植物响应淹涝的转录组学研究进展

doi:10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2019-0312

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 转录组测序技术,能够从mRNA水平研究物种基因功能以及特定的生理学过程,采用该项技术可研究植物在淹涝胁迫下所有的基因表达水平情况,有利于揭示植物对淹涝的应答机理。综述了采用转录组测序技术揭示的淹涝胁迫下植物体内信号传导、内源激素、光合作用、呼吸代谢与活性氧清除等途径中的差异基因表达情况,以及各种转录因子和功能蛋白的差异基因表达情况,并展望了今后的研究趋势,以期为植物淹涝研究提供参考。

关键词: 转录组, mRNA, 淹涝, 差异基因表达

Abstract: Transcriptome sequencing technology allows the study of the species gene function and specific physiological processes at the mRNA level. This technology can be used to study the expression levels of all genes under drowning stress,which is conducive to revealing the response mechanism of plants to waterlogging. We reviewed the differential gene expressions in the pathways of signal transduction,endogenous hormones,photosynthesis,respiratory metabolism and reactive oxygen scavenging in plants under waterlogging stress when using transcriptome sequencing technology,as well as in various transcription factors and functional proteins. Besides,we gave the prospect in the future research so as to provide a reference for the study of plant under waterlog condition.

Key words: transcriptome, mRNA, waterlogging, differentialgene expression

王得运, 罗光明, 刘培培, 周丽, 徐月莹, 陈云婷. 植物响应淹涝的转录组学研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2019, 35(7): 156-161.

WANG De-yun, LUO Guang-ming, LIU Pei-pei, ZHOU Li, XU Yue-ying, CHEN Yun-ting. Advances in Transcriptome Research on Plant Response to Waterlogging[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(7): 156-161.

参考文献

[1] 王尧龙, 黄璐琦, 袁媛, 等. 药用植物转录组研究进展[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2015, 40(11):2055-2061.
[2] 刘冠, 赵婷婷, 杨欢欢, 等. 番茄转录组学研究进展[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2016, 35(10):2802-2807.
[3] Velculescu VE, Zhang L, Zhou W, et al.Characterization of the yeast transcriptome[J]. Cell, 1997, 88(2):243-251.
[4] 邹丽秋, 匡雪君, 李滢, 等. 人参属药用植物转录组研究进展[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2016, 41(22):4138-4143.
[5] 李霞, 王顺利. 高通量转录组在园艺植物色素代谢中的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2017, 33(7):7-14.
[6] 倪知游, 梁东, 高帆, 等. 植物响应干旱的转录组学研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(8):2460-2465.
[7] 谭淑端, 朱明勇, 张克荣, 等. 植物对水淹胁迫的响应与适应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(9):1871-1877.
[8] Bodegom PMV, Sorrell BK, Oosthoek A, et al.Separating the effects of partial submergence and soil oxygen demand on plant physiology[J]. Ecology, 2008, 89(1):193-204.
[9] 田志环. 淹涝胁迫对水稻影响的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018(1):143-145.
[10] 季晶. 黄瓜涝胁迫下超微结构变化及差异蛋白组学研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2016.
[11] Bailey-Serres J, Chang R.Sensing and signalling in response to oxygen deprivation in plants and other organisms[J]. Ann Bot, 2005, 96(4):507-518.
[12] Zabalza A, Van Dongen JT, Froehlich A, et al.Regulation of respiration and fermentation to control the plant internal oxygen concentration[J]. Plant Physiol, 2008, 149(2):1087-1098.
[13] Subbaiah CC.A Ca²+-dependent cysteine protease is associated with anoxia-induced root tip death in maize[J]. J Exp Bot, 2000, 51(345):721-730.
[14] Kazan K.Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance[J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2015, 20(4):219-229.
[15] Alexander L.Ethylene biosynthesis and action in tomato:a model for climacteric fruit ripening[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2002, 53(377):2039-2055.
[16] Boer KD, Tilleman S, Pauwels L, et al.Apetala2/ethylene response factor and basic helix-loop-helix tobacco transcription factors cooperatively mediate jasmonate-elicited nicotine biosynthesis[J]. Plant Journal, 2011, 66(6):1053-1065.
[17] Hattori Y, Nagai K, Furukawa S, et al.The ethylene response factors SNORKEL1 and SNORKEL2 allow rice to adapt to deep water[J]. Nature, 2009, 460(7258):1026-1030.
[18] Ayano M, Kani T, Kojima M, et al.Gibberellin biosynthesis and signal transduction is essential for internode elongation in deepwater rice[J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2014, 37(10):2313-2324.
[19] 邹锡玲. 玉米苗期根系淹水应答相关基因的筛选、克隆以及鉴定[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2011.
[20] Drew MC, He CJ, Morgan PW.Programmed cell death and aerenchyma formation in roots[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2000, 5(3):123-127.
[21] 张小娟, 汪双喜, 李常凤, 等. 棉花涝渍胁迫的耐受及应答机制研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017(33):22-32.
[22] 王翠英, 李鑫宇, 王潇然, 等. 地黄根部响应涝胁迫关键基因的鉴定[J]. 中国现代中药, 2017, 19(2):232-238.
[23] Vidoz ML, Loreti E, et al.Hormonal interplay during adventitious root formation in flooded tomato plants[J]. Plant J, 2010, 63(4):12.
[24] Qi XH, Xu XW, Lin XJ, et al.Identification of differentially expressed genes in cucumber(Cucumis sativus L.)root under waterlogging stress by digital gene expression profile[J]. Genomics, 2012, 99(3):160-168.
[25] Kushiro T, Okamoto M, et al.The arabidopsis cytochrome P450 CYP707A encodes ABA 8'-hydroxylases:key enzymes in ABA catabolism[J]. Embo Journal, 2014, 23(7):1647-1656.
[26] Zhang YJ, Chen YZ, Lu HQ, et al.Growth, lint yield and changes in physiological attributes of cotton under temporal waterlogging[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 194:83-93.
[27] 潘澜, 薛晔, 薛立. 植物淹水胁迫形态学研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(7):11-15.
[28] Christianson JA, Llewellyn DJ, et al.Global gene expression responses to waterlogging in roots and leaves of cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.).[J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 2010, 51(1):21-37.
[29] Lee YH, Kim KS, Jang YS, et al.Global gene expression responses to waterlogging in leaves of rape seedlings[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2014, 33(2):289-299.
[30] 陈强, 郭修武, 等. 淹水对甜樱桃根系呼吸强度和呼吸酶活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(7):1462-1466.
[31] Tadege M.Ethanolic fermentation:new functions for an old pathway[J]. Trends Plant Sci, 1999, 4(8):320-325.
[32] 沙向红, 梁燕, 严建萍, 等. 淹涝胁迫对幼苗期大豆根系乙醇脱氢酶1基因和乙醛脱氢酶7基因表达的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2011, 38(18):12-14.
[33] 赵森, 等. 荧光定量PCR检测淹涝胁迫下水稻Adh2基因的表达量变化[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(2):455-458.
[34] 黄胜男, 张计育, 莫正海, 等. 猕猴桃丙酮酸脱羧酶2基因(AdPDC2)的克隆与功能分析[C]. 中国园艺学会2015年学术年会, 2015.
[35] Meyer Y, Belin C, et al.Thioredoxin and glutaredoxin systems in plants:molecular mechanisms, crosstalks, and functional signifi-cance[J]. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2012, 17(8):1124-1160.
[36] Noctor G, Mhamdi A, Foyer CH.The roles of reactive oxygen metabolism in drought:not so cut and dried[J]. Plant Physiology, 2014, 164(4):1636-1648.
[37] Gill SS, Tuteja N.Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2010, 48(12):909-930.
[38] Mustroph A, Lee SC, Oosumi T, et al.Cross-kingdom comparison of transcriptomic adjustments to low-oxygen stress highlights conserved and plant-specific responses[J]. Plant Physiology, 2010, 152(3):1484-1500.
[39] Lindemose S, O’Shea C, Jensen M, et al. Structure, function and networks of transcription factors involved in abiotic stress responses[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2013, 14(3):5842-5878.
[40] 陈儒钢, 巩振辉, 逯明辉, 等. 植物抗逆反应中的转录因子网络研究进展[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2010(1):126-134.
[41] 李桂英, 田玉富, 杨成君. 植物GRAS家族转录因子的研究现状[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(14):4207-4210.
[42] 孙利军, 李大勇, 等. NAC转录因子在植物抗病和抗非生物胁迫反应中的作用[J]. 遗传, 2012, 34(8):993-1002.
[43] Huang W, Xian Z, Kang X, et al.Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of GRAS gene family in tomato[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2015, 15(1):209.
[44] 李彦杰, 杨俊年, 刘仁华, 等. 水淹胁迫下三峡库区消落带适生狗牙根转录因子的转录组分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(2):265-269.
[45] 惠林冲. 莲藕NnDREB2A克隆、表达分析和功能验证[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2015.
[46] Zou X, Jiang Y, Liu L, et al.Identification of transcriptome induced in roots of maize seedlings at the late stage of waterlogging[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2010, 10(1):189.
[47] 栗振义, 龙瑞才, 张铁军, 等. 植物热激蛋白研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32(2):7-13.
[48] 张健, 刘美艳, 申杰, 等. 外源亚精胺对淹涝胁迫下黄瓜根HSP70表达的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2013, 33(5):669-673.