兵, 艾超凡, 廖汉鹏, 周顺桂. 一株新的多重耐药福氏志贺菌噬菌体生物学特性及基因组分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(9): 127-135. |
| [9] | 李霁虹, 荆玉玲, 马桂珍, 郭荣君, 李世东. 无色杆菌77的基因组构成及其趋化和耐药特性[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(9): 136-146. |
| [10] | 刘警鞠, 张雨森, 陈娟, 孙炳达, 赵国柱. 曲霉属的现代分类命名研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38(7): 109-118. |
| [11] | 王娅丽, 朱姗姗, 杨峰山, 马玉堃, 付海燕, 刘春光. 莠去津降解菌泛基因组测序及比较基因组分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2019, 35(7): 90-99. |
| [12] | 朱薇,马亚龙. 极端嗜酸热古菌Acidianus manzaensis硫氧化模型构建[J]. 生物技术通报, 2018, 34(5): 179-186. |
| [13] | 罗燕,刘小刚,周志钦. 植物糖基转移酶基因的分离方法及其生物学功能研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32(12): 34-39. |
| [14] | 孙雷心. 连锁图谱开创遗传研究新领域[J]. , 1995, 0(01): 10-11. |
| [15] | 孙国凤;. James Watson向消极对待基因组分析的人发出警告[J]. , 1990, 0(08): 23-24. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||