生物技术通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 174-185.doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2026-0040
• 研究报告 • 上一篇
张钰婧1,2, 陈晨3, 苟宁宁4, 姜楠1(
), 乌云塔娜1(
)
收稿日期:2026-01-12
出版日期:2026-11-26
发布日期:2026-11-03
通讯作者:
乌云塔娜tanatanan@163.com基金资助:
ZHANG Yu-jing1,2, CHEN Chen3, GOU Ning-ning4, JIANG Nan1(
), WUYUN Ta-na1(
)
Received:2026-01-12
Published:2026-11-26
Online:2026-11-03
摘要:
目的 探究PaSPLs在普通杏(Prunus armeniaca)果实成熟中的表达模式及响应外源脱落酸(abscisic acid, ABA)处理的分子机理,鉴定调控PaSPLs的miRNA,为后续深入研究miR156-PaSPLs介导ABA调控果实成熟奠定基础。 方法 以‘Sungold’为供试材料,利用生物信息学方法鉴定PaSPL基因家族成员,分析PaSPLs基本理化性质、保守基序、系统进化关系及启动子顺式作用元件;通过实时荧光定量PCR(RT-qPCR)分析外源ABA处理后果实PaSPLs基因的表达特征。通过瞬时转化烟草叶片验证PaSPLs蛋白的亚细胞定位。根据全转录组数据,构建miR156-PaSPLs调控网络,分析miR156和PaSPLs在普通杏果实成熟中的表达情况;利用STRING预测SPL互作蛋白。 结果 普通杏PaSPL基因家族共鉴定到15个成员,分为8个亚家族。启动子序列分析表明,存在4类参与生长发育调控的元件。表达分析结果显示,杏果实成熟过程中,PaSPL1和PaSPL2随着果实成熟表达量升高,且外源ABA处理后表达量增加,脱落酸抑制剂处理后表达量降低,而PaSPL9表达变化与之相反。PaSPL1、PaSPL2和PaSPL9均定位于细胞核。通过转录调控和蛋白互作预测分析,构建了miR156-PaSPLs表达调控网络及PaSPLs蛋白互作网络。 结论 共鉴定出15个普通杏的PaSPLs基因,其中PaSPL1和PaSPL2对果实成熟可能具有正向促进作用,而PaSPL9对果实成熟可能具有抑制作用,且均可响应ABA信号;同时miR156c可能通过负调控PaSPL9表达调控果实成熟,为miR156-SPLs与ABA协同调控果实成熟的分子机制提供理论依据。
张钰婧, 陈晨, 苟宁宁, 姜楠, 乌云塔娜. 杏果实成熟过程中SPLs基因的ABA响应特征与调控网络解析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(11): 174-185.
ZHANG Yu-jing, CHEN Chen, GOU Ning-ning, JIANG Nan, WUYUN Ta-na. ABA Response Characteristics and the Regulatory Network of SPLs during Prunus armeniaca Fruit Ripening[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2026, 42(11): 174-185.
物种 Species | 基因 Gene | 功能 Function | 拟南芥同源基因 Arabidopsis ortholog gene | 杏同源基因 Apricot ortholog gene |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 香蕉 Musa acuminata | MaSPL1 | 果实成熟 | AtSPL3/4/5 | PaSPL11/12 |
| MaSPL16 | 果实成熟 | AtSPL13 | PaSPL4/9 | |
| 蓝莓 Vaccinium spp. | VvSPL2 | 果实成熟 | AtSPL2/10/11 | PaSPL5 |
| 苹果 Malus domestica | MdSPL6 | 株型 | AtSPL6 | PaSPL6 |
| MdSPL13B | 单性结实 | AtSPL13 | PaSPL4/9 | |
| 柑橘 Citrus reticulata | CiSPL2 | 果实成熟 | AtSPL2 | PaSPL5 |
| CiSPL3 | 株型 | AtSPL3/4/5 | PaSPL11/12 | |
| CiSPL6 | 株型 | AtSPL6 | PaSPL6 |
表1 SPL转录因子在不同物种中的功能
Table 1 Function of SPL transcription factors in various plant species
物种 Species | 基因 Gene | 功能 Function | 拟南芥同源基因 Arabidopsis ortholog gene | 杏同源基因 Apricot ortholog gene |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 香蕉 Musa acuminata | MaSPL1 | 果实成熟 | AtSPL3/4/5 | PaSPL11/12 |
| MaSPL16 | 果实成熟 | AtSPL13 | PaSPL4/9 | |
| 蓝莓 Vaccinium spp. | VvSPL2 | 果实成熟 | AtSPL2/10/11 | PaSPL5 |
| 苹果 Malus domestica | MdSPL6 | 株型 | AtSPL6 | PaSPL6 |
| MdSPL13B | 单性结实 | AtSPL13 | PaSPL4/9 | |
| 柑橘 Citrus reticulata | CiSPL2 | 果实成熟 | AtSPL2 | PaSPL5 |
| CiSPL3 | 株型 | AtSPL3/4/5 | PaSPL11/12 | |
| CiSPL6 | 株型 | AtSPL6 | PaSPL6 |
图1 普通杏‘Sungold’、西伯利亚杏‘F106’、大扁杏‘LWM’、拟南芥、番茄、樱桃和桃SPL家族蛋白质系统进化树
Fig. 1 Phylogenetic tree of SPL family proteins in Prunus armeniaca 'Sungold', P. sibirica 'F106', P. armeniaca × P. sibirica 'LWM', Arabidopsis thaliana, Solanum lycopersicum, P. avium and P. persica
图5 普通杏PaSPLs在不同发育时期(A)及响应外源ABA处理(B)的表达量变化GF-1:63 DAFB,绿果期-1;GF-2:70 DAFB,绿果期-2;TF:74 DAFB,转色期;RF:84 DAFB,成熟期。不同字母表示在0.05水平上差异显著(P<0.05)。下同
Fig. 5 Changes in the expression of PaSPLs in P. armeniaca at different developmental stages (A) and in response to exogenous ABA treatment (B)GF-1: 63 DAFB, green fruit stage-1; GF-2: 70 DAFB, green fruit stage-2; TF: 74 DAFB, turning fruit stage; RF: 84 DAFB, ripening fruit stage. Different letters indicate significant differences at 0.05 level (P < 0.05). The same below
图7 普通杏miR156结合PaSPLs基因的靶位点及调控网络分析A:7个miR156家族成员成熟序列比对;B:PaSPL4/5/6/8/9/14/15基因中miR156靶位点;黄色方框代表PaSPLs基因编码区,紫色方框代表SBP结构域,蓝色方框代表miR156靶位点;C:miRNAs与PaSPLs基因的调控网络;D:miRNAs在普通杏不同发育时期的表达量变化
Fig. 7 Analysis of target site prediction and regulatory network of miR156-PaSPLs in P. armeniacaA: Alignment of mature sequences of seven miR156 family members. B: miR156 target sites in PaSPL4/5/6/8/9/14/15 genes. Yellow boxes represent the coding sequences (CDS) of PaSPLs genes, purple boxes represent the SBP domain, and blue boxes represent the miR156 target sites. C: Regulatory network between miRNAs and PaSPLs genes. D: Expression variation of miRNAs in common apricot at different developmental stages
| [1] | Yao T, Park BS, Mao HZ, et al. Regulation of flowering time by SPL10/MED25 module in Arabidopsis [J]. New Phytol, 2019, 224(1): 493-504. |
| [2] | Wang L, Ming LC, Liao KY, et al. Bract suppression regulated by the miR156/529-SPLs-NL1-PLA1 module is required for the transition from vegetative to reproductive branching in rice [J]. Mol Plant, 2021, 14(7): 1168-1184. |
| [3] | Jadhao KR, Kale SS, Chavan NS, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the SPL transcription factor family and its response to water stress in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) [J]. Cell Stress Chaperones, 2023, 28(6): 943-958. |
| [4] | Lai TF, Wang Y, Zhou T, et al. Virus-induced LeSPL-CNR silencing inhibits fruit ripening in tomato [J]. J Agric Sci, 2015, 7(7): 184-195. |
| [5] | Manning K, Tör M, Poole M, et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening [J]. Nat Genet, 2006, 38(8): 948-952. |
| [6] | Wang B, Dou TX, Sheng O, et al. Characterization of SPL family genes in banana reveals the critical role of MaSPL1 in regulating fruit ripening [J]. Horticulturae, 2025, 11(6): 576. |
| [7] | Han YC, Gao HY, Chen HJ, et al. The involvement of papaya CpSBP1 in modulating fruit softening and carotenoid accumulation by repressing CpPME1/2 and CpPDS4 [J]. Sci Hortic, 2019, 256: 108582. |
| [8] | Li XY, Hou YM, Xie X, et al. A blueberry miR156a-SPL12 module coordinates the accumulation of chlorophylls and anthocyanins during fruit ripening [J]. J Exp Bot, 2020, 71(19): 5976-5989. |
| [9] | Chen SY, Song XW, Zheng QX, et al. The transcription factor SPL13 mediates strigolactone suppression of shoot branching by inhibiting cytokinin synthesis in Solanum lycopersicum [J]. J Exp Bot, 2023, 74(18): 5722-5735. |
| [10] | Fan XQ, Li HX, Xiong Y, et al. Strigolactones inhibit axillary bud outgrowth through transcription factor MdSPL6-mediated regulation of ABA levels in apple [J]. Plant Physiol, 2025, 199(3): kiaf517. |
| [11] | Wei W, Yang YY, Wu CJ, et al. MaSPL16 positively regulates fruit ripening in bananas via the direct transcriptional induction of MaNAC029 [J]. Hortic Adv, 2023, 1: 10. |
| [12] | Jung JH, Ju Y, Seo PJ, et al. The SOC1-SPL module integrates photoperiod and gibberellic acid signals to control flowering time in Arabidopsis [J]. Plant J, 2012, 69(4): 577-588. |
| [13] | Li DD, Mou WS, Xia R, et al. Integrated analysis of high-throughput sequencing data shows abscisic acid-responsive genes and miRNAs in strawberry receptacle fruit ripening [J]. Hortic Res, 2019, 6: 26. |
| [14] | Wang DR, Zhang CL, Wang X, et al. microRNA156-SPL13B module induces parthenocarpy through the gibberellin pathway [J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2025, 23(12): 5536-5549. |
| [15] | Chen M, Zhang TL, Zhang WB, et al. miR156-SPLs module regulates flowering and controls plant height by modulating gibberellin biosynthesis in citrus [J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2025, 23(10): 4271-4289. |
| [16] | Li HX, Wang SW, Zhai LL, et al. The miR156/SPL12 module orchestrates fruit colour change through directly regulating ethylene production pathway in blueberry [J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2024, 22(2): 386-400. |
| [17] | 吴锦秋, 白海坤, 王楚, 等. 不同砧穗组合对杏果实大小及品质的影响 [J]. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2025, 53(9): 93-103. |
| Wu JQ, Bai HK, Wang C, et al. Effects of different rootstock-scion combinations on fruit size and quality of apricot [J]. J Northwest A F Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2025, 53(9): 93-103. | |
| [18] | 陈学森, 王楠, 彭福田, 等. 中国重要落叶果树果实品质和熟期育种研究进展 [J]. 园艺学报, 2024, 51(1): 8-26. |
| Chen XS, Wang N, Peng FT, et al. Advances in quality and maturity breeding of important deciduous fruit trees in China [J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2024, 51(1): 8-26. | |
| [19] | Jia MX, Feng J, Zhang LN, et al. PaPYL9 is involved in the regulation of apricot fruit ripening through ABA signaling pathway [J]. Hortic Plant J, 2022, 8(4): 461-473. |
| [20] | Chen CJ, Wu Y, Li JW, et al. TBtools-II: a “one for all, all for one” bioinformatics platform for biological big-data mining [J]. Mol Plant, 2023, 16(11): 1733-1742. |
| [21] | Kumar S, Stecher G, Suleski M, et al. MEGA12: molecular evolutionary genetic analysis version 12 for adaptive and green computing [J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2024, 41(12): msae263. |
| [22] | Love J, Selker R, Marsman M, et al. JASP: graphical statistical software for common statistical designs [J]. J Stat Soft, 2019, 88(2): 1-17. |
| [23] | Cardon G, Höhmann S, Klein J, et al. Molecular characterisation of the Arabidopsis SBP-box genes [J]. Gene, 1999, 237(1): 91-104. |
| [24] | Salinas M, Xing SP, Höhmann S, et al. Genomic organization, phylogenetic comparison and differential expression of the SBP-box family of transcription factors in tomato [J]. Planta, 2012, 235(6): 1171-1184. |
| [25] | Xiong JS, Zheng D, Zhu HY, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the SPL gene family in woodland strawberry Fragaria vesca [J]. Genome, 2018, 61(9): 675-683. |
| [26] | Sun YT, Wang YY, Xiao YQ, et al. Genome-wide identification of the SQUAMOSA promoter-binding protein-like (SPL) transcription factor family in sweet cherry fruit [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(3): 2880. |
| [27] | 张晓辉, 魏小春, 李锡香, 等. 苹果全基因组SBP-box基因家族分析及代表成员的分子克隆 [J]. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(2): 215-226. |
| Zhang XH, Wei XC, Li XX, et al. Genome-wide analysis of SBP-box gene family and molecular cloning of its typical members in Malus × domestica [J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2014, 41(2): 215-226. | |
| [28] | 李天源, 亓新亮, 刘珊, 等. 欧李SPL基因家族的鉴定及在果实发育过程中的表达分析 [J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(3): 362-373. |
| Li TY, Qi XL, Liu S, et al. Identification of Cerasus humilis SPL gene family and expression analysis during fruit development [J]. Biotechnol Bull, 2026, 42(3): 362-373. | |
| [29] | 阿丽亚·外力, 陈永坤, 克拉热木·克里木江, 等. 核桃SPL基因家族的系统进化和表达分析 [J]. 生物技术通报, 2024, 40(6): 180-189. |
| ALIYA W, CHEN YK, KELAREMU K, et al. Phylogenetic evolution and expression analysis of SPL gene family in Juglans regia [J]. Biotechnol Bull, 2024, 40(6): 180-189. | |
| [30] | 李静, 房震, 李美芸, 等. 新疆野苹果WRKY基因家族鉴定及低温沙藏过程中的表达模式分析 [J]. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2026, 54(1): 9-23. |
| Li J, Fang Z, Li MY, et al. Identification of WRKY gene family in Malus sieversii and analysis of its expression patterns during low-temperature sand storage [J]. J Northwest A&F Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2026, 54(1): 9-23. | |
| [31] | Tong C, Jia Y, Hu HF, et al. Pangenome and pantranscriptome as the new reference for gene-family characterization: a case study of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) genes in barley [J]. Plant Commun, 2025, 6(1): 101190. |
| [32] | Jiang FC, Zhang JH, Wang S, et al. The apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genome elucidates Rosaceae evolution and beta-carotenoid synthesis [J]. Hortic Res, 2019, 6: 128. |
| [33] | Magadum S, Banerjee U, Murugan P, et al. Gene duplication as a major force in evolution [J]. J Genet, 2013, 92(1): 155-161. |
| [34] | Li L, Xu JB, Zhu ZW, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the SPL transcription factor family and its response to abiotic stress in Pisum sativum L [J]. BMC Genom, 2024, 25: 539. |
| [35] | Chao LM, Liu YQ, Chen DY, et al. Arabidopsis transcription factors SPL1 and SPL12 confer plant thermotolerance at reproductive stage [J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(5): 735-748. |
| [36] | Dong HX, Yan SL, Jing YX, et al. miR156-targeted SPL9 is phosphorylated by SnRK2s and interacts with ABI5 to enhance ABA responses in Arabidopsis [J]. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 708573. |
| [37] | Pérez-Antón M, Schneider I, Kroll P, et al. Explosive seed dispersal depends on SPL7 to ensure sufficient copper for localized lignin deposition via laccases [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2022, 119(24): e2202287119. |
| [38] | Li CL, Lu SF. Molecular characterization of the SPL gene family in Populus trichocarpa [J]. BMC Plant Biol, 2014, 14(1): 131. |
| [39] | Xing SP, Salinas M, Höhmann S, et al. miR156-targeted and nontargeted SBP-box transcription factors act in concert to secure male fertility in Arabidopsis [J]. Plant Cell, 2011, 22(12): 3935-3950. |
| [40] | Su ZW, Wang XC, Xuan XX, et al. Characterization and action mechanism analysis of VvmiR156b/c/d-VvSPL9 module responding to multiple-hormone signals in the modulation of grape berry color formation [J]. Foods, 2021, 10(4): 896. |
| [41] | Zhang L, Xu CY, Xu YH, et al. The miR156k- SQUAMOSA promoter-binding protein-like2 module regulates the abscisic acid receptor PYL 2 during citrus fruit ripening [J]. Plant Physiol, 2025, 198(3): kiaf278. |
| [1] | 桑志鹏, 侯栋, 王慧婷, 岳宏忠, 李亚莉, 颉建明, 路雯, 许照泰. 黄瓜CsHXKs基因家族鉴定及CsHKL1.2调控花器官糖积累[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(9): 157-168. |
| [2] | 任文斌, 陈登科, 吴翠翠. 花生转录因子AhZHD9的生物信息学分析及耐盐性研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(9): 297-305. |
| [3] | 董向向, 侯威威, 缪百灵, 陈娟娟, 李亮杰, 翟敏, 朱庆松, 刘松虎. 过表达森林草莓FvBBX22促进拟南芥花青素合成和延迟开花时间[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(9): 231-237. |
| [4] | 崔秀妍, 代春阳, 张谊婷, 田翔, 陈凌, 乔治军, 王海岗, 王君杰. 糜子伪响应调节蛋白PRR基因家族的鉴定及对光周期的响应[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(8): 133-141. |
| [5] | 陈萃, 兰丽霞, 苏梦雨, 翁年东, 张震. 苹果蛋白磷酸酶基因MdPP2C24的克隆及功能鉴定[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(8): 153-161. |
| [6] | 王建波, 李诗雅, 邢鹤炫, 周瑞金, 李桂荣, 王玲. 海藻糖-6-磷酸合成酶基因VvTPS10在葡萄耐盐和生长发育中的功能分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(8): 188-196. |
| [7] | 辛晴, 郑永杰, 李雨华, 涂白连, 刘新亮, 张月婷, 伍艳芳. 樟树MYC转录因子的全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(7): 214-225. |
| [8] | 黄旭升, 周雅莉, 贾峥嵘, 沈珊, 陈锦钗, 周广立, 李鑫鑫, 王计平, 李润植, 贾小云. 紫苏ARF转录因子家族全基因组鉴定及其在非生物胁迫响应中的功能分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(7): 148-162. |
| [9] | 冉丹丹, 邰森林, 欧小宏, 周涛, 徐娇. 天麻尿苷二磷酸糖基转移酶基因家族鉴定与分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(7): 163-172. |
| [10] | 阎晓光, 杜艳伟, 马志远, 王彬, 王国梁, 胡丹珠. 玉米ZmDIR基因家族的全基因组鉴定与表达模式分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(7): 126-137. |
| [11] | 张艾岑, 闫会, 马居奎, 张允刚, 李强. 甘薯DNA甲基转移酶和去甲基化酶基因家族的全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(6): 1-12. |
| [12] | 熊仕发, 陈益存, 吴立文, 施翔, 张盛剿, 彭方有, 陈涛梅, 汪阳东. 白栎TCP基因家族的鉴定及功能分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(6): 258-266. |
| [13] | 王江清, 张蝶, 王荟洁, 袁柱东, 付艳鸿, 黄娅楠, 王洪洋. 马铃薯AP2/ERF基因家族鉴定及响应致病疫霉胁迫的表达分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(6): 116-127. |
| [14] | 郭威, 耿越, 梁晓, 刘迎, 伍春玲, 陈青. 抗、感木薯品种对木薯绵粉蚧蜡质合成基因表达的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(6): 128-138. |
| [15] | 李旭龙, 徐世强, 张龙, 李静宇, 何伟贤, 陈立凯, 王继华. 巴戟天萜烯合成酶基因家族鉴定、进化及表达模式分析[J]. 生物技术通报, 2026, 42(6): 314-325. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||