生物技术通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 236-245.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2025-0930
• 研究报告 • 上一篇
收稿日期:2025-08-29
出版日期:2026-07-26
发布日期:2026-07-20
通讯作者:
张立全zhangliquan430@126.com基金资助:
ZHAO Jing-wei1,2, CHANG Na3, JIN Xiao-wei1, ZHANG Li-quan1,4(
)
Received:2025-08-29
Published:2026-07-26
Online:2026-07-20
摘要:
目的 探究MfWRKY22转录因子在黄花苜蓿(Medicago falcata)响应盐、干旱和低温胁迫中的作用,为进一步解析MfWRKY22调节植物适应非生物胁迫的分子机理提供理论依据。 方法 基于课题组前期盐、干旱胁迫黄花苜蓿转录组数据,利用RT-PCR和基因组步移技术分别克隆MfWRKY22基因及其启动子,并进行生物信息学、基因表达、亚细胞定位和转录激活分析,同时创制OE-MfWRKY22转基因拟南芥植株,在盐、干旱和低温处理10 d时观测植株的鲜重、根长和侧根数。 结果 MfWRKY22 CDS长度为1 017 bp,编码338个氨基酸,分子量为37.05 kD,理论等电点为5.65,定位于细胞核,具有转录激活活性,属于Group Ⅱ亚家族。获得MfWRKY22启动子区1 888 bp序列,其含有响应盐胁迫、干旱胁迫、渗透胁迫、激素应答以及W-box顺式作用元件。MfWRKY22在根、茎和叶中均有表达,但在叶中的表达量最高,且盐、干旱和低温胁迫均可诱导其表达。盐、干旱和低温胁迫下,OE-MfWRKY22转基因拟南芥植株幼苗的鲜重、根长和侧根数均显著高于野生型植株。 结论 MfWRKY22属于WRKY转录因子Group Ⅱ亚家族成员,其表达受盐、干旱、低温胁迫诱导,且在盐、干旱以及低温等非生物胁迫下,超表达MfWRKY22可促进转基因幼苗生长。
赵静玮, 常娜, 金宵溦, 张立全. 黄花苜蓿MfWRKY22的克隆及抗逆性功能分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(7): 236-245.
ZHAO Jing-wei, CHANG Na, JIN Xiao-wei, ZHANG Li-quan. Cloning and Function Analysis of MfWRKY22 Gene in Medicago falcata[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 236-245.
顺式作用元件 Cis-acting element | 序列 Sequence | 位置 Site | 功能 Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| ERE | TATGAAAT | -1 731;-1 299 | 乙烯应答元件 Ethylene response element |
| MYB | TAACCA | -1 364;-311;-252 | 参与干旱响应顺式作用元件 Cis-acting element involved in drought-responsiveness |
| TGACG-motif | TGACG | -840;-543 | 参与茉莉酸甲酯反应顺式作用元件 Cis-acting regulatory element involved in the MeJA-responsiveness |
| STRE | AGGGG | -623;-584 | 渗透压胁迫应答元件 Osmotic stress-responsive elements |
| GT1-motif | GGTTAA | -1 626 | 参与盐胁迫诱导 Involvement in salt-stress induction |
| W-box | TTGACC | -1 616;-599;-236 | WRKY结合位点 Binding site of WRKY |
表1 MfWRKY22启动子顺式作用元件
Table 1 Cis-acting elements in MfWRKY22 promoter
顺式作用元件 Cis-acting element | 序列 Sequence | 位置 Site | 功能 Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| ERE | TATGAAAT | -1 731;-1 299 | 乙烯应答元件 Ethylene response element |
| MYB | TAACCA | -1 364;-311;-252 | 参与干旱响应顺式作用元件 Cis-acting element involved in drought-responsiveness |
| TGACG-motif | TGACG | -840;-543 | 参与茉莉酸甲酯反应顺式作用元件 Cis-acting regulatory element involved in the MeJA-responsiveness |
| STRE | AGGGG | -623;-584 | 渗透压胁迫应答元件 Osmotic stress-responsive elements |
| GT1-motif | GGTTAA | -1 626 | 参与盐胁迫诱导 Involvement in salt-stress induction |
| W-box | TTGACC | -1 616;-599;-236 | WRKY结合位点 Binding site of WRKY |
图1 MfWRKY22蛋白序列分析A:MfWRKY22蛋白与不同物种WRKY22s序列比对分析;B:蛋白进化树分析;C:蛋白二级结构预测;D:蛋白保守结构域分析;E:蛋白三级结构预测
Fig. 1 Analysis of MfWRKY22 protein sequenceA: Sequence alignment and analysis of protein MfWRKY22 with WRKY22s from different plant species. B: Phylogenetic tree analysis of protein. C: Prediction of the secondary structure. D: Prediction of protein conserved domain. E: Prediction of the tertiary structure
图4 MfWRKY22的表达分析A:盐胁迫条件下的相对表达量; B:干旱胁迫条件下的相对表达量; C:4 ℃低温胁迫条件下的相对表达量。*,**和***分别代表在P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.001水平差异显著
Fig. 4 Expression analysis of MfWRKY22A: Relative expression under salt stress. B: Relative expression under drought stress. C: Relative expression under 4 ℃. *, ** and *** indicate significant difference at P<0.05, P<0.01, and P<0.001, respectively
图7 超表达MfWRKY22植株鉴定不同字母表示在P<0.01水平差异显著
Fig. 7 Identification of transgenic lines overexpressing MfWRKY22Different letters indicate significant difference at P<0.01
图9 胁迫对超表达MfWRKY22植株的生长影响不同字母表示在P<0.01水平差异显著
Fig. 9 Effects of stresses on the growths of overexpressing MfWRKY22 linesDifferent letters indicate significant difference at P<0.01
| [1] | Li WY, Li XZ, Li W, et al. A haplotype-resolved genome assembly of tetraploid Medicago sativa ssp. falcata [J]. Sci China Life Sci, 2025, 68(4): 1186-1189. |
| [2] | 刘亚玲, 王俊杰, 云锦凤, 等. 野生黄花苜蓿冷诱导基因克隆及序列分析 [J]. 生物技术通报, 2010, 26(4): 108-111, 121. |
| Liu YL, Wang JJ, Yun JF, et al. Cloning and sequence analysis of cold resistance gene from wild Medicago falcata [J]. Biotechnol Bull, 2010, 26(4): 108-111, 121. | |
| [3] | Zhang LQ, Jia XH, Zhao JW, et al. Molecular characterisation and expression analysis of NAC transcription factor genes in wild Medicago falcata under abiotic stresses [J]. Funct Plant Biol, 2020, 47(4): 327-341. |
| [4] | Ishiguro S, Nakamura K. Characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel DNA-binding protein, SPF1 that recognizes SP8 sequences in the 5' upstream regions of genes coding for sporamin and beta-amylase from sweet potato [J]. Mol Gen Genet, 1994, 244(6): 563-571. |
| [5] | 张桐, 李智强, 伍国强. WRKY转录因子在植物逆境响应中的作用 [J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(10): 203-215. |
| Zhang T, Li ZQ, Wu GQ. Role of WRKY transcription factor in plant response to stresses [J]. Biotechnol Bull, 2021, 37(10): 203-215. | |
| [6] | Yang L, Fang SY, Liu L, et al. WRKY transcription factors: Hubs for regulating plant growth and stress responses [J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2025, 67(3): 488-509. |
| [7] | Goyal P, Devi R, Verma B, et al. WRKY transcription factors: evolution, regulation, and functional diversity in plants [J]. Protoplasma, 2023, 260(2): 331-348. |
| [8] | Xiong R, Peng Z, Zhou H, et al. Correction: Genome-wide identification, structural characterization and gene expression analysis of the WRKY transcription factor family in pea (Pisum sativum L.) [J]. BMC Plant Biol, 2024, 24(1): 141. |
| [9] | Zhou QY, Tian AG, Zou HF, et al. Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes, GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, confer differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants [J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2008, 6(5): 486-503. |
| [10] | Pnueli L, Hallak-Herr E, Rozenberg M, et al. Molecular and biochemical mechanisms associated with dormancy and drought tolerance in the desert legume Retama raetam . [J]. Plant J, 2002, 31(3): 319-330. |
| [11] | Li ML, Xue M, Ma HY, et al. Wild soybean (Glycine soja) transcription factor GsWRKY40 plays positive roles in plant salt tolerance [J]. Crop J, 2024, 12(3): 766-775. |
| [12] | Liu LP, Zhang ZQ, Dong JL, et al. Overexpression of MtWRKY76 increases both salt and drought tolerance in Medicago truncatula [J]. Environ Exp Bot, 2016, 123: 50-58. |
| [13] | Mao P, Jin XY, Bao QY, et al. WRKY transcription factors in Medicago sativa L.: genome-wide identification and expression analysis under abiotic stress [J]. DNA Cell Biol, 2020, 39(12): 2212-2225. |
| [14] | Wen WW, Wang RY, Su LT, et al. MsWRKY11, activated by MsWRKY22, functions in drought tolerance and modulates lignin biosynthesis in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) [J]. Environ Exp Bot, 2021, 184: 104373. |
| [15] | Ma L, Li X, Zhang JJ, et al. MsWRKY33 increases alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) salt stress tolerance through altering the ROS scavenger via activating MsERF5 transcription [J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2023, 46(12): 3887-3901. |
| [16] | Wen WW, Su LT, Gao L, et al. MsWRKY44 regulates Mg-K homeostasis of shoots and promotes alfalfa sensitivities to acid and Al stresses [J]. J Hazard Mater, 2024, 473: 134610. |
| [17] | 蒋智虎. 黄花苜蓿MfWRKY40基因的克隆及功能研究 [D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2024. |
| Jiang ZH. Cloning and functional characterization of MfWRKY40 gene in Medicago falcata L. [D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2024. | |
| [18] | 张立全, 常娜, 赵志远, 等. 黄花苜蓿MfNAC34基因克隆及特性分析 [J]. 中国草地学报, 2024, 46(3): 22-27. |
| Zhang LQ, Chang N, Zhao ZY, et al. Cloning and characteristic analysis of MfNAC34 in Medicago falcata [J]. Chin J Grassland, 2024, 46(3): 22-27. | |
| [19] | Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCt method [J]. Methods, 2001, 25(4): 402-408. |
| [20] | Zhou X, Jiang YJ, Yu DQ. WRKY22 transcription factor mediates dark-induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis [J]. Molecules and Cells, 2011, 31(4): 303-314. |
| [21] | Wang HY, Gao ZY, Chen XS, et al. BcWRKY22 activates BcCAT2 to enhance catalase (CAT) activity and reduce hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation, promoting thermotolerance in non-heading Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis) [J]. Antioxidants, 2023, 12(9): 1710. |
| [22] | Gu JM, Liu PK, Nie WT, et al. Abscisic acid alleviates photosynthetic damage in the tomato ABA-deficient mutant sitiens and protects photosystem II from damage via the WRKY22-PsbA complex under low-temperature stress [J]. J Integr Agric, 2025, 24(2): 546-563. |
| [23] | Wu Z, Li T, Cao X, et al. Lily WRKY factor LlWRKY22 promotes thermotolerance through autoactivation and activation of LlDREB2B [J]. Hortic Res, 2022, 9(1): 2253-2263. |
| [24] | Zhu GQ, Qu L, Xue HW. Casein kinase 1 AELs promote senescence by enhancing ethylene biosynthesis through phosphorylating WRKY22 transcription factor [J]. New Phytol, 2024, 244(1): 116-130. |
| [25] | Hsu FC, Chou MY, Chou SJ, et al. Submergence confers immunity mediated by the WRKY22 transcription factor in Arabidopsis [J]. Plant Cell, 2013, 25(7): 2699-2713. |
| [26] | Johanna S, Andrea B, Michael M, et al. The transcription factor WRKY22 is required during cryo-stress acclimation in Arabidopsis shoot tips [J]. J Exp Bot, 2020, 71(16): 4993-5009. |
| [27] | Karen JK, Gerrie LW, Jacqueline BL, et al. AtWRKY22 promotes susceptibility to aphids and modulates salicylic acid and jasmonic acid signalling [J]. J Exp Bot, 67(11): 3383-3396. |
| [28] | Liu ZH, Yan JW, Wang TT, et al. TgLCYB1 regulated by TgWRKY22 enhances the tolerance of Torreya grandis to waterlogging stress [J]. Int J Biol Macromol, 2023, 253: 126702. |
| [29] | Li T, Zhou TT, Liang JH, et al. Overexpression of lily LlWRKY22 enhances multiple abiotic stress tolerances in transgenic Arabidopsis [J].Ornamental Plant Research, 2022,2(1):1-10. |
| [30] | Fan LJ, Niu ZQ, Shi GF, et al. WRKY22 transcription factor from iris laevigata regulates flowering time and resistance to salt and drought [J]. Plants, 2024, 13(9): 1191. |
| [1] | 黄旭升, 周雅莉, 贾峥嵘, 沈珊, 陈锦钗, 周广立, 李鑫鑫, 王计平, 李润植, 贾小云. 紫苏ARF转录因子家族全基因组鉴定及其在非生物胁迫响应中的功能分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(7): 148-162. |
| [2] | 安飞飞, 罗秀芹, 蔡杰, 薛晶晶, 朱文丽. 木薯MeMYB106基因克隆及其在叶片花青素合成中的功能[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(6): 13-21. |
| [3] | 杨洁, 王玉婷, 冯成天, 何其光, 张明亮, 袁坤, 王真辉, 刘辉. 橡胶树HbTRXh2的克隆、表达及功能分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(6): 250-257. |
| [4] | 张艾岑, 闫会, 马居奎, 张允刚, 李强. 甘薯DNA甲基转移酶和去甲基化酶基因家族的全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(6): 1-12. |
| [5] | 李琼瑶, 鲍瑞, 雷海涛, 杨苑姁, 韩丽珍. 抗逆促生菌恶臭假单胞菌对辣椒种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(5): 257-271. |
| [6] | 殷亚龙, 张明洋, 王洁敏, 苗雪雪, 陈劲, 王伟平. 水稻非生物胁迫协同耐受机制研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(4): 26-37. |
| [7] | 陈登科, 兰刚, 夏芝, 侯保国, 杨六六, 曹彩荣, 李朋波, 吴翠翠. 花生ZF-HD基因家族的鉴定和非生物胁迫响应分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(4): 114-128. |
| [8] | 李迎辉, 王杨博涵, 周浩博, 卢心如, 张珂欣, 于洋, 李传友, 孙传龙. 番茄VPE基因家族鉴定和抗逆功能分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(3): 263-274. |
| [9] | 徐泽, 周陈平, 邝瑞彬, 吴夏明, 杨敏, 刘传和, 贺涵, 魏岳荣. 番木瓜PG基因家族鉴定及其在果实软化中的功能[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(3): 349-361. |
| [10] | 程婷婷, 刘俊, 王利丽, 练从龙, 魏文君, 郭辉, 吴尧琳, 杨晶凡, 兰金旭, 陈随清. 杜仲查尔酮异构酶基因家族全基因组鉴定及其表达模式分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2025, 41(9): 242-255. |
| [11] | 程雪, 付颖, 柴晓娇, 王红艳, 邓欣. 谷子LHC基因家族鉴定及非生物胁迫表达分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2025, 41(8): 102-114. |
| [12] | 张学琼, 潘素君, 李魏, 戴良英. 植物磷酸盐转运蛋白在胁迫响应中的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2025, 41(7): 28-36. |
| [13] | 韩燚, 侯昌林, 唐露, 孙璐, 谢晓东, 梁晨, 陈小强. 大麦HvERECTA基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2025, 41(7): 106-116. |
| [14] | 李霞, 张泽伟, 刘泽军, 王楠, 郭江波, 辛翠花, 张彤, 简磊. 马铃薯转录因子StMYB96的克隆及功能研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2025, 41(7): 181-192. |
| [15] | 龚钰涵, 陈兰, 尚方慧子, 郝灵颖, 刘硕谦. 茶树TRB基因家族鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2025, 41(7): 214-225. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||